This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Achrekar, H., Gandhe, A., Lazarus, R., Yu, S.-H., & Liu, B.Y. (2011). Predicting flu trends using twitter data. In 2011 IEEE conference on computer communications workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), pp. 702–707. IEEE.AchrekarH.GandheA.LazarusR.YuS.-H.LiuB.Y.2011In2011 IEEE conference on computer communications workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)702707IEEE10.1109/INFCOMW.2011.5928903Search in Google Scholar
Akella, A.P., Alhoori, H., Kondamudi, P.R., Freeman, C., & Zhou, H. (2021). Early indicators of scientific impact: Predicting citations with altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 15(2), 101128.AkellaA.P.AlhooriH.KondamudiP.R.FreemanC.ZhouH.2021Early indicators of scientific impact: Predicting citations with altmetrics15210112810.1016/j.joi.2020.101128Search in Google Scholar
Alhoori, H. (2016). How to identify specialized research communities related to a researcher's changing interests. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL ’16, pp. 239–240, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.AlhooriH.2016InProceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL ’16239240New York, NY, USAAssociation for Computing Machinery10.1145/2910896.2925450Search in Google Scholar
Alhoori, H., & Furuta, R. (2014). Do altmetrics follow the crowd or does the crowd follow altmetrics? In IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 375–378.AlhooriH.FurutaR.2014InIEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries37537810.1109/JCDL.2014.6970193Search in Google Scholar
Alhoori, H., & Furuta, R. (2017). Recommendation of scholarly venues based on dynamic user interests. Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 553–563.AlhooriH.FurutaR.2017Recommendation of scholarly venues based on dynamic user interests11255356310.1016/j.joi.2017.03.006Search in Google Scholar
Alhoori, H., Furuta, R., Tabet, M., Samaka, M., & Fox, E.A. (2014). Altmetrics for country-level research assessment. In International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, pp. 59–64. Springer.AlhooriH.FurutaR.TabetM.SamakaM.FoxE.A.2014InInternational Conference on Asian Digital Libraries5964Springer10.1007/978-3-319-12823-8_7Search in Google Scholar
Alhoori, H., Ray Choudhury, S., Kanan, T., Fox, E., Furuta, R., & Giles, C.L. (2015). On the relationship between open access and altmetrics. iConference 2015 Proceedings.AlhooriH.Ray ChoudhuryS.KananT.FoxE.FurutaR.GilesC.L.2015iConference 2015 ProceedingsSearch in Google Scholar
Alhoori, H., Samaka, M., Furuta, R., & Fox, E.A. (2019). Anatomy of scholarly information behavior patterns in the wake of academic social media platforms. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 20(4), 369–389.AlhooriH.SamakaM.FurutaR.FoxE.A.2019Anatomy of scholarly information behavior patterns in the wake of academic social media platforms20436938910.1007/s00799-018-0255-9Search in Google Scholar
Amolik, A., Jivane, N., Bhandari, M., & Venkatesan, M. (2016). Twitter sentiment analysis of movie reviews using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 1–7.AmolikA.JivaneN.BhandariM.VenkatesanM.2016Twitter sentiment analysis of movie reviews using machine learning techniques7617Search in Google Scholar
Bae, Y., & Lee, H. (2012). Sentiment analysis of twitter audiences: Measuring the positive or negative influence of popular twitterers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, 63(12), 2521–2535.BaeY.LeeH.2012Sentiment analysis of twitter audiences: Measuring the positive or negative influence of popular twitterers63122521253510.1002/asi.22768Search in Google Scholar
Bermingham, A., & Smeaton, A. (2011). On using twitter to monitor political sentiment and predict election results. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment Analysis where AI meets Psychology (SAAIP 2011), pp. 2–10.BerminghamA.SmeatonA.2011InProceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment Analysis where AI meets Psychology (SAAIP 2011)210Search in Google Scholar
Bharathwaj, S.K., Na, J.-C., Sangeetha, B., & Sarathkumar, E. (2019). Sentiment analysis of tweets mentioning research articles in medicine and psychiatry disciplines. In International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, pp. 303–307. Springer.BharathwajS.K.NaJ.-C.SangeethaB.SarathkumarE.2019InInternational Conference on Asian Digital Libraries303307Springer10.1007/978-3-030-34058-2_29Search in Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A., Gupta, U., Chinnakotla, M.K., Srikanth, R., Galley, M., & Agrawal, P. (2019). Understanding emotions in text using deep learning and big data. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 309–317.ChatterjeeA.GuptaU.ChinnakotlaM.K.SrikanthR.GalleyM.AgrawalP.2019Understanding emotions in text using deep learning and big data9330931710.1016/j.chb.2018.12.029Search in Google Scholar
Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., & Kegelmeyer, W.P. (2002). Smote: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321–357.ChawlaN.V.BowyerK.W.HallL.O.KegelmeyerW.P.2002Smote: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique1632135710.1613/jair.953Search in Google Scholar
Chen, X.Y., Cho, Y.W., & Jang, S.Y. (2015). Crime prediction using twitter sentiment and weather. In 2015 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, pp. 63–68. IEEE.ChenX.Y.ChoY.W.JangS.Y.2015In2015 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium6368IEEE10.1109/SIEDS.2015.7117012Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.CohenJ.1960A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales201374610.1177/001316446002000104Search in Google Scholar
Da Silva, N.F., Hruschka, E.R., & Hruschka Jr, E.R. (2014). Tweet sentiment analysis with classifier ensembles. Decision Support Systems, 66, 170–179.Da SilvaN.F.HruschkaE.R.HruschkaE.R.Jr2014Tweet sentiment analysis with classifier ensembles6617017910.1016/j.dss.2014.07.003Search in Google Scholar
Didegah, F., Mejlgaard, N., & Sørensen, M.P. (2018). Investigating the quality of interactions and public engagement around scientific papers on twitter. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 960–971.DidegahF.MejlgaardN.SørensenM.P.2018Investigating the quality of interactions and public engagement around scientific papers on twitter12396097110.1016/j.joi.2018.08.002Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, C., Alhoori, H., & Shahzad, M. (2020). Measuring the diversity of face-book reactions to research. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(GROUP), 1–17.FreemanC.AlhooriH.ShahzadM.2020Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(GROUP)11710.1145/3375192Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, C., Roy, M.K., Fattoruso, M., & Alhoori, H. (2019). Shared feelings: Understanding facebook reactions to scholarly articles. In 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 301–304. IEEE.FreemanC.RoyM.K.FattorusoM.AlhooriH.2019In2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)301304IEEE10.1109/JCDL.2019.00050Search in Google Scholar
Friedrich, N., Bowman, T.D., & Haustein, S. (2015). Do tweets to scientific articles contain positive or negative sentiments. In Altmetrics Workshop, Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics15/friedrich.FriedrichN.BowmanT.D.HausteinS.2015InAltmetrics WorkshopAmsterdamRetrieved from http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics15/friedrich.Search in Google Scholar
Friedrich, N., Bowman, T.D., Stock, W.G., & Haustein, S. (2015). Adapting sentiment analysis for tweets linking to scientific papers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.01967.FriedrichN.BowmanT.D.StockW.G.HausteinS.2015arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.01967.Search in Google Scholar
Gayo-Avello, D. (2012). No, you cannot predict elections with twitter. IEEE Internet Computing, 16(6), 91–94.Gayo-AvelloD.2012No, you cannot predict elections with twitter166919410.1109/MIC.2012.137Search in Google Scholar
Hansson, K., & Ludwig, T. (2019). Crowd dynamics: Conflicts, contradictions, and community in crowdsourcing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 28(5), 791–794.HanssonK.LudwigT.2019Crowd dynamics: Conflicts, contradictions, and community in crowdsourcing28579179410.1007/s10606-018-9343-zSearch in Google Scholar
Hansson, K., Ludwig, T., & Aitamurto, T. (2019). Capitalizing relationships: Modes of participation in crowdsourcing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 28(5), 977–1000.HanssonK.LudwigT.AitamurtoT.2019Capitalizing relationships: Modes of participation in crowdsourcing285977100010.1007/s10606-018-9341-1Search in Google Scholar
Hao, M., Rohrdantz, C., Janetzko, H., Dayal, U., Keim, D.A., Haug, L.-E., & Hsu, M.-C. (2011). Visual sentiment analysis on twitter data streams. In 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), pp. 277–278. IEEE.HaoM.RohrdantzC.JanetzkoH.DayalU.KeimD.A.HaugL.-E.HsuM.-C.2011In2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST)277278IEEE10.1109/VAST.2011.6102472Search in Google Scholar
Hassan, A., Abbasi, A., & Zeng, D. (2013). Twitter sentiment analysis: A bootstrap ensemble framework. In 2013 international conference on social computing, pp. 357–364. IEEE.HassanA.AbbasiA.ZengD.2013In2013 international conference on social computing357364IEEE10.1109/SocialCom.2013.56Search in Google Scholar
Hassan, S.-U., Saleem, A., Soroya, S.H., Safder, I., Iqbal, S., Jamil, S., Bukhari, F., Aljohani, N.R., & Nawaz, R. (2020). Sentiment analysis of tweets through altmetrics: A machine learning approach. Journal of Information Science, 0165551520930917.HassanS.-U.SaleemA.SoroyaS.H.SafderI.IqbalS.JamilS.BukhariF.AljohaniN.R.NawazR.2020Sentiment analysis of tweets through altmetrics: A machine learning approach0165551520930917.10.1177/0165551520930917Search in Google Scholar
Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2020). Library and information science papers discussed on twitter: A new network-based approach for measuring public attention. Journal of Data and Information Science, 5(3), 5–17.HaunschildR.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.2020Library and information science papers discussed on twitter: A new network-based approach for measuring public attention5351710.2478/jdis-2020-0017Search in Google Scholar
Haustein, S. (2019). Scholarly twitter metrics. In Springer handbook of science and technology indicators, pp. 729–760. Springer.HausteinS.2019Scholarly twitter metricsIn729760Springer10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_28Search in Google Scholar
Hussein, D.M.E.-D.M. (2018). A survey on sentiment analysis challenges. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, 30(4), 330–338.HusseinD.M.E.-D.M.2018A survey on sentiment analysis challenges30433033810.1016/j.jksues.2016.04.002Search in Google Scholar
Ibrahim, N.F., & Wang, X. (2019). Decoding the sentiment dynamics of online retailing customers: Time series analysis of social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 32–45.IbrahimN.F.WangX.2019Decoding the sentiment dynamics of online retailing customers: Time series analysis of social media96324510.1016/j.chb.2019.02.004Search in Google Scholar
Jaidka, K., Guntuku, S.C., Lee, J.H., Luo, Z., Buffone, A., & Ungar, L.H. (2021). The rural–urban stress divide: Obtaining geographical insights through twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106544.JaidkaK.GuntukuS.C.LeeJ.H.LuoZ.BuffoneA.UngarL.H.2021The rural–urban stress divide: Obtaining geographical insights through twitter11410654410.1016/j.chb.2020.106544Search in Google Scholar
Kale, B., Siravuri, H.V., Alhoori, H., & Papka, M.E. (2017). Predicting research that will be cited in policy documents. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference, WebSci ’17, pp. 389–390, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.KaleB.SiravuriH.V.AlhooriH.PapkaM.E.2017InProceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference, WebSci ’17389390New York, NY, USAAssociation for Computing Machinery10.1145/3091478.3098865Search in Google Scholar
Kharde, V., & Sonawane, S. (2016). Sentiment analysis of twitter data: A survey of techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 139(11), 5–15.KhardeV.SonawaneS.2016Sentiment analysis of twitter data: A survey of techniques1391151510.5120/ijca2016908625Search in Google Scholar
Kou, Y., Kow, Y.M., Gui, X., & Cheng, W. (2017). One social movement, two social media sites: A comparative study of public discourses. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26(4), 807–836.KouY.KowY.M.GuiX.ChengW.2017One social movement, two social media sites: A comparative study of public discourses26480783610.1007/s10606-017-9284-ySearch in Google Scholar
Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., & Moore, J. (2011). Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg! In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), 538–541.KouloumpisE.WilsonT.MooreJ.2011Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg!In5153854110.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14185Search in Google Scholar
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2019). An automatic method to identify citations to journals in news stories: A case study of uk newspapers citing web of science journals. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(3), 73–95.KoushaK.ThelwallM.2019An automatic method to identify citations to journals in news stories: A case study of uk newspapers citing web of science journals43739510.2478/jdis-2019-0016Search in Google Scholar
Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Morgan & Claypool Publishers.LiuB.2012Synthesis Morgan & Claypool Publishers10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016Search in Google Scholar
Mandel, B., Culotta, A., Boulahanis, J., Stark, D., Lewis, B., & Rodrigue, J. (2012). A demographic analysis of online sentiment during hurricane irene. In Proceedings of the second workshop on language in social media, pp. 27–36.MandelB.CulottaA.BoulahanisJ.StarkD.LewisB.RodrigueJ.2012InProceedings of the second workshop on language in social media2736Search in Google Scholar
McKinney, W. (2011). Pandas: A foundational python library for data analysis and statistics. Python for High Performance and Scientific Computing, 14(9), 1–9.McKinneyW.2011Pandas: A foundational python library for data analysis and statistics14919Search in Google Scholar
Mittal, A., & Goel, A. (2012). Stock prediction using twitter sentiment analysis. Standford University, CS229. Retrieved from http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2011/GoelMittal-StockMarketPredictionUsingTwitterSentimentAnalysis.pdf.MittalA.GoelA.2012Standford UniversityCS229. Retrieved from http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2011/GoelMittal-StockMarketPredictionUsingTwitterSentimentAnalysis.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Mohammad, S.M. (2017). Challenges in sentiment analysis. In A practical guide to sentiment analysis, pp. 61–83. Springer.MohammadS.M.2017Challenges in sentiment analysisIn6183Springer10.1007/978-3-319-55394-8_4Search in Google Scholar
Narr, S., Hulfenhaus, M., & Albayrak, S. (2012). Language-independent twitter sentiment analysis. Knowledge discovery and machine learning (KDML), LWA, pp. 12–14.NarrS.HulfenhausM.AlbayrakS.2012Knowledge discovery and machine learning (KDML), LWA1214Search in Google Scholar
Neethu, M., & Rajasree, R. (2013). Sentiment analysis in twitter using machine learning techniques. In 2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), pp. 1–5. IEEE.NeethuM.RajasreeR.2013In2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT)15IEEE10.1109/ICCCNT.2013.6726818Search in Google Scholar
Noyons, E. (2019). Measuring societal impact is as complex as ABC. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(3), 6–21.NoyonsE.2019Measuring societal impact is as complex as ABC4362110.2478/jdis-2019-0012Search in Google Scholar
Pak, A., & Paroubek, P. (2010). Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of European Language Resource Association, volume 10, pp. 1320–1326.PakA.ParoubekP.2010InProceedings of European Language Resource Association1013201326Search in Google Scholar
Pal, J., Thawani, U., Van Der Vlugt, E., Out, W., Chandra, P., et al. (2018). Speaking their mind: Populist style and antagonistic messaging in the tweets of donald trump, narendra modi, nigel farage, and geert wilders. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 27(3), 293–326.PalJ.ThawaniU.Van Der VlugtE.OutW.ChandraP.2018Speaking their mind: Populist style and antagonistic messaging in the tweets of donald trump, narendra modi, nigel farage, and geert wilders27329332610.1007/s10606-018-9316-2Search in Google Scholar
Pandian, N.D.S., Na, J.-C., Veeramachaneni, B., & Boothaladinni, R.V. (2019). Altmetrics: Factor analysis for assessing the popularity of research articles on twitter. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 7(4), 33–44.PandianN.D.S.NaJ.-C.VeeramachaneniB.BoothaladinniR.V.2019Altmetrics: Factor analysis for assessing the popularity of research articles on twitter743344Search in Google Scholar
Parikh, R., & Movassate, M. (2009). Sentiment analysis of user-generated twitter updates using various classification techniques. CS224N Final Report, 118.ParikhR.MovassateM.2009CS224N Final Report, 118.Search in Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. the Journal of machine Learning research, 12, 2825–2830.PedregosaF.VaroquauxG.GramfortA.MichelV.ThirionB.GriselO.2011Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python1228252830Search in Google Scholar
Pozzi, F.A., Fersini, E., Messina, E., & Liu, B. (2017). Challenges of sentiment analysis in social networks: An overview. Sentiment analysis in social networks, pp. 1–11.PozziF.A.FersiniE.MessinaE.LiuB.2017Challenges of sentiment analysis in social networks: An overview11110.1016/B978-0-12-804412-4.00001-2Search in Google Scholar
Raamkumar, A.S., Ganesan, S., Jothiramalingam, K., Selva, M.K., Erdt, M., & Theng, Y.-L. (2018). Investigating the characteristics and research impact of sentiments in tweets with links to computer science research papers. In International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, pp. 71–82. Springer.RaamkumarA.S.GanesanS.JothiramalingamK.SelvaM.K.ErdtM.ThengY.-L.2018InInternational Conference on Asian Digital Libraries7182Springer10.1007/978-3-030-04257-8_7Search in Google Scholar
Saif, H., Fernandez, M., He, Y., & Alani, H. (2014). On stopwords, filtering and data sparsity for sentiment analysis of Twitter. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), pp. 810–817, Reykjavik, Iceland. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).SaifH.FernandezM.HeY.AlaniH.2014InProceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14)810817Reykjavik, IcelandEuropean Language Resources Association (ELRA)Search in Google Scholar
Shaban, H. (2019). Twitter reveals its daily active user numbers for the first time. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-twitter-daily-users-20190207-story.htmlShabanH.2019Washington PostRetrieved from https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-twitter-daily-users-20190207-story.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Shaikh, A.R., & Alhoori, H. (2019). Predicting patent citations to measure economic impact of scholarly research. In 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 400–401.ShaikhA.R.AlhooriH.2019In2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)40040110.1109/JCDL.2019.00089Search in Google Scholar
Siravuri, H.V., Akella, A.P., Bailey, C., & Alhoori, H. (2018). Using social media and scholarly text to predict public understanding of science. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL ’18, pp. 385–386, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.SiravuriH.V.AkellaA.P.BaileyC.AlhooriH.2018InProceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL ’18385386New York, NY, USAAssociation for Computing Machinery10.1145/3197026.3203890Search in Google Scholar
Siravuri, H.V., & Alhoori, H. (2017). What makes a research article newsworthy? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 802–803.SiravuriH.V.AlhooriH.2017What makes a research article newsworthy?54180280310.1002/pra2.2017.14505401163Search in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., & Kappas, A. (2010). Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2544–2558.ThelwallM.BuckleyK.PaltoglouG.CaiD.KappasA.2010Sentiment strength detection in short informal text612544255810.1002/asi.21416Search in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., Tsou, A., Holmberg, K., & Haustein, S. (2013). Tweeting links to academic articles. Cybermetrics, 17(1), 1–8.ThelwallM.TsouA.HolmbergK.HausteinS.2013Tweeting links to academic articles17118Search in Google Scholar
Vinkers, C.H., Tijdink, J.K., & Otte, W.M. (2015). Use of positive and negative words in scientific pubmed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis. BMJ, 351.VinkersC.H.TijdinkJ.K.OtteW.M.2015Use of positive and negative words in scientific pubmed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis35110.1136/bmj.h6467467769526668206Search in Google Scholar
Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F., & Narayanan, S. (2012). A system for real-time twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 us presidential election cycle. In Proceedings of the ACL 2012 system demonstrations, pp. 115–120.WangH.CanD.KazemzadehA.BarF.NarayananS.2012InProceedings of the ACL 2012 system demonstrations115120Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X., Gerber, M.S., & Brown, D.E. (2012). Automatic crime prediction using events extracted from twitter posts. In International conference on social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling, and prediction, pp. 231–238. Springer.WangX.GerberM.S.BrownD.E.2012InInternational conference on social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling, and prediction231238Springer10.1007/978-3-642-29047-3_28Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X.L., Wei, F.R., Liu, X.H., Zhou, M., & Zhang, M. (2011). Topic sentiment analysis in twitter: A graph-based hashtag sentiment classification approach. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pp. 1031–1040.WangX.L.WeiF.R.LiuX.H.ZhouM.ZhangM.2011InProceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management1031104010.1145/2063576.2063726Search in Google Scholar
Le, X.Q., Chu, J.D., Deng, S.Y., Jiao, Q.H., Pei, J.J., et al. (2019). Citeopinion: Evidence-based evaluation tool for academic contributions of research papers based on citing sentences. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(4), 26–41.LeX.Q.ChuJ.D.DengS.Y.JiaoQ.H.PeiJ.J.2019Citeopinion: Evidence-based evaluation tool for academic contributions of research papers based on citing sentences44264110.2478/jdis-2019-0019Search in Google Scholar
Zaman, T.R., Herbrich, R., Van Gael, J., & Stern, D. (2010). Predicting information spreading in twitter. In Workshop on computational social science and the wisdom of crowds, nips, volume 104, pp. 17599–601. Citeseer.ZamanT.R.HerbrichR.Van GaelJ.SternD.2010InWorkshop on computational social science and the wisdom of crowds, nips10417599601CiteseerSearch in Google Scholar