Open Access

Machine Learning-based GIS Model for 2D and 3D Vehicular Noise Modelling in a Data-scarce Environment

, , , ,  and   
Aug 06, 2024

Cite
Download Cover

Figure 1:

The study area.
The study area.

Figure 2:

Training and testing noise samples in the study area.
Training and testing noise samples in the study area.

Figure 3:

Different spatial data used in this study: (A) Road networks; (B) Low, medium, and high light vehicles; (C) Low, medium, and high trucks; (D) Low, medium, and high motorbike; (E) Low, medium, and high semitrailer; (F) Low, medium, and high bus; (G) Low, medium, and high average speed; (H) Low, medium, and high maximum speed; (I) DSM. DSM, digital surface model.
Different spatial data used in this study: (A) Road networks; (B) Low, medium, and high light vehicles; (C) Low, medium, and high trucks; (D) Low, medium, and high motorbike; (E) Low, medium, and high semitrailer; (F) Low, medium, and high bus; (G) Low, medium, and high average speed; (H) Low, medium, and high maximum speed; (I) DSM. DSM, digital surface model.

Figure 4:

Methodology used in this work.
Methodology used in this work.

Figure 5:

(A) Architecture of ANN of 2D traffic noise prediction (8-18-1), (B) architecture of ANN of 3D traffic noise prediction (22-11-1). 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; ANN, artificial neural network.
(A) Architecture of ANN of 2D traffic noise prediction (8-18-1), (B) architecture of ANN of 3D traffic noise prediction (22-11-1). 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; ANN, artificial neural network.

Figure 6:

Number of hidden units with RMSE for 2D and 3D noise model prediction. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; RMSE, root mean square error.
Number of hidden units with RMSE for 2D and 3D noise model prediction. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; RMSE, root mean square error.

Figure 7:

(A) Learning rate and (B) gradient momentum with RMSE for 2D and 3D noise model prediction. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; RMSE, root mean square error.
(A) Learning rate and (B) gradient momentum with RMSE for 2D and 3D noise model prediction. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; RMSE, root mean square error.

Figure 8:

The correlation of training and testing noise models between observed and predicted of 2D traffic noise for (A) SVM, (B) RF, and (C) ANN models. 2D, two-dimensional; ANN, artificial neural network; RF, random forest; SVM, support vector machine.
The correlation of training and testing noise models between observed and predicted of 2D traffic noise for (A) SVM, (B) RF, and (C) ANN models. 2D, two-dimensional; ANN, artificial neural network; RF, random forest; SVM, support vector machine.

Figure 9:

The correlation of training and testing noise models between observed and predicted of 3D traffic noise for (A) SVM, (B), RF, and (C) ANN models. 3D, three-dimensional; ANN, artificial neural network; RF, random forest; SVM, support vector machine.
The correlation of training and testing noise models between observed and predicted of 3D traffic noise for (A) SVM, (B), RF, and (C) ANN models. 3D, three-dimensional; ANN, artificial neural network; RF, random forest; SVM, support vector machine.

Figure 10:

2D average noise prediction map for roads in the study area from 2D ANN noise model. 2D, two-dimensional; ANN, artificial neural network.
2D average noise prediction map for roads in the study area from 2D ANN noise model. 2D, two-dimensional; ANN, artificial neural network.

Figure 11:

(A) 3D average noise prediction map for building in the study area from the 3D noise model, (B) average noise prediction map for building in the study area from the 3D noise model for part of the study area, (C) average noise prediction map for roads and building at the study area through combined 2D and 3D model maps. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional.
(A) 3D average noise prediction map for building in the study area from the 3D noise model, (B) average noise prediction map for building in the study area from the 3D noise model for part of the study area, (C) average noise prediction map for roads and building at the study area through combined 2D and 3D model maps. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional.

Statistical summary of noise predictors of 2D and 3D noise models

Parameter Minimum Maximum Mean Deviation
Average noise 28.21 83.28 47.71 20.14
Light vehicle 0.00 354.00 20.15 70.01
Truck 0.00 92.00 8.69 22.76
Motorbike 0.00 29.00 2.00 5.87
Semitrailer 0.00 108.00 5.53 21.39
Bus 0.00 129.00 9.69 26.92
DSM 2.47 29.2 13.73 15.66
Average speed 0.00 49.64 11.65 17.02
Maximum speed 0.00 66.00 13.69 21.57
Distance from high volume of light vehicle 0.00 1079.08 432.70 261.98
Distance from medium volume of light vehicle 0.00 1002.72 252.37 239.22
Distance from low volume of light vehicle 0.00 539.36 58.45 103.52
Distance from high volume of truck 0.00 628.94 220.19 164.74
Distance from medium volume of truck 0.00 594.40 119.59 129.21
Distance from low volume of truck 0.00 738.88 120.67 161.98
Distance from high volume of motorbike 0.00 1157.50 468.80 268.63
Distance from medium volume of motorbike 0.00 926.08 243.85 233.62
Distance from low volume of motorbike 0.00 569.75 65.09 114.28
Distance from high volume of semitrailer 0.00 1549.70 636.87 378.83
Distance from medium volume of semitrailer 0.00 849.06 250.78 191.34
Distance from low volume of semitrailer 0.00 379.29 25.43 47.44
Distance from high volume of bus 0.00 910.39 158.78 208.53
Distance from medium volume of bus 0.00 445.29 84.82 88.49
Distance from low volume of bus 0.00 1059.13 295.93 272.59
Distance from high volume of average speed 0.00 666.25 141.29 137.27
Distance from medium volume of average speed 0.00 406.50 78.55 81.38
Distance from low volume of average speed 0.00 652.80 117.52 129.15
Distance from high volume of maximum speed 0.00 722.50 170.70 178.77
Distance from medium volume of maximum speed 0.00 442.07 75.57 84.09
Distance from low volume of maximum speed 0.00 829.62 179.87 195.56

Hyperparameters of the proposed model for traffic noise prediction and their search space used for fine-tuning

Hyperparameters Search domain
Type of network {multilayer perceptron (MLP)}
Number of hidden units (3–30)
Training algorithm {BFGS, RBFT}
Hidden and output activation {Identity, Logistic, Tanh, Exponential, Gaussian}
Learning rate (0.01–0.9) by step of 0.05
Momentum (0.1–0.9) by step of 0.1

Performance of models such as ANN, SVM, and RF for 2D and 3D noise models

Model Type of model Training (R) Testing (R) Training (R2) Testing (R2) Training (RMSE) Testing (RMSE)
2D Noise Model ANN 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.75 0.003 7.14
SVM 0.85 0.81 0.72 0.65 3.60 10.34
RF 0.98 0.82 0.97 0.68 1.82 9.83

3D Noise Model ANN 1.00 0.82 1.00 0.68 0.058 4.46
SVM 0.98 0.77 0.96 0.60 6.16 4.75
RF 0.98 0.80 0.96 0.64 6.00 4.50

Shows the hidden and output activation of the ANN model

Model Hyperparameter Identity Logistic Tanh Exponential Gaussian
2D Noise Model Hidden and output activation 0.003 0.0248 0.1892 2.0043 0.2373
3D Noise Model 0.0805 0.058 0.3584 1.2066 0.1166
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
1 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Engineering, Introductions and Overviews, Engineering, other