About this article
Published Online: Mar 16, 2024
Page range: 38 - 44
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijanmc-2023-0075
Keywords
© 2023 Hongyan Wang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Comparison of Average Confidence
| Average confidence of person i | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenPose method | 0.572 | 0.473 | 0.473 |
| Lightweight OpenPose method | 0.625 | 0.718 | 0.779 |
Improving OpenPose network evaluation results
| Model | AP, % |
|---|---|
| OpenPose | 48.6 |
| Optimization | 86.3 |
Comparison before and after network structure improvement
| Type | FPS |
|---|---|
| OpenPose | 0.035 |
| Lightweight OpenPose | 20.889 |
Lightweight backbone performance comparison
| AP, % | |
|---|---|
| MobileNet v1 (cut to conv4_1) | 37.9 |
| Dilated MobileNet v1 (cut to conv5_5) | 42.8 |
| Dilated MobileNet v1 (cut to conv5_6) | 43.2 |
| Dilated MobileNet v2 (cut to conv6_3) | 39.6 |