[
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). The role and impact of the multiple-streams approach in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Aanalysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), 221-227.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Béland, D., & Marier, P. (2020). COVID-19 and long-term care policy for older people in Canada. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 32(4-5), 358-364.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cairney, P. (2018). Three habits of successful policy entrepreneurs. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 199-215.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Honig, J. A. S. (2020). The punctuated-equilibrium theory and US counterterrorism policy. Journal of International Relations, 8(1), 1-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government priorities problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2012). From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 1-20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kern, F., & Rogge, K. S. (2018). Harnessing theories of the policy process for analyzing the politics of sustainability transitions: A critical survey. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 102-117.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kingdon, J. W. (1999). America the unusual. New York, NY: Worth.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kingdon, J. W. (2014). Agenda, alternatives, and public policy (2nd ed.). London, UK: Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mintrom, M., & True, J. (2022). COVID-19 as a policy window: Policy entrepreneurs responding to violence against women. 41(1), Policy and Society, 143-154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson, S. E., Caver, F. S., Meier, K. J., & O’Toole Jr, L. J. (2007). Explaining policy punctuations: Bureaucratization and budget change. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 140-150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sabatier, P.A. (1991). Toward better theories of the policy process. PS: Political Science and Politics, 24(2), 147-156.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simon, H.A. (1997). Administrative behavior (4th Ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2017). The public policy theory primer (3rd Ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007). Theories of the policy process. In P. A. Sabatier, (Ed.) Theories of the policy process (2nd Ed.) (pp. 155-187). Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Volz, K. G., & Hertwig, R. (2016). Emotions and decisions: Beyond conceptual vagueness and the rationality muddle. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 101-116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walgrave, S., & Varone, F. (2008). Punctuated equilibrium and agenda‐setting: Bringing parties back in: Policy change after the dutroux crisis in Belgium. Governance, 21(3), 365-395.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weimer, D. L. (2008). Theories of and in the policy process. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 489-495.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahariadis, N. (1998). Comparing three lenses of policy choice. Policy Studies Journal, 26(3), 434-448.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahariadis, N. (2007). The multiple streams framework: Structure, limitations, prospects. In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd Ed.) (pp. 65-92). Westview.
]Search in Google Scholar
