Prioritisation and Analysis of Faults in Shirt Production by the A3 Technique
Jun 08, 2022
About this article
Article Category: Research Article
Published Online: Jun 08, 2022
Page range: 35 - 46
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ftee-2022-0005
Keywords
© 2022 Mehmet Küçük, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13
![Collar automat [9]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/6471dae8215d2f6c89db3242/j_ftee-2022-0005_fig_013.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20250919%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20250919T204918Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=c0375023050c09ab2b451370a1a5c7e02bf4b6c0bbcf22244e3feb87c3c1b120&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)

Records obtained by processes with the apparatus
Sample-1 | 3,6 | 95 | 11 | 100 | 8,1 | 105 | 18,4 | 100 | 1,2 | 100 |
Sample-2 | 3,2 | 100 | 11,2 | 110 | 7,5 | 105 | 18 | 100 | 1 | 100 |
Sample-3 | 3,5 | 100 | 10,8 | 105 | 9 | 100 | 17,5 | 100 | 1,5 | 95 |
Sample-4 | 3,6 | 95 | 10,9 | 105 | 7,3 | 100 | 17,7 | 95 | 1 | 100 |
Sample-5 | 3,4 | 95 | 11,5 | 100 | 8,7 | 90 | 18,2 | 100 | 1,5 | 95 |
Sample-6 | 3,4 | 100 | 11 | 100 | 9 | 90 | 18 | 100 | 1,4 | 95 |
Sample-7 | 2,6 | 115 | 10,7 | 100 | 9 | 100 | 17,9 | 95 | 1,3 | 100 |
Sample-8 | 4,2 | 90 | 10,8 | 100 | 8,7 | 90 | 17 | 95 | 1,2 | 100 |
Sample-9 | 3,7 | 100 | 11,5 | 95 | 8,8 | 100 | 17,8 | 95 | 1,4 | 95 |
Sample-10 | 3,9 | 100 | 10 | 110 | 9 | 100 | 19 | 90 | 1 | 100 |
Averages | 3,5 | 99,0 | 10,9 | 102,5 | 8 | 5 | 18,0 | 97,0 | 1,3 | 98,0 |
Basic Time= Avg Time × Avg Rating 100 | 3,5 | 11,2 | 8,3 | 17,4 | 1,2 | |||||
Total Basic Time | 41,7 | |||||||||
Relaxation Allowance (%4) | 1,67 | |||||||||
Unavoidable Delays (%7) | 2,92 | |||||||||
STANDARD TIME (sec) | 46,2 |
The faults and effects
Size difference | A difference in the size of the pieces | Repetition of the spreading-cutting processes | |
Barcode | The attached barcode does not belong to the product. | The delivery of the product to a different warehouse | |
Fabric Fault | Defects on the fabric affect the quality of the product | Disassemble process, repetition of the spreading-cutting processes | |
Button | Broken, incorrect, unsewn or improper positioning of the buttons | Disassemble process or re-sewing, productivity loss | |
Label | Incorrect, defected or incorrect positioning | Disassemble process and re-sewing, productivity loss | |
Needle | Unsuitable needle for the fabric or the yarn | Damage to the product, re-cutting and re-sewing processes, fabric waste, cost increase | |
Button hole | Unsuitable position, number or type | Damage to the product, re-cutting and re-sewing processes, fabric waste, cost increase | |
Yarn | Yarn knitting, knotting or fringing | Loss of productivity and quality | |
Seam Fault | Seam faults, such as skipping or disassembling | Re-sewing, loss of productivity and time | |
Stain | Colour changes occurred on the product due to various reasons | Loss of productivity and time | |
Cuff form | Position, sewing, ironing or size-related defects | Labour, time and productivity loss | |
Position | Not settling the product pieces at specified lines or levels | Labour, time and productivity loss | |
Colour difference | Colour mismatch between product parts | Productivity loss, re-cutting and re-sewing processes, fabric waste, cost increase | |
Disassembly | Stitch defect between parts, button, buttonhole and hemline | Labour, time and productivity loss | |
Fibre flies | Adhesion of fly fibers on the products | Productivity loss | |
Interlining resin traces on fabric surface | Non-sticking or -tracing the interlining resin on the fabric surface | Labour, time and productivity loss | |
Collar tip form | Wrong positioning of the collar and visible seam allowance | Productivity loss |
Faults and their frequency
Collar Tip form | 2450 | 28,21 | 28,21 | |
Stain | 2178 | 25,08 | 53,29 | |
Cuff Form | 1128 | 12,99 | 66,28 | |
Button | 870 | 10,02 | 76,30 | |
Seam Fault | 468 | 5,39 | 81,69 | |
Needle | 248 | 2,86 | 84,55 | |
Color Difference | 231 | 2,66 | 87,21 | |
Position | 206 | 2,37 | 89,58 | |
Interlining Resin | 177 | 2,04 | 91,62 | |
Fiber Flies | 152 | 1,75 | 93,37 | |
Button Hole | 113 | 1,30 | 94,67 | |
Yarn | 103 | 1,19 | 95,86 | |
Size Difference | 100 | 1,15 | 97,01 | |
Fabric Fault | 89 | 1,02 | 98,03 | |
Label | 87 | 1,00 | 99,03 | |
Barcode | 45 | 0,52 | 99,55 | |
Disassembly | 40 | 0,46 | 100 |
Comparison of the techniques
14,0 | 65,2 | - | |
8,3 | 46,2 | 84 | |
7,9 | 24,6 | 2050 |
Records obtained by manual processes
Sample-1 | 3,8 | 100 | 10,2 | 100 | 13 | 105 | 30,4 | 95 | 1 | 100 |
Sample-2 | 4,2 | 95 | 11 | 95 | 15 | 90 | 31 | 90 | 1 | 100 |
Sample-3 | 5 | 95 | 10,6 | 100 | 14,5 | 100 | 29,4 | 100 | 2 | 90 |
Sample-4 | 3,66 | 100 | 10,8 | 100 | 13,4 | 100 | 29 | 100 | 2,5 | 90 |
Sample-5 | 3 | 105 | 12 | 90 | 13,9 | 100 | 30 | 100 | 2 | 90 |
Sample-6 | 3,7 | 100 | 10,7 | 100 | 14 | 100 | 30,7 | 95 | 2 | 90 |
Sample-7 | 2,9 | 110 | 11 | 100 | 14 | 100 | 29,8 | 100 | 1 | 100 |
Sample-8 | 3,5 | 100 | 11 | 100 | 13,6 | 105 | 30 | 95 | 1 | 100 |
Sample-9 | 3,7 | 100 | 10,2 | 100 | 15 | 90 | 32 | 90 | 1 | 100 |
Sample-10 | 3,1 | 100 | 10 | 95 | 14,8 | 105 | 29,1 | 100 | 1 | 100 |
Averages | 3,7 | 100,5 | 10,8 | 98,0 | 14 | 1 | 30,1 | 96,5 | 1,5 | 96,0 |
Basic Time= Avg Time × Avg Rating 100 | 3,7 | 10,5 | 14,0 | 29,1 | 1,4 | |||||
Total Basic Time | 58,7 | |||||||||
Relaxation Allowance (%4) | 2,35 | |||||||||
Unavoidable Delays (%7) | 4,11 | |||||||||
STANDARD TIME (sec) | 65,2 |