Open Access

Bursaphelenchus mucronatus (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae) associated with Monochamus galloprovincialis from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia


Cite

Introduction

Detection surveys for quarantine pests are one of the most effective preventive measures given by the Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament of the Council on protective measures against the introduction of non-native plant pathogens. The pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and its non-european insect vectors (Monochamus spp.) are classified as quarantine pests according to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072. Based on the established legislation long-term detection surveys are obligatory for all EU member countries. Following the Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, medium- and long-term monitoring programs of quarantine species are well established within the EU countries in order to protect the national forest resources, and to develop strategies against the potential introduction and spreading of this highly pathogenic nematode species to native pine forests. Within this scenario, national surveys for the pine wood nematode and its vectors have also been established in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and in Georgia.

Currently, the information regarding the distribution of species within the genus Bursaphelenchus in Bosnia and Herzegovina is to our knowledge not known. On the other hand, in case of Georgia, a total of 22 putative Bursaphelenchus species have been reported from the country so far (Mikaia et al., 2010). Nevertheless, from the morphologically closest species of the xylophilus-group only B. fraudulentus has been reported. In this study we report both morphological and molecular data of Bursaphelenchus mucronatus found during national surveys associated with the pine sawyer beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis. To our knowledge this represents the first report of this nematode species in both Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia.

Materials and Methods
Sampling, nematode extraction and cultivation

Pheromone-baited black cross traps (Ecconex/Galloprotect Pack) were established as a part of the workshops focused on general surveys for forest quarantine species, including the pine wood nematode and its insect vectors. Two traps were hanged in the crowns of most abundant pine trees (approximately 20 m high), one in 2017 in the area of Banja Luka (BiH) on Pinus nigra, second in 2018 in Mamkoda park (Georgia) on P. sylvestris. Traps were checked for insects weekly (from June to September). Insects caught in the trap containers were transferred into plastic bottles, labelled, and transported to the laboratory. Although also other insects were caught in the traps, this study focused only on the identification and screening of known insect vectors of the pine wood nematode (i.e., Monochamus spp.). All collected vectors were identified morphologically to the species level before nematode analysis.

Nematodes were extracted by dissection and maceration of insects in sterile water followed by three hours incubation at room temperature. The presence or absence of nematodes was checked under the stereomicroscope (IPPC, 2016). The extracted nematode “dauer larvae” were fixed in 4 % formalin and transferred to pure glycerin according to De Grisse (1969) or prepared for molecular analysis. Where a large number of nematodes was available, a subset of living nematodes was transferred onto the plates containing the sporulating form of the fungus Monilinia sp., instead of Botryotinia fuckeliana (anamorph: Botrytis cinerea) in accordance with IPPC (2016), and cultured. Three weeks later, adults were fixed and transferred into glycerin as mentioned above.

Morphological and morphometric analysis

Morphological and morphometric analyses were based on the main diagnostic features for the genus Bursaphelenchus as described by Ryss et al. (2005) and Braasch et al. (2009). Specimens mounted in permanent slides were deposited in the nematological collection of the Division of Plant Pest Diagnostics in Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Molecular analysis

For molecular identification, DNA from single nematode specimens (“dauer larvae”) was extracted and processed as follows: nematodes were homogenised in 50 μL of nematode lysis buffer (10mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8; 1mM EDTA; 1 % Triton X-100 (v/v); 100 μg ml−1 proteinase K) in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube using a micropestle. Samples were incubated at 55 °C for 1 h and subsequently at 95 °C for 10 min. The resulting DNA extracts were used as a template for each PCR reaction. The identification of individual nematodes was performed using two different loci, i.e., the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of ribosomal DNA and the D2–D3 region of the 28S rDNA. The ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region was amplified using the forward primer 5′-CGTAACAAGGTAGCTGTAG-3′ (Ferris et al., 1993) and the reverse primer 5′-TTTCACTCGCCGTTACTAAGG-3′ (26S, Vrain, 1993). For amplification of the D2–D3 region the forward primer D2A 5′-ACAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTG-3′ and the reverse primer D3B 5′-TCGGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA-3′ were used (De Ley et al., 1999).

The ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 PCR reaction was performed in a total volume of 50 μl containing 1x PCR buffer (75mM Tris-HCl pH 9.0; 50mM KCl; 20mM (NH4)2SO4, 4mM MgCl2, 400μM dNTPs, 600nM primers, 2 U of DNA polymerase (Biotools, Madrid, Spain) and 10 μl of undiluted template DNA, in a GenePro thermal cycler (Bioer Technology Co., LTD) using an initial denaturation step for 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 40 reaction cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 94 °C, annealing for 1 min at 48 °C and extension for 2 min at 72 °C, with a final 10min extension at 72 °C. Six μl of the PCR product were digested for at least 2 hours at 37 °C, using 1x restriction buffer and 5 U of enzyme (RsaI, HaeIII, MspI, HinfI and AluI) in the total reaction volume of 10 μl. Restriction products were run on the Midori Green Advance (Nippon Genetics) stained 3 % TBE-buffered agarose gel (65 V, 60 min).

Amplification of the D2–D3 region was performed in a total volume of 25 μl using 1x PCRBIO Taq Mix (PCR Biosystems, London, UK), 400nM primers and 2 μl of undiluted template DNA, in a GenePro thermal cycler (Bioer Technology Co., LTD) using an initial denaturation step for 1 min at 95 °C, followed by 5 reaction cycles of denaturation for 15 s at 95 °C, annealing for 15 s at 45 °C and extension for 30 s at 72 °C and 35 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 15 s at 54 °C and 30 s at 72 °C.

After ExoSAP purification, PCR products of both regions were submitted for direct Sanger sequencing to the Centre of Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany (Olomouc, Czech Republic) using the corresponding forward and reverse primers. Resulting sequence data were analysed using Geneious Bioinformatics software platform (Biomatters). The online bioinformatic tool RestrictionMapper (www.restrictionmapper.org) was used for in-silico calculations of ITS-restriction fragment sizes and virtual RFLP pattern, using five above mentioned restriction enzymes, which are known to generate species-specific ITS-RFLP profiles for the genus Bursaphelenchus (Burgermeister et al., 2009).

Phylogenetic analysis

The D2–D3 sequences obtained from nematodes collected in BiH and Georgia, as well as 10 sequences downloaded from the GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), were used to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships with other Bursaphelenchus species. Aphelenchoides besseyi (AY508109.1) was used as outgroup taxa. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA X (Kumar et al., 2018). DNA sequences were aligned using ClustalW with default options (Thompson et al., 1994). The final alignment was visually checked. The optimal nucleotide substitution model for the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method was chosen according the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The evolutionary history was inferred by using the ML method based on the General Time Reversible (GTR) model with a discrete Gamma distribution of evolutionary rate differences among sites (five categories, + G) and invariant sites (+ I) (Nei & Kumar, 2000). The bootstrap consensus tree was inferred from 100 replicates (Felsenstein, 1985). Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50 % bootstrap replicates were collapsed.

Results
Insect Vector and Nematode morphological characterization

As mentioned above, the main goal of our study was to detect potential insect vectors of pine wood nematode in BiH and Georgia, and therefore our analyses focused primarilly on the genus Monochamus. Forty specimens of Monochamus galloprovincialis were captured and processed in BiH. In Georgia, a total of 82 individuals of M. galloprovincialis were captured, of which 32 were analyzed. The processed M. galloprovincialis specimens collected in BiH and Georgia contained only “dauer larvae” of nematodes settled in tracheae of the sawyer beetles. Morphometric analysis of dauer larvae from both countries is summarized in Table 1, while morphological diagnostic characters are shown in Figure 1. Morphological and morphometric analysis of adult stages of Georgian population recovered from the fungal cultures confirmed the species identification of these nematodes as B. mucronatus (Fig. 1 and Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Light micrograph of Bursaphelenchus mucronatus. A: Female entire body; B: Male entire body; C: Lateral field with four incisures; D: Female anterior region; E, F: Vulva; G, H: Dauer larvae anterior part; I, J: Dauer larvae tail tip; K: Female tail tip; L: Mail tail; A, B, C, D, E, F, G, I, K, L: Georgian population; H, J: BiH population; A, B – 100 µm; C-L – 10 µm.

Morphometric comparison between the populations of Bursaphelenchus mucronatus from BiH and Georgia with the type population of B. mucronatus (Mamiya & Enda, 1979) from Japan. All measurements are in μm and in the form: mean ± s.d. (range).

Dauers Georgian population ♀♀ Georgian population ♂♂ Georgian population Dauers BiH population Dauers Mamiya & Enda 1979 ♀♀ Mamiya & Enda 1979 ♂♂ Mamiya & Enda 1979
n 5 25 12 5 30 40 35
L 597.5±19.8 (570–620) 866.4± 77.0 (738–1018) 675.3 ± 19.7 (652.5–723.0) 589 ± 23.7 (558–620) 590 (500–650) 870 (700–980) 790 (640–970)
a 43.2±2.3 (39.5–45.6) 40.9 ± 2.6 (35.0–45.7) 42.6 ± 3.9 (35.8–50.4) 41.7 ± 3.6 (35.8–45.0) 39.8 (35.1–45.8) 41.8 (36.5–45.9) 44.0 (38.8–51.1)
b 9.5* 11.0 ± 1.2 (8.0–13.3) 9.1 ± 0.4 (8.4–9.9) 9.3* 8.9 (7.9–9.6) 12.6 (9.6–15.6) 11.4 (9.0–14.7)
c 20.7±1.40 (18.3–21.7) 27.1 ± 2.8 (23.3–30.1) 20.0 ± 1.1 (18.6–22.1) 19.4 ± 1.3 (18.0–21.1) 21.2 (19.7–24.4) 26.2 (19.6–30.4) 29.1 (25.7–35.6)
c′ 3.6±0.3 (3.3–4.0) 2.9 ± 0.2 (2.5–3.3) 2.4 ± 0.1 (2.1–2.5) 3.5 ± 0.2 (3.0–3.7)
V [%] - 74.1 ± 2.0 (67.0–76.9) - - 75 (73–77)
Stylet length 8.5* 13.3 ± 1.2 (10.2–15.1) 13.6 ± 0.6 (12.8–14.6) 8.8* 15.8 (14–16) 15.0 (14–16)
Excretory pore position1) 54.9±4.5 (49–58.1) 83.7 ± 3.6 (73.6–89.5) 76.7 ± 4.2 (70.5–84.9) 63,3±7,2 (54.0–74.4)
Pharynx length 59.6* 77.9 ± 4.2 (72.3–91.4) 74.9 ± 3.0 (69.2–80.8) 58.9*
MB2) 59.9±4.9 (54.7–67.9) 66.6 ± 3.7 (62.6–78.3) 64.9± 2.5 (61.5–69.5) 58.0 ± 5.7 (50.7–67.0)
Hemizonid position1) - 95.8± 5.2 (76.0–101.8) 91.0 ± 2.5 (86.9–94.9) -
Anal/cloacal body diameter 8.1±0.2 (7.9–8.4) 11.1± 0.7 (10.1–12.2) 14.0 ± 0.7 (12.7–14.8) 8.2 ± 0.3 (7.8–8.5)
Tail length 29.1±2.8 (27.0–33.9) 32.0± 2.2 (26.0–36.9) 33.9 ± 1.9 (30.4–36.9) 28.3 ± 2.55 (27.0–33.9)
Post-uterine sac length - 156.5 ± 17.9 (125.0–195.6) - -
Spicule length (curved median line) - - 31.2 ± 1.5 (28.5–33.6) - 26.0 (23–29)

Distance from anterior end;

Distance from anterior end to base valves of median bulb,

- n=1

Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis

For both BiH and Georgian populations found during the survey, a molecular characterization was performed using the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 and D2–D3 region of 28S of the ribosomal DNA generated from single dauer larvae specimens.

The amplification and sequencing of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region yielded an 884 bp sequence (corresponding to the entire PCR product sequence after primer trimming) for both BiH and Georgian populations (OK500292 and OK500293, respectively) sharing 99.7 % identity to each other: BiH sequence included one ambiguous base (A/G=R) at position 161 and G at 642 (which prevented amplicon cutting with RsaI restriction enzyme at this position) while Georgian sequence had an A in position 642 (cutting motif for RsaI) and R at position 805. Both R bases come from an A+R double-peak presence in all raw data reads. From BiH population two specimens were analysed separately and sequenced twice in both directions resulting in 7 out of 8 raw data reads useful for consensus sequence generation. In all 7 of them a clear double-peak was observed. From Georgian population a single specimen was sequenced in both directions resulting in a double-peak presence in both raw data. Both BiH and Georgian sequences show high similarity (99 % for BiH due to R base at 161 position and 100 % for Georgian whose R is located out of section aligned with sequences deposited at NCBI (sequences AM396572.1 and MK584707.1, see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic tree resulting from alignment of 28S rRNA gene sequences.

The tree was inferred by Maximum Likelihood method under the GTR + G + I model. Bootstrap values were obtained from 100 replicate. Values higher than 50% are presented. OK523378 and OK523379 are the original sequences.

The ITS-RFLP pattern was calculated virtually for the ITS sequences generated for both populations collected in BiH and Georgia. The virtual restriction profile generated for four enzymes were similar for both populations (Table 2) and showed the same reference ITS-RFLP pattern established for the B. mucronatus European type by Burgermeister et al. (2009). The only difference found between both populations was in the pattern generated by the RsaI restriction enzyme (Table 2). The restriction profile of RsaI of the population from Georgia corresponded to the profile of East-Asian type of B. mucronatus and differed from the reference profile for the European type of B. mucronatus (Burgermeister et al., 2009).

In case of D2–D3 region amplification and sequencing resulted in a sequence of 743 bp (corresponding to the entire PCR product sequence after primer trimming) for the population collected in BiH (OK523378) and partial 720 bp for the population collected in Georgia (OK523379). Both sequences shared 100 % identity to each other and also to the population of B. mucronatus kolymensis (MK584707) from Romania (Calin et al., 2020) and other sequence of B. mucronatus (AM396572.1) from Germany (data not shown). All four sequences clustered together in phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2).

Virtual ITS-RFLP patterns of Bursaphelenchus mucronatus from BiH and Georgia.

BiH population, OK523378 Georgian population, OK523379

ITS-PCR product RsaI HaeIII MspI HinfI AluI RsaI HaeIII MspI HinfI AluI
Fragment sizes (~bp) 884* 490 623 355 411 678 412 623 355 411 678
412 196 304 232 246 264 196 304 232 246
22 105 265 120 226 105 265 120
87 22 87
49 49
25 25

The amplification and sequencing of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region yielded an 884 bp sequence (corresponding to the entire PCR product sequence after primer trimming) for both BiH and Georgia populations (OK523378 and OK523379, respectively)

Discussion

The genus Bursaphelenchus is widely distributed in the Northern Hemisphere, largely associated with conifer native forests. After the first detection of the pine wood nematode in Portugal (Mota et al., 1999), intense surveys have been conducted in all EU member state conifer forests. These intense surveys resulted in identification and characterization of a large list of Bursaphlenchus species in Europe, but also from Asia and the North America (Penas et al., 2004; Ryss et al., 2005; Kanzaki et al., 2012; Tomalak et al., 2013; Čermák et al., 2013; d’Errico et al., 2015 and Mitrea-Calin et al., 2020).

The diversity of the genus Bursaphelenchus in Bosnia and Herzegovina territories is still totally unknown, while to date a large number of species have been reported from Georgia (Kurashvili et al., 1980; Kakulia & Devdariani, 1965 and 1967; Kakulia, 1989; Mikaia et al., 2010). The first known report of the still valid representative of the genus Bursaphelenchus from Georgia was detection of Bursaphelenchus piniperdae in the frass of Blastophagus minor in Borjomi-Bakuriani coniferous forests in 1963 (Kakulia, 1967). After that, 22 putative species have been reported from Georgia in total (Mikaia et al., 2010) including nine species described originally from Georgia: B. ernoporus, Devdariani, 1975; B. erosus Kuraschvili, Kakulia & Devdariani, 1980; B. georgicus Devdariani et al., 1980; B. hylesini Devdariani, 1975; B. populneus Devdariani, 1973; B. scalari Kakulia, 1989; B. tbilisyensis Kakulia, 1989 and B. sutoricus Devdariani, 1974; B. wecuae Kurashvili et al., 1980. Hunt (1993) classified four of those species: B. georgicus, B. populneus, B. tbilisyensis, B. wekuae as nomina nuda. However, Ryss et al. (2005) included B. georgicus and B. wekuae into the list of valid Bursaphelenchus species and all together listed 18 species from Georgia, but at the same time considered B. populneus and B. tbilisyensis as nomina nuda. Based on the drawings of B. populneus and B. ernoporus re-published in Mikaia et al. (2010) and description of B. tbilisyensis in Kakulia (1989) we consider them as valid species. We consider only B. hylesini as nomen nudum. In total, we include 23 Bursaphelenchus species in the list of species described from Georgia (see Table 3). However, the majority of them has been insufficiently described and molecularly characterized to allow their classification into the groups (Braasch et al., 2009).

List of Bursaphelenchus species described from Georgia.

No. status Species Insect vector Associated plant/note Group* Reference
1 valid B. chitwoodi Rühm, 1956 Hylastes ater (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Pinus sp. (Pinales: Pinaceae), exact pine species is not mentioned in the text Hofmanni group Kakulia & Shalibashvili, 1976a
Pinus sosnowskyi Nakai, Pinus pityosa Steven (Pinales: Pinaceae) Kakulia, Shalibashvili, Gorgadze, 1983
2 valid B. crenati Rühm, 1956 Hylesinus crenatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Fraxinus excelsior L. (Oleales: Oleaceae) Xylophilus group Kurashvili et al., 1980
3 valid B. eggersi Rühm, 1956 Hylurgops palliatus (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Picea orientalis (L.) (Pinales:Pinaceae); Abies sp., Larix sp.; Picea orientalis (L.), Pinus cedrus L. (Pinales: Pinaceae) Eggersi group Kakulia & Maglakelidze, 1973
Kurashvili et al., 1980
4 valid B. eidmanni Rühm, 1956 Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Abies sp., Larix sp., Picea orientalis (L.), Pinus cedrus L., P. sosnowskyi Nakai (Pinales: Pinaceae) Eidemani group Kakulia, 1971
Georgia Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Kakulia & Devdariani, 1975** Kurashvili et al., 1980
5 valid B. eremus Rühm, 1956 Scolytus intricatus (Ratzeburg) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Populus gracilis Grossh., Salix sp. (Salicales: Salicaceae), Castanea vulgaris Hance, Quercus iberica Steven ex Bieb., Q. pedunculata Ehrh., Q. sessiliflora Salisb. (Fagales: Fagaceae), Ulmus foliacea Gilib. (Urticales: Ulmaceae) Eremus group Kurashvili et al., 1980
6 valid B. ernoporus Devdariani, 1975 Ernoporicus fagi (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Scolitidae) Fagus sp. (Fagales: Fagaceae), Carpinus sp. (Fagales: Betulaceae) Insufficient description: not considered for Grouping Kakulia & Devdariani, 1975** Mikaia et al., 2010
Hunt, 1993 (nomen nudum) Ryss et al., 2005 (nomen nudum)
7 valid B. erosus Kurashvili et al., 1980 Orthotomicus erosus (Woll.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Abies sp., Picea orientalis (L.), Pinus sosnowskyi Nakai (Pinales: Pinaceae) Pinus pityusa Steven Eidemani group Kurashvili et al., 1980
Kakulia, Shalibashvili, Gorgadze, 1983
8 valid B. eucarpus Rühm, 1956 Scolytus mali (Bechstein & Scharfenberg) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Malus domestica Borkh., Prunus sp., Sorbus sp. (Rosales: Rosaceae), Ulmaceae gen. sp. (Urticales) Sexdentati group Kakulia & Devdariani, 1975**
Kurashvili et al., 1980
9 valid B. fraudulentus Rühm, 1956 Saperda carcharias(L.) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) - Xylophilus group Kakulia & Devdariani, 1975**
Kurashvili et al., 1980
10 valid B. georgicus Devdariani et al., 1980 Rhopalopus macropus Germar (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Quercus iberica Schur. (Fagales: Fagaceae) Insufficient description: not considered for grouping Devdariani et al., 1980
Kakulia, 1989
Hunt, 1993 (nomen nudum)
Ryss et al., 2005
11 valid B. idius Rühm, 1956 Pityogenes chalcographus L. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Pinus sp. (Pinales: Pinaceae), Carpinus caucasica Grossh. (Betulales: Betulaceae), Juglans sp. (Juglandales: Juglandaceae), Populus tremula L. (Salicales: Salicaceae), Quercus iberica Steven ex Bieb. (Fagales: Fagaceae) Six-incisure ungrouped species Kakulia & Devdariani, 1975**
Kurashvili et al., 1980
12 valid B. incurvus Rühm, 1956 Dendroctonus micans (Kugel.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Abies sp., Picea orientalis (L.), Pinus sylvestris L. (Pinales: Pinaceae) Sexdentati group Kurashvili et al., 1980
13 valid B. mucronatus Mamiya & Enda, 1979 Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Pinus sylvestris (L.) (Pinales: Pinaceae) Xylophilus group This article
14 valid B. nuesslini Rühm, 1956 Pityokeines curvidens (Germar) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Not mentioned in the text. Piniperdae group Kakulia & Shalibashvili, 1976b
15 valid B. piniperdae Fuchs, 1937 Blastophagus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Pinus sosnowskyi Nakai, Pinus pityosa Steven (Pinales: Pinaceae) Piniperdae group Kakulia, Devdariani, 1965
Kakulia, 1967
Kurashvili et al., 1980
Kakulia, Shalibashvili, Gorgadze, 1983
16 valid B. populneus Devdariani, 1937 Saperda populnea L. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Populus sp. Insufficient description: not considered for grouping Devdariani, 1973*
Mikaia et al., 2010
Hunt, 1993 (nomen nudum)
Ryss et al., 2005 (nomen nudum)
17 valid B. ratzerburgii Rühm, 1956 Scolytus ratzeburgii Janson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Betula sp. (Betulales: Betulaceae) Hofmanni group Kurashvili et al., 1980
18 valid B. scalari Kakulia, 1989 Saperda scalaris L. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Alnus glutinosa L. Insufficient description: not considered for grouping Kakulia, 1989
19 valid B. sexdentati Rühm, 1960 Ips sexdentatus (Boerner) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Picea orientalis (L.), Pinus sosnowskyi Nakai, Pinus pityosa Steven (Pinales: Pinaceae) Sexdentati gropu Kakulia & Devdariani, 1975**
Kurashvili et al., 1980
Kakulia, Shalibashvili, Gorgadze, 1983
20 valid B. sutoricus Devdariani, 1974 Monochamus sutor (L.) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Pinus sp. (Pinales: Pinaceae) Sexdentati group Devdariani, 1974
21 valid B. tbilisiensis Kakulia, 1989 Saperda carcharias L. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Not mentioned in the text. Insufficient description: not considered for grouping Kakulia, 1989
Hunt, 1993 (nomen nudum)
Ryss et al., 2005 (nomen nudum)
22 valid B. wekuae Kakulia et al., 1978 Trypophloeus sp. (erroneously named as Trypodendron sygnatum) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Carpinus caucasica Grossh. (Betulales: Betulaceae), Fagus orientalis Lipsky. (Fagales: Fagaceae) Insufficient description: not considered for Grouping Kakulia et al., 1978**
Kurashvili et al., 1980
Kakulia, 1989
Hunt, 1993 (nomen nudum)
Ryss et al., 2005
23 valid B. xerocarterus Rühm, 1956 Scolytus scolytus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Scolytus scolytus (Fabricius), S. multistriatus (Marsh.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Ulmus foliacea Gilib., Zelkova sp. (Urticales: Ulmaceae), Carpinus caucasica Grossh. (Betulales: Betulaceae), Juglans sp. (Juglandales: Juglandaceae), Populus nigra L. (Salicales: Salicaceae) Hofmanni/Abietinus group Kakulia & Devdariani, 1967
Kakulia & Devdariani, 1975**
Kurashvili et al., 1980
Ryss et al., 2005
24 species inquirendae vel incertae sedis B. conurus (Steiner, 1932) - - - Kakulia, 1989
Hunt, 1993
Ryss et al., 2005
25 species inquirendae vel incertae sedis B. conjuctus - - - Kakulia, 1989
Hunt, 1993
Ryss et al., 2005
26 species inquirendae vel incertae sedis B. rüehmi - - - Kakulia, 1989
Hunt, 1993
Ryss et al., 2005
27 nomen nudum B. hylesini - - - Devdariani, 1975**
Kurashvili et al., 1980
This article (Nomina Nuda)
28 Transfer to other genus B. lignophilus (Körner, 1954) - Laimaphelenchus lignophilus (Körner, 1954) - Kakulia, 1989
Meyl, 1961 Goodey, 1960 Ryss et al., 2005
29 Transfer to other genus B. teratospicularis Kakulia & Devdariani, 1965 - Devibursaphelenchus teratospicularis - Kakulia & Devdariani, 1965
Kakulia, 1989
Ryss et al., 2005
Braasch, 2009
30 Transfer to other genus B. typographi Kakulia, 1967 - Devibursaphelenchus typographi - Kakulia, 1967
Kakulia, 1989
Ryss et al., 2005
Braasch, 2009

Legend:

= grouping is based on Braasch et al. (2009);

original publication not available to the authors

Six species were associated with longhorn beetle vectors (Cerambycidae): B. fraudulentus associated with Cerambys cerdo acuminatus Motsch (Kakulia et al., 1980); B. georgicus associated with Rhopalopus macropus Pens (Devdariani et al., 1980); B. populneus associated with Saperda populnea L. (Kakulia et al., 1980); B. scalari associated with Saperda scalaris L. (Kakulia, 1989); B. sutoricus associated with Monochamus sutor L. (Devdariani, 1974) and B. tbilisyensis associated with Saperda carcharias L. (Kakulia, 1989).

Due to the association of B. mucronatus with Europe- and Asia-widely distributed Monochamus species (Evans et al., 1996; Akbulut et al., 2017; Löbl & Smetana, 2010), the nematode occurrence should copy the habitat of its insect vectors. Up to now B. mucronatus has been already reported from 22 European and Mediterranean countries: Austria and Bulgaria (Braasch, 2001), Finland (Tomminen, 1989), Croatia (Đođ et al., 2016), France (Baujard et al., 1979), Germany (Braasch et al., 1999), Greece (Skarmoutsos & Skarmoutsos, 1992), Hungary (Tóth & Elekes, 2013), Italy (Marinari-Palmisano et al., 1992), Israel (Gu et al., 2006), Lithuania (Stanelis, 2005), Norway (Magnusson et al., 2004), Poland (Brzeski & Baujard, 1997), Portugal (Penas et al., 2004), Romania (Mitrea-Calin et al., 2020), Russia (Braasch, 1991), Serbia (Bašic et al., 2014), Slovenia (Urek & Širca, 2005), Spain (Escuer et al., 2004), Sweden (Schroeder & Magnusson, 1992), Turkey (Akbulut et al., 2006) and Ukraine (Kozlovsky, 2013). Bursaphelenchus mucronatus is mainly associated with M. galloprovincialis in Europe (Tomminen et al., 1989; Vincent et al., 2008, Penas et al., 2004; Braasch et al., 1999). Association with M. sutor is rarer in Europe as reported only from Romania (Mitrea-Calin et al., 2020), Spain (Abelleira et al., 2015) and Sweden (Schroeder & Magnusson, 1992). Anyway, it is probable that B. mucronatus might be vectored by other Monochamus species present in the region as well (Togashi et al., 2008). Besides M. galloprovincialis, also M. saltuarius, M. sartor and M. sutor occur in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Although only M. galloprovincialis and M. sutor are reported from Georgia, it is likely that some other species known from neighbouring countries (i.e. M. saltuarius, M. sartor and M. urussovii) might occur in Georgia (Löbl & Smetana, 2010). As authors know the association of B. mucronatus with other Monochamus species (M. saltuarius, M. sartor and M. urussovi) has not been reported in Europe.

B. mucronatus as a native European species (Ryss et al., 2005; Pereira et al., 2013) is not pathogenic to coniferous trees and is not considered as a pest in European conditions. However, as data from Portugal and Spain have shown (Penas et. al., 2004; Vincent et al., 2008) it can be very quickly displaced by its harmful relative B. xylophilus after first occurrence in new area. And reciprocally, a certain risk is involved in planting of non-European coniferous tree species (Pötzelsberger et al., 2020). Therefore, the permanent and detailed detection survey including laboratory analysis of wood and insect samples and survey of wood packaging material is highly recommended for monitoring of distribution of insect vectors and relative species of Bursaphelenchus as an integral part of the discrimination of high-risk areas for the potential establishment of B. xylophilus, early findings of new outbreaks and creation of an emergency plan.

eISSN:
1336-9083
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Zoology, Ecology, other, Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Microbiology, Virology and Infection Epidemiology