[
Anderson, Walter. 1951. Ein volkskundliches Experiment. Helsinki: Academia Scientarum Fennica.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aunger, Robert, ed. 2001. Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780192632449.001.0001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aunger, Robert. 2002. The Electric Meme: A New Model of How We Think. New York: Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Averill, James R. 1980. A Constructivist View of Emotion. – Theories of Emotion, edited by Robert Plutchik and Henry Kellerman. New York: Academic Press, 305–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50018-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barrett, Justin L. 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barrett, Justin L. 2008. Coding and Quantifying Counterintuitiveness in Religious Concepts: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections. – Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 20: 308‒338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157006808X371806.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bartlett, Frederic C. 1920. Some Experiments on the Reproduction of Folk Stories. – Folklore 31: 30‒47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.1920.9719123.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, Charles H.; Ming Li and Bin Ma. 2003. Chain Letters & Evolutionary Histories. – Scientific American 288 (6): 76–81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennet, Gillian. 2005. Bodies: Sex, Violence, Decease, and Death in Contemporary Legend. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bessonov, Igor’ A. 2011. Traditsiya peredachi “svyatogo khleba” i “piroga schast’ya” v XX–XXI vv. – Zhivaya starina 3: 5–8. [Бессонов, Игорь А. 2011. Традиция передачи «святого хлеба» и «пирога счастья» в XX–XXI вв. – Живая старина 3: 5–8.]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blackmore, Susan. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bloch, Maurice. 2001. A Well-Disposed Social Anthropologist’s Problems with Memes. – Darwinizing Culture: The Status оf Memetics as a Science, edited by Robert Aunger. New York: Oxford University Press, 189–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780192632449.003.0010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borisov, Sergey B. 2000. Sovremennyye raznovidnosti russkikh zhenskikh kommunikativno- magicheskikh praktik. – Shadrinskaya starina 8: 64–75. [Борисов, Сергей Б. 2000. Современные разновидности русских женских коммуникативно-магических практик. – Шадринская старина 8: 64–75.] https://www.ruthenia.ru/folklore/borisov5.htm (accessed May 10, 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion Explained: The Human Instincts That Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boyer, Pascal and Brian Bergstrom. 2008. Evolutionary Perspectives on Religion. – Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 111–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085201.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dawkins, Richard. 2006 [1976]. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dégh, Linda. 1995. Narratives in Society: A Performer-Centered Study of Narration. Helsinki: Academia Scientarum Fennica.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dégh, Linda. 2001. Legend and Belief: Dialectics of a Folklore Genre. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Distin, Kate. 2005. The Selfish Meme: A Critical Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Douglas, Мary. 1995. Red Riding Hood: An Interpretation from Anthropology. – Folklore 106: 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.1995.9715887.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Bill. 1989. Death by Folklore: Ostension, Contemporary Legend, and Murder. – Western Folklore 48 (3): 201–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1499739.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Bill. 2003. Aliens, Ghosts, and Cults: Legends We Live. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eriksson, Kimmo and Julie C. Coultas. 2014. Corpses, Maggots, Poodles and Rats: Emotional Selection Operating in Three Phases of Cultural Transmission of Urban Legends. – Journal of Cognition and Culture 14: 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342107.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fine, Gary Alan. 1979. Folklore Diffusion through Interactive Social Networks: Conduits in a Preadolescent Community. – New York Folklore 5: 87–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodenough, Oliver R. 1995. Mind Viruses: Culture, Evolution, and the Puzzle of Altruism – Social Science Information 34 (2): 287–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901895034002007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodenough, Oliver R. and Richard Dawkins. 1994. The ‘St Jude’ Mind Virus. – Nature 371: 23–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/371023a0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harvey, Graham. 2006. Animism: Respecting the Living World. New York: Columbia University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heath, Chip; Chris Bell and Emily Sternberg. 2001. Emotional Selection in Memes: The Case of Urban Legends. – Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (6): 1028–1041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1028.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heyd, Theresa. 2008. Email Hoaxes: Form, Function, Genre Ecology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.174.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jakobson, Roman. 1966. Selected Writings IV. Hague: Mouton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirzyuk, Anna A. 2018. Syuzhet – eto simptom? Kak fol’kloristy izuchayut gorodskiye legendy. – Fol’klor i antropologiya goroda 1 (1): 20–43. [Кирзюк, Анна А. 2018. Сюжет – это симптом? Как фольклористы изучают городские легенды. – Фольклор и антропология города 1 (1): 20–43.]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latour, Bruno. 1992. Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. – Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 225–258.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leavitt, John. 1996. Meaning and Feeling in the Anthropology of Emotions. – American Ethnologist 23 (3): 514–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1996.23.3.02a00040.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norenzayan, Ara; Scott Atran, Jason Faulkner and Mark Schaller. 2006. Memory and Mystery: The Cultural Selection of Minimally Counter-intuitive Narratives. – Cognitive Science 30 (3): 531–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noyes, Dorothy. 2008. Humble Theory. – Journal of Folklore Research 45 (1): 37–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/JFR.2008.45.1.37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ong, Walter J. 2012 [1982]. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. Anniversary edn. with additional chapters by John Hartley. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oring, Elliott. 2008. Legendry and the Rhetoric of Truth. – Journal of American Folklore 121 (480): 127–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jaf.0.0008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oring, Elliott. 2014a. Memetics and Folkloristics: The Theory. – Western Folklore 73 (4): 432–454.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oring, Elliott. 2014b. Memetics and Folkloristics: The Applications. – Western Folklore 73 (4): 455–492.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oring, Elliott. 2016. Joking Asides: The Theory, Analysis, and Aesthetics of Humor. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607324928.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Panchenko, Aleksandr. 2021. “Moral’naya ekonomika” zhertvoprinosheniya i svyatotatstva v russ-koy krest’yanskoy kul’ture. – Quaestio Rossica 9 (4): 1241–1258. [Панченко, Александр. 2021. «Моральная экономика» жертвоприношения и святотатства в русской крестьянской культуре. – Quaestio Rossica 9 (4): 1241–1258.] DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2021.4.637.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porubanova-Norquist, Michaela; Daniel Joel Shaw and Dimitris Xygalatas. 2013. Minimal Counterintuitiveness Revisited: Effects of Cultural and Ontological Violations on Concept Memo-rability. – Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 1 (2): 181–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.v1i2.181.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porubanova, Michaela and John H. Shaver. 2017. Minimal Counterintuitiveness Revisited, Again: The Role of Emotional Valence in Memory for Conceptual Incongruity. – Religion Explained? The Cognitive Science of Religion after Twenty-Five Years, edited by Luther H. Martin and Donald Wiebe. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 123–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenwein, Barbara. 2010. Problems and Methods in the History of Emotions. – Passions in Context 1 (1): 1–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sayes, Edwin. 2014. Actor-Network Theory and Methodology: Just What Does It Mean to Say That Nonhumans Have Agency. – Social Studies of Science 44 (1): 134–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713511867.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, Steve. 2005. Heavenly Letters and Tales of the Forest: ‘Superstition’ against Bolshevism. – Forum for Anthropology and Culture 2: 316–339.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sørensen, Jesper. 2007. Acts That Work: A Cognitive Approach to Ritual Agency. – Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 19 (3–4): 281–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157006807X240118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sørensen, Jesper. 2021. Cognitive Underpinnings of Divinatory Practices. – Theoretical and Empirical Investigations of Divination and Magic: Manipulating the Divine, edited by Jesper Sørensen and Anders Klostergaard Petersen. Leiden: Brill, 124–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004447585_007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sperber, Dan. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stubbersfield, Joseph M. and Jamshid J. Tehrani. 2013. Expect the Unexpected? Testing for Minimally Counterintuitive (MCI) Bias in the Transmission of Contemporary Legends: A Computational Phylogenetic Approach. – Social Science Computer Review 31 (1): 90–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439312453567.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stubbersfield, Joseph M.; Jamshid J. Tehrani and Emma J. Flynn. 2017. Chicken Tumours and a Fishy Revenge: Evidence for Emotional Content Bias in the Cumulative Recall of Urban Legends. – Journal of Cognition and Culture 17: 12–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uther, Hans-Jörg. 2004. The Types of International Folktales: A Classification and Bibliography 1–3. Folklore Fellows’ Communications 296. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VanArsdale, Daniel W. 2002 [1998]. Chain Letter Evolution. http://pascalfroissart.online.fr/3-cache/2002-vanarsdale.pdf (accessed December 20, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wiggins, Bradley E. 2019. The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492303.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yarbrough, Elizabeth. 2017. Kombucha Culture: An Ethnographic Approach to Understanding the Practice of Home-Brew Kombucha in San Marcos, Texas. A Master Dissertation. Texas State University. https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/6756 (accessed December 20, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zipes, Jack. D. 2006. Why Fairy Tales Stick: The Evolution and Relevance of a Genre. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zipes, Jack D. 2008.What Makes a Repulsive Frog So Appealing: Memetics and Fairy Tales. – Journal of Folklore Research 45 (2): 109–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/JFR.2008.45.2.109.
]Search in Google Scholar
