This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Hilton K, Anderson A. IHI Psychology of Change Framework to Advance and Sustain Improvement. IHI White Paper. Boston, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2018. Available from https://www.ihi.org/resources/white-papers (accessed December 2023).HiltonKAndersonA..Boston, Massachusetts:Institute for Healthcare Improvement;2018. Available from https://www.ihi.org/resources/white-papers(accessed December 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Atun R. Health systems, systems thinking and innovation. Health Policy Plan 2012; 27 Suppl 4: iv4-iv8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs088.AtunR.Health systems, systems thinking and innovation.2012;27Suppl 4: iv4-iv8. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs088.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carey G, Malbon E, Carey N, et al. Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2015; 5(2): e009002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009002.CareyGMalbonECareyN.Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review.2015;5(2): e009002. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009002.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nilsen P, Seing I, Ericsson C, et al. Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20: 147. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8.NilsenPSeingIEricssonC.Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses.2020;20:147. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zimlichman E, Nicklin W, Aggarwal R, Bates DW. Healthcare 2030: the coming transformation. NEJM Catalyst March 3 2021. doi: 10.1056/CAT.20.0569.ZimlichmanENicklinWAggarwalRBatesDW.Healthcare 2030: the coming transformation.March32021. doi:10.1056/CAT.20.0569.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bok A, Noone D, Skouw-Rasmussen N; EHC Think Tank. Key challenges for patient registries – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Registries. J Haem Pract 2022; 9 (1): 14-19. doi: 10.2478/jhp-2022-0002.BokANooneDSkouw-RasmussenNEHC Think Tank.Key challenges for patient registries – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Registries.2022;9(1):14-19. doi:10.2478/jhp-2022-0002.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bok A, Noone D, Skouw-Rasmussen N; EHC Think Tank. Key challenges for hub and spoke models of care – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank on Hub and Spoke Treatment Models. J Haem Pract 2022; 9 (1): 20-26. doi: 10.2478/jhp-2022-0003.BokANooneDSkouw-RasmussenNEHC Think Tank.Key challenges for hub and spoke models of care – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank on Hub and Spoke Treatment Models.2022;9(1):20-26. doi:10.2478/jhp-2022-0003.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bok A, Noone D, Skouw-Rasmussen N; EHC Think Tank. Patient agency: key questions and challenges – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Patient Agency. J Haem Pract 2022; 9 (1): 27-35. doi: 10.2478/jhp-2022-0004.BokANooneDSkouw-RasmussenNEHC Think Tank.Patient agency: key questions and challenges – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Patient Agency.2022;9(1):27-35. doi:10.2478/jhp-2022-0004.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Skouw-Rasmussen N, Savini L, on behalf of the EHC Think Tank. Access equity: key questions and challenges – A report from the 1st workshop of the European Haemophilia Consortium (EHC) Think Tank Workstream on Access Equity. J Haem Pract 2023; 10(1). doi: 10.2478/jhp-2023-0011.Skouw-RasmussenNSaviniLon behalf of the EHC Think Tank.Access equity: key questions and challenges – A report from the 1st workshop of the European Haemophilia Consortium (EHC) Think Tank Workstream on Access Equity.2023;10(1). doi:10.2478/jhp-2023-0011.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Skouw-Rasmussen N, Savini L, on behalf of the EHC Think Tank. Future Care Pathways – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Future Care Pathways. J Haem Pract 2023; 10(1). doi: 10.2478/jhp-2023-0013.Skouw-RasmussenNSaviniLon behalf of the EHC Think Tank.Future Care Pathways – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Future Care Pathways.2023;10(1). doi:10.2478/jhp-2023-0013.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bok A, Noone D, Skouw-Rasmussen N, on behalf of the EHC Think Tank. Short- and longer-term goals for change – A report from the 2nd workshops of the EHC Think Tank Workstreams on Registries, the Hub and Spoke Model and Patient Agency. J Haem Pract 2023; 10(1). doi: 10.2478/jhp-2023-0001.BokANooneDSkouw-RasmussenNon behalf of the EHC Think Tank.Short- and longer-term goals for change – A report from the 2nd workshops of the EHC Think Tank Workstreams on Registries, the Hub and Spoke Model and Patient Agency.2023;10(1). doi:10.2478/jhp-2023-0001.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gacser Z, Skouw-Rasmussen N, Bourke S, ten Ham R, Hosszú D. Short- and longer-term goals for change – A report from the 2nd workshops of the EHC Think Tank Workstreams on Access Equity and Future Care Pathways. J Haem Pract 2023; 10(1): 155-163. doi: 10.2478/jhp-2023-0023.GacserZSkouw-RasmussenNBourkeSten HamRHosszúD.Short- and longer-term goals for change – A report from the 2nd workshops of the EHC Think Tank Workstreams on Access Equity and Future Care Pathways.2023;10(1):155-163. doi:10.2478/jhp-2023-0023.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Knowles SE, Allen D, Donnelly A, et al. More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production. Res Involv Engagem 2021; 7(1): 34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00262-5.KnowlesSEAllenDDonnellyA.More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production.2021;7(1):34. doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00262-5.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Goodman M. Systems thinking: what, why, when, where and how? The Systems Thinker. Available from https://thesystemsthinker.com/systems-thinking-what-why-when-where-and-how/ (accessed December 2023).GoodmanM.Systems thinking: what, why, when, where and how?. Available from https://thesystemsthinker.com/systems-thinking-what-why-when-where-and-how/(accessed December 2023).Search in Google Scholar
EHC Think Tank. Registries | System map of the underlying challenges. Available from https://ehcthinktank.eu/workstream/workstream-one-registries/ (accessed January 2024).EHC Think Tank.. Available from https://ehcthinktank.eu/workstream/workstream-one-registries/(accessed January 2024).Search in Google Scholar
European Haemophilia Consortium. EHC Think Tank Registry Mapping – An overview of rare bleeding disorder registries across Europe. Copenhagen Economics, 2023. Available from https://ehcthinktank.eu/wp-content/uploads/2522/15/EHC-Think-Tank-Registry-Mapping_Final.pdf (accessed December 2023).European Haemophilia Consortium..Copenhagen Economics,2023. Available from https://ehcthinktank.eu/wp-content/uploads/2522/15/EHC-Think-Tank-Registry-Mapping_Final.pdf(accessed December 2023).Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. European Health Data Space. Available from https://health.ec.europa.eu/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/european-health-data-space_en#more-information (accessed December 2023).European Commission.. Available from https://health.ec.europa.eu/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/european-health-data-space_en#more-information(accessed December 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 2016; 3: 160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18.WilkinsonMDumontierMAalbersbergI.The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.2016;3:160018. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
OPEN Health. Targeted literature review – Understanding the description and application of patient agency in the healthcare context. Prepared for the European Haemophilia Consortium (EHC). 30 August 2022. Available from https://ehcthinktank.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/OH-EHC-Patient-Agency_Literature-review_310822_FINAL.pdf (accessed December 2023).OPEN Health.Targeted literature review – Understanding the description and application of patient agency in the healthcare context..30August2022. Available from https://ehcthinktank.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/OH-EHC-Patient-Agency_Literature-review_310822_FINAL.pdf(accessed December 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.MichieSvan StralenMMWestR.The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.2011;6:42. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Social Change UK. A guide on the COM-B model of behaviour. Available from https://social-change.co.uk/files/02.09.19_COM-B_and_changing_behaviour_.pdf (accessed December 2023).Social Change UK.. Available from https://social-change.co.uk/files/02.09.19_COM-B_and_changing_behaviour_.pdf(accessed December 2023).Search in Google Scholar
EHC Think Tank. Patient Agency | System map of the underlying challenges. Available from https://ehcthinktank.eu/workstream/workstream-three-patient-agency/ (accessed January 2024).EHC Think Tank.. Available from https://ehcthinktank.eu/workstream/workstream-three-patient-agency/(accessed January 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Chin MH, Afsar-Manesh N, Bierman AS, et al. Guiding principles to address the impact of algorithm bias on racial and ethnic disparities in health and health care. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6(12): e2345050. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023/45050.ChinMHAfsar-ManeshNBiermanAS.Guiding principles to address the impact of algorithm bias on racial and ethnic disparities in health and health care.2023;6(12): e2345050. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023/45050.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
US Food and Drug Administration. Patient-focused drug development: collecting comprehensive and representative input. Guidance for industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and other stakeholders. June 2020 Procedural. Available from https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-focused-drug-development-collecting-comprehensive-and-representative-input (accessed January 2024).US Food and Drug Administration.Patient-focused drug development: collecting comprehensive and representative input..June2020Procedural. Available from https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-focused-drug-development-collecting-comprehensive-and-representative-input(accessed January 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Oerhlein EM, Burcu M, Schoch S, Gressler LE. Enhancing patient centricity of real-world data research: an exploratory analysis using the patient experience mapping tool. Value Health 2023; 26(1): 10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022-10-002.OerhleinEMBurcuMSchochSGresslerLE.Enhancing patient centricity of real-world data research: an exploratory analysis using the patient experience mapping tool.2023;26(1):10-17. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022-10-002.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Escontrías OA. Dossiers: a new way of alleviating the disorganization of patient experience data. National Health Council. 16 November 2023. Available from https://nationalhealthcouncil.org/blog/dossiers-a-new-way-of-alleviating-the-disorganization-of-patient-experience-data/ (accessed December 2023).EscontríasOA..National Health Council.16November2023. Available from https://nationalhealthcouncil.org/blog/dossiers-a-new-way-of-alleviating-the-disorganization-of-patient-experience-data/(accessed December 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Irwin RS, Richardson ND. Patient-focused care: using the right tools. Chest 2006; 130(1 Suppl): 73S-82S. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.1_suppl.73S.IrwinRSRichardsonND.Patient-focused care: using the right tools.2006;130(1 Suppl): 73S-82S. doi:10.1378/chest.130.1_suppl.73S.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patientcentered care. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9(2): 100-103. doi: 10.1370/afm.1239.EpsteinRMStreetRL.The values and value of patientcentered care.2011;9(2):100-103. doi:10.1370/afm.1239.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rathert C, Wyrwich MD, Boren SA. Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2013; 70(4): 351-79. doi: 10.1177/1077558712465774.RathertCWyrwichMDBorenSA.Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.2013;70(4):351-79. doi:10.1177/1077558712465774.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
More T, Cano SJ. Measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2017; 12: 171. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0718-x.MoreTCanoSJ.Measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures.2017;12:171. doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0718-x.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Swanson RC, Cattaneo A, Bradley E, et al. Rethinking health systems strengthening: key systems thinking tools and strategies for transformational change. Health Policy Plan 2012; 27 Suppl 4: iv54-61. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czd090.SwansonRCCattaneoABradleyE.Rethinking health systems strengthening: key systems thinking tools and strategies for transformational change.2012;27Suppl 4: iv54-61. doi:10.1093/heapol/czd090.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wilkinson H, Hills D, Penn A, Barbrook-Johnson P. Building a system-based theory of change using participatory systems mapping. Evaluation 2021; 27(1): 80-101. doi: 10.1177/1356389020980493.WilkinsonHHillsDPennABarbrook-JohnsonP.Building a system-based theory of change using participatory systems mapping.2021;27(1):80-101. doi:10.1177/1356389020980493.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
European Haemophilia Consortium. Think Tank. Available from https://ehcthinktank.eu (accessed January 2024).European Haemophilia Consortium.. Available from https://ehcthinktank.eu(accessed January 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Chatham House. Chatham House rule. Available from https://www.chathamhouse.org/about-us/chatham-house-rule (accessed January 2024).Chatham House.. Available from https://www.chathamhouse.org/about-us/chatham-house-rule(accessed January 2024).Search in Google Scholar