1. bookVolume 11 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2543-831X
First Published
25 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Compliance Risk Management in Polish and German Companies

Published Online: 28 Jan 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 11 (2019) - Issue 4 (December 2019)
Page range: 115 - 145
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2543-831X
First Published
25 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Objective: This article focuses on the analysis of cultural similarities and differences important in terms of the compliance risk management in Polish and German enterprises, with the deliberate omission of Hofstede’s four cultural dimensions, in favour of the modified E. Schein’s model. This article explains the basic concept of risk management culture, the compliance risk and the essence of the compliance management system in Poland and Germany as well as the impact of cultural factors of each of the analysed countries on the development of compliance. The research objective of this paper is to present a comparative analysis of the examined countries, through the analysis of compliance management systems, as an indispensable element of risk management in an organisation, both in practical and formal terms.

Methodology: This research is based on a critical review of the source literature and inference with assigned classical and fuzzy logic values as part of the culture description and risk management.

Findings: The initial hypothesis is that the compliance risk management in companies in Poland and Germany has common and standardised features of the Community legal standards, which can be differently displayed from the declarative and actual point of view in Germany, due to an increase in internationalisation and intercultural relations.

Value Added: This article presents the theoretical significance and functions of compliance risk management based on an analysis of applicable compliance systems and cultural systems in Poland and in Germany.

Recommendations: The compliance risk management system is an essential risk management mechanism in organisations, both in formal and practical terms. It should take into account both the cultural diversity of the regions in Germany and the high cultural and ethnic homogeneity of enterprises in Poland – open, however, to cultural diversity.

Keywords

JEL Classification

Baker McKenzie (2019).Hot Topics. Bundesjustizministerium verö-ffentlicht Entwurf für ein Verbandssanktionengesetz – was auf Unternehmen jetzt zukommt: zuneh-mender Verfolgungsdruck durch Legalitätsprinzip, höhere Sanktionen sowie Anreize für Compliance Programme und interne Untersuchungen. 28 August.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, W., et al. (2011).Compliance-Management im Mittelstand. Bamberg, 7–22.Search in Google Scholar

Bannenberg, B., & Poppe, S. (2013).Compliance: Aufbau-Management-Risikobereiche. CF Müller GmbH, 1–34.Search in Google Scholar

Behringer, S. (2012).Compliance für KMU. Praxisleit-faden für den Mittelstand. Erich Schmidt Verlag, 19–28.Search in Google Scholar

Bierbrauer, G. (1994). Toward an understanding of legal culture: Variations in individualism and collectivism between Kurds, Lebanese, and Germans. Law and Society Review, 28(2), 243–264.10.2307/3054146Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Braun, T. (2019).Impact of differences in legal risk assessment on compliance norms in multinational corporations. Ius Novum, 2, 225–226.Search in Google Scholar

https://iusnovum.lazarski.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/oficyna/Ius_Novum/iusnovum-2019-2/Ius_Novum_2-19_11-T.Braun.pdf, access 8.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, T. (2017). Unormowania compliance w korporacjach. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 333–334.Search in Google Scholar

Bussmann, K.D., & Niemeczek, A. (2019). Compliance through company culture and values: An international study based on the example of corruption prevention. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 797–811.10.1007/s10551-017-3681-5Search in Google Scholar

Cadbury, A. (2002).Corporate Governance and Chairmanship: A Personal View. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 70–75.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252008.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Collective Action – Gemeinsam gegen Korruption und unfairen Wettbewerb (2006). Siemens.Search in Google Scholar

https://new.siemens.com/global/de/unternehmen/nachhaltigkeit/compliance/collective-action.html. Access: 10.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Compliance w Polsce. Raport z badania stanu compliance i systemów zarządzania zgodnością w działających w Polsce przedsiębiorstwach (2018). Instytut Compliance, Warsaw, 8–9, 50.Search in Google Scholar

Das Ordnung-swidrigkeitenrecht (2015). Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. November.Search in Google Scholar

Definicja audytu wewnętrznego, Kodeks Etyki oraz Międzynarodowe standardy praktyki zawodowej audytora wewnętrznego (2012). The Institute of Internal Auditors, p. 47, https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/PublicDocuments/IPPF2013Polish.pdf. Access: 21.09.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Demangeot, C., Adkins, N. R., Mueller R. D. et al., (2013). Toward Intercultural Competency in Multicultural Marketplaces. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32, 156–159.10.1509/jppm.12.051Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Deutscher Corporate Governance Kodex (2019). Frankfurt am Main. https://www.dcgk.de. Access: 12.09.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Dobre Praktyki Spółek Notowanych na GPW (2016). Warsaw, p. 14.Search in Google Scholar

https://www.gpw.pl/pub/GPW/files/PDF/GPW_1015_17_DOBRE_PRAKTYKI_v2.pdf. Access: 10.09.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Economic Overview Germany. Market, Productivity, Innovation (2019). Germany Trade&Investments. Berlin-Bonn.Search in Google Scholar

Eleryk, P., Piskorz-Szpytka, A., & Szpytka P. (2019).Compliance w podmiotach nadzorowanych rynku finansowego. Aspekty praktyczne. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Wolters Kluwer, 25.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, G. P. (2014.) Managing Risk with an End-to-End Process View: Adopting a Process-based Approach to Risk Management. BPTrends Article.Search in Google Scholar

https://www.bptrends.com/managing-risks-with-an-end-to-end-process-view/. Access: 10.09.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. („FCPA”).https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreign-corrupt-practices-act. Access: 11.09.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Framework for Compliance Commitments (2019). OFAC. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm680. Access: 9.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Framework for Internal Control Systems in Banking Organizations (1998). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. https://www.bis.org/press/p980922a.htm. Access: 9.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Germany’s Phase 4 report (2018). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/corruption/germany-s-strong-anti-bribery-enforcement-against-individuals-needs-to-be-matched-by-comparably-strong-enforcement-against-companies.htm. Access: 9.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Guidelines on certain aspects of the MIFID compliance function requirements (2012). European Securities and Markets Authority.Search in Google Scholar

https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2015/11/2012-388_en.pdf. Access: 9.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Guidelines on Internal Governance (2011). European Banking Authority, London.Search in Google Scholar

https://eba.europa.eu/regulation-and-policy/internal-governance/guidelines-on-internal-governance. Access: 10.09.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Głuchowski, J. (ed.) (2001).Leksykon finansów. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo PWE, 266.Search in Google Scholar

GRC Standards (2019). OCEG. https://www.oceg.org/standards/. Access: 8.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2000).Kultury i organizacje. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo PWE, 375.Search in Google Scholar

Hopkin, P. (2010).Fundamentals of Risk Management. London, New Delhi, Philadelphia: The Institute of Risk Management, 2.Search in Google Scholar

Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992). COSO.Search in Google Scholar

https://www.coso.org/Pages/ic.aspx. Access: 10.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

ISO 19600: 2014 – Norma ISO Systemy zarządzania zgodnością.Search in Google Scholar

https://www.iso.org/standard/62342.html. Access: 8.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Jaguga, K., (2009), Teoretyczne podstawy zarządzania ryzykiem. In K. Jajuga (ed.), Zarządzanie ryzykiem, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo PWN, 13.Search in Google Scholar

Jagura, B. (2017).Rola organów spółki kapitałowej w realizacji funkcji compliance. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 283 et al.Search in Google Scholar

Jagura, B. (2014), Zarządzanie ryzykiem w handlu globalnym częścią polskiej kultury compliance – refleksje po IV. Polsko-Niemieckim Forum Prawa i Gospodarki. Monitor Prawa Celnego i Podatkowego, 1, 33–36.Search in Google Scholar

Kaczmarek, T. T. (2006).Ryzyko i zarządzanie ryzykiem. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Difin, 99.Search in Google Scholar

Komunikat w sprawie roli i znaczenia realizacji przez zakłady ubezpieczeń i zakłady reasekuracji funkcji zgodności z przepisami (2018). Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF),Search in Google Scholar

https://www.knf.gov.pl/o_nas/komunikaty?articleId=62617&p_id=18. Access: 8.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

König, C. (2019).Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Pro-tection of IP Rights in Distribution. Cham: Springer, 149–169.Search in Google Scholar

Kreß, S. (2018).Criminal compliance und Datenschutz im Konzern. Vol. 12. No-mos Verlag, 23–61.10.5771/9783845288512Search in Google Scholar

McBarnet, D. (2019).When compliance is not the solution but the problem: From changes in law to changes in attitude. Centre for Tax System Integrity (CTSI), Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Menzies, Ch. (ed.) (2006).Sarbanes-Oxley und Corporate Compliance. Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. (2001).Corporate Governance. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 275–290.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, S., & Seulen G. (2019).Deutsche Tochter im internationalen Konzern. 1. Auflage, Buch. XXII, 398 S. Hardcover (In Leinen). München: C.H.BECK.Search in Google Scholar

Namiri, K., & Stojanovic, N. (2008).Towards A Formal Framework for Business Process Compliance. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, p. 1185.Search in Google Scholar

Nowak, E., Roland, R., & Mahr, T. G. (2005). Wer den Kodex Nicht Einhält, den Bestraft der Kapitalmarkt?: Eine Empirische Analyse der Selbstreguli-erung und Kapitalmarktrelevanz des Deutschen Corporate Governance Ko-dex. Zeitschrift für Unternehmens-und Gesellschaftsrecht, 34(2), 252–279.10.1515/zgre.2005.34.2.252Search in Google Scholar

OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (1997).Search in Google Scholar

http://www.oecd.org/corruption/oecdantibriberyconvention.htm. Access: 10.09.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Olson, D., & Wu Dash, D. (2007).Enterprise Risk Management, in Financial Engineering and Risk Management. Singapore: World Scientific Pub Co Inc., p. 5.10.1142/6732Search in Google Scholar

Prigge, S. (1998). A Survey of German Corporate Governance. In K. J. Hopt, H. Kanda, M. J. Roe, E. Wymeersch, & S. Prigge (ed.), Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research (pp. 943–1044). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Principles for the Proper Performance of Reasonable Assurance Engagements Relating to Compliance Management Systems (2011). IDW WPg Supplement 2/2011, S. 78 ff., FN-IDW 4/2011, S. 203 ff.Search in Google Scholar

Raczkowski, K., Noga, M., & Klepacki, J. (2015).Zarządzanie ryzykiem w polskim systemie finansowym. Warsaw: Difin, 14.Search in Google Scholar

Rathje, S. (2007). Intercultural Competence: The Status and Future of a Controversial Concept. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7(4), 261–264.10.2167/laic285.0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rekomendacja H (2017). Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF).Search in Google Scholar

https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/Rekomendacja_H_2011_26995.pdf. Access: 5.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Enforcement Division of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Updated 02. November 2015; Implementing the OECD Anit-Bribery Convention Phase 4 Report: Germany, 21.06.2018.Search in Google Scholar

https://www.oecd.org/corruption/germany-s-strong-anti-bribery-enforcement-against-individuals-needs-to-be-matched-by-comparably-strong-enforcement-against-companies.htm. Access: 5.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Role of Internal Auditing in Enterprise - wide Risk Management (2009). Institute of internal auditors, p. 2.Search in Google Scholar

Rodziewicz, B. (2016), Polacy, Rosjanie i Niemcy wobec wartości. Hierarchia i sposoby rozumienia jednostek aksjologicznych. Etnolingwistyka, 28. Lublin DOI: 10.17951/et.2016.28.137.10.17951/et.2016.28.137Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Romanowska, M., & Trocki, M. (2004). Podejście procesowe w zarządzaniu. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo SGH, 347.Search in Google Scholar

Rudolph, E. J. (2014). The Board Must Take the Lead in Establishing a Corporate Culture of Ethics and Compliance. http://https://www.corporatecomplianceinsights.com/the-board-must-take-the-lead-in-establishing-a-corporate-culture-of-ethics-and-compliance/. Access: 9.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Schein, E. (1985).Organizational Culture and Leadership. A Dynamic View. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Securities Industry Association, Compliance & Legal Division (2005). The role of compliance. Journal of Investment Compliance, 6(3), 14.10.1108/15285810510700863Search in Google Scholar

Sidor-Rządkowska, M. (2009).Coaching. Teoria. Praktyka. Studia przypadku. Cracow: Wydawnictw: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer Business, 125.Search in Google Scholar

Spira, L., & Page, M. (2003). Risk Management. The Reinvention of Internal Control and the Changing Role of Internal Audit. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(4), 3–4.Search in Google Scholar

Spindler, G, Stilz, E., & Fleischer, S. (2019). Kommentar 4. Aufl. 2019, AktG § 91 Rn. 51.Search in Google Scholar

Standardy rekomendowane dla systemu zarządzania zgodnością w zakresie przeciwdziałania korupcji oraz systemu ochrony sygnalistów w spółkach notowanych na rynkach organizowanych przez Giełdę Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie S.A. (2018). Warszawa, p. 1.Search in Google Scholar

Strach, M. (2003). Der Sarbanes-Oxley Act und die Entwicklungen im US-Aufsichtsrecht. NZG, p. 952.Search in Google Scholar

Stark, C. (2018). Organizational Integrity. Individual Misconduct and the Legal Structure of Society. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. Germany: Springer, 1–3.Search in Google Scholar

Steßl, A. (2010).Effektives compliance management in unternehmen. Springer-Verlag, 20–54.Search in Google Scholar

Stiftung Hans-Böckler (2013).Ausländische Rechtsnormen und Compliance Magazin Mitbestimmung Ausgabe.Search in Google Scholar

https://www.boeckler.de/42944_42985.htm. Access: 11.09.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Sundrum, E. (2004). Moving beyond compliance and control: Building a values-based corporate governance culture supportive of a culture of mutual accountability. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1, 192–209.10.1504/IJBGE.2004.005255Search in Google Scholar

Thielemann, U. (2005). Compliance und Integrity-Zwei Seiten ethisch integrierter Unternehmenssteuerung. Lektionen aus dem Compliance-Management einer Gross-bank. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unterneh-mensethik, 6(1), 31–45.Search in Google Scholar

Verhezen, P. (2010), Giving voice in a culture of silence. From a culture of compliance to a culture of integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 187–206.10.1007/s10551-010-0458-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Werder, A. V. (2011). Neue Entwicklungen der Corporate Governance in Deutschland. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 63(1), 48–62.10.1007/BF03372843Search in Google Scholar

Werder, A. V., Talaulicar, T., & Kolat, G. L. (2005). Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code: an empirical analysis of the compliance statements by German listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13, 178–187.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00416.xSearch in Google Scholar

What is Enterprise Risk Management (2019). Institute of Risk Management. https://www.theirm.org/what-we-do/what-is-enterprise-risk-management. Access: 10.09.2019.Search in Google Scholar

White Paper: The Evolving Role of Compliance (2013). Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, p. 1, 2, 31.Search in Google Scholar

https://www.sifma.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/the-evolving-role-of-compliance.pdf. Access: 4.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Wieland, J. (2014). Compliance Management als Corporate Governance – konzeptionelle Grundlagen und Erfolgsfaktoren. In J. Wieland, R. Steinmeyer, S. Grüninger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Compliance-Management: Konzeptionelle Grundlagen, praktische Erfolgsfaktoren, globale Herausforderungen (pp. 15–40). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co. KG.Search in Google Scholar

Wilczek, M. T. (2002).Podstawy zarządzania projektem inwestycyjnym. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Katowicach, 72.Search in Google Scholar

Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2017). Kulturowe uwarunkowania zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem społecznym, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 336, 94.Search in Google Scholar

Zasady ładu korporacyjnego dla instytucji nadzorowanych (2014). Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF).Search in Google Scholar

https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/knf_140904_Zasady_ladu_korporacyjnego_22072014_38575.pdf. Access: 5.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo