[1. Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Wilson PW, et al. One-year cardiovascular event rates in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2007;291:1197-1206.10.1001/jama.297.11.119717374814]Search in Google Scholar
[2. McGill Jr, Henry C. Risk factors for atherosclerosis. The Thrombotic Process in Atherogenesis. Springer. 1978;104:273-280.10.1007/978-1-4684-7787-0_15]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Vrselja Z, Brkic H, Mrdenovic S, Radic R, Curic G. Function of circle of Willis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:578-584.10.1038/jcbfm.2014.7398210124473483]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Willeit J, Stefan K. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. A population-based study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13;661-668.10.1161/01.ATV.13.5.6618485116]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Piotr S, Joshua B. Carotid Artery Disease. Circulation. 2006;114:244-247.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.542860]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Walker M, Marler R, Goldstein M, et al. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995;273:1421-1428.10.1001/jama.1995.03520420037035]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Griggs R, Bluth E. Noninvasive risk assessment for stroke: special emphasis on carotid atherosclerosis, sex-related differences, and the development of an effective screening strategy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:259-264.10.2214/AJR.10.555521257875]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Kakisis, JD, Avgerinos ED, Antonopoulos CN, et al. The European society of vascular surgery guidelines for carotid intervention: an updated independent assessment and literature review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:238-243.10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.01522658616]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;91:566-579.10.1161/01.CIR.91.2.566]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Adla T, Adlova R. Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis. Int J Angiol. 2015;24:179-184.10.1055/s-0035-1556056457201326417185]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Loizou CP. A review of ultrasound common carotid artery image and video segmentation techniques. Springer. 2014;52:1073-1093.10.1007/s11517-014-1203-525284219]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Adla T, Adlova R. Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis. Int J Angiol. 2015;24:179-184.10.1055/s-0035-1556056]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Serena J, Irimia P, Calleja S, Blanco M, Vivancos J, Ayo-Martín Ó. Cuantificación ultrasonográfica de la estenosis carotídea: recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Neurosonología. Neurología. 2013;28:435-442.10.1016/j.nrl.2012.07.01123040716]Search in Google Scholar
[14. AbuRahma AF, Wulu Jr JT, Crotty B. Carotid plaque ultrasonic heterogeneity and severity of stenosis. Stroke. 2002;33:1772-1775.10.1161/01.STR.0000019127.11189.B5]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Polak JF, Shemanski L, O’Leary DH, et al. Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: an independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older. Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology. 1998;208:649-654.10.1148/radiology.208.3.97228419722841]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Prabhakaran S, Rundek T, Ramas R, et al. Carotid Plaque Surface Irregularity Predicts Ischemic Stroke The Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2006;37:2696-2701.10.1161/01.STR.0000244780.82190.a4265432417008627]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Rothwell PM, Gibson R, Warlow CP. Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2000;31:615-621.10.1161/01.STR.31.3.615]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Brinjikji W, Huston III J, Rabinstein A, et al. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:27-42.10.3171/2015.1.JNS14245226230478]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Lee W. General principles of carotid Doppler ultrasonography. Ultrasonography. 2014;33:11-17.10.14366/usg.13018405896924936490]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Sitzer M, Fürst G, Fischer H, et al. Between-method correlation in quantifying internal carotid stenosis. Stroke. 1993;24:1513-1518.10.1161/01.STR.24.10.15138378955]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Alexandrov A, Brodie DS, McLean A, et al. Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. Stroke. 1997;28:339-342.10.1161/01.STR.28.2.339]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis – Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology. 2003;229:340-346.10.1148/radiol.229203051614500855]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Oates CP, Naylor AR, Hartshorne T, et al. Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:251-261.10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.01519046904]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Evans NS. Carotid Artery Stenosis. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2016;24:47-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, et al. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:16-94.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.00621288679]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Tahmasebpour HR, Buckley AR, Cooperberg PL, Fix CH. Sonographic examination of the carotid arteries. Radiographics. 2005;25:1561-1575.10.1148/rg.25604501316284135]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Boontje AH. External carotid artery revascularization: indications, operative techniques and results. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;33:315-318.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Päivänsalo MJ, Siniluoto TM, Tikkakoski TA, Myllylä V, Suramo IJ. Duplex US of the external carotid artery. Acta Radiologica. 1996;37:41-45.10.1177/02841851960371P1088611322]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Ricotta A, AbuRahma E, Ascher M, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery. Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1-3.10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.03121889701]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke. 2003;34:660-664.10.1161/01.STR.0000057462.02141.6F12624288]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001;220:179-185.10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3517911425993]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, et al. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology. 2004;63:457-460.10.1212/01.WNL.0000135154.53953.2C15304575]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Cumming MJ, Morrow IM. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:517-522.10.2214/ajr.163.3.80798368079836]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Mester A, Oltean-Péter B, Rodean I, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Function Following Intracoronary and Intramyocardial Stem Cell Injection. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine. 2017;2:112-116.10.1515/jim-2017-0053]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Inzitari D, Eliasziw M, Gates P, et al. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1693-1700.10.1056/NEJM200006083422302]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Fox Allan J. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology. 1993;186:316-318.10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421726]Search in Google Scholar
[37. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445-453.10.1056/NEJM199108153250701]Search in Google Scholar
[38. European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991;337:1235-1243.10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-P]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J, et al. Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Stroke. 1994;25:2440-2444.10.1161/01.STR.25.12.2440]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Saba L, Giorgio M. A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids: evaluation using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:42-47.10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.06419464837]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Staikov IN, Arnold M, Mattle H, et al. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. J Neurol. 2000;247:681-686.10.1007/s00415007011011081806]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Craven TE, Ryu JE, Espeland MA, et al. Evaluation of the associations between carotid artery atherosclerosis and coronary artery stenosis. A case-control study. Circulation. 1990;82:1230-1242.10.1161/01.CIR.82.4.12302205416]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Salonen JT, Riitta S. Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:1245-1249.10.1161/01.ATV.11.5.1245]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Jashari F, Ibrahimi P, Nicoll R. Coronary and carotid atherosclerosis: similarities and differences. Atherosclerosis. 2013;227:193-200.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.11.00823218802]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, et al. The role of carotid arterial intima-media thickness in predicting clinical coronary events. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:262-269.10.7326/0003-4819-128-4-199802150-00002]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Kablak-Ziembicka A, Tracz W, Przewlocki T, et al. Association of increased carotid intima-media thickness with the extent of coronary artery disease. Heart. 2004;90:1286-1290.10.1136/hrt.2003.025080]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Lester SJ, Eleid MF, Khandheria BK, Hurst RT. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Coronary Artery Calcium Score as Indications of Subclinical Atherosclerosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:229-233.10.4065/84.3.229]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Ikeda N, Kogame N, Iijima R, Nakamura M, Sugi K. Impact of carotid artery ultrasound and ankle-brachial index on prediction of severity of SYNTAX score. Circ J. 2013;77:712-716.10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1087]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Oei HH, Vliegenthart R, Hak AE, et al. The association between coronary calcification assessed by electron beam computed tomography and measures of extracoronary atherosclerosis: the Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1745-1751.10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01853-3]Search in Google Scholar