[Alexander L, Hess GR (2012) Land trust evaluation of progress toward conservation goals. Conservation Biology 26(1): 7−12.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01779.x22044678]Search in Google Scholar
[Anheier HK (2013) Civil society and non-profit organizations: what are the issues? In: 17th International Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research. Masaryk University, Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[AOPK (2020) Maloplošná zvláště chráněná území. Available at: <https://drusop.nature.cz/ost/chrobjekty/zchru/index.php?MZCHU> Retrieved on 3rd January 2020.]Search in Google Scholar
[Balázsi A (2018) Grassland management in protected areas – implementation of the EU biodiversity strategy in certain postcommunist countries. Hacquetia 17(1): 73−84.10.1515/hacq-2017-0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Bastian C T, Keske C M, McLeod D M, Hoag D L (2017) Landowner and land trust agent preferences for conservation easements: implications for sustainable land uses and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 157: 1−13.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.030]Search in Google Scholar
[Bennett D E, Pejchar L, Romero B, Knight R, Berger J (2018) Using practitioner knowledge to expand the toolbox for private lands conservation. Biological Conservation 227: 152−159.10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Campopiano M (2006) The Land Trust Alliance’s new accreditation program. Ecology LQ 33: 897.]Search in Google Scholar
[ČSOP (2020a) Pozemkové spolky. Available at: <https://ČSOP.nap.cz/Statistiky-pozemku>]Search in Google Scholar
[ČSOP (2020b) Historie ČSOP. Available at: <http://www.ČSOP.cz/index.php?cis_menu=1&m1_id=1001&m2_id=1062&m_id_old=1028>10.1155/2020/8682598]Search in Google Scholar
[ČSOP (2020c) Založení pozemkového spolku. Available at: <http://www.ČSOP.cz/index.php?cis_menu=1&m1_id=1003&m2_id=1071&m3_id=1078&m_id_old=1071>10.1155/2020/8832627]Search in Google Scholar
[ČSOP (2020d): Pozemkové spolky. Available at: <https://ČSOP.nap.cz/Prehled.aspx>]Search in Google Scholar
[Czech Nature Protection Law No. 114/1992 Call. Available at: <https://www.mzp.cz/www/platnalegislativa.nsf/%24%24OpenDominoDocument.xsp?documentId=58170589E7DC0591C125654B004E91C1&action=open-Document>]Search in Google Scholar
[Dowding K (2008) Agency and Structure: Interpreting power relationships. Journal of Power 1(1): 21− 36.10.1080/17540290801943380]Search in Google Scholar
[Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Graves R A, Williamson M A, Belote R T, Brandt J S (2019) Quantifying the contribution of conservation easements to largelandscape conservation. Biological Conservation 232: 83−96.10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.024]Search in Google Scholar
[Horton K, Knight H, Galvin K A, Goldstein J H, Herrington J (2017) An evaluation of landowners’ conservation easements on their livelihoods and well-being. Biological Conservation 209: 62−67.10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Kluvánková-Oravská T, Chobotová V, Banaszak I, Slavikova L, Trifunovova S (2009) From government to governance for biodiversity: the perspective of central and Eastern European transition countries. Environmental Policy & Governance 19(3): 186–196.10.1002/eet.508]Search in Google Scholar
[Larson E R, Boyer A G, Armsworth P R (2014). A lack of response of the financial behaviors of biodiversity conservation nonprofits to changing economic conditions. Ecology and Evolution 4(23): 4429−4443.10.1002/ece3.1281]Search in Google Scholar
[Lohmann Roger A (2015) Voluntary action in new commons. Faculty Scholarship: 760. <https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications/760>]Search in Google Scholar
[Librová H, Pelikán V (2016) Ethical motivations and the phenomenon of disappointment in two types of environmental movements: Neo-Environmentalism and the Dark Mountain Project. Environmental Values 25(2): 167−193.10.3197/096327116X14552114338828]Search in Google Scholar
[LTA (2020) Community conservation. <https://www.landtrustalliance.org/topics/community-conservation>]Search in Google Scholar
[Machar I (2012) Protection of nature and landscapes in the Czech Republic. Selected current issues and possibilities of their solution. In: Machar I, Drobilova L (Eds) Ochrana Prirody a Krajiny v Ceske Republice I, II. Palacky University, Olomouc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Merenlender A M, Huntsinger L, Guthey G, Fairfax S K (2004) Land trusts and conservation easements: who is conserving what for whom?. Conservation Biology 18(1): 65−76.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00401.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore T, McKee K (2012) Empowering local communities? An international review of community land trusts. Housing Studies 27(2): 280−290.10.1080/02673037.2012.647306]Search in Google Scholar
[Müllerová H (2013) Pozemkové spolky – alternativní způsob ochrany půdy, flóry a fauny. Institute of state and law of the Czech Academy of Sciences.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murray Svidroňová M, Vacekova G, Valentinov V (2016) The theories of non-profits: a reality check from Slovakia. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government 14(3): 399−418.10.4335/14.3.399-418(2016)]Search in Google Scholar
[Nature Protection Law (1992) Zákon č. 114/1992 Sb. o ochraně přírody a krajiny.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pechanec V, Machar I, Pohanka T, Opršal Z, Petrovič F, Švajda J, Málková J (2018) Effectiveness of Natura 2000 system for habitat types protection: A case study from the Czech Republic. Nature Conservation 24: 21.10.3897/natureconservation.24.21608]Search in Google Scholar
[Pražan J, Ratinger T, Krumalová V (2005) The evolution of nature conservation policy in the Czech Republic—challenges of Europeanisation in the White Carpathians Protected Landscape Area. Land Use Policy 22(3): 235–243.10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.09.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Rafiee M, Mirzaee H, Mirzaee A, Hashemzadeh A (2014) The relationship between structure and agency in communicative action theory. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences 3: 141–149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ratinger T, Čamská K, Pražan J, Bavorová M, Vančurová I (2020) From elite-driven to community-based governance mechanisms for the delivery of public goods from land management. Land Use Policy (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.10456010.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104560]Search in Google Scholar
[Růžička T, Moravec J (2008) Věcná břemena a další nástroje pozemkospolkové činnosti v České republice. Ochrana přírody 6 [Czech translation of Bernstein J, Mitchell BA (2005), Parks 15(2), 2005]]Search in Google Scholar
[Schreier M (2014) Qualitative Content Analysis. In: Flick U (ed) The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. SAGE Publishing, London, pp. 170−183.10.4135/9781446282243.n12]Search in Google Scholar
[Selinske M J, Howard N, Fitzsimons J A, Hardy M J, Smillie K, Forbes J, Knight A T (2019) Monitoring and evaluating the social and psychological dimensions that contribute to privately protected area program effectiveness. Biological conservation 229: 170−178.10.1016/j.biocon.2018.11.026]Search in Google Scholar
[Sewell W H (1992) A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1−29.10.1086/229967]Search in Google Scholar
[Slavíková, L, Syrbe R, Slavík J, Berens A (2017): Local environmental NGO roles in biodiversity governance: a Czech-German comparison. GeoScape 11(1): 1−15.10.1515/geosc-2017-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Slavíková L, Raška P (2019) This is my land! Privately funded natural water retention measures in the Czech Republic. In: Hartmann T, Slavíková L, McCarthy S (eds) Nature-based flood risk management on private land. Springer, Cham, pp. 55−67.10.1007/978-3-030-23842-1_6]Search in Google Scholar
[TNC (2020) About us. <https://www.nature.org/en-us/aboutus/who-we-are>]Search in Google Scholar
[Valentinov V (2009) Toward an economics of the rural third sector. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 8(5): 439−456.10.1504/IJARGE.2009.032644]Search in Google Scholar
[Valentinov V, Hielscher S, Pies I (2015) Nonprofit organizations, institutional economics, and system thinking. Economic Systems 39: 491−501.10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Wandel J, Valentinov V (2014) The nonprofit catallaxy: an Austrian economics perspective on the nonprofit sector. Voluntas 25: 138−149.10.1007/s11266-012-9330-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Wätzold F, Schwerdtner K (2005) Why be wasteful when preserving a valuable resource? A review article on the costeffectiveness of European biodiversity conservation policy. Biological Conservation 123(3): 327−338.10.1016/j.biocon.2004.12.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Will M G, Roth S, Valentinov V (2018). From nonprofit diversity to organizational multifunctionality: a systems–theoretical proposal. Administration and Society 50(7): 1015−1036.10.1177/0095399717728093]Search in Google Scholar