1. bookVolume 10 (2021): Issue 2 (May 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2336-9205
First Published
11 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Global Versus Non-Global Banks: A Capital Ratios-Based Analysis

Published Online: 12 May 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 10 (2021) - Issue 2 (May 2021)
Page range: 5 - 22
Received: 04 Feb 2020
Accepted: 27 May 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2336-9205
First Published
11 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This paper examines the Leverage Ratio and Total Capital Ratio of global versus non-global banks in both the pre- and post-crisis periods. A panel data set of 165 global and non-global financial institutions from 38 countries is used for the period 1999-2015 and a random effects model is employed to examine whether global banks perform better or not compared to their non-global counterparts. This study comes up with two important findings. First, global banks do not exhibit heterogeneous behaviour with respect to both ratios neither in the pre- and especially nor in the post-crisis period. Second, the Leverage Ratio is crisis-insensitive, but the Total Capital Ratio is not. Our findings encourage further research on the topic of the contribution of global banks to the financial crisis propagation (at least as far as leverage is concerned).

Keywords

JEL Classification

1. Anastasiou, D., Louri, H., and Tsionas, M. (2016). “Determinants of non-performing loans: Evidence from Euro area countries”. Finance Research Letters, 18, 116-119.10.1016/j.frl.2016.04.008 Search in Google Scholar

2. Altunbas, Y., Manganelli, S. and Marques-Ibanez, D. (2011). “Bank risk during the financial crisis: do business models matter?” European Central Bank, Working Paper No. 1394. Search in Google Scholar

3. Baltagi, H.D. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Search in Google Scholar

4. Bank for International Settlements (BIS) (2009). 79th Annual Report, 29 June 2009. Basel: BIS. Search in Google Scholar

5. Banks around the World (2016). “Top Banks in the World”, update: June 10, 2016 (https://www.relbanks.com/worlds-top-banks/assets, accessed: 23 July 2016). Search in Google Scholar

6. Bańbuła, P. and Iwanicz-Drozdowska, M. (2016). “The systemic importance of banks - name and shame seems to work”. Finance Research Letters, 18, 297-30110.1016/j.frl.2016.05.001 Search in Google Scholar

7. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) (2013). Global systemically important banks: assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement, July 2013. Basel: Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Search in Google Scholar

8. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) (2017). Global systemically important bank - revised assessment framework”, March 2017. Basel: Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Search in Google Scholar

9. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) (2019). Leverage ratio requirements for global systemically important banks. Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/chapter/LEV/40.htm?inforce=20220101 (2019, August 24). Search in Google Scholar

10. Bassett, F.W., Lee, J. S. and Spiller, P. T. (2015). “Estimating changes in supervisory standards and their economic effects”. Journal of Banking & Finance, 60, 21-43.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.010 Search in Google Scholar

11. Baur, G.D. (2012). “Financial contagion and the real economy”. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36, 2680-2692.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.05.019 Search in Google Scholar

12. Beck, T., Demirgüc-Kunt, A. and Merrouche, O. (2013). “Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability”. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 433-447.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.016 Search in Google Scholar

13. Behn, M., Haselmann, R. and Wachtel, P. (2016). “Procyclical Capital Regulation and Lending”. Journal of Finance, Vol. LXXI-No.2, 919-955.10.1111/jofi.12368 Search in Google Scholar

14. Berger, N.A. and DeYoung, R. (1997). “Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks”. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21, 849-870.10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00003-4 Search in Google Scholar

15. Cetorelli, Ν. And Goldberg, S.L. (2010). “Global Banks and International Shock Transmission: Evidence from the Crisis”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, No.446, May 2010. Search in Google Scholar

16. Chiaramonte, L., Croci, E. and Poli, F. (2015), “Should we trust the Z-score? Evidence from the European Banking Industry”. Global Finance Journal, 28, 111-131.10.1016/j.gfj.2015.02.002 Search in Google Scholar

17. De Haan, L., and J. Kakes. (2019). “European banks after the global financial crisis: peak accumulated losses, twin crises and business models”, Journal of Banking Regulation. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-019-00107-y .10.1057/s41261-019-00107-y Search in Google Scholar

18. De Haas, R. and Van Lelyveld, I. (2014), “Multinational Banks and the Global Financial Crisis: Weathering the Perfect Storm?”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46 (1), 333-364.10.1111/jmcb.12094 Search in Google Scholar

19. Doumpos, M. and Zopounidis, C. (2010), “A multicriteria decision support system for bank rating”. Decision Support Systems, 50, 55-63.10.1016/j.dss.2010.07.002 Search in Google Scholar

20. European Banking Authority (EBA) (2016). CRD IV - CRR/Basel III Monitoring Exercise - Results based on data as of 30 June 2015, 2 March 2016, EBA. Search in Google Scholar

21. Fillat L.J., Garetto, S. and Gӧtz M. (2013). “Multinational Banks”, December 7, 2013. Retrieved from https://cepr.org/sites/default/files/Fillat.pdf (2018, March 23). Search in Google Scholar

22. Financial Stability Board (FSB) (2016). 2016 list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). FSB Search in Google Scholar

23. Francis, B.W. (2014). “UK deposit-taker responses to the financial crisis: what are the lessons?”, Bank of England, Working Paper 501 – June 2014.10.2139/ssrn.2461786 Search in Google Scholar

24. Gilbert, A.R., Meyer, P.A. and Vaughan, D.M. (2000). “The Role of a CAMEL Downgrade Model in Bank Surveillance”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Working Paper, 2000-021A. Search in Google Scholar

25. Gopalan, K.Y. (2010). “Earliest Indicator of Bank Failure Is Deterioration in Earnings”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Central Banker, Spring 2010. Search in Google Scholar

26. Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic Econometrics, fourth ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Companies. Search in Google Scholar

27. Hale, G., Kapan, T. and Minoiu, C. (2016). “Crisis Transmission through the Global Banking Network”, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Working Paper WP/16/91.10.5089/9781475551341.001 Search in Google Scholar

28. Hogan, L.T. (2015). “Capital and risk in commercial banking: A comparison of capital and risk-based capital ratios”. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 57, 32-45.10.1016/j.qref.2014.11.003 Search in Google Scholar

29. Jeucken, M. (2001). Sustainable Finance and Banking: The Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet, Earthscan Puplications Ltd, London. Search in Google Scholar

30. Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Papaioannou, E. and Perri, F. (2013). “Global banks and crisis transmission”. Journal of International Economics, 89, 495-510.10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.07.001 Search in Google Scholar

31. Laeven, L., and Valencia, F. (2012). “Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update”, International Monetary Fund (IMF). IMF Working Paper WP/12/163 – June 2012. Search in Google Scholar

32. Liu, X.E. and Pogach, J. (2017). “The effect of foreign lending on domestic loans: An analysis of US global banks”. Economic Letters, 156, 151-154.10.1016/j.econlet.2017.04.027 Search in Google Scholar

33. Louzis, D., Vouldis, A., and Metaxas, V. (2012). “Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece: A comparative study of mortgage, business and consumer loan portfolios”. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36 (4), 1012-1027.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.012 Search in Google Scholar

34. McCauley, N.R., Ruud, S.J. and Wooldridge, D.P. (2002). “Globalising international banking”. BIS Quarterly Review, March 2002, 41-51. Search in Google Scholar

35. McCauley, R., McGuire, P. and von Peter, G. (2010). “The architecture of global banking: from international to multinational”. BIS Quarterly Review, March 2010, 25-37. Search in Google Scholar

36. Mody, A. and Sandri, D. (2012). “The eurozone crisis: how banks and sovereigns came to be joined at the hip”. Economic Policy, 27 (70), 199–230.10.1111/j.1468-0327.2012.00281.x Search in Google Scholar

37. Moosa, I. (2010). “The myth of too big to fail”. Journal of Banking Regulation, 11, 319-333.10.1057/jbr.2010.15 Search in Google Scholar

38. Niepmann, F. (2011). “Banking across Borders”, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), Working Paper 325 – December 2011.10.2139/ssrn.1972972 Search in Google Scholar

39. Pfeifer, L. and Pikhart, Z. (2019). “Leverage Ratio and its Potential For Enhancing the Effectiveness of Capital Regulation”. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 8 (2), 129-146.10.2478/jcbtp-2019-0017 Search in Google Scholar

40. Smith, A.J., Grill, M. and Lang, J.H. (2017). “The leverage ratio, risk-taking and bank stability”, European Central Bank, Working Paper 2079. Search in Google Scholar

41. Tanasković, S. and Jandrić, M. (2015). “Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Non-performing Loans”. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 4 (1), 47-62.10.1515/jcbtp-2015-0004 Search in Google Scholar

42. Turguttopbas, N.T. (2018). “Are Capital Ratios Procyclical? Evidence from Turkish Banking Data”. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 7 (3), 159-180. Search in Google Scholar

43. Van den End, W.J. (2013). “A macroprudential approach to address liquidity risk with the Loan-to-Deposit ratio”, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), Working Paper 372 – February 2013.10.2139/ssrn.2228599 Search in Google Scholar

44. Yuksel, M. (2014). “Identifying Global Systemically Important Financial Institutions”, Reserve Bank of Australia, Bulletin, December Quarter 2014, 63-72. Search in Google Scholar

45. Wooldridge, M.J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo