Constructional Meaning and Knowledge-Driven Interpretation of Motion Events

Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall, M. Meacham, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 1–14). Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Search in Google Scholar

Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. (2010). The typology of motion expression revisited. Journal of linguistics, 46(3), 331–377.10.1017/S0022226709990272 Search in Google Scholar

Buoniconto, A. (2018). The many ways to cross a boundary. (Intra)Typological limina in motion event encoding. In M. De Blasi, G. Imbriaco, F. Messina, S. Orlando, & V. Schettino (Eds.), In limine. Forme marginali e discorsi di confine – Quaderni della ricerca 2 (pp. 359–374). Napoli, Italy: Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” Press. Search in Google Scholar

Buoniconto, A. (2019a). “Going through the motions”. Motion events encoding and analysis parameters. A test study on the Romance family (Doctoral dissertation, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy). Search in Google Scholar

Buoniconto, A. (2019b). “It goes without saying”. Covert encoding in the linguistic expression of motion events. In A. Buoniconto, R. Cesaro, & G. Salvati (Eds.), Spazi Bianchi. Le espressioni letterarie, linguistiche e visive dell’assenza (pp. 261–271). Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino. Search in Google Scholar

Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W. B., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (pp. 201–235). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Croft, W., & Cruse, A. D. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864 Search in Google Scholar

Fagard, B., Zlatev, J., Kopecka, A., Cerruti, M., & Blomberg, J. (2013). The expression of motion events: A quantitative study of six typologically varied languages. In M. Faytak, M. Goss, N. Baier, J. Merrill, K. Neely, E. Donnelly, & J. Heath (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 364–379). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society. Search in Google Scholar

Filipović, L. (2007). Talking about motion. A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.91 Search in Google Scholar

Filipović, L. (2013). Typology as a continuum. Intraypological evidence from English and Serbo­Croatian. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Filipović, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2015). Motion. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 526–545). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Fortis, J.-M., & Vittrant, A. (2016). On the morpho­syntax of path­expressing constructions: Toward a typology. Language Typology and Universals – STUF, 69(3), 341–374.10.1515/stuf-2016-0015 Search in Google Scholar

Giacalone Ramat, A., Mauri, C., & Molinelli, P. (Eds.). (2013). Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.133 Search in Google Scholar

Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Same family, different paths: Intratypological differences in three Romance languages. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp. 39–54). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Iacobini, C. (2015). Particle­verbs in romance. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe (pp. 627–659). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Iacobini, C., Corona, L., Buoniconto, A. (forthcoming). A grid for decoding motion encoding. In C. Iacobini, L. Corona, & L. Brucale (Eds.), La semantica dello spazio del movimento e della maniera. Roma, Italy: Carocci. Search in Google Scholar

Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B. (2011). A diachronic approach to variation and change in motion event expression. Faits de Langues. Les cahiers, 3, 151–171.10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000010 Search in Google Scholar

Iacobini, C., & Vergaro, C. (2014). The role of inference in motion event encoding/decoding: A cross­linguistic inquiry into English and Italian. Lingue e Linguaggio, 13(2), 211–240. Search in Google Scholar

Ibarretxe­Antuñano, I. (2009). Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin­Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Özçalişkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–414). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ibarretxe­Antuñano, I. (Ed.). (2017). Motion and space across languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.59 Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kopecka, A. (2013). Describing motion events in old and modern French discourse effects of a typological change. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp. 163–183). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Landragin, F., Poibeau, T., & Victorri, B. (2012). ANALEC: A new tool for the dynamic annotation of textual data. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. Doğan, M. Uğur, M. Bente, J. Mariani, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth international conference on language resources and evaluation (pp. 357–362). Istanbul, Turkey: European Language Resources Association. Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., & Johnson­Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674421288 Search in Google Scholar

Naidu, V., Zlatev, J., Duggirala, V., Van De Weijer, J., Devylder, S., & Blomberg, J. (2018). Holistic spatial semantics and post­Talmian motion event typology: A case study of Thai and Telugu. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(2). doi:10.1515/cogsem­2018­2002. Search in Google Scholar

Nikitina, T. (2008), Pragmatic factors and variation in the expression of spatial goals: The case of into vs. in. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke, & R. Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P (pp. 175–209), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.120.09nik Search in Google Scholar

Osmańska­Lipka, I. (2012). Elements of Gestalt psychology in American Cognitive Linguistics. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, 30(2), 47–72. Search in Google Scholar

Sinha, C., & Kuteva, T. (1995). Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18(2), 167–199.10.1017/S0332586500000159 Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–220). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.) Relating events in narrative: Vol. 2. Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (2005). Relating narrative events in translation. In D. Ravid, & H.B.­Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (pp. 115–129). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. In S. Gahl, A. Dolbey, & C. Johnson (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 487–505). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Search in Google Scholar

Stein, P. (1997). Untersuchungen zur Verbalsyntax der Livius Übersetzungen in die romanischen Sprachen: ein Versuch zur Anwendung quantitativer Methoden in der historisch-vergleichenden Syntax. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110930306 Search in Google Scholar

Stolova, N. (2015). Cognitive linguistics and lexical change. Motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (1975). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In C. Cogen, H. Thompson, K. Whistler, & J. Wright (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 419–430). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society. Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space, in H. L. Pick, & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: theory, research and application (pp. 225–282). New York, NY: Plenum Press. Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Zlatev, J. (2003), Holistic spatial semantics of Thai. In E. Casad, & G. Palmer (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and non-indo-European languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197150.7.305 Search in Google Scholar