Design and implementation of a safety algorithm on V2V routing protocol
, , and | Apr 15, 2022
About this article
Article Category: Article
Published Online: Apr 15, 2022
Page range: -
Received: Dec 22, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijssis-2022-0004
Keywords
© 2022 Ahmed Yasser Gadalla et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Simulation parameters.
| Total simulation time | 12 min |
| Simulation area | 9000 m × 1000 m |
| Total no. of vehicles | 50 vehicles |
| Vehicles mobility | Random starting from 0 to 40 km/hr |
| Mobility model | Random waypoint model |
| Number of lanes | 2 |
| IEEE 802.11p data rate | 1 Mbps |
| Channel bandwidth | 2 Mbps |
| Packet size | 512 bytes |
| Transmission range per hop | 250 m |
| Node processing delay | sec |
Summarize comparison between different protocols.
| VANET delay | Very low | High | Low | Low |
| VANET Throughput | Very high | High | Very high | Low |
| VANET retransmission attempts | Very low | Very high | High | Low |
| VANET dropped data | Very low | Very High | Very high | Very low |
| VANET load | Very low | Very high | Very low | Very high |
| VANET traffic received | Very low | Very low | Very low | Very low |
Summarize comparison between proposed and AODV protocol.
| VANET delay | Low | Very low |
| VANET throughput | Very high | Very high |
| VANET retransmission attempts | Low | Very low |
| VANET dropped data | Low | Low |
| VANET load | Very high | Very high |
| VANET traffic received | Very high | Very high |