Using Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Hospital Admission at the Emergency Department

1Sun BC, Hsia RY, Weiss RE, et al. Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(6):605-611.Sun BC Hsia RY Weiss RE et al Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients Ann Emerg Med 2013616605 61110.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.026369078423218508Search in Google Scholar

2Gaieski DF, Agarwal AK, Mikkelsen ME, et al. The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(7):953-960.Gaieski DF Agarwal AK Mikkelsen ME et al The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis Am J Emerg Med 2017357953 96010.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.06128233644Search in Google Scholar

3Rathore SS, Curtis JP, Chen J, et al. National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study. BMJ. 2009;338:b1807.Rathore SS Curtis JP Chen J et al National Cardiovascular Data Registry Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study. BMJ 2009338b180710.1136/bmj.b1807268457819454739Search in Google Scholar

4Hautz WE, Kämmer JE, Hautz SC, et al. Diagnostic error increases mortality and length of hospital stay in patients presenting through the emergency room. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019;27(1):54.Hautz WE Kämmer JE Hautz SC et al Diagnostic error increases mortality and length of hospital stay in patients presenting through the emergency room Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 20192715410.1186/s13049-019-0629-z650522131068188Search in Google Scholar

5Feretzakis G, Loupelis E, Sakagianni A, et al. Using Machine Learning Techniques to Aid Empirical Antibiotic Therapy Decisions in the Intensive Care Unit of a General Hospital in Greece. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9(2):50.Feretzakis G Loupelis E Sakagianni A et al Using Machine Learning Techniques to Aid Empirical Antibiotic Therapy Decisions in the Intensive Care Unit of a General Hospital in Greece Antibiotics (Basel) 2020925010.3390/antibiotics9020050716793532023854Search in Google Scholar

6Raita Y, Goto T, Faridi MK, Brown DFM, Camargo CA Jr, Hasegawa K. Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):64.Raita Y Goto T Faridi MK Brown DFM Camargo CA Jr Hasegawa K Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models Crit Care 20192316410.1186/s13054-019-2351-7638756230795786Search in Google Scholar

7Yan L, Zhang HT, Goncalves J, et al. An interpretable mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients. Nat Mach Intell. 2020;2:283-288.Yan L Zhang HT Goncalves J et al An interpretable mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients Nat Mach Intell 20202283 28810.1038/s42256-020-0180-7Search in Google Scholar

8Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten I. The WEKA data mining software. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 2009;11(1):10–18.Hall M Frank E Holmes G Pfahringer B Reutemann P Witten I The WEKA data mining software ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 200911110 1810.1145/1656274.1656278Search in Google Scholar

9Kasperczuk A, Dardzinska A. Comparative Evaluation of the Different Data Mining Techniques Used for the Medical Database. Acta Mechanica Et Automatica. 2016;10(3):233– 238.Kasperczuk A Dardzinska A Comparative Evaluation of the Different Data Mining Techniques Used for the Medical Database Acta Mechanica Et Automatica 2016103233–23810.1515/ama-2016-0036Search in Google Scholar

10Bouckaert R. Naive Bayes Classifiers That Perform Well with Continuous Variables. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2004;3339:1089-1094.Bouckaert R Naive Bayes Classifiers That Perform Well with Continuous Variables Lecture Notes in Computer Science 200433391089 109410.1007/978-3-540-30549-1_106Search in Google Scholar

11Han J, Pei J, Yin Y. Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation, ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2000;1–12.Han J Pei J Yin Y Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data 20001–1210.1145/342009.335372Search in Google Scholar

12Rish, I. An empirical study of the naive bayes clas-sifier. InIJCAI workshop on Empirical Methods in AI. 2005Rish I An empirical study of the naive bayes clas-sifier InIJCAI workshop on Empirical Methods in AI 2005Search in Google Scholar

13John GH, Langley P: Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifiers. In: Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, San Mateo, 338-345, 1995.John GH Langley P Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifiers In Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence San Mateo 338 345 1995Search in Google Scholar

14le Cessie S, van Houwelingen JC. Ridge Estimators in Logistic Regression. Applied Statistics. 1992;41(1):191-201.le Cessie S van Houwelingen JC Ridge Estimators in Logistic Regression Applied Statistics 1992411191 20110.2307/2347628Search in Google Scholar

15Freund Y, Schapire RE. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, San Francisco, 148-156, 1996.Freund Y Schapire RE Experiments with a new boosting algorithm In Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning San Francisco 148 156 1996Search in Google Scholar

16Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Additive Logistic Regression: a Statistical View of Boosting. The Annals of Statistics. 2000;28(2):337-407.Friedman J Hastie T Tibshirani R Additive Logistic Regression: a Statistical View of Boosting The Annals of Statistics 2000282337 40710.1214/aos/1016218223Search in Google Scholar

17Frank E, Wang Y, Inglis S, Holmes G, Witten IH. Using model trees for classification. Machine Learning. 1998;32:63-76.Frank E Wang Y Inglis S Holmes G Witten IH Using model trees for classification Machine Learning 19983263 7610.1023/A:1007421302149Search in Google Scholar

18Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45:5-32.Breiman L Random Forests Machine Learning 2001455 3210.1023/A:1010933404324Search in Google Scholar

19Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning. 1996;24:123-140.Breiman L Bagging predictors Machine Learning 199624123 14010.1007/BF00058655Search in Google Scholar

20Smith TC, Frank E. Introducing Machine Learning Concepts with WEKA. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1418:353–378.Smith TC Frank E Introducing Machine Learning Concepts with WEKA Methods Mol Biol 20161418353 37810.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_1727008023Search in Google Scholar

21Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(9):1315-6.Mandrekar JN Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment J Thorac Oncol 2010591315 610.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d20736804Search in Google Scholar

22Fernandes M, Vieira SM, Leite F, Palos C, Finkelstein S, Sousa JMC. Clinical Decision Support Systems for Triage in the Emergency Department using Intelligent Systems: a Review. Artif Intell Med. 2020;102:101762.Fernandes M Vieira SM Leite F Palos C Finkelstein S Sousa JMC Clinical Decision Support Systems for Triage in the Emergency Department using Intelligent Systems: a Review Artif Intell Med 202010210176210.1016/j.artmed.2019.10176231980099Search in Google Scholar

23Levin S, Toerper M, Hamrock E, et al. Machine-Learning-Based Electronic Triage More Accurately Differentiates Patients With Respect to Clinical Outcomes Compared With the Emergency Severity Index. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(5):565-574.Levin S Toerper M Hamrock E et al Machine-Learning-Based Electronic Triage More Accurately Differentiates Patients With Respect to Clinical Outcomes Compared With the Emergency Severity Index Ann Emerg Med 2018715565 57410.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.00528888332Search in Google Scholar

24Weant KA, Bailey AM, Baker SN. Strategies for reducing medication errors in the emergency department. Open Access Emerg Med. 2014;6:45-55.Weant KA Bailey AM Baker SN Strategies for reducing medication errors in the emergency department Open Access Emerg Med 2014645 5510.2147/OAEM.S64174475398427147879Search in Google Scholar

25Morley C, Unwin M, Peterson GM, Stankovich J, Kinsman L. Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0203316.Morley C Unwin M Peterson GM Stankovich J Kinsman L Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions PLoS One 2018138e020331610.1371/journal.pone.0203316611706030161242Search in Google Scholar

26Reason J. Understanding adverse events: human factors. Qual Health Care. 1995;4(2):80-9.Reason J Understanding adverse events: human factors Qual Health Care 19954280 910.1136/qshc.4.2.80105529410151618Search in Google Scholar

27González J, Soltero R. Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage algorithm: trends after implementation in the emergency department. Bol Asoc Med P R. 2009;101(3):7-10.González J Soltero R Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage algorithm: trends after implementation in the emergency department Bol Asoc Med P R 200910137 10Search in Google Scholar