[
Cucăilă, S., Cucăilă, M. (2021). “Evaluation of topographical works necessary for underground mining activities”, Ed. Universitas, Petroșani, ISBN 978-973-741-563-9;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Danciu, C., Marchiș, D., Cucăilă S. (2021). The influence of physical parameters on the mechanical characteristics of some volcanic magmatic rocks of the andesite type, Mining Revue, 30-34, 27 (2), ISSN-L 1220-2053 / ISSN 2247-8590 DOI: 10.2478/minrv-2021-0014. https://issuu.com/revmin/docs/nr2ro2021;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daria, H., Fassbinder, J. W. E., & Mazurkevich, A. (2011). Integrated archaeological survey, magnetometry and susceptibility prospecting.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herbei, R. C., Cucăilă, S., Cucăilă, M,; David, F. (2024). The use of topo-geodetic modern techniques and methods in buildings monitoring, Research Journal of Agricultural Science. 56 (2), 125-133, ISSN 2066-1843 Accession Number 180449723;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jörg W. E. Fassbinder (2017). Magnetometry for archaeology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich, Germany, Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manu, C. S., et al. (2023). Applications of photogrammetry in cadastral inventory of the public rural land. Mining Revue, 29 (2), 70-74; ISSN-L 1220-2053/ISSN 2247-8590;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marc Arvinte (2010), https://pont-sur-le-danube-apollodorde-damas.blogspot.com/ (view at 15 Sep. 2024);
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Melinte, M. (2007). Use of Geoelectrical Methods in Archeological Studies. Case Study: The Saint Nicholas Church of Densuş. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milo, P., Murin, I., & Vágner, M. (2022). Application of Geophysical Methods in Archaeological Survey of Early Medieval Fortifications. Remote Sensing . https://doi.org/10.3390/RS14102471
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nache, R., Păunescu, C., Manu, C. S., Cucăilă, S., Tivig D-F (2019). Use of Low Altitude Aerial and TerrestrialPhotogrammetry for Cultural Heritage Conservation-Restoration Works. Case Study: Church of the Holy Great Martyr Gheorghe, Rodna Village, Bistrița-Năsăud County”, - The 19 the edition of International Conference „Modern Technologies for the 3rd Millennium (TMPMIII); Smekalova T.N., Voss O., Smekalov S.L.: Magnetic surveying in archaeology. Wormianum (2008), ISBN 978-87-89531-29-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer LS. (2014). Geoelectrical Surveying of Archaeological Sites. Cambridge University Press. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 26:64-75 DOI:10.1017/S0079497X0001625X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt, A. (2009). Electrical and Magnetic Methods in Archaeological Prospection. Schmidt, A. 2009. Electrical and Magnetic Methods in Archaeological Prospection. In S. Campana and S. Piro (Eds) Seeing the Unseen. Geophysics and Landscape Archaeology: 67-81. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verma, Mukesh & Yadav, Manohar (2023). Survey planning for documentation of a monument for the understanding, preservation and restauration, 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1607-2023;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wynn, J. (2007). A Review of Geophysical Methods Used in Archaeology. Geoarchaeology.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeballos, Carlos & Quiroz, Carlos & Bustinza, Daniel & Pacheco, Edwin (2020). Surveying Heritage with Affordable Yet Accurate Methods. A Study Case from Arequipa, Peru”, International Journal of Environmental Science & Sustainable Development. 5. 14. 10.21625/essd.v5i1.714.
]Search in Google Scholar
