[
Acemoglu, D., and J. A. Robinson. 2001. A theory of political transitions. American Economic Review 91 (4): 938-963.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Acemoglu, D., and J. A. Robinson. 2002. Economic backwardness in political perspective. NBER Working Paper 8831.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aghion, P., C. García-Peñaloza, and E. Caroli. 1999. Inequality and economic growth. In Growth, inequality and globalization, edited by P. Aghion and J. Williamson, 5-102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ali, O., W. A. Darity, A. Janz, and M. Sanchez. 2021. The association between wealth inequality and socioeconomic outcomes. AEA Papers and Proceedings 111: 211-215.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arellano, M., and O. Bover. 1995. Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics 68: 29-52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58: 277-297.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baltagi, B. H. 2008. Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barro, R. J. 2008. Inequality and growth revisited. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration 11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beck, T., A. Demirgüç-Kunt, and R. Levine. 2007. Finance, inequality and the poor. Journal of Economic Growth 12: 27-49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benhabib, J., A. Bisin, and S. Zhu. 2011. The distribution of wealth and fiscal policy in economies with finitely lived agents. Econometrica 79 (1): 123-157.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benhabib, J., and A. Bisin. 2018. Skewed wealth distributions: Theory and empirics. Journal of Economic Literature 56 (4): 1261-1291.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87: 11-143.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boix, C. 2010. Origins and persistence of economic inequality. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 489-516.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cagetti, M., and M. De Nardi. 2008. Wealth inequality: Data and models. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12 (S2): 285-313.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case, K., and R. Shiller. 1989. The effciency of the market for single-family homes. American Economic Review 79 (1): 125-137.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Changkyu, C. 2006. Does foreign direct investment affect domestic income inequality? Applied Economics Letters 13 (12): 811-814.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Credit Suisse. 2017. Global Wealth Report. Zurich: Credit Suisse. https://www.credit-suisse.com/corporate/en/research/research-institute/publications.html (accessed April 21, 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Credit Suisse. 2018. Credit Suisse Databook. Zurich: Credit Suisse. https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us/en/reports-research/global-wealth-report.html (accessed April 20, 2018).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, J., R. Lluberas, and A. Shorrocs. 2017. Estimating the level and distribution of global wealth 2000–2014. Review of Income and Wealth 63 (4): 731-759.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Do, Q.-T. 2002. Institutions, institutional change, and the distribution of wealth. Massachusetts Institute of Technology draft paper.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Easterly, W. 2005. National policies and economic growth: A reappraisal. In Handbook of economic growth, edited by P. Aghion and S. Durlauf, 1015–1059. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edelstein, P., and L. Kilian. 2007. The response of business fixed investment to changes in energy prices: A test of some hypotheses about the transmission of energy price shocks. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 7 (1): 1-41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Efendic, A., and G. Pugh. 2008. Institutions and economic performance: An overview of empirical research with the main focus on transition economies. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 2 (1): 25-30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Efendic, A., and G. Pugh. 2015. Institutional effects on economic performance in post-socialist transition: A dynamic panel analysis. Acta Oeconomica 65 (4): 503-523.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Efendic, A., and A. Ledeneva. 2020. The importance of being networked: The costs of informal networking in the Western Balkans region. Economic Systems 44 (4): 100784.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fagereng, A., M. Blomhoff Holm, B. Moll, and G. Natvik. 2019. Saving behavior across the wealth distribution: The importnace of capital gains. NBER Working Paper w26588.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galbraith, J. K. 2012. Inequality and instability: A study of the World economy just before the Great Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glaeser, E., and A. Shleifer. 2002a. Legal origins. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1193-1230.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glaeser, E., and A. Shleifer. 2002b. The rise of the regulatory state. NBER Working Paper 8650.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glaeser, L. E., J. Scheinkman, and A. Shleifer. 2003. The injustice of inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics 50 (1): 199-222.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gupta, S., H. Davoodi, and R. Alonso-Terme. 2002. Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Economics of Governance 45: 3-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen, L. P. 1982. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50: 1029-1054.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hermann, C. 2014. The role of the public sector in combating inequality. International Journal of Labour Research 6 (1): 113-128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey, and H. Rosen. 1990. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56: 1371-1395.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hopkins, M. 2004. The determinants of income inequality: A Bayesian approach to model uncertainty. Washington: Gettysburg College.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hsiao, C. 2007. Analysis of panel data: Second edition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hurst, C. E. 1997. Social inequality forms, causes, and consequences: Third edition. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iftekhar, H., R. Horvath, and J. Mares. 2020. Finance and wealth inequality. Journal of International Money and Finance 108: 102161
]Search in Google Scholar
[
International Monetary Fund. 2015. Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. IMF Staff Discussion Notes 15/13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jain-Chandra, S., N. Khor, R. Mano, J. Schauer, P. Wingender, and J. Zhuang. 2018. Inequality in China – Trends, drivers and policy remedies. IMF Working Paper 2018/127.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jauch, S., and S. Watzka. 2012. Financial development and income inequality: A panel data approach. Cesifo Woking Paper 3687.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaumotte, F., S. Lall, and C. Papageorg. 2008. Rising income inequality: Technology, or trade and financial globalization? IMF Working Paper WP/08/185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2010. The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5430.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kessler, D., and E. N. Wolff. 1991. A comparative analysis of household wealth patterns in France and the United States. Review of Income and Wealth 37: 249-266.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Killewald, A., F. T. Pfeffer, and J. N. Schachner. 2017. Wealth inequality and accumulation. Annual Review of Sociology 43 (1): 379-404.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klevmarken, N. A. 1989. Panel studies: What can we learn from them? European Economic Review 33: 523-529.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kolb, R. W., and J. R. Ricardo. 1996. Financial institutions. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kumhof, M., and R. Rancière. 2011. Inequality, leverage and crises. IMF Working Paper WP/10/268.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuznets, S. 1955. Economic growth and economic inequality. American Economic Review 45 (1): 1-28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, C. S. 2005. Income inequality, democracy, and public sector size. American Sociological Review 70 (1): 158-181.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leszczensky, L., and T. Wolbring. 2022. How to deal with reverse causality using panel data? Recommendations for researchers based on a simulation study. Sociological Methods & Research 51 (2): 837-865.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindert, P. H. 1994. The rise of social spending, 1880–1930. Explorations in Economic History 31 (1): 1-37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindert, P. H. 2004. Social spending and economic growth since the eighteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Llavador, H, and R. J. Oxoby. 2005. Partisan competition, growth, and the franchise. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120: 1155-1192.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mendes, M. 2013. Inequality and growth: An overview of the theory. Núcleo de Estudos ePesquisas/CONLEG/Senado 67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moskowitz, T., and A. Vissing-Jorgensen. 2002. The returns to entrepreneurial investment: A private equity premium puzzle? American Economic Review 92 (4): 745-778.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. 2015. In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. Paris: OECD Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the twenty-first century. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reuveny, R., and Q. Li. 2003. Economic openness, democracy, and income inequality: An empirical analysis. Comparative Political Studies 36 (5): 575-601.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roodman, D. 2007. A short note on the theme of too many instruments. Center for Global Development Working Paper 125.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roodman, D. 2009. How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal 9 (1): 86-136.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth. 1979. Report no. 7: Fourth report on the standing reference. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saez, E., and G. Zucman. 2016. Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 519-78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saez, E., and G. Zucman. 2020. The rise of income and wealth inequality in America: Evidence from distributional macroeconomic accounts. Journal of Economic Perspectives 34 (4): 3-26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solow, R. M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1): 65-94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spant, R. 1987. Wealth distribution in Sweden: 1920-1983. In International comparisons of the distribution of household wealth, edited by E. N. Wolff, 51-71. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stiglitz, J. E. 2015. The great divide: Unequal societies and what we can do about them. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Takayama, N. 1991. Household asset- and wealth holdings in Japan. In Aging in the United States and Japan, edited by Y. Noguchi and D. A. Wise, 85-108. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tanzi, V. 1998. Fundamental determinants of inequality and the role of government. IMF Working Paper WP/98/178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weicher, J. C. 1995. Changes in the distribution of wealth: Increasing inequality? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 77: 5-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, C. C., and A. Gashi. 2022. Formal institutional failings and informal employment: Evidence from the Western Balkans. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 17 (2): 83-95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Windmeijer, F. 2005. A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics 126 (1): 25-51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolff, E. N. 1992. Changing inequality of wealth. American Economic Review 82 (2): 552-558.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
World Bank. 2017. World Bank Open Data. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org (accessed December 25, 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
World Bank. 2022a. World Bank DataBank. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group. https://databank.worldbank.org/databases (accessed October 18, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
World Bank. 2022b. World development indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group. http://wdi.worldbank.org (accessed October 18, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
You, J.-s. 2015. Democracy, inequality and corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
| Jun 09, 2023