[Coates, K.D. 2002. Tree recruitment in gaps of various size, clearcuts and undisturbed mixed forest of interior British Columbia, Canada. – Forest Ecology and Management, 155, 387–398.10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00574-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Dalling, J.W., Hubbell, S.P. 2002. Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species. – Journal of Ecology, 90, 557–568.10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00695.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Foster, S.A., Janson, C.H. 1985. The relationship between seed size and establishment conditions in tropical woody plants. – Ecology, 66, 773–780.10.2307/1940538]Search in Google Scholar
[Gross, K.L. 1984. Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants. – Journal of Ecology, 72, 369–387.10.2307/2260053]Search in Google Scholar
[Hunt, L.P. 2001. Low seed availability may limit recruitment in grazed Atriplex vesicaria and contribute to its local extinction. – Plant Ecology, 157, 53–67.10.1023/A:1014515122231]Search in Google Scholar
[Khan, M.L., Rai, J.P.N., Tripathi, R.S. 1987. Population structure of some tree species in disturbed and protected sub-tropical forests of northeast India. – Acta Ecology, 8, 247–255.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krauchi, N., Brang, P., Schonenberger, W. 2000. Forests of mountainous regions: Gaps in knowledge and research needs. – Forest Ecology and Management, 132, 73–82.10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00382-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Mori, A., Takeda, H. 2004. Effect of undisturbed canopy structure on population structure and species coexistence in an old growth sublpine forest in Central Japan. – Forest Ecology and Management, 200, 89–100.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.036]Search in Google Scholar
[Oliver, C.D., Larson, B.C. 1990. Forest stand dynamics. McGraw-Hill,Inc., New York, 467 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parthasarthy, N. 2001. Changes in forest composition and structure in three sites of tropical evergreen forests around Sengltheri, Western Ghats. – Current Science, 80, 389–393.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rao, P., Barik, S.K., Pandey, H.N., Tripathi, R.S. 1990. Community composition and tree population structure in a sub-tropical broad-leaved forest along a disturbance gradient. – Vegetatio, 88, 151–162.10.1007/BF00044832]Search in Google Scholar
[Sagar, R., Singh, J.S. 2005. Structure, diversity and regeneration of tropical deciduous forest of northern India. – Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 935–959.10.1007/s10531-004-0671-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Saxena, A.K., Singh. J.S. 1982. A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya. – Vegetatio, 50, 3–22.10.1007/BF00120674]Search in Google Scholar
[Saxena, A.K., Singh. S.P., Singh. J.S. 1984. Population structure of forests of Kumaon Himalaya: Implications for management. – Journal of Environmental Management, 19, 307–324.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shrestha, B.B. 2003. Quercus semecarpifolia Sm. in the Himalayan region: Ecology, exploitation and threats. – Himalayan Journal of Sciences, 1(2), 126–128.10.3126/hjs.v1i2.212]Search in Google Scholar
[Stone, J.N., Porter, J.L. 1998. What is stand structure and how to measure it? – Northwest Science, 72(2), 25–26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turnbull, L.A., Rees, M., Crawley, M.J. 1999. Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade- off: a sowing experiment. – Journal of Ecology, 87, 899–912.10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00405.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Vetaas, O.R. 2000. Does regulated land use allow regeneration of keystone forest species in the Annapurna conservation area, Central Himalaya? – Mountain Research and Development, 27(4), 345–351.10.1659/mrd.0893]Search in Google Scholar
[Winn, A.A., Werener, P.A. 1987. Regulation of seed yield within and among populations of Prunella vulgaris. – Ecology, 68, 1224–1233.10.2307/1939206]Search in Google Scholar