This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
ARWU (2018). Ranking Methodology of Academic Ranking of World Universities—2017. Retrieved from: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2017.htmlARWU2018Ranking Methodology of Academic Ranking of World Universities—2017Retrieved fromhttp://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2017.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
CWTS (2018). CWTS Leiden Ranking. Retrieved from: http://www.leidenranking.com/information/indicatorsCWTS2018CWTS Leiden RankingRetrieved fromhttp://www.leidenranking.com/information/indicatorsSearch in Google Scholar
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69, 131–152.EggheL.2006Theory and practise of the g-indexScientometrics69131–15210.1007/s11192-006-0144-7Search in Google Scholar
Egghe, L. (2008). Modelling successive h-indices. Scientometrics, 77, 377–387.EggheL.2008Modelling successive h-indicesScientometrics77377–38710.1007/s11192-007-1968-5Search in Google Scholar
Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the battle for world-class excellence. Houndmills Basingstoke Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.HazelkornE.2011Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the battle for world-class excellence. Houndmills Basingstoke HampshireNew YorkPalgrave Macmillan10.1057/9780230306394Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572.HirschJ. E.2005An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America10216569–1657210.1073/pnas.0507655102Search in Google Scholar
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317–323.LotkaA. J.1926The frequency distribution of scientific productivityJournal of the Washington Academy of Sciences16317–323Search in Google Scholar
Molinari, J. F., & Molinari, A. (2008). A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics. Retrieved from: https://akademiai.com/doi/abs/10.1007/s11192-007-1853-2MolinariJ. F.&MolinariA.2008A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. ScientometricsRetrieved fromhttps://akademiai.com/doi/abs/10.1007/s11192-007-1853-210.1007/s11192-007-1853-2Search in Google Scholar
MS (2009). Ordin nr. 1509/2008 privind aprobarea Nomenclatorului de specialităi medicale, medico-dentare şi farmaceutice pentru reeauă de asistenă medicală. Retrieved from: https://www.eshg.org/fileadmin/www.eshg.org/documents/countries/RomanMS2009Ordin nr. 1509/2008 privind aprobarea Nomenclatorului de specialităi medicale, medico-dentare şi farmaceutice pentru reeauă de asistenă medicalăRetrieved fromhttps://www.eshg.org/fileadmin/www.eshg.org/documents/countries/RomanSearch in Google Scholar
Proteasa, V., Păunescu, M., & Miroiu, A. (2017). An extension of the characteristics scales and scores: Isolating interinstitutional from intra-institutional variance in highly skewed real population distributions. In 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, ISSI 2017 (pp. 1192–1203).ProteasaV.PăunescuM.&MiroiuA.2017An extension of the characteristics scales and scores: Isolating interinstitutional from intra-institutional variance in highly skewed real population distributionsIn 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, ISSI 2017 (pp. 1192–1203)Search in Google Scholar
QS (2016). QS World University Rankings. Retrieved from: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodol.QS2016QS World University RankingsRetrieved fromhttps://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodolSearch in Google Scholar
Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science; New York, N.Y., 43.SeglenP. O.1992The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information ScienceNew York, N.Y.4310.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<628::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-0Search in Google Scholar
Shen, Z., Yang, L., Di, Z., & Wu, J. (2017). How large is large enough? In 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, ISSI 2017 (pp.302–313).ShenZ.YangL.DiZ.&WuJ.2017How large is large enough? In 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & InformetricsISSI2017pp. 302–313Search in Google Scholar
Tol, R. S. J. (2008). A rational, successive g-index applied to economics departments in Ireland. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 149–155.TolR. S. J.2008A rational, successive g-index applied to economics departments in IrelandJournal of Informetrics2149–15510.1016/j.joi.2008.01.001Search in Google Scholar
Wasserman, L. (2004). All of Statistics. Springer New York.WassermanL.2004All of StatisticsSpringer New York10.1007/978-0-387-21736-9Search in Google Scholar
