[
Ağan Y., Kuzey C., Acar M. F., Açıkgöz A. (2016). The relationships between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 1872-1881.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.090
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Agudelo, M. A. L., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1-23.10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arru, B., & Ruggieri, M. (2016). I benefici della Corporate Social Responsibility nella creazione di valore sostenibile: il ruolo delle risorse di competenza e del capitale reputazionale. Economia Aziendale Online-, 7(1), 17-41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, G. D. (2021). Women garment workers face huge inequities in global supply chain factories made worse by COVID-19. NEW SOLUTIONS: a journal of environmental and occupational health policy, 31(2), 113-124.10.1177/10482911211011605
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burger-Helmchen, T., & Siegel, E. J. (2020). Some thoughts on CSR in relation to B Corp labels. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 10(4), 1-19.10.1515/erj-2020-0231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long range planning, 29(4), 495-502.10.1016/0024-6301(96)00041-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.10.2307/257850
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizzons, 34(4), 39-48.10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.10.1177/000765039903800303
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, 1.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Green Paper: promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Commission of the European Communities.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2021). COVID-19 and the future of CSR research. Journal of Management Studies.10.1111/joms.12642
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 15(1), 1-13.10.1002/csr.132
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities?. California Management Review, 2(3), 70-76.10.2307/41166246
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. (2011). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. European Commission.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans, W. R., Haden, S. S. P., Clayton, R. W., & Novicevic, M. M. (2013). History-of-management-thought about social responsibility. Journal of Management History, 19(1), 8-32.10.1108/17511341311286150
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feng, P., & Ngai, CS-b. (2020). Doing more on the corporate sustainability front: a longitudinal analysis of CSR reporting of global fashion companies. Sustainability, 12(6), 2477.10.3390/su12062477
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frederick, W. C. (1978). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business and society thought. Business & Society, 33(2), 150-164.10.1177/000765039403300202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freeman, R. E., Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88-106.10.2307/41165018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freitas, Mónica. 2016. “Responsabilidade Social no Setor da Saúde: Representações, Valores, Motivações e Instrumentos”. Dissertação de doutoramento em Sociologia defendida na Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa. 08 de dezembro de 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago U. P.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gazzola, P. (2012a). CSR e reputazione nella creazione di valore sostenibile. Economia Aziendale Online-, (2), 27-45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gazzola, P. (2012b). La comunicazione sociale nella creazione di valore sostenibile. Economia Aziendale Online-, (2), 11-24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gazzola, P. (2012c). CSR per scelta o per necessità?. Maggioli.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gazzola, P., & Mella, P. (2012). Corporate performance and corporate social responsibility (CSR). A necessary choice?. Economia Aziendale Online-, (3), 1-22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffman, R. C. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in the 1920s: an institutional perspective. Journal of Management History.10.1108/17511340710715179
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husted, B. W. (2000). A contingency theory of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39(1), 24-48.10.1177/000765030003900104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59-67.10.2307/41164877
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, R. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1–2), 128-143.10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kantar. (2020). Special Eurobarometer 501: attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. European Union.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: doing the most good for your company and your cause. John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kreps, T. J. (1962). Measurement of the Social Performance of Business. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 343, 20–31.10.1177/000271626234300104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595–632.10.1108/07363760110410281
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International journal of management reviews, 10(1), 53-73.10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lopez, B. (2020). Connecting business and sustainable development goals in Spain. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(5), 573-585.10.1108/MIP-08-2018-0367
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lyon, T. P., Delmas, M. A., Maxwell, J. W., Bansal, T. P., Chiroleu-Assouline, M., Crifo, P., Durand, R., Gond, J-P., King, A., Lenox, M., Toffel, M., Vogel, D., & Wijen, F. (2018). CSR needs CPR: corporate sustainability and politics. California Management Review, 60(4), 5-24.10.1177/0008125618778854
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazurkiewicz, P. (2004). Corporate environmental responsibility: Is a common CSR framework possible?. World Bank, 2, 1-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meuer, J., Koelbel, J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2020). On the nature of corporate sustainability. Organization & Environment, 33(3), 319-341.10.1177/1086026619850180
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and saliance: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.10.2307/259247
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business ethics: A European review, 15(4), 323-338.10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nave, A., & Ferreira, J. (2019) Corporate social responsibility strategies: past research and future challenge. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 885-901.10.1002/csr.1729
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pedrini, M. (2012). I bilanci di sostenibilità e delle risorse intangibili: il processo di integrazione nelle aziende italiane. Economia Aziendale Online-, (1), 117-146.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pelikánová R. M., Němečková T., MacGregor R. K. (2021). CSR statements in international and czech luxury fashion industry at the onset and during the COVID-19 pandemic - slowing down the fast fashion business?. Sustainability, 13(7), 3715, 1-19.10.3390/su13073715
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perrini, F. (2006). Book review of corporate social responsibility: doing the most good for your company and your cause by Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 90-93.10.5465/amp.2006.20591016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. Berrett-Koehler publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: the link between corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: creating shared value. (Vol. 17), FSG.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romolini, A., Fissi, S., & Gori, E. (2014). Scoring CSR reporting in listed companies - Evidence from italian best practices, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(2), 65-81.10.1002/csr.1299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sachs J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The lancet, 379(9832), 2206-2211.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. Berkeley. Cal.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California management review, 17(3), 58-64.10.2307/41162149
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, N. C. (2001). Changes in corporate practices in response to public interest advocacy and actions. Handbook of marketing and society, 140-161.10.4135/9781452204765.n7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spulber D., (2020) Ecology, environment and education, the role of Erasmus+ projects in support to Life Programme, I20th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2020, ISSN 1314-2704 Vol 20 N 5.1, 2020, pp. 915-922 DOI: 10.5593/sgem2020/5.1/s23.11510.5593/sgem2020/5.1/s23.115
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spulber D., Zamaraeva D.m (2020) Environmental questions and mass-media: the case of Italy and Russia, 20th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2020, ISSN 1314-2704 Vol 20 N 5.2, 2020, pp. 135-146 DOI: 10.5593/sgem2020/5.2/s21.016,10.5593/sgem2020/5.2/s21.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsalis, T. A., Malamateniou, K. E., Koulouriotis, D., & Nikolaou, I. E. (2020). New challenges for corporate sustainability reporting: United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for sustainable development and the sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1617-1629.10.1002/csr.1910
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of business ethics, 44(2), 95-105.10.1023/A:1023331212247
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of business ethics, 44(2), 95-105.10.1023/A:1023331212247
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ward H. (2004). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: taking stock, Washington, DC: World Bank.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Il Sole 24 Ore, (2021), Cose che noi umani. [Online] Available: https://lab24.ilsole24ore.com/storia-coronavirus/ (November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WBCSD, (1998), Stakeholder Dialogue on CSR, The Nederlands. [Online] Available: https://www.wbcsd.org (Sept 6-8, 1998).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friedman, M., (1970), A Friedman doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. [Online] Available: https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html (September 13, 1970).
]Search in Google Scholar
