1. bookVolume 6 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
06 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Classroom Participation as a Performative Act of Language Learners’ Identity Construction

Published Online: 25 Jan 2019
Page range: 72 - 84
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
06 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

In the first part of this study, we briefly present different approaches used to define the concept of second language learners’ identity. Then we introduce Butler’s theory of performativity (1988) and we attempt to apply its main concepts as tools for describing L2 learners’ identity. In the second part of the study, we try to answer the following question: What are typical performative acts of a good and a poor language learner in the language learning classroom? Our research suggests that performing a good language learner identity refers to the learner’s frequent and repetitive participation in utterances whose content is related to the language classroom, regardless of the chosen communicative resources. As for performing a poor language learner identity, it appeared that it refers to the learner’s repetitive and frequent participation in utterances whose content is not related to the language classroom, regardless of the chosen communicative resources.

Keywords

Austin, J. L. (1970). Quand dire, c’est faire. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645–68.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519-531. doi: 10.2307/320789310.2307/3207893Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. New York, London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Duff, P. A. (2012). Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 410-426). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, J. K. (1993). The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everyday lives: The sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning of another language. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 145-165.Search in Google Scholar

Lalonde, R. N., Lee, P. A., & Gardner, R. C. (1987). The common view of the good language learner: An investigation of teachers’ beliefs. Canadian Modern Language Journal, 44, 16-34.Search in Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and The Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1997). How Languages are Learned (7th Impression). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, Attitudes, and Affect as Predictors of Second Language Communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3-26. doi: 10.1177/0261927X96015100110.1177/0261927X960151001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, P. D., & Noels, K. A. (1996). Using psychosocial variables to predict the use of language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 373-386. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01249.x10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01249.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H.H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (1), 9–31. doi: 10.2307/358780310.2307/3587803Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Singapore: Pearson Education LimitedSearch in Google Scholar

Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on Good Language Learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 307-322. doi: 10.2307/358765010.2307/3587650Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 209-229. doi: 10.1080/1074903940952467310.1080/10749039409524673Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” Can Teach Us. TESOL Quarterly, 9 (1), 41-51. doi: 10.2307/358601110.2307/3586011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rubin, J., & Thompson, I. (1982). How to be a more successful language learner. Belmont: Heinle, Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1996) [1972]. Les actes de langage: Essai de philosophie du langage. Paris: Hermann, Editeurs des sciences et des arts.Search in Google Scholar

Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Second Edition. London: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between Learning and Development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo