1. bookVolume 12 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
25 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Scientist Organizational Identity – the Diversity of Perspectives

Published Online: 31 Dec 2020
Page range: 29 - 48
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
25 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Objective: The purpose of this article is to show the diversity of possibilities for interpreting identities in the context of the academic profession by showing the different dimensions of participation in the academic community and personality transformations associated with the capture of certain attitudes and behaviors of the scientists.

Keywords

JEL Classification

Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (2004). Organizational Identity. In M.J. Hatch, M. Schultz, Organisational Identity. A Reader. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bascom, W. R. (1948). Ponapean prestige economy. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 4(2), 211–21.Search in Google Scholar

Bhaduri, S. (2013). Scientists’ Motivation to Innovate, Catch Up and Collaborate A transdisciplinary perspective. In. U. Hilpert (Ed.), Handbook of Politics and Technology (pp. 396–408). Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, R. (2016). Prestige in Academic Life: Excellence and Exclusion. Times Higher Education, 46, 22–64.Search in Google Scholar

Bruton, S. V., Medlin, M., Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2020). Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 531–547.Search in Google Scholar

Büyükgöze, H., & Gün, F. (2017). Building the Professional Identity of Research Assistants: A Phenomenological Research. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17,1 237–63.Search in Google Scholar

Burris, V. (2004). The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in Ph.D. Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 239-64.Search in Google Scholar

Child, J., Rodrigues, S. B., Dooley, K. J., & Tsoukasaridimos, H. (2011). How Organizations Engage with External Complexity: A Political Action Perspective. Organization Studies, 32(6), 803-24.Search in Google Scholar

Cianciolo, A. T., Mitzelfelt, J., Ghareeb, A., Zahid, M. F., Akbar, R., & Ghias, K. (2020). Physician-scientist or Basic Scientist? Exploring the Nature of Clinicians’ Research Engagement. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 25, August.Search in Google Scholar

Cobern, W., & Loving, C. (2001). Defining “Science” in a Multicultural World: Implications for Science Education. Science Education, 85, 55–56.Search in Google Scholar

Grinev, A. V. (2005).The Tlingit Indians in Russian America, 1741–1867. Trans. R. L. Bland & K. G. Solovjova. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1998).Is Science Multicultural?. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Herskovits, M. J. (1948). Man and his works: The science of cultural anthropology. New York: A.A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Iyer, U. J., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2006). Achievement motivation and performance of scientists in research and development organizations. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 65, March, 187–194.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, B. B., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2019). Americans’ views of scientists’ motivations for scientific work. Public Understanding of Science, Sage Journals, 2–20.Search in Google Scholar

Kligyte, V., Marcy, R., Waples, E., Sevier, S., Godfrey, E., Mumford, M., & Hougen, D. (2008). Application of a Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training in the Physical Sciences and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 251–278.Search in Google Scholar

Kwiek, M. (2019). Economics of Academic Prestige. Quantitative Inclusion of the Best Journals in the Field of Higher Education Research. Science and Higher Education, 01 December, 1–2, 53–54.Search in Google Scholar

Lam, A. (2015).Academic Scientists and Knowledge Commercialization: Self-Determination and Diverse Motivations. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Leith, P., & Vanclay, F. (2015). Translating Science to Benefit Diverse Publics: Engagement Pathways for Linking Climate Risk, Uncertainty, and Agricultural Identities. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(6), 939–964.Search in Google Scholar

Margulies, W. (1977). Make the most of your corporate identity. Harward Bussines Review, July-August.Search in Google Scholar

Martineau, P. (1958). The personality of the retail store. Harvard Business Review, January/ February.Search in Google Scholar

Martin-Rios, C. (2016). Sensemaking of Organizational Innovation and Change in Public Research Organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 24(3), 516–31.Search in Google Scholar

Mead, G.H. (1975).Mind, personality, society, Warsaw: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Myung-Hui, K., Suk Bong, C., & Seung-Wan, K. (2017).Women Scientists’ Workplace and Parenting Role Identities: A Polynomial Analysis of Congruence. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(1), 29–38.Search in Google Scholar

Nunnally, S. C. (2019).The National Conference of Black Political Scientists (NCOBPS): Organizational Empowerment Through Signaling and Valuing Women and Diversity During #MeToo, 22, March.Search in Google Scholar

Ommering, B. W. C, van Blankenstein, F. M., Wijnen-Meijer, M., van Diepen, M., & Dekker, F. W. (2019).Fostering the physician-scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement. BMJ Open, 20 July, 9(7).Search in Google Scholar

Leith, P., & Vanclay, F. (2015). Translating Science to Benefit Diverse Publics: Engagement Pathways for Linking Climate Risk, Uncertainty, and Agricultural Identities. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(6), 939–964.Search in Google Scholar

Pekdoğan, S. (2019). I Can Draw a Scientist Whom I Imagined. NeuroQuantology 17(3), 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, J. C. (2014). The Work Motivation of Research Scientists and Its Effect on Research Performance. R&D Management, 44(4), 355-69.Search in Google Scholar

Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Audit Culture Revisited. Rankings, Ratings, and the Reassembling of Society. Current Anthropology, 56(3), 421–444.Search in Google Scholar

Stallings, D., Iyer, S. K., & Hernandez, R. (2013). National Diversity Equity Workshop-Focus on Gender Identity and Orientation in Chemistry Faculties. ACS Symposium Series, 2018, 12(77), 51–77.Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In W.G. Austin, & S. Worchel, The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tan, M., Herberg, J. S., Samarasekera, D., & Chen, Zhi Xiong (2020). Understanding factors that motivate research performance and career longevity of science, technology, engineering and mathematics postgraduates. Asia Pacific Scholar, 01 January, Vol. 5(1), 25–45.Search in Google Scholar

Turney, J. (1996). Public Understanding of Science. The Lancet (British Edition) 347.9008, 1087–090Search in Google Scholar

Sułkowski, Ł. (2008). Czy warto zajmować się kulturą organizacyjną. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 6, 9–25.Search in Google Scholar

Sułkowski, Ł. (2012).Cultural management processes. Warsaw: Diffin.Search in Google Scholar

Sułkowski, Ł. (2013a). Kultura jakości w zarządzaniu, czyli pomiędzy tożsamością a kulturą organizacyjną. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, XIV, 8, II, 25–37.Search in Google Scholar

Sułkowski, Ł. (2013b). Transformacje kulturowe współczesnych uczelni wyższych. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie. XIV, 12, I, 23–31.Search in Google Scholar

Sułkowski, Ł. (2014). Który model uniwersytetu?. Przeglad Socjologiczny, 63(3), 67–70.Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo