Electrodermal activity responses for quantitative assessment of felt pain

1Boucsein W. Electrodermal activity. Berlin: Plenum Press; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0BoucseinWElectrodermal activityBerlinPlenum Press2012https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-010.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0Search in Google Scholar

2Martin I, Venables PH. Techniques in psychophysiology. Chichester: Wiley & Sons; 1980.MartinIVenablesPHTechniques in psychophysiologyChichesterWiley & Sons1980Search in Google Scholar

3Healey JA, Picard RW. Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2005; 6:156-66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2005.848368HealeyJAPicardRWDetecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensorsIEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2005615666https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2005.84836810.1109/TITS.2005.848368Search in Google Scholar

4Setz C, Arnrich B, Schumm J, La Marca R, Tröster G, Ehlert U. Discriminating stress from cognitive load using a wearable EDA device. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010; 14: 410-17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2009.2036164SetzCArnrichBSchummJLaMarca RTrösterGEhlertUDiscriminating stress from cognitive load using a wearable EDA deviceIEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed20101441017https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2009.203616410.1109/TITB.2009.203616419906598Search in Google Scholar

5Tronstad C, Kalvøy H, Grimnes S, Martinsen ØG. Improved estimation of sweating based on electrical properties of skin. Annals Biomed Eng. 2013; 41:1074-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0743-4TronstadCKalvøyHGrimnesSMartinsenØG.Improved estimation of sweating based on electrical properties of skinAnnals Biomed Eng201341107483https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0743-410.1007/s10439-013-0743-423325304Search in Google Scholar

6Hullett B, Chambers N, Preuss J, Zamudio I, Lange J, Pascoe E, Ledowski T. Monitoring Electrical Skin Conductance: A Tool for the Assessment of Postoperative Pain in Children?. Anesthesiology: J Am Soc Anesthesiologists. 2009; 111:51317. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b27c18HullettBChambersNPreussJZamudioILangeJPascoeELedowskiTMonitoring Electrical Skin Conductance: A Tool for the Assessment of Postoperative Pain in Children?Anesthesiology: J Am Soc Anesthesiologists200911151317https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b27c1810.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b27c1819672172Search in Google Scholar

7Kucera P, Goldenberg Z, Kurca E. Sympathetic skin response: review of the method and its clinical use. Bratisl Med J. 2004; 105:108-16.KuceraPGoldenbergZKurcaESympathetic skin response: review of the method and its clinical useBratisl Med J200410510816Search in Google Scholar

8Martinsen ØG, Grimnes S, Karlsen J. Electrical methods for skin moisture assessment. Skin Pharmacol Physio.1995; 8: 237-45. https://doi.org/10.1159/000211353MartinsenØGGrimnesSKarlsenJElectrical methods for skin moisture assessmentSkin Pharmacol Physio1995823745https://doi.org/10.1159/00021135310.1159/0002113538527155Search in Google Scholar

9Lidberg L, Wallin BG. Sympathetic skin nerve discharges in relation to amplitude of skin resistance responses. Psychophysiology. 1981; 18: 268-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03033.xLidbergLWallinBGSympathetic skin nerve discharges in relation to amplitude of skin resistance responsesPsychophysiology19811826870https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03033.x10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03033.x7291444Search in Google Scholar

10Bini G, Hagbarth KE, Hynninen Pt, Wallin BG. Thermoregulatory and rhythm-generating mechanisms governing the sudomotor and vasoconstrictor outflow in human cutaneous nerves. J Physiol. 1980; 306: 537-52. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013413BiniGHagbarthKEHynninenPtWallinBGThermoregulatory and rhythm-generating mechanisms governing the sudomotor and vasoconstrictor outflow in human cutaneous nervesJ Physiol198030653752https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp01341310.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp01341312830227463376Search in Google Scholar

11Bari DS, Aldosky HYY, Tronstad C, Kalvøy H, Martinsen ØG. Electrodermal responses to discrete stimuli measured by skin conductance, skin potential, and skin susceptance. Skin Res Technol. 2018; 24:108-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12397BariDSAldoskyHYYTronstadCKalvøyHMartinsenØG.Electrodermal responses to discrete stimuli measured by skin conductance, skin potential, and skin susceptanceSkin Res Technol20182410816https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.1239710.1111/srt.1239728776764Search in Google Scholar

12Grimnes S, Martinsen ØG. Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015.GrimnesSMartinsenØGBioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics. 3rd edOxfordElsevier201510.1016/B978-0-12-411470-8.00011-8Search in Google Scholar

13Edelberg R. Electrodermal mechanisms: A critique of the two-effector hypothesis and a proposed replacement. In: Roy JC, Boucsein W, Fowles DC, Gruzelier JH, editors. Progress in Electrodermal Research. New York: Plenum Press; 1993. p. 730. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2864-7_2EdelbergRElectrodermal mechanisms: A critique of the two-effector hypothesis and a proposed replacementRoyJCBoucseinWFowlesDCGruzelierJHProgress in Electrodermal ResearchNew YorkPlenum Press1993730https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2864-7_210.1007/978-1-4615-2864-7_2Search in Google Scholar

14Martinsen, ØG, Grimnes S, Nilsen JK, Tronstad C, Jang W, Kim H, et al. Gravimetric method for in vitro calibration of skin hydration measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008; 55:728-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.912651MartinsenØGGrimnesSNilsenJKTronstadCJangWKimHGravimetric method for in vitro calibration of skin hydration measurementsIEEE Trans Biomed Eng20085572832https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.91265110.1109/TBME.2007.91265118270010Search in Google Scholar

15Vila JH, Smith RA, Augustyniak MJ, Nagi PA, Soto RG, Ross TW, et al. The efficacy and safety of pain management before and after implementation of hospital-wide pain management standards: is patient safety compromised by treatment based solely on numerical pain ratings?. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101: 474-80. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000155970.45321.A8VilaJHSmithRAAugustyniakMJNagiPASotoRGRossTWThe efficacy and safety of pain management before and after implementation of hospital-wide pain management standards: is patient safety compromised by treatment based solely on numerical pain ratings?Anesth Analg200510147480https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000155970.45321.A810.1213/01.ANE.0000155970.45321.A816037164Search in Google Scholar

16Merboth MK, Barnason S. Managing pain: the fifth vital sign. Nurs Clin North Am. 2000; 35:375-83.MerbothMKBarnasonSManaging pain: the fifth vital signNurs Clin North Am20003537583Search in Google Scholar

17Kim EJ, Buschmann MT. Reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale with older adults. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006; 43:447-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.001KimEJBuschmannMTReliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale with older adultsInt J Nurs Stud20064344756https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.00110.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.00116510146Search in Google Scholar

18Ledowski T, Bromilow J, Paech MJ, Storm H, Hacking R, Schug SA. Monitoring of skin conductance to assess postoperative pain intensity. Br J Anaesth. 2006; 97:862-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael280LedowskiTBromilowJPaechMJStormHHackingRSchugSAMonitoring of skin conductance to assess postoperative pain intensityBr J Anaesth2006978625https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael28010.1093/bja/ael28017060329Search in Google Scholar

19Ledowski T, Bromilow J, Wu J, Paech MJ, Storm H, Schug SA. The assessment of postoperative pain by monitoring skin conductance: results of a prospective study. Anaesthesia. 2007; 62:989-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05191.xLedowskiTBromilowJWuJPaechMJStormHSchugSAThe assessment of postoperative pain by monitoring skin conductance: results of a prospective studyAnaesthesia20076298993https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05191.x10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05191.x17845649Search in Google Scholar

20Sabourdin N, Arnaout M, Louvet N, Guye ML, Piana F, Constant I. Pain monitoring in anesthetized children: first assessment of skin conductance and analgesia-nociception index at different infusion rates of remifentanil. Pediatr Anesth. 2013; 23:149-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12071SabourdinNArnaoutMLouvetNGuyeMLPianaFConstantIPain monitoring in anesthetized children: first assessment of skin conductance and analgesia-nociception index at different infusion rates of remifentanilPediatr Anesth20132314955https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.1207110.1111/pan.1207123170802Search in Google Scholar

21Tronstad C, Kalvøy H, Grimnes S, Martinsen ØG. Waveform difference between skin conductance and skin potential responses in relation to electrical and evaporative properties of skin. Psychophysiology. 2013; 50:1070-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12092TronstadCKalvøyHGrimnesSMartinsenØGWaveform difference between skin conductance and skin potential responses in relation to electrical and evaporative properties of skinPsychophysiology201350107078https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.1209210.1111/psyp.1209223889171Search in Google Scholar

22Martinsen ØG, Pabst O, Tronstad C, Grimnes S. Sources of error in AC measurement of skin conductance. J Electr Bioimp. 2015; 6: 49-53. https://doi.org/10.5617/jeb.2640MartinsenØGPabstOTronstadCGrimnesSSources of error in AC measurement of skin conductanceJ Electr Bioimp201564953https://doi.org/10.5617/jeb.264010.5617/jeb.2640Search in Google Scholar

23Tronstad C, Johnsen GK, Grimnes S, Martinsen ØG. A study on electrode gels for skin conductance measurements. Physiol Meas. 2010; 31:1395–410. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/31/10/008TronstadCJohnsenGKGrimnesSMartinsenØGA study on electrode gels for skin conductance measurementsPhysiol Meas2010311395410https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/31/10/00810.1088/0967-3334/31/10/00820811086Search in Google Scholar

24Boucsein W, Fowles DC, Grimnes S, Ben-Shakhar G, roth WT, Dawson ME, Filion DL. Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology. 1981; 18:232-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03024.xBoucseinWFowlesDCGrimnesSBen-ShakharGrothWTDawsonMEFilionDLPublication recommendations for electrodermal measurementsPsychophysiology1981182329https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03024.x10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03024.x7291438Search in Google Scholar

25Edelberg R. Electrical properties of the skin. In: Brown CC, editors. Methods in psychophysiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1967. p. 1-53.EdelbergRElectrical properties of the skinBrownCCMethods in psychophysiologyBaltimoreWilliams & Wilkins1967153Search in Google Scholar

26Venables PH, Christie MJ. Electrodermal activity. In: Martin I, Venables PH, editors. Techniques in psychophysiology. New York: Wiley; 1980. p. 3-67.VenablesPHChristieMJElectrodermal activityMartinIVenablesPHTechniques in psychophysiologyNew YorkWiley1980367Search in Google Scholar