[
ALI, Gabriele Spina, YU, Ronald. Artificial Intelligence between Transparency and Secrecy: From the EC Whitepaper to the AIA and Beyond. European Journal of Law and Technology, 2021, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ALMADA, Marco, RADU, Anca. The Brussels Side-Effect: How the AI Act Can Reduce the Global Reach of EU Policy. German Law Journal, 2024, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.108
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ANDRADA, Gloria, CLOWES, Robert W., SMART, Paul R., Varieties of transparency: Exploring agency within AI systems. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1321–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01326-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ANDRAŠKO, Jozef, MESARČÍK, Matúš; HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej. The regulatory intersections between artificial intelligence, data protection and cyber security: Challenges and opportunities for the EU legal framework. AI & SOCIETY, 2021, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01125-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ANTONOV, Alexander, KERIKMÄE, Tanel. Trustworthy AI as a Future Driver for Competitiveness and Social Change in the EU. In RAMIRO TROITIÑO, David, et al. (eds). The EU in the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities for the European Integration Process. Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38399-2_9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BIEGA, Asia J., FINCK, Michèle. Reviving Purpose Limitation and Data Minimisation in Data-Driven Systems. Technology and Regulation, 2021, pp. 44-61. https://doi.org/10.26116/techreg.2021.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BROWN, Rafael; TRUBY, John; IBRAHIM, Imad Antoine. Mending Lacunas in the EU’s GDPR and Proposed Artificial Intelligence Regulation. European Studies – the Review of European law, Economics and Politics. 2022, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 61–90, DOI: 10.2478/eustu-2022-0003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BUTCHER, James, BERIDZE, Irakli. What is the State of Artificial Intelligence Governance Globally? The RUSI Journal, 2019, vol. 164, no. 5–6, pp. 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1694260
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CARTER, J. Adam. Trust and trustworthiness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2023, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12918
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CACHAT-ROSSET, Gaelle, KLARSFELD, Alain. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Artificial Intelligence: An Evaluation of Guidelines. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 2023, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2176618
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CHATILA, Raja, et al. Trustworthy AI. In BRAUNSCHWEIG, Bertrand, GHALLAB, Malik (eds). Reflections on Artificial Intelligence for Humanity. Springer International Publishing, 2021 pp. 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69128-8_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CHOUNG, Hyesun, DAVID, Prabu, ROSS, Arun. Trust and ethics in AI. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01473-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CUBIE, Dug, NATOLI, Tommaso. Coherence, Alignment and Integration: Understanding the Legal Relationship Between Sustainable Development, Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction. In FLOOD, Stephen, et al. (eds). Creating Resilient Futures: Integrating Disaster Risk Reduction, Sustainable Development Goals and Climate Change Adaptation Agendas. Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80791-7_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DE COOMAN, Jerome. Humpty Dumpty and High-Risk AI Systems: The Ratione Materiae Dimension of the Proposal for an EU Artificial Intelligence Act. Market and Competition Law Review, 2022, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DIGNUM, Virginia. Taking Responsibility. In DIGNUM, Virginia (Ed). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30371-6_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EDWARDS, Lilian. The EU AI Act: A summary of its significance and scope. Ada Lovelace Institute, 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FANNI, Rosanna, et al. Enhancing human agency through redress in Artificial Intelligence Systems. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01454-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FELZMANN, Heike, et al. Towards Transparency by Design for Artificial Intelligence. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2020, vol. 26 no. 6, pp. 3333–3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00276-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FELZMANN, Heike, et al. Transparency you can trust: Transparency requirements for artificial intelligence between legal norms and contextual concerns. Big Data & Society, 2019, vol. 6, no 1, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719860542
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FLORIDI, Luciano. Establishing the Rules for Building Trustworthy Ai. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2019, vol. 1, pp. 261–262.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FLORIDI, Luciano. The European Legislation on AI: A Brief Analysis of its Philosophical Approach. Philosophy & Technology, 2021, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00460-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FLORIDI, Luciano, et al. capAI – A Procedure for Conducting Conformity Assessment of AI Systems in Line with the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. SSRN Scholarly Paper, 2022, pp. 1–82. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4064091
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GREENSTEIN, Stanley. Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2022, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAGENDORFF, Thilo. The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines. Minds and Machines, 2020, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HOHMA, Ellen, et al. Investigating accountability for Artificial Intelligence through risk governance: A workshop-based exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, vol 14, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1073686
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HUPONT, Isabelle, et al. The landscape of facial processing applications in the context of the European AI Act and the development of trustworthy systems. Scientific Reports, 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14981-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JHA, Ashish K., LEAHY, Eoghan. The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act: An Analysis of Preliminary Perceptions and Responses of Irish SMEs. SHARMA, Sujeet K., et al. (eds). Transfer, Diffusion and Adoption of Next-Generation Digital Technologies. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50188-3_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JOAMETS, Kristi, CHOCHIA, Archil. Access to Artificial Intelligence for Persons with Disabilities: Legal and Ethical Questions Concerning the Application of Trustworthy Ai. Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum, 2021, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 51–66. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2021.1.04
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JOAMETS, Kristi, VASQUEZ, Maria Claudia Solarte. Regulatory Framework of the Research-Based Approach to Education in the EU. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 109–136.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JOHNSON, James. Automating the OODA loop in the age of intelligent machines: Reaffirming the role of humans in command-and-control decision-making in the digital age. Defence Studies, 2023, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2102486
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JUSTO-HANANI, Ronit. The politics of Artificial Intelligence regulation and governance reform in the European Union. Policy Sciences, 2022, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09452-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KALE, Amruta. Provenance documentation to enable explainable and trustworthy AI: A literature review. Data Intelligence, 2023, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00119
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KERIKMÄE, Tanel; MÜÜRSEP, Peeter; PIHL, Henri Mert; HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej; KOCHARYAN, Hovsep. Legal Person or Agenthood of Artificial Intelligence Technologies. Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, 2020, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 73–92. ISSN 2228-2009. DOI 10.11590/abhps.2020.2.0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOULU, Riikka. Proceduralizing control and discretion: Human oversight in artificial intelligence policy. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2020, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20978649
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LAUX, Johann, WACHTER, Sanda, MITTELSTADT, Brent. Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk. Regulation & Governance, 2024, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12512
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LI, Bo, et al. Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, vol. 55, no.9, pp. 177:1–177:46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555803
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LIU, Haochen, et al. Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2022, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 4:1–4:59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546872
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LIU, Fanjue, et al. When citizens support AI policies: The moderating roles of AI efficacy on AI news, discussion, and literacy. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 2023, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2294363
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MAAS, Matthijs M. Aligning AI Regulation to Sociotechnical Change, SSRN Scholarly Paper, 2021, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3871635
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MARTÍNEZ RAMIL, Pablo. Is the EU human rights legal framework able to cope with discriminatory AI? IDP: Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política = Revista d’Internet, Dret i Política, 2021, no. 34, pp. 1–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MAZZINI, Gabriele, BAGNI, Filippo. Considerations on the regulation of AI systems in the financial sector by the AI Act. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2023, vol. 6, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1277544
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MORA-CANTALLOPS, Marçal, et al. Traceability for Trustworthy AI: A Review of Models and Tools. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 2021, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5020020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MOSKALENKO, Viacheslav, et al. Resilience and Resilient Systems of Artificial Intelligence: Taxonomy, Models and Methods. Algorithms, 2023, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1–44. https://doi.org/10.3390/a16030165
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MÖKANDER, Jakob, et al. Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed European AI Regulation. Minds and Machines, 2022, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09577-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MUSIKANSKI, Laura, et al. Artificial Intelligence and Community Well-being: A Proposal for an Emerging Area of Research. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 2020, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-019-00054-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NAHAVANDI, Saeid. Trusted Autonomy Between Humans and Robots: Toward Human-on-the-Loop in Robotics and Autonomous Systems. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine, 2017, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSMC.2016.2623867
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NIKOLINAKOS, Nikos Th. A European Approach to Excellence and Trust: The 2020 White Paper on Artificial Intelligence. In NIKOLINAKOS, Nikos Th (ed), EU Policy and Legal Framework for Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Related Technologies—The AI Act. Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 211–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27953-9_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NOVELLI, Claudio, et al. Taking AI risks seriously: A new assessment model for the AI Act. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01723-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NOVELLI, Claudio, et al. AI Risk Assessment: A Scenario-Based, Proportional Methodology for the AI Act. Digital Society, 2024, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00095-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NOVELLI, Claudio, TADDEO, Mariarosaria, FLORIDI, Luciano. Accountability in artificial intelligence: What it is and how it works. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01635-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’SULLIVAN, Shane, et al. Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for development of standards in artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous robotic surgery. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2019, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1968
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PATANAKUL, Peerasit, PINTO, Jeffrey K. Examining the roles of government policy on innovation. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2014, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2014.07.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
POPA, Elena. Human Goals Are Constitutive of Agency in Artificial Intelligence (AI). Philosophy & Technology, 2021, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1731–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00483-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RAJI, Inioluwa Deborah et al. Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2020, pp. 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RAPOSO, Vera Lúcia. Ex machina: Preliminary critical assessment of the European Draft Act on artificial intelligence. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 2022, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaac007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RÁDI, V. Gábor. Comparative Analysis of the AI Regulation of the EU, US and China from a Privacy Perspective. 2023 46th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO), 2023, pp. 1446–1451. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO57284.2023.10159864
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROBBINS, Scott. A Misdirected Principle with a Catch: Explicability for AI. Minds and Machines, 2019, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-019-09509-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROBLES CARRILLO, Margarita. Artificial intelligence: From ethics to law. Telecommunications Policy, 2020, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101937
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RUSCHEMEIER, Hannah. AI as a challenge for legal regulation – the scope of application of the artificial intelligence act proposal. ERA Forum, 2023, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00725-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHNEIBERG, Marc, Clemens, Elisabeth S. The Typical Tools for the Job: Research Strategies in Institutional Analysis*. Sociological Theory, 2006, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 195–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2006.00288.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SIEGMANN, Charlotte, ANDERLJUNG, Markus. The Brussels Effect and Artificial Intelligence: How EU regulation will impact the global AI market. ArXiv, 2022, pp. 1–97. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.12645
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SIGFRIDS, Anton, et al. Human-centricity in AI governance: A systemic approach. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2023, vol. 6, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.976887
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SMUHA, Nathalie A, et al. How the EU Can Achieve Legally Trustworthy AI: A Response to the European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act. SSRN Scholarly Paper, 2021, pp. 1–64. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3899991
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SOLARTE-VASQUEZ, Maria Claudia, HIETANEN-KUNWALD, Petra. Responsibility and Responsiveness in the Design of Digital and Automated Dispute Resolution Processes: Internationales Rechtsinformatik Symposium Iris 2020. Verantwortungsbewusste Digitalisierung / Responsible Digitalization, 2020, pp. 451–459.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
USMANI, Usman Ahmad, HAPPONEN, Ari, WATADA, Junzo. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Designing for User Empowerment and Ethical Considerations. 2023 5th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA), 2023, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA58378.2023.10156761
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VAN WYNSBERGHE, Aimee. Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI. AI and Ethics, 2021, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00043-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VAROŠANEC, Ida. On the path to the future: Mapping the notion of transparency in the EU regulatory framework for AI. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2022, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2022.2060471
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VEALE, Michael, BORGESIUS, Frederik Z. Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act—Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 2021, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 97–112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VETRÒ, Antonio, TORCHIANO, Marco, MECATI, Mariachiara. A data quality approach to the identification of discrimination risk in automated decision making systems. Government Information Quarterly, 2021, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101619
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WILLIAMS, Rebecca, et al. From transparency to accountability of intelligent systems: Moving beyond aspirations. Data & Policy, 2022, vol. 4, no. e7, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.37
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZANZOTTO, Fabio M. Viewpoint: Human-in-the-loop Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 219, vol. 64, pp. 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11345
]Search in Google Scholar
[
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts – General approach. 2022. [Interinstitutional File: 2021/0106(COD)].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. 2024. [Interinstitutional File: 2021/0106(COD)].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Artificial Intelligence for Europe. 2018a. COM(2018) 237 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. European Commission Staff Working Document: Liability for Emerging Digital Technologies. 2018b. COM(2018) 237 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Building trust in human-centric artificial intelligence. 2019. COM(2019) 168 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: A European approach to excellence and trust. 2020. COM(2020) 65 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. 2021a. COM (2021a) 206 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment Accompanying the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. 2021b. SWD(2021b) 84 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence 2021c Review. 2021c. COM(2021) 205 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence (AI Liability Directive). 2022. COM(2022) 496 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
INDEPENDENT HIGH-LEVEL EXPERT GROUP ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SET UP BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. 2019a.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
INDEPENDENT HIGH-LEVEL EXPERT GROUP ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SET UP BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Policy and Investment Recommendations for Trustworthy AI. 2019b.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
INDEPENDENT HIGH-LEVEL EXPERT GROUP ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SET UP BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Sectoral Considerations on the Policy and Investment Recommendations for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L119, 4.5.2016, pp. 1–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REGULATION (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a single market for digital services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC, OJ, L277/1, pp. 1–102.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REGULATION (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act), OJ, L 265/1, pp. 1–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REGULATION (EU) 2022/863 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on European data governance and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (Data Governance Act), OJ, L 152/1, pp. 1–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REGULATION (EU) 2023/988 on general product safety, amending Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 87/357/EEC, OJ, L135/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REGULATION (EU) 2023/2854 on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 (Data Act), OJ, L.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MERRIAM-WEBSTER. (2024) Excellence. [online]. Available at: <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/excellence> Accessed: 13.03.2024
]Search in Google Scholar
