Paramphistomosis is a fluke infestation of the ruminant forestomach caused by
Paramphistomosis is common in temperate and tropical regions of Australia, Africa, and Asia. However, it is also noted as an emerging disease in Europe. Previous results suggested that the prevalence of Paramphistomosis is greater than that of fasciolosis in parts of the United Kingdom (Huson
Ruminants are also called compound stomach animals because of the four compartments of their stomach. The ruminal environment is considered the most important factor that affects the digestive physiology of animals (DePeters & George, 2014). The main energy substrate of animals, volatile fatty acids, are synthesized by the ruminal flora and are rapidly absorbed through the ruminal mucosa (Xiao
The present study was designed to evaluate the prevalence and worm load of
Narowal is a city located on the western bank of the river Ravi in the northeast of Punjab province, Pakistan. Narowal lies from 31° 55’ to 32° 30’ latitude and 74° 35’ to 75° 21’ longitude. The Narowal District borders Sialkot to the west, Sheikhupura to the South, Gurdaspur (Eastern Punjab, India) to the east, and the Kathua District and Jammu Kashmir to the north.
Parasites were collected from small (sheep and goat) and large (cattle and buffalo) ruminants. The sample size of ruminant population for screening
Animals were selected from the local abattoirs of Narowal city. Animals were sacrificed through the Islamic slaughter method, and after exsanguination, the entire gastrointestinal tract was located and ligated. Both openings of the rumen, esophageal and rumeno-reticulum were ligated, and both dorsal cranial and caudal sacs of the rumen were opened and searched for rumen flukes. Tissue samples of the rumen (1 cm2) were sectioned from animals positive for rumen flukes and then following technique was used as described by Hofmann and Schnorr (1982) and Zitnan
Photomicrographs of the stained sections taken at different magnifications were analyzed with ImagJ software for different histological features such as epithelial length or thicknesses, length and width of ruminal papillae, and thickness of tunica submucosa and mucularis externae. Sections were also analyzed for pathological lesions in the different tunics (Nobel, 1997).
In this study, logistic regression was used to ascertain the effect of age, sex, and species on the likelihood that an animal had a
In the present study, the logistic regression model was significant and had χ2 = 176.399, p = 0.000. The model explained 49.4 % of the variance in the
Binary logistic regression analysis for factors potentially associated with
Age | Adult | 190 | 117 | 33.027 (0.000)* | 0.002 (0.000 – 0.018) |
Young | 26 | 51 | – | – | |
Sex | Male | 126 | 129 | 53.253 (0.000)* | 8.968 (4.975 – 16.165) |
Female | 90 | 39 | – | – | |
Species | Cattle | 76 | 34 | 29.590 (0.000)* | 10.997 (4.636 – 26.090) |
Goat | 53 | 68 | 28.446 (0.000)* | 328.390 (39.053 – 2761.354) | |
Sheep | 22 | 31 | 0.049 (0.825) | 1.089 (0.513 – 2.310) | |
Buffalo | 65 | 35 | – | – |
OR = Odds Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval, *Significant association
The overall prevalence of
Fig. 1
The percentage prevalence and burden of

Fig. 2
Histo-micrograph of different ruminal sections collected from different groups of large ruminants. Ruminal sections showing normal tunics of rumen along with the epithelial thickness, ruminal papilla length and width, tunica submucosa and muscularis externae. These parameters are recorded significantly decreased with the parasitic loads in different groups. The disruption of epithelium (ED) in the ruminal mucosa is seen in the GB and GC. Furthermore, compromised cell junctions in the epithelium (small black arrow) are also seen in GB and GC (H&E, Upper row 40X, lower row 100X, scale bar 100μm). Normal: Normal or control negative group, GA: Animals with parasitic load of 10-20/5cm2, Group B (GB) animals with the parasitic load 20-40/5cm2.Group C (GC): Animal with parasitic load >41/5cm2. PL: Ruminal papilla length, PW: Ruminal papilla width, TS: Tunica submucosa, TM: Muscularis externae, EW: Epithelium thickness.

Epithelium thickness was significantly affected by parasite load in large ruminants, and the most significant (P < 0.05) decreased value of epithelium thickness was recorded in Groups B (31.12 ± 1.82 μm) and C (31.07 ± 1.68 μm). A similar trend was found in small ruminants, with the most significant decrease in the Group B (29.76 ± 4.76 μm) (Table 4). Apart from thinning of epithelium, the eruption of mucosal cells was also seen in the mucosal cells of the papillae in Group C (Fig. 2 & 3). The junctions between the cells of the different strata for adhesion of the epidermis appeared to be compromised, as evidenced by large gaps between cells (Fig. 2). The rumen papilla length followed the same trend as that of the epithelium thickness, being decreased with higher parasite load and significantly (P < 0.05) lowest length measured in Group C of small and large ruminants (424.42 ± 15.12, 418.30 ± 17.36 μm), respectively. Although ruminal papillae widths were not correlated with parasite load, burdens of > 45 led to significant (P < 0.05) thinning of rumen papillae as observed in Group C (209.55 ± 6.31 μm) of large ruminants, while this character was unaffected by parasite load in small ruminants. The thickness of tela submucosa was not significantly correlated with parasite load, but the infiltration of inflammatory cells was prominent in this layer at some points (Fig. 2 & 3). The most drastic impact of parasite burden was seen on the muscularis externae of the rumen wall, which was significantly (P < 0.05) thinner in Groups B and C of large (533.91 ± 16.12 and 525.35 ± 12.82 μm, respectively) and small ruminants (415.60 ± 12.08, 405.36 ± 16.32, respectively) leading to thinning of the rumen wall (Fig. 3). The inner circular muscle of the muscularis externae was more compromised, as this continuous smooth muscle layer changed into thin patches. The influence of parasites on the rumen mucosa and epithelium thickness of small and large ruminants is presented in Table 2.
Fig. 3
Histo-micrograph of different ruminal sections collected from different groups of small ruminants. Ruminal sections showing normal tunics of rumen along with the epithelial thickness, ruminal papilla length and width, tunica submucosa and muscularis externae in upper row. These parameters are recorded significantly decreased with the parasitic loads as showed in lower row. The disruption of epithelium (small arrow) in the ruminal mucosa (H&E, left column 40X, right column100X, scale bar 100μm).

Analysis of Means ± SEM of different histological features of rumens amongst different groups of large and small ruminants of Narowal district, Punjab, Pakistan.
Epithelium Thickness | 46.96±2.05a | 35.49±1.93b | 31.12±1.82b | 31.07±1.68b |
Ruminal Papilla Length | 645.34±10.27a | 562.98±17.57 b | 448.42±6.48c | 424.42±15.12c |
Ruminal Papilla Width | 310.63±25.47a | 290.80±27.88 a | 284.52±4.15 a | 209.55±6.31b |
Tela Submucosa | 213.39±8.61a | 194.69±6.64ab | 198.08±10.28ab | 192.01±5.54ab |
Muscularis Externae | 714.83±31.76a | 697.85±34.71b | 533.91±16.12c | 525.35±12.82c |
Epithelium Thickness | 41.65±3.24 a | 38.2±0.76 a | 29.76±4.76 b | 30.78±0.97 b |
Ruminal Papilla Length | 712.87±9.27 a | 680.37±12.72 a | 503.46±15.7 b | 418.30±17.36 c |
Ruminal Papilla Width | 205.32±7.5 a | 187.97±7.5 a | 198.31±4.2 a | 190.47±10.3 a |
Tela Submucosa | 177.45±8.3 a | 175.37±9.1 a | 168.59±6.3 a | 170.67±10.2 a |
Muscularis Externae | 503.46±23.29 a | 498.71±15.78 a | 415.60±12.08 b | 405.36 ±16.32 b |
Means sharing with different superscripts in a row (a, b, c) are statistically different at P<0.05
Means sharing with superscript “a” is statistically different from means sharing with superscript “b” and “c” and vice versa. Superscript “a” represents the significant higher means, lower value represented by superscript “b” and significantly least or lowest value amongst the groups represented by the superscript “c”.
The district Narowal is high in humidity, at risk of floods, and always has a high chance of rain (Asim
In our study, four ruminant species (cattle, buffalo, goat, and sheep) were used to study
Ruminants provide important means of support for many South Asian farmers and livestock producers. The dependence of small farmers, and predominantly women, is high on small ruminants
The prevalence of
In the gastrointestinal tract, the rumen occupies more than two-thirds of the space and is the site for absorption of certain nutrients (Novak
These histopathology changes due to
The government should proceed with initiatives to raise awareness among small/marginal farmers for the improvement of livestock production and hence, food security. Communally, the data developed in this study support the preparation of control operations against economically significant snails that harbor trematodes that affect the productivity of livestock. The data of the present study should also stimulate future researchers to conduct a project on molecular level vaccine development for
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Binary logistic regression analysis for factors potentially associated with Paramphistomum infection in ruminants of district Narowal, Punjab Pakistan.
Age | Adult | 190 | 117 | 33.027 (0.000)* | 0.002 (0.000 – 0.018) |
Young |
26 |
51 |
– |
– |
|
Sex | Male | 126 | 129 | 53.253 (0.000)* | 8.968 (4.975 – 16.165) |
Female |
90 |
39 |
– |
– |
|
Species | Cattle | 76 | 34 | 29.590 (0.000)* | 10.997 (4.636 – 26.090) |
Goat | 53 | 68 | 28.446 (0.000)* | 328.390 (39.053 – 2761.354) | |
Sheep | 22 | 31 | 0.049 (0.825) | 1.089 (0.513 – 2.310) | |
Buffalo | 65 | 35 | – | – |
Analysis of Means ± SEM of different histological features of rumens amongst different groups of large and small ruminants of Narowal district, Punjab, Pakistan.
Epithelium Thickness | 46.96±2.05a | 35.49±1.93b | 31.12±1.82b | 31.07±1.68b |
Ruminal Papilla Length | 645.34±10.27a | 562.98±17.57 b | 448.42±6.48c | 424.42±15.12c |
Ruminal Papilla Width | 310.63±25.47a | 290.80±27.88 a | 284.52±4.15 a | 209.55±6.31b |
Tela Submucosa | 213.39±8.61a | 194.69±6.64ab | 198.08±10.28ab | 192.01±5.54ab |
Muscularis Externae | 714.83±31.76a | 697.85±34.71b | 533.91±16.12c | 525.35±12.82c |
Epithelium Thickness | 41.65±3.24 a | 38.2±0.76 a | 29.76±4.76 b | 30.78±0.97 b |
Ruminal Papilla Length | 712.87±9.27 a | 680.37±12.72 a | 503.46±15.7 b | 418.30±17.36 c |
Ruminal Papilla Width | 205.32±7.5 a | 187.97±7.5 a | 198.31±4.2 a | 190.47±10.3 a |
Tela Submucosa | 177.45±8.3 a | 175.37±9.1 a | 168.59±6.3 a | 170.67±10.2 a |
Muscularis Externae | 503.46±23.29 a | 498.71±15.78 a | 415.60±12.08 b | 405.36 ±16.32 b |
Revision of Corynosoma australe Johnston, 1937 (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) from a North American population using novel SEM images, Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis, and molecular analysisPrevalence of Blastocystis sp. among cooks in the region of Fez-Meknes (Morocco)Diversity of digeneans parasitizing Mullus barbatus andMullus surmuletus (Teleostean, Mullidae) off the coast of AlgerianPossible zoonotic implications of the discovery of the advanced third stage larva of Gnathostoma turgidum (Spirurida: Gnathostomatidae) in a Mexican fish speciesA case of natural infection with Dirofilaria immitis in a coati (Nasua narica ) from MexicoThe prevalence of potentially zoonotic intestinal parasites in dogs and cats in Moscow, Russia Ecological study on helminths of three species of Gobiidae from the Danube River, Bulgaria Aphelenchoides varicaudatus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) andHelicotylenchus erythrinae (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) from Garlic Plantation in Magelang, Central Java, IndonesiaObservations on the biology of Postharmostomum ntowi Hodasi, 1967 (Trematoda: Brachylaimidae) based on intermediate and definitive hosts found in NigeriaPrevalence and distribution of urinary schistosomiasis among senior primary school pupils of Siphofaneni area in the low veld of Eswatini: A cross-sectional study Diagnostic accuracy of swine echinococcosis cytopathological tests and challenges for a differential diagnosis: slaughterhouse data