Open Access

Adoption of Good Agricultural Practice to Increase Yield and Profit of Ginger Farming in Nepal


Cite

Fig. 1

Distribution of ginger yield (mean, quartiles, and minimum and maximum) affected by treatment. Treatments included traditional practice with mother rhizome harvest (T1), traditional practice without mother rhizome harvest (T2), GAP with mother rhizome harvest (T3), and GAP without mother rhizome harvest (T4)
Distribution of ginger yield (mean, quartiles, and minimum and maximum) affected by treatment. Treatments included traditional practice with mother rhizome harvest (T1), traditional practice without mother rhizome harvest (T2), GAP with mother rhizome harvest (T3), and GAP without mother rhizome harvest (T4)

Soil fertility status of the experimental plots

Plot Soil Type Soil pH Organic matter content Nitrogen (N) Phosphorus (P) Potassium (k)

scale status % status % status g·ha−1 status kg·ha−1 status
Plot 1 sandy loam 5 acidic 3.9 medium 0.2 medium 23.8 low 156 medium
Plot 2 sandy loam 5.1 acidic 3.7 medium 0.2 medium 28.3 low 336 high
Plot 3 sandy loam 5.2 acidic 5.8 high 0.3 high 38.5 medium 300 high
Plot 4 sandy loam 4.9 acidic 6.1 high 0.3 high 25.6 low 307 high
Plot 5 sandy loam 5.1 acidic 2.6 medium 0.1 medium 22.4 low 226 medium

Cost-benefit analysis of ginger under different farming practices in Ilam district of Nepal

Treatment Rhizome yield (t·ha−1) Gross income ($·ha−1) Total fixed cost ($·ha−1) Total variable cost ($·ha−1) Total cost ($·ha−1) Net income ($·ha−1) BC ratio
T1 12.3 4638.1 523.8 3282.4 3806.2 831.9 1.2
T2 12.8 3657.1 523.8 3116.7 3640.5 16.7 1.0
T3 17.5 5933.3 523.8 3336.9 3860.7 2072.6 1.5
T4 17.9 5114.3 523.8 3298.3 3822.1 1292.1 1.3

Recommended fertilizers for each experimental plot by Soil Testing Laboratory, Surunga, Nepal

Plot Recommended fertilizers for ginger cultivation

agricultural lime (t·ha−1) compost (t·ha−1) nitrogen (kg·ha−1) phosphorous (kg·ha−1) potassium (kg·ha−1)
Plot 1 3.4 12 15 30 30
Plot 2 3.3 12 15 30 15
Plot 3 3.1 6 7.5 15 15
Plot 4 3.6 6 7.5 30 15
Plot 5 3.3 12 15 30 30

Pesticides application details of this research experiment

Fungicide; insecticide Treatment Formulation Method and time of application Frequency of application
Carbendazim 50% WP T1 and T2 3 g·L−1 water The seed rhizome was dipped in the formulated solution for 3–5 minutes and dried in the shadow before planting one time during seed treatment
Trichoderma viride 1.5 WP T3 and T4 5 g·L−1 water Same as above but used Trichoderma instead of carbendazim. For compost making, the formulated solution was sprayed over the compost pit and then the pit was covered by plant materials or black colored plastic for at least one week before the application one time during seed treatment and one time during compost making
Metalaxyl 35% WS T1 and T2 2.5 g·L−1 water Foliar sprayed when disease symptoms appeared 3 times at intervals of 10 days
Validamycin 3% L T3 and T4 2.5 g·L−1 water Foliar sprayed when disease symptoms appeared 3 times at intervals of 10 days
Cypermethrin 25% EC T1 and T2 2.5 mL·L−1 water Foliar sprayed when insect and borer appeared 3 times at intervals of 10 days
Plant extracts T3 and T4 10 mL·L−1 water Foliar sprayed starting after one month of planting regularly at intervals of 2 weeks

Analysis of variance results on ginger yield as affected by production year, location, treatment, and their interactions

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Year 2 0.27 0.13 0.8 NS
Location 1 0.07 0.07 0.42 NS
Treatment 3 396.59 132.19 771.58 ***
Year × Treatment 6 0.77 0.12 0.74 NS
Location × Treatment 3 0.05 0.01 0.09 NS
Year × Location × Treatment 6 0.72 0.12 0.96 NS
Residuals 38 5.48 0.17 NS

Net farm income of various crops grown in Nepal

Crops Production cost ($·ha−1) Revenue ($·ha−1) Net farm income ($·ha−1) Reference
Ginger (GAP with mother rhizome harvest) 3860.7 5933.3 2072.6 field survey
Large cardamom 623.0 2952.4 2329.4 Kandel (2019)
Cabbage 1478.6 826.7 826.7 Katovich and Sharma (2014)
Potato 1878.0 2552.8 674.9 Bajracharya and Sapkota (2017)
Tomato 1823.5 2344.4 521.0 Katovich and Sharma (2014)
Cucumber 2119.5 3795.8 1676.3 Katovich and Sharma (2014)
Pigeon pea 617.8 906.7 305.8 MOAD (2017)
Tea 4718.4 5780.0 1061.6 Baral (2019)
Rice 543.0 757.4 214.4 Katovich and Sharma (2014)
Maize 467.8 526.6 58.7 Katovich and Sharma (2014)
eISSN:
2353-3978
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Biotechnology, Plant Science, Ecology, other