Comparative analysis of surface layer functionality in STM and AFM probes: Effects of coating on emission characteristics

[1] G. Binnig, H. Rohrer, C. Gerber, and E. Weibel. “Surface studies by scanning tunneling microscopy”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 57–61, 1982. Search in Google Scholar

[2] G. Binning, and H. Rohrer, “Scanning tunneling microscopy”. Surf. Sci. 126, 236–244, 1983. Search in Google Scholar

[3] G. Binnig, and H. Rohrer. “Scanning Tunneling Microscopy–From Birth to Adolescence”. Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 615−625, 1987. Search in Google Scholar

[4] C. Gerber, G. Binnig, H. Fuchs, O. Marti, and H. Rohrer. “Scanning tunneling microscope combined with a scanning electron-microscope”. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 221–224, 1986. Search in Google Scholar

[5] H.-J. Güntherodt R. Wiesendanger, “Scanning tunneling microscopy I”. First edition, Springer series in Surface Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1992. Search in Google Scholar

[6] H.-J. Güntherodt R. Wiesendanger, “Scanning tunneling microscopy II”. First edition, Springer series in Surface Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1992. Search in Google Scholar

[7] K. Besocke. “An easily operable scanning tunneling microscope”. Surf. Sci. 181, 145–153, 1987. Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Salmeron, and B. Eren, “High-Pressure Scanning Tunneling Microscopy”. Chem. Rev. 121(2), 962-1006, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[9] B. J. McIntyre, M. Salmeron, and G. A. Somorjai, “A Variable Pressure/Temperature Scanning Tunneling Microscope for SurfaceScience and Catalysis Studies”. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 687−691, 1993. Search in Google Scholar

[10] T. Tiedje, J. Varon, H. Deckman, and J. Stokes. “Tip contamination effects in ambient pressure scanning tunneling microscopy imaging of graphite”. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6(2), 372-375, 1987. Search in Google Scholar

[11] K. Bian, C. Gerber, A. J. Heinrich, D. J. Müller, S. Scheuring, and Y. Jiang. “Scanning probe microscopy”. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 36, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Y. Martin, C. C. Williams, and H. K. Wickramasinghe. “Atomic force microscope force mapping and profiling on a sub 100-Å scale”. J. Appl. Phys. 61, 4723–4729, 1987. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Y. F. Dufrêne, T. Ando, R. Garcia, D. Alsteens, D. Martinez-Martin, A. Engel, C. Gerber, and D. J. Müller. “Imaging modes of atomic force microscopy for application in molecular and cell biology”. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 295–307, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. J. Müller, A. C. Dumitru, C. Lo Giudice, H. E. Gaub, P. Hinterdorfer, G. Hummer, J. J. De Yoreo, Y. F. Dufrêne, and D. Alsteens. “Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Force Spectroscopy and Multiparametric Imaging of Biomolecular and Cellular Systems”. Chem. Rev. 121(19), 11701–11725, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[15] R. Garcıá, and Rubén Pérez. "Dynamic atomic force microscopy methods". Surf. Sci. Rep. 47(6-8), 197-301, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

[16] F. J. Giessibl. “Advances in atomic force microscopy”. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 949, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

[17] L. W. Francis, P. D. Lewis, C. J. Wright, and R. S. Conlan. “Atomic force microscopy comes of age”. Biology of the Cell 102, 133-143, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

[18] R. G. Forbes. “Development of a simple quantitative test for lack of field emission orthodoxy” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 469, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

[19] R. G. Forbes. “The Murphy–Good plot: a better method of analysing field emission data”. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[20] R. G. Forbes, E. O. Popov, A. G. Kolosko, and S. V. Filippov. “The pre-exponential voltage-exponent as a sensitive test parameter for field emission theories”. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. M. Allaham, R. G. Forbes, A. Knápek, D. Sobola, D. Burda, P. Sedlák, M. S. Mousa, Interpretation of field emission current–voltage data: Background theory and detailed simulation testing of a user-friendly webtool, Mat. Tod. Comm., 31, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. M. Allaham, R. G. Forbes, A. Knapek, and M. S. Mousa. “Implementation of the orthodoxy test as a validity check on experimental field emission data”. J. Electr. Eng. 71 (1), 37–42, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. M. Allaham, A. Knápek, M. S. Mousa and R. G. Forbes. “User-friendly method for testing field electron emission data: Technical report”. 2021 34th International Vacuum Nano-electronics Conference (IVNC), Lyon, France 2021, 1-2. Search in Google Scholar

[24] [24] Z. Košelová, L. Horáková, D. Burda, M. M. Allaham, A. Knápek, Z. Fohlerová. “Cleaning of tungsten tips for subsequent use as cold field emitters or STM probes”, J. Elect. Eng. 75 (1), 41–46, 2024. Search in Google Scholar

[25] A. Knápek, M. M. Allaham, D. Burda, D. Sobola, M. Drozd, M. Horáček. “Explanation of the quasi-harmonic field emission behaviour observed on epoxy-coated polymer graphite cathodes”. Mat. Tod. Comm 34, 2023. Search in Google Scholar

[26] E. O. Popov, S. V. Filippov, A. G. Kolosko, and A. Knápek. “Comparison of the effective parameters of single-tip tungsten emitter using Fowler–Nordheim and Murphy–Good plots”. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 40 (2), 2022. Search in Google Scholar

[27] “Electrical conductivity of silicon.” http://lampz.tugraz.at/~hadley/psd/L4/conductivity.php (accessed Jun. 06, 2024). Search in Google Scholar

[28] N. D. Arora, J. R. Hauser, and D. J. Roulston, “Electron and Hole Mobilities in Silicon as a Function of Concentration and Temperature,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 292–295, 1982. Search in Google Scholar

[29] G. N. Fursey, “Field emission in vacuum micro-electronics,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 215, no. 1–4, pp. 113–134, Jun. 2003. Search in Google Scholar