1. bookVolume 8 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2336-9205
First Published
11 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Brexit and new perspectives of an unconventional way of Eurozone revival

Published Online: 19 Sep 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 8 (2019) - Issue 3 (September 2019)
Page range: 5 - 20
Received: 22 Apr 2018
Accepted: 06 Jul 2018
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2336-9205
First Published
11 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In the aftermath of the UK referendum on June 23rd, 2016 that resulted in a sonorous negative decision regarding the willingness of the British people to remain in the EU, a significant number of alarming questions have emerged. Although Europe should have forged in crises, nowadays, many compromises have to be made in order to maintain the European construction as intact as possible. The question we attempt to answer is whether a new phase of unconventional monetary policy in the form of QE would be appropriate to lessen the threat of an upcoming crisis. This is why we examine Eurozone QE perspectives through the prism of the new EU era without the UK in order to highlight the pros and cons of the historical Brexit decision. As new rounds of unconventional monetary policy are believed to be essential for supporting the weaker countries in the European south, perspectives of non-conventional success could alter and optimal policies be substantially reformulated subject to the newly-arising constraints. Based on the main scenarios about the UK’s relations to the European Union in the near future, we estimate how a new round of non-conventional measures could affect the Britons as well as the European citizens. Moreover, we try to assess the viability of each of these outcomes through the spectrum of a monetary-driven decision-making.

Keywords

JEL Classification

1. Beck, T. (2012). Banking Union for Europe. Risks and challenges. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR). Retrieved at: http://www.voxeu.org/sites/default/files/file/Banking_Union.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

2. Bordo, M.D, Markiewicz, A. & Jonung, L. (2011). A Fiscal Union for the Euro: Some lessons from history. NBER Working Paper No. 17380. Retrieved at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w17380.pdf10.3386/w17380Search in Google Scholar

3. de Quiros, L.B. (1999). The European Monetary Union. A political time bomb, Cato Journal 19(1): 143-160.Search in Google Scholar

4. Del Negro, M., & Sims, C.A. (2015). When does a central bank’s balance sheet require fiscal support? Journal of Monetary Economics 73, 1-19.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2015.05.001Search in Google Scholar

5. Friedman, M. (2005). The optimum quantity of money. Transaction Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

6. Fuest, C. & Peichl, A (2012). European Fiscal Union: What is it? Does it work? And are there really ‘no alternatives’? IZA Policy Paper No. 39. Retrieved at: http://ftp.iza.org/pp39.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

7. Goyal, R. Brooks, P.K., Pradhan, M., Tressel, T., Dell’Ariccia, G., Leckow, R & Pazarbasioglu, C. (2013). A Banking Union for the euro area. IMF Staff Discussion One. Retrieved at: https://www.google.gr/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=EwiKV_DqD6yt8wfy4KHACg&gws_rd=ssl#q=european+banking+union+pdf10.2139/ssrn.3376148Search in Google Scholar

8. Kyriazis, N. & Economou, E.M.L. (2016). “The memoranda trap and the near fall of Greece”, in D. Caldwell (ed.). Greece: Economic Crises and Management (pp. 75-93). New York: Nova Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

9. Kyriazis, N. A. (2017). Eurozone Debt Monetization and Helicopter Money Drops: How Viable can this be?. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 6(3), 5-15.10.1515/jcbtp-2017-0018Search in Google Scholar

10. Kyriazis, N. A., & Economou, E. M. (2017). The Relation of Brexit with the UK’s QE Decisions and its Impact on the Eurozone. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 6(1), 5-14.10.1515/jcbtp-2017-0001Search in Google Scholar

11. Nasir, M. A., Yagob, M., Solimanc, A., & Wud, J. (2017). Institutional Design, Macroeconomic Policy Coordination and Implications for the Financial Sector in the UK. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 6(3), 95-126.10.1515/jcbtp-2017-0022Search in Google Scholar

12. Pisani-Ferry, J. (2012). The Euro crisis and the new impossible trinity. Bruegel Policy Contribution 2012/01. Retrieved at: http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/publications/pc_2012_01_.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

13. Schoenmaker, D. (2015). Firmer foundations for a stronger European banking Union. Bruegel Working Paper2015/13. Retrieved at: http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/WP-2015_132.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo