About this article
Published Online: Mar 16, 2024
Page range: 29 - 37
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijanmc-2023-0074
Keywords
© 2023 Long Qin et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Comparison of optimization results between Chebyshev distribution and WOA
amplitude | amplitude | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Element number | Chebyshev | WOA | Element number | Chebyshev | WOA |
0.2271 | 0.2307 | 1 | 1 | ||
0.238 | 0.2119 | 0.9965 | 0.9823 | ||
0.2241 | 0.2605 | 0.9561 | 0.9644 | ||
0.353 | 0.2993 | 0.9158 | 0.8965 | ||
0.4001 | 0.3938 | 0.8849 | 0.8608 | ||
0.4593 | 0.4684 | 0.7747 | 0.7952 | ||
0.536 | 0.5472 | 0.7251 | 0.7009 | ||
0.6153 | 0.637 | 0.6153 | 0.637 | ||
0.7251 | 0.7009 | 0.536 | 0.5472 | ||
0.7747 | 0.7952 | 0.4593 | 0.4684 | ||
0.8849 | 0.8608 | 0.4001 | 0.3938 | ||
0.9158 | 0.8965 | 0.353 | 0.2993 | ||
0.9561 | 0.9644 | 0.2241 | 0.2605 | ||
0.9965 | 0.9823 | 0.238 | 0.2119 | ||
1 | 1 | 0.2271 | 0.2307 |