Scholarly publishing in Ukraine (2005-2023): Mobility, productivity, and citation impact
Sep 17, 2025
About this article
Article Category: Research Papers
Published Online: Sep 17, 2025
Received: May 18, 2025
Accepted: Jul 17, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2025-0043
Keywords
© 2025 Myroslava Hladchenko et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3a.

Figure 3b.

Figure 4a.

Figure 4b.

Summary of requirements for (international) publications in Ukrainian research assessment policies_
Policy | Publication requirements |
---|---|
Doctoral degrees (2013) | Publications in Ukrainian Scopus- and WoS-indexed journals or in international journals Since 2020 publications in any Scopus- and WoS-indexed journals |
Licensing (2015) | At least five articles published during last five years in Ukrainian journals, in journals indexed in databases including Scopus and WoS |
Requirements for scientific titles of associate professor and professor (2015) | Article(s) in Scopus- and WoS indexed journals |
Research assessment of higher education institutions (2017) | Articles in journals indexed in international databases (the legislation does not clarify the names of databases) |
Funding of research projects (2019) | Publications in Scopus- and WoS-indexed journals |
Performance-based funding (2019) | Indicator of international recognition is defined based on the positions in international university rankings including QS Ranking. Research assessment by QS rankings takes the form of citations per faculty indicator. It takes data from Scopus |
Negative binomial regression_
Predictor | Number of scholars | Model 1 | Model 2 | Predicted number of articles per year | Predicted FNCI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5%CI | 97.5%CI | 2.5%CI | 97.5%CI | ||||||
Intercept | 900 | 0.932 |
0.887 | 0.976 | 0.079 |
0.062 | 0.096 | 2.5 | 1.08 |
Nationally institutionally mobile | 401 | -0.525 |
-0.621 | -0.431 | -0.979 |
-1.028 | -0.930 | 1.5 | 0.41 |
Nationally mobile (university) | 282 | -0.630 |
-0.745 | -0.518 | -1.383 |
-1.454 | -1.314 | 1.4 | 0.27 |
Non-mobile (university) | 2,955 | -0.656 |
-0.711 | -0.600 | -1.365 |
-1.394 | -1.336 | 1.3 | 0.28 |
Non-mobile (NASU) | 3,089 | -0.762 |
-0.818 | -0.707 | -0.983 |
-1.011 | -0.955 | 1.2 | 0.41 |
Second cohort | 623 | 0.11 |
0.042 | 0.177 | -0.225 |
-0.258 | -0.193 | 2.8 | 0.86 |
Nationally institutionally mobile: second cohort | 355 | 0.270 |
0.139 | 0.402 | 0.370 |
0.291 | 0.449 | 2.2 | 0.47 |
Nationally mobile (university): second cohort | 1,403 | 0.517 |
0.388 | 0.648 | 0.259 |
0.177 | 0.342 | 2.5 | 0.28 |
Non-mobile (university): second cohort | 14,410 | 0.351 |
0.275 | 0.427 | 0.068 |
0.025 | 0.111 | 2.1 | 0.24 |
Non-mobile (NASU): second cohort | 2,123 | 0.303 |
0.221 | 0.386 | 0.002 (0.026) | -0.49 | 0.054 | 1.8 | 0.32 |
Log Likelihood theta | -42,754.650 14.868 |
-188,335.900 0.903 |
|||||||
Obs | 26,541 | 236,618 |