Machine Learning-based GIS Model for 2D and 3D Vehicular Noise Modelling in a Data-scarce Environment
, , , , and
Aug 06, 2024
About this article
Article Category: Research Article
Published Online: Aug 06, 2024
Received: Jun 10, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijssis-2024-0022
Keywords
© 2024 Biswajeet Pradhan et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1:

Figure 2:

Figure 3:

Figure 4:

Figure 5:

Figure 6:

Figure 7:

Figure 8:

Figure 9:

Figure 10:

Figure 11:

Statistical summary of noise predictors of 2D and 3D noise models
Average noise | 28.21 | 83.28 | 47.71 | 20.14 |
Light vehicle | 0.00 | 354.00 | 20.15 | 70.01 |
Truck | 0.00 | 92.00 | 8.69 | 22.76 |
Motorbike | 0.00 | 29.00 | 2.00 | 5.87 |
Semitrailer | 0.00 | 108.00 | 5.53 | 21.39 |
Bus | 0.00 | 129.00 | 9.69 | 26.92 |
DSM | 2.47 | 29.2 | 13.73 | 15.66 |
Average speed | 0.00 | 49.64 | 11.65 | 17.02 |
Maximum speed | 0.00 | 66.00 | 13.69 | 21.57 |
Distance from high volume of light vehicle | 0.00 | 1079.08 | 432.70 | 261.98 |
Distance from medium volume of light vehicle | 0.00 | 1002.72 | 252.37 | 239.22 |
Distance from low volume of light vehicle | 0.00 | 539.36 | 58.45 | 103.52 |
Distance from high volume of truck | 0.00 | 628.94 | 220.19 | 164.74 |
Distance from medium volume of truck | 0.00 | 594.40 | 119.59 | 129.21 |
Distance from low volume of truck | 0.00 | 738.88 | 120.67 | 161.98 |
Distance from high volume of motorbike | 0.00 | 1157.50 | 468.80 | 268.63 |
Distance from medium volume of motorbike | 0.00 | 926.08 | 243.85 | 233.62 |
Distance from low volume of motorbike | 0.00 | 569.75 | 65.09 | 114.28 |
Distance from high volume of semitrailer | 0.00 | 1549.70 | 636.87 | 378.83 |
Distance from medium volume of semitrailer | 0.00 | 849.06 | 250.78 | 191.34 |
Distance from low volume of semitrailer | 0.00 | 379.29 | 25.43 | 47.44 |
Distance from high volume of bus | 0.00 | 910.39 | 158.78 | 208.53 |
Distance from medium volume of bus | 0.00 | 445.29 | 84.82 | 88.49 |
Distance from low volume of bus | 0.00 | 1059.13 | 295.93 | 272.59 |
Distance from high volume of average speed | 0.00 | 666.25 | 141.29 | 137.27 |
Distance from medium volume of average speed | 0.00 | 406.50 | 78.55 | 81.38 |
Distance from low volume of average speed | 0.00 | 652.80 | 117.52 | 129.15 |
Distance from high volume of maximum speed | 0.00 | 722.50 | 170.70 | 178.77 |
Distance from medium volume of maximum speed | 0.00 | 442.07 | 75.57 | 84.09 |
Distance from low volume of maximum speed | 0.00 | 829.62 | 179.87 | 195.56 |
Hyperparameters of the proposed model for traffic noise prediction and their search space used for fine-tuning
Type of network | {multilayer perceptron (MLP)} |
Number of hidden units | (3–30) |
Training algorithm | {BFGS, RBFT} |
Hidden and output activation | {Identity, Logistic, Tanh, Exponential, Gaussian} |
Learning rate | (0.01–0.9) by step of 0.05 |
Momentum | (0.1–0.9) by step of 0.1 |
Performance of models such as ANN, SVM, and RF for 2D and 3D noise models
2D Noise Model | ANN | 1.00 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.003 | 7.14 |
SVM | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 3.60 | 10.34 | |
RF | 0.98 | 0.82 | 0.97 | 0.68 | 1.82 | 9.83 | |
3D Noise Model | ANN | 1.00 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.058 | 4.46 |
SVM | 0.98 | 0.77 | 0.96 | 0.60 | 6.16 | 4.75 | |
RF | 0.98 | 0.80 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 6.00 | 4.50 |
Shows the hidden and output activation of the ANN model
2D Noise Model | Hidden and output activation | 0.003 | 0.0248 | 0.1892 | 2.0043 | 0.2373 |
3D Noise Model | 0.0805 | 0.058 | 0.3584 | 1.2066 | 0.1166 |