1. bookVolume 9 (2019): Issue 3 (July 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2449-6499
First Published
30 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Swarm Algorithms for NLP - The Case of Limited Training Data

Published Online: 09 May 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2019) - Issue 3 (July 2019)
Page range: 219 - 234
Received: 07 Dec 2018
Accepted: 30 Jan 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2449-6499
First Published
30 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

[1] D. Klein and C. D. Manning, A generative constituent-context model for improved grammar induction, Proceedings of 40th ACL Meeting, Philadelphia, USA, pages 128–135, July 2002.10.3115/1073083.1073106Search in Google Scholar

[2] D. Klein and C. D. Manning, Corpus-based induction of syntactic structure: Models of dependency and constituency, Proceedings of 42nd ACL Meeting, Barcelona, Spain, pages 478–485, July 21-26, 2004.10.3115/1218955.1219016Search in Google Scholar

[3] Y. Seginer, Fast unsupervised incremental parsing, Proceedings of 45th ACL Meeting, Prague, Czech Republic, pages 384–391, June 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[4] E. Ponvert, J. Baldridge, and K. Erk, Simple unsupervised grammar induction from raw text with cascaded finite state models, Proceedings of 49th ACL Meeting, Portland, Oregon, USA, pages 1077–1086, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[5] D. Yarowsky and G. Ngai, Inducing multilingual PoS taggers and np bracketers via robust projection across aligned corpora, Proceedings of NAACL-2001 Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pages 200-207, 2-7 June 2001.10.3115/1073336.1073362Search in Google Scholar

[6] L. Zhu, D.F. Wong, and L.S. Chao, Unsupervised chunking based on graph propagation from bilingual corpus, The Scientific World Journal, Article ID 401943, 2014.10.1155/2014/401943397742424772017Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Goldwater, T.L. Griffiths, and M. Johnson, Contextual dependencies in unsupervised word segmentation, Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th ACL Meeting, Sydney, Australia, pages 673–680, 2006.10.3115/1220175.1220260Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. Mochihashi, T. Yamada, and N. Ueda, Bayesian unsupervised word segmentation with nested Pitman-Yor language modeling, Proceedings of 47th ACL Meeting, Suntec, Singapore, pages 100–108, August 2009.10.3115/1687878.1687894Search in Google Scholar

[9] T. Nguyen, S. Vogel, and N.A. Smith, Nonparametric word segmentation for machine translation, Proceedings of COLING-2010, Beijing, China, pages 815–823, August 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[10] G. Tambouratzis, M. Vassiliou, & S. Sofianopoulos, Machine Translation with Minimal Reliance on Parallel Resources, Springer Briefs in Statistics series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-63107-3Search in Google Scholar

[11] E.F. Tjong, K. Sang, and H. Dejean, Introduction to the CONLL-2001 shared task: Clause identification, Proceedings of CoNLL-2001, Toulouse, France, pages 53–57, 6-7 July 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Lafferty, A. McCallum and F.C.N. Pereira, Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labelling sequence data. ICML Conference Proceedings, Williamstown, USA, pages 282–289, 28 June-1 July 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[13] F. Sha and F.C.N. Pereira, Shallow parsing with conditional random fields, Proceedings of HLTNAACL Conference, Alberta, Canada, pages 213–220, 27 May – 1 Jun 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Y. Tsuruoka, J. Tsujii, and S. Ananiadou, Fast full parsing by linear-chain conditional random fields, 12th EACL Conference Proceedings, Athens, Greece, pages 790–798, 30 March-3 April 2009.10.3115/1609067.1609155Search in Google Scholar

[15] R.O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D.G. Stork, Pattern Classification (2nd edition), Wiley Interscience, New York, U.S.A., 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[16] G. Tambouratzis, Conditional Random Fields versus template-matching in MT phrasing tasks involving sparse training data, Pattern Recognition Letters, 53:44-52, 2015.10.1016/j.patrec.2014.11.002Search in Google Scholar

[17] A.J. Booker, J.E. Dennis Jr., P.D. Frank, D.B. Serafini, V. Torczon, and M.W. Trosset, A Rigorous Framework for Optimization of Expensive Functions by Surrogates, Structural Optimisation, 17:1-13, 1999.10.1007/BF01197708Search in Google Scholar

[18] Y. Jin, Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: Recent advances and future challenges, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 1(2):61-70, 2011.10.1016/j.swevo.2011.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[19] K. Stoeber, P. Wagner, J. Helbig, S. Koester, D. Stall, M. Thomae, J. Blauert, W. Hess, and H. Mangold, Speech synthesis by multilevel selection and concatenation of units from large speech corpora. Verbmobil: Foundations of Speech-to-Speech Translation, Symbolic Computation, Springer, Berlin, pages 519–537, 2000.10.1007/978-3-662-04230-4_38Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, USA, pages 1942–1948, 27 Nov-1 Dec 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[21] G. Tambouratzis, Applying PSO to Natural Language Processing Tasks: Optimizing the Identifi-cation of Syntactic Phrases, Proceedings of CEC-2016 Conference, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 1831-1838, July 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[22] R. Mendes, J. Kennedy, and J. Neves, The fully informed particle swarm: Simpler maybe better, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 8(3):204–210, 2004.10.1109/TEVC.2004.826074Search in Google Scholar

[23] Z.-H. Zhan, J. Zhang, Y. Li, and H.S.-H. Chung, Adaptive particle swarm optimization, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man Cybernetics Part B: Cybernetics, 39(6):1362–1381, 2009.10.1109/TSMCB.2009.201595619362911Search in Google Scholar

[24] G. Tambouratzis (2017) The effectiveness of surrogate functions in improving the accuracy of PSO-type algorithms in an NLP task, Proceedings of 10th SSCI Conference, Honolulu, USA, pp. 3214-3221, IEEE Press, 27 November - 1 December 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[25] K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.J. Zhu. 2002. Bleu: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. 40th ACL Meeting Proceedings, Philadelphia, USA, pages 311–318.Search in Google Scholar

[26] NIST. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram cooccurrences statistics. Report available at http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/mig/tests/mt/doc/ngramstudy.pdf, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[27] K.R. Harrison., A.P. Engelbrecht, B.M. Ombuki-Berman, An adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm based on optimal parameter regions, Proceedings of 10th SSCI Conference, Honolulu, USA, pp. 1606-1613, IEEE Press, 27 November - 1 December 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo