Open Access

The effect of implementation on successful forest management policy, moderated by actor-network and stakeholder collaboration


Cite

Figure 1

Explanation of the importance–performance analysis quadrant.
Explanation of the importance–performance analysis quadrant.

Figure 2

Conceptual framework.
Conceptual framework.

Figure 3

The IPA results of variable X1.
The IPA results of variable X1.

Figure 4

The IPA results of variable X2.
The IPA results of variable X2.

Figure 5

The IPA results of variable X3.
The IPA results of variable X3.

Figure 6

The IPA results of variable X4.
The IPA results of variable X4.

Figure 7

The IPA results of variable X5.
The IPA results of variable X5.

Figure 8

The IPA results of variable X6.
The IPA results of variable X6.

Figure 9

The IPA results of variable X7.
The IPA results of variable X7.

Figure 10

The IPA results of variable X8.
The IPA results of variable X8.

Figure 11

The IPA results of variable Y1.
The IPA results of variable Y1.

Figure 12

The IPA results of Y2 variable.
The IPA results of Y2 variable.

The IPA results of the community development variable (Y1).

Variable Indicator Importance Performance
Community development (Y1) Human development (Y11) 42.20 51.75
Business Building (Y12) 45.20 52.63
Building the Environment (Y13) 42.40 55.25
Building Institutions (Y14) 41.40 48.88

The IPA results of the actor-network variable (X7).

Variable Indicator Importance Performance
Actor-network(X7) Actor participation (X71) 43.10 45.25
Actor's perspective (X72) 64.50 57.75
Actor accessibility (X73) 51.70 54.13
Determination of action (X74) 41.10 54.75

The IPA results of stakeholder collaboration variable (X8).

Variable Indicator Importance Performance
Stakeholder Collaboration (X8) Networked structure (X81) 68.10 66.88
Commitment to a common purpose (X82) 57.20 60.25
Trust among the participants (X83) 41.70 64.13
Governance (X84) 52.70 49.50
Access to authority (X85) 64.60 58.50
Distributive accountability/responsibility (X86) 51.40 58.25
Information sharing (X87) 57.10 49.75
Access to resources (X88) 69.60 65.25

The IPA results of the disposition variable (X3).

Variable Indicator Importance Performance
Disposition (X3) Disposition effects (X31) 59.40 59.00
Staffing the bureaucracy (X32) 44.60 72.75
Incentive (X33) 68.90 54.13

The IPA results of the successful implementation of forest management policy variable (Y2).

Variable Indicator Importance Performance
Successful Implementation of Forest Management Policy (Y2) Communication (Y21) 40.90 36.63
Resources (Y22) 65.60 58.63
Disposition (Y23) 47.50 64.38
Bureaucratic structure (Y24) 67.10 72.75

Research hypothesis testing.

Structural Model Coefficient Std Error Critical Ratio (CR) P-value Remark
Direct Effect

Communication Community development 0.325 0.086 3.779 0.000 Significant
Resource Community development 0.240 0.093 2.581 0.010 Significant
Disposition Community development 0.064 0.085 0.753 0.451 Not Significant
Organizational structure Community development 0.060 0.073 0.822 0.411 Not Significant
Environmental conditions Community development 0.336 0.093 3.613 0.000 Significant
Relations between Organizations Community development 0.336 0.072 4.667 0.000 Significant
Community development Successful Implementation of Forest Management Policies 0.326 0.082 3.976 0.000 Significant

Moderation Effect Actor-Network

Structural Model Coefficient Std Error CR P-value Remark
Communication Community development 0.339 0.079 4.291 0.000 Significant
Resource Community development 0.226 0.070 3.229 0.001 Significant
Disposition Community development 0.092 0.087 1.057 0.290 Not Significant
Organizational structure Community development 0.142 0.093 1.527 0.127 Not Significant
Environmental conditions Community development 0.120 0.072 1.667 0.096 Not Significant
Relations between Organizations Community development 0.356 0.098 3.633 0.000 Significant

Moderation Effect Stakeholder Collaborations

Structural Model Coefficient Std Error CR P-value Remark
Community development Successful Implementation of Forest Management Policies 0.292 0.077 3.792 0.000 Significant

The IPA results of the organizational structure variable (X4).

Variable Indicator Importance Performance
Organizational structure(X4) Standard operating procedures (X41) 57.30 58.38
Fragmentation (X42) 68.00 58.50

The IPA results of the communication variable (X1).

Variable Indicator Importance Performance
Communication (X1) Transmission (X11) 59.20 58.50
Clarity (X12) 40.10 48.38
Consistency (X13) 69.60 65.25

The IPA results of environmental condition variables (X5).

Variable Indicator Importance Performance
Environmental conditions (X5) Physical (X51) 53.60 37.75
Flora and fauna (X52) 55.40 52.88

The IPA results of the resources variable (X2).

Variable Indicator Importance Performance
Resource (X2) Member (X21) 52.30 55.25
Information (X22) 62.60 52.63
Authority (X23) 63.20 57.75
Amenities (X24) 55.90 58.00

The IPA results of the relationship between organizations variable (X6).

Variable Indicator Importance Performance
Relations between organizations (X6) Organizational culture (X61) 46.40 53.38
Leadership (X62) 51.60 48.13
Work motivation (X63) 61.10 72.50
eISSN:
1736-8723
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Plant Science, Ecology, other