Open Access

First report of Contracaecum jorgei (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in Centropomus armatus from a fish market in Panama City, Republic of Panama

, ,  and   
May 24, 2025

Cite
Download Cover

Introduction

Contracaecum is a genus belonging to the Anisakidae family, characterized by having an heteroxenus cycle involving different intermediary and paratenic hosts, in order to reach its final host, mostly fish-eating birds (Ángeles-Hernández et al., 2020; Castellanos-Garzón et al., 2020). Different parasite species have been reported in several fish, some of those of commercial importance in the continent, from North America (Ángeles-Hernández et al., 2020), to South America (Falla-Zuñiga et al., 2021), including countries nearby Panama, such as Colombia (Castellanos-Garzón et al., 2020) and Costa Rica (Choc-M et al., 2020).

Among these species, Contracaecum jorgei is a notable nematode recently described in Argentine wolffish (Hoplias argentinensis) and the neotropical cormorant (Nannopterum brasilianus) (Sardella et al., 2020). This species has also been reported in other South American countries like Brazil, parasitizing Centropomus undecimalis (Duarte et al., 2024), and freshwater fishes from the Ponzo River in Colombia (unpublished work). Additionally, recent studies have pointed the potential misidentifications between Contracaecum jorgei and Contracaecum multipapillatum in freshwater fishes from Costa Rica and Guatemala in Central America (Duarte et al., 2024). This underscores the importance of accurate identification in order to understand the distribution and impact of these parasites across regions.

Material and Methods

Fifteen specimens of Centropomus armatus were obtained in a local fish market in Panama City, Panama. They were transported under refrigeration to the laboratory of the Veterinary Faculty at the University of Panama. All specimens were inspected macroscopically and carefully dissected following the guidelines of Klimpel et al. (2019), collecting third stage larvae nematode present in flesh, guts or the celomic cavity. Collected parasites were preserved in 95 % ethanol and labeled for further morphological identification.

Morphological identification

For morphological identification, labeled third stage larvae were cut into three pieces, the anterior and posterior tips were cleared with the ethanol/glycerine method (Seinhorst, 1962). The cuticular tooth, esophagus and cecum were observed in the anterior tip and the tail in the posterior tip with an optic microscope (Amscope, model B450.3MP) following dichotomous keys, used by Sardella et al. (2020) and Duarte et al. (2024). The remaining part was preserved in 99 % ethanol for molecular characterization.

DNA extraction, PCR, and phylogenetic analysis

Total DNA was extracted from the excised midbody (approximately 0.5 mm) using a commercial kit DNeasy Blood & tissue (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two combinations of primers were used for the amplification of fragments. The first one, cytochrome oxidase 2 gene fragment (Cox-II) (Nadler & Hudspeth, 2000), was performed using the forward primer 211 (5′-TTTTCTAGTTATATAGATTGRTT TYAT-3′) and the reverse primer 210 (5′-CACCAACTCTTAAAATTATC-3′). Amplification was conducted with 5 μl of the DNA template, 12.5 μl of Taq PCR Master Mix Kit (Qiagen), 1 μl of each primer (10 pmol μl−1) and 5.5 μl of ddH2O, for a final volume of 25 μl; and processed using SimpliAmp (Applied biosystems by life technologies), with an initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 minutes, 25 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 45°C for 30 seconds, extension at 72°C for 50 seconds and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 minutes, followed by temperature on hold at 4°C.

For the small subunit of the mitochondrial ribosomal RNA gene (rrnS), primer MH3 (forward 5′-TTG TTC CAG AAT AAT CGG CTA GAC TT-3′) and MH4.5 (reverse 5′-TCT ACT TTA CTA CAA CTT ACT CC-3′) were used (D’Amelio et al. 2007). Amplification was conducted with 4 μl of the DNA template, 12.5 μl of Taq PCR Master Mix Kit (Qiagen), 1 μl of each primer (10 pmol μl−1), and 6.5 μl of ddH2O, for a final volume of 24 μl; and processed using SimpliAmp (Applied biosystems by life technologies), with initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 minutes, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55°C for 30 seconds, extension at 72°C for 60 seconds and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 minutes followed by temperature on hold at 4°C.

PCR products were purified using Exosap-IT (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and directly sequenced in both directions using the Big Dye terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) and the 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster, Ca, USA). Sequences were edited using Sequencher version 5.4.6.

Phylogenetic analysis

Partial Cox II and rrnS sequences were aligned with those available in GenBank. Alignments were performed with MAFFT version 1.5.0 (Katoh & Standley, 2013) and visualized using Geneious Prime 2024.0.1 (Kearse et al., 2012). Both alignments were curated using the BMGE (Block mapping and gathering with entropy) algorithm (Criscuolo & Gribaldo 2010). Maximum likelihood trees were constructed using IQ-TREE2 version 2.2.2.6 (Minh et al., 2020). The best model of nucleotide substitution selected by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017) was identified as TPM2u+F+I+G4 for Cox II, and HKY+F+I+G4 for rrnS. The branch support was evaluated using the option -bb 10000 ultra-fast bootstraps (Hoang et al., 2018). Final visualization and annotations of the Phylogenetic trees were performed by Geneious Prime and iTOL v6 (Letunic & Bork, 2019).

Ethical Approval and/or Informed Consent

The study received ethical exemption approval from the Research Ethics and Animal Welfare Committee of the University of Panama (CEIBA-UP) CEIBA-UP-021-2023.

Results and Discussion

The prevalence of parasites was 6 % (1/15), for Centropomus armatus, two nematodes were found in the celomic cavity (Fig. 1). These larvae were later identified within the genus Contracaecum (Fig. 2). The PCR with the Cox-II showed a 500 to 600 pb band, while the PCR with the rrnS region presented a 600 – 700 pb band. The partial nucleotide sequences of C. jorgei generated in this study were deposited in GenBank database under the accession numbers: PQ066916 and PQ066917 for Cox-2, and PQ068747 and PQ068748 for rrnS. The analysis of both amplified fragments of Cox II showed a 99 % similarity to the GenBank sequences, thus being identified as Contracaecum jorgei.

Fig. 1.

Contracaecum jorgei larvae found in the celomic cavity of Centropomus armatus.

Fig. 2.

Morphological identification of the third stage larvae of Contracaecum genus. A. cuticular tooth (ct), esophagus (e), intestinal cecum (ic). B. Conical tail with pointed tip.

Phylogenetic trees of Cox II and rmS markers describe the relationship between the sequences generated in the study and the ones retrieved from the GenBank database. (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). Notably, the bootstrapping analysis of Cox II phylogeny provided substantial support for the clade encompassing the present sequences and previously published Contracaecum jorgei sequences. However, rrnS phylogenetic analysis placed the two individuals from the present study in a sister clade to another clade that includes C. multipapillatum and C. overstreeti. The rrnS had no comparison whatsoever, mainly because there is no reference in Genbank from this coding region for Contracaecum jorgei.

Fig. 3.

Phylogenetic relationship among different isolates of Contracaecum, studied and published, using maximum likelihood analysis for the Cox-II fragment, demonstrating the characterization of the species Contracaecum jorgei with the ones obtained in this study (CA01 and CA02).

Fig. 4.

Maximum likelihood tree of the two sequences of the rrnS fragment in the current study with other Contracaecum species downloaded from GenBank.

The definitive host for Contracaecum jorgei has been reported in Argentina, Nannopterum brasilianus (Sardella et al., 2020). This species is also abundantly present in the Pacific Ocean of Panama (Angehr & Kushlan, 2007). Therefore, this can explain why Contracaecum jorgei is present in Panamanian waters, suggesting complete life cycle occurs in the region. To date, there have been no previous reports of the Anisakidae family in Panama. Consequently, this study represents the first report of Contracaecum jorgei, a member of the Anisakidae family, in the Pacific Ocean.

Conclusion

This study constitutes the first report of nematode larvae of the Anisakidae family, highlighting the need to continue research, in order to identify other parasites, especially from this family, considering their potential impact on public health.