[
Adhikari, L., Khan, B., Joshi, S., Ruijun, L., Ali, G., Shah, G. M. et al., 2021: Community-based trophy hunting programs secure biodiversity and livelihoods: Learnings from Asia’s high mountain communities and landscapes. Environmental Challenges, 4:100175.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Akoglu, H., 2018: User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18:91–93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Almasan, H., 1988: Bonitatea fondurilor de vânătoare și efectivele la principalele specii de vânat. Redacția de propagandă tehnică agricolă, București. n Romanian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amos, M., Baxter, G., Finch, N., Lisle, A., Murray, P., 2014: I just want to count them! Considerations when choosing a deer population monitoring method. Wildlife Biology, 20:362–370.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Angelstam, P., Manton, M., Pedersen, S., Elbakidze, M., 2017: Disrupted trophic interactions affect recruitment of boreal deciduous and coniferous trees in northern Europe. Ecological Applications, 27:1108–1123.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Apollonio, M., Andersen, R., Putman, R., 2010: European Ungulates and their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 604 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Apollonio, M., Belkin, V. V., Borkowski, J., Borodin, O. I., Borowik, T., Cagnacci, F. et al., 2017: Challenges and science-based implications for modern management and conservation of European ungulate populations. Mammal Research, 62:209–217.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balčiauskas, L., Kawata, Y., 2022: Red Deer in Lithuania: History, Status and Management. Sustainability, 14:14091.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balčiauskas, L., 2024: Roe Deer, Lithuania’s Smallest and Most Abundant Cervid. Forests, 15:767.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ballard, W. B., 2003: Deer-predator relationship. Mule Deer Conservation: Issues and Management Strategies, 177–218.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barton, O., Gresham, A., Healey, J. R., Cordes, L. S., Shannon, G., 2022: The effects of population management on wild ungulates: A systematic map of evidence for UK species. PLoS ONE, 17:e0267385.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baumanis, J., Rungis, D. E., Gailite, A., Gaile, A., Done, G., Lukins, M. et al., 2018: Genetic Structure of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.) – A Review of the Population and its Reintroduction in Latvia. Baltic Forestry, 24:296–303.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernard, M., Gamelon, M., Boulanger, V., Dupouey, J. L., Laurent, L., Laurent, L. et al., 2017: Deer browsing promotes Norway spruce at the expense of silver fir in the forest regeneration phase. Forest Ecology and Management, 400:269–277.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernes, C., Macura, B., Jonsson, B. G., Junninen, K., Müller, J., Sandström, J. et al., 2018: Manipulating ungulate herbivory in temperate and boreal forests: Effects on vegetation and invertebrates. A systematic review. Environmental Evidence, 7:1–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bijl, H., Csányi, S., 2022: Fallow Deer (Dama dama) Population and Harvest Changes in Europe since the Early 1980s. Sustainability, 14:12198.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bishara, A. J., Hittner, J. B., 2012: Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: Comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches. Psychological Methods, 17:399–417.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bleier, N., Kovács, I., Schally, G., Szemethy, L., Csányi, S., 2017: Spatial and temporal characteristics of the damage caused by wild ungulates in maize (Zea mays L.) crops. International Journal of Pest Management, 63:92–100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burbaitė, L., Csányi, S., 2009: Roe deer population and harvest changes in Europe. Estonian Journal of Ecology, 58:169–180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burbaite, L., Csányi, S., 2010: Red deer population and harvest changes in Europe. Acta Zoologica Lituanica, 20:179–188.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carpio, A. J., Acevedo, P., Villafuerte-Jordán, R., Rodríguez, R. S., Pascual-Rico, R., Martínez-Jauregui, M., 2024: Knowledge, perception, and awareness of society regarding (over)abundance of wild ungulate populations. Ecology and Society, 29:24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carvalho, J., Hipólito, D., Teixeira, D., Fonseca, C., Torres, R. T., 2024: Hunting bag statistics of wild mammals in Portugal (1989–2022): on the need to improve data report and compilation. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 70:96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cermák, P., Mrkva, R., 2000: Browsing damage to broadleaves in some national nature reserves (Czech Republic) in 2000–2001. Ekológia (Bratislava), 22:394–403.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cermak P., Mrkva R., 2006: Effects of game on the condition and development of natural regeneration in the Vrapač National Nature Reserve (Litovelské Pomoraví). Journal of Forest Science, 52:329–336.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chapman, N., Chapman, D., 1980: The distribution of fallow deer: a worldwide review. Mammal Review, 10:61–138.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chapron, G., Kaczensky, P., Linnell, J. D. C., Von Arx, M., Huber, D., Andrén, H., 2014: Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science, 346:35–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clark, T. J., Hebblewhite, M., 2021: Predator control may not increase ungulate populations in the future: A formal meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58:812–824.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Lonergan, M. E., 1994: Culling Regimes and Sex Ratio Biases in Highland Culling regimes and sex ratio biases in Highland red deer. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31:3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Coulson, T. N., Milner-Gulfland, E. J., Thomson, D., Armstrong, H. M., 2002: Sex differences in emigration and mortality affect optimal management of deer populations. Nature, 415:633–637.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cook-Patton, S. C., LaForgia, M., Parker, J. D., 2014: Positive interactions between herbivores and plant diversity shape forest regeneration. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281:20140261.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cotta, V., Bodea, M., Micu, I., 2001: Vânatul şi vânătoarea în România, Bucharest, Editura Ceres, 786p. (In Romanian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coulson, T., 1999: The Science of Overabundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8:1719–1721.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cutini, A., Chianucci, F., Apollonio, M., 2015: Wild ungulates and forests in Europe: insights from long term studies in Central Italy. In: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Selvicoltura. Progettare il futuro per il settore forestale, Firenze, 26–29 novembre 2014. Firenze: Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali. Vol. 1, p. 509–517. Available at https://doi.org/10.4129/2cis-ac-wil.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daniels, M. J., 2006: Estimating red deer Cervus elaphus populations: An analysis of variation and cost-effectiveness of counting methods. Mammal Review, 36:235–247.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, A. J., Keiter, D. A., Kierepka, E. M., Slootmaker, C., Piaggio, A. J., Beasley, J. C. et al., 2020: A comparison of cost and quality of three methods for estimating density for wild pig (Sus scrofa). Scientific Reports, 10:2047.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Marinis, A. M., Chirichella, R., Apollonio, M., 2022: Common Fallow Deer Dama dama (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Corlatti, L., Zachos, F. E. (eds): Terrestrial Cetartiodactyla. Handbook of the Mammals of Europe. Cham, Springer, pp.115–154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monte-Luna, P., Brook, B. W., Zetina-Rejón, M. J., Cruz-Escalona, V. H., 2004: The carrying capacity of ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 13:485–495.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delahay, R. J., Smith, G. C., Barlow, A. M., Walker, N., Harris, A., Clifton-Hadley, R. S. et al., 2007: Bovine tuberculosis infection in wild mammals in the South-West region of England: A survey of prevalence and a semi-quantitative assessment of the relative risks to cattle. The Veterinary Journal, 173:287–301.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Done, G., Ozoliņš, J., Bagrade, G., Jansons, J., Baumanis, J., Vecvanags, A. et al., 2024: A case study for best suitable methods of monitoring demographic structure in cervid populations to predict increasing forest damages. Silva Fennica, 58:23025.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drexhage, M., Colin, F., 2003: Effects of browsing on shoots and roots of naturally regenerated sessile oak seedlings. Annals of Forest Science, 60:173–178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drimaj, J., Skoták, V., Kamler, J., Plhal, R., Adamec, Z., Mikulka, O. et al., 2023: Comparison of Methods for Estimating Damage by Wild Ungulates on Field Crops. Agriculture, 13:1184.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edenius, L., Ericsson, G., 2015: Effects of ungulate browsing on recruitment of aspen and rowan: a demographic approach. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30:283–288.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eliason, S. L., 1999: The illegal taking of wildlife: Toward a theoretical understanding of poaching. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 4:27–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esattore, B., Saggiomo, L., Sensi, M., Francia, V., Cherin, M., 2022: Tell me what you eat and I’ll tell you…where you live: an updated review of the worldwide distribution and foraging ecology of the fallow deer (Dama dama). Mammalian Biology, 102:321–338.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferretti, F., Bertoldi, G., Sforzi, A., Fattorini, L., 2011: Roe and fallow deer: are they compatible neighbours? European Journal of Wildlife Research, 57:775–783.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Festa-Bianchet, M., 2003: Exploitative wildlife management as a selective pressure for the life-history evolution of large mammals. Animal Behavior and Wildlife Conservation, Washington, DC, Island Press, pp. 191–207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forsyth, D. M., Comte, S., Davis, N. E., Bengsen, A. J., Côté, S. D., Hewitt, D. G., 2022: Methodology matters when estimating deer abundance: a global systematic review and recommendations for improvements. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 86:e22207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuchs, Z., Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., Gallo, J., 2021: Effect of game browsing on natural regeneration of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests in the Krušné hory Mts. (Czech Republic and Germany). Central European Forestry Journal, 67:166–180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gerner, J., Heurich, M., Günther, S., Schraml, U., 2011: Red deer at a crossroads – An analysis of communication strategies concerning wildlife management in the ‘Bayerischer Wald’ National Park, Germany. Journal for Nature Conservation, 19:319–326.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gill, R. M. A., 1992: A Review of Damage by Mammals in North Temperate Forests: 3. Impact on Trees and Forests. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 65:363–388.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hardalau, D., Fedorca, M., Popovici, D.-C., Ionescu, G., Fedorca, A., Mirea, I. et al., 2025: Insights in Managing Ungulates Population and Forest Sustainability in Romania. Diversity, 17:194. Available at https://doi.org/10.3390/d17030194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinze, E., Boch, S., Fischer, M., Hessenmöller, D., Klenk, B., Müller, J. et al., 2011: Habitat use of large ungulates in northeastern Germany in relation to forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 261:288–296.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heuze, P., Schnitzler, A., Klein, F., 2005: Is browsing the major factor of silver fir decline in the Vosges Mountains of France? Forest Ecology and Management, 217:219–228.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hewison, A. J. M., Andersen, R., Gaillard, J. M., Linnell, J. D. C., Delorme, D., 1999: Contradictory findings in studies of sex ratio variation in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45:339–348.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hothorn, T., Müller, J., 2010: Large-scale reduction of ungulate browsing by managed sport hunting. Forest Ecology and Management, 260:1416–1423.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ichim, R., 1989: Daunele provocate de cervide in pădurile din Nordul României și măsurile de prevenție, Revista Padurilor, 3:151–154. (In Romanian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaczensky, P., Chapron, G., Arx, M., Huber, D., Andrén, H., Linnell, J., 2013: Status, management and distribution of large carnivores – bear, lynx, wolf & wolverine-in Europe. Available at https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11382.88645.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Shipley, L. A., 2018: Intensity of red deer browsing on young rowans differs between freshly-felled and standing individuals. Forest Ecology and Management, 429:511–519.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, B., Šebeň, V., Pajtík, J., 2024: Bark Browsing and Recovery: A Comparative Study between Douglas Fir and Silver Fir Species in the Western Carpathians. Sustainability, 16:2293.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, B., Šebeň, V., 2024: Positive impact of large wild herbivore exclusion on silver fir regeneration: A case study from the Poľana Mountains, Central Slovakia. Central European Forestry Journal, 70:222–234.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kruuk, L., Clutton-Brock, T., Albon, S., Pemberton, J., Guinness, F., 1999: Population density affects sex ratiovariation in red deer. Nature, 399:459–461.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langbein, J., Putman, R., Pokorny, B., 2011: Traffic collisions involving deer and other ungulates in Europe and available measures for mitigation. In: Putman, R., Apollonio, M., Andersen, R. (eds.): Ungulate Management in Europe: Problems and Practices. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–259.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linnel, D. C., Aanes, R., Swenson, S., 1997: Translocation of carnivores as a method for managing problem animals: a review. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6:1245–1257.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linnell, J. D. C., Swenson, J. E., Andersen, R., 2001: Predators and people: Conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable. Animal Conservation, 4:345–349.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linnell, J. D. C., Cretois, B., Nilsen, E. B., Rolandsen, C. M., Solberg, E. J., Veiberg, V., 2020: The challenges and opportunities of coexisting with wild ungulates in the human-dominated landscapes of Europe’s Anthropocene. Biological Conservation, 244:108500.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lovari, S., Serrao, G., Mori, E., 2017: Woodland features determining home range size of roe deer. Behavioural Processes, 140:115–120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ludwig, A., Vernesi, C., Lieckfeldt, D., Lattenkamp, E. Z., Wiethölter, A., Lutz, W., 2012: Origin and patterns of genetic diversity of German fallow deer as inferred from mitochondrial DNA. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 58:495–501.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macdonald, D. W., Johnson, P. J., 2008: Sex ratio variation and mixed pairs in roe deer: evidence for control of sex allocation? Oecologia, 158:361–370.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marrocoli, S., Nielsen, M. R., Morgan, D., van Loon, T., Kulik, L., Kühl, H., 2019: Using wildlife indicators to facilitate wildlife monitoring in hunter-self monitoring schemes. Ecological Indicators, 105:254–263.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mesinger, D., Ocieczek, A., 2021: Identification of Differences in Hunting Management in Poland and Selected European Countries in the Context of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13:11048.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milner, J. M., Bonenfant, C., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J. M., Csányi, S., Stenseth, N. C., 2006: Temporal and spatial development of red deer harvesting in Europe: biological and cultural factors. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43:721–734.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mysterud, A., Rivrud, I. M., Gundersen, V., Rolandsen, C. M., Viljugrein, H., 2020: The unique spatial ecology of human hunters. Nature Human Behaviour, 4:694–701.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Partl, E., Szinovatz, V., Reimoser, F., Schweiger-Adler, J., 2002: Forest restoration and browsing impact by roe deer. Forest Ecology and Management, 159:87–100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pekin, B. K., Wisdom, M. J., Endress, B. A., Naylor, B. J., Parks, C. G., 2014: Ungulate browsing maintains shrub diversity in the absence of episodic disturbance in seasonally-arid conifer forest. PLoS ONE, 9:e86288.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pellerin, M., Saïd, S., Richard, E., Hamann, J. L., Dubois-Coli, C., Hum, P., 2010: Impact of deer on temperate forest vegetation and woody debris as protection of forest regeneration against browsing. Forest Ecology and Management, 260:429–437.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramirez, J. I., Jansen, P. A., Poorter, L., 2018: Effects of wild ungulates on the regeneration, structure and functioning of temperate forests: A semi-quantitative review. Forest Ecology and Management, 424:406–419.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reimoser, F., Gossow, H., 1996: Impact of ungulates on forest vegetation and its dependence on the silvicultural system. Forest Ecology and Management, 88:107–119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reimoser, F., Reimoser, S., 2010: Ungulates and their management in Austria. In: Apollonio, M., Andersen, R., Putman, R. (eds.): European Ungulates and Their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 338–356.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reimoser, F., Putman, R., 2011: Impacts of wild ungu-late on vegetation: cost and benefits. In: Putman, R., Apollonio, M., Andersen, R. (eds.): Ungulate Management in Europe: Problems and Practices. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 144–191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reimoser, S., Reimoser, F., 2016: Long-term trends of hunting bags and wildlife populations in Austria. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung, Bd. 41:45–57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ripple, W. J., Beschta, R. L., 2012: Large Predators Limit Herbivore Densities in Northern Forest Ecosystems. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 58:733–742.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šebeň, V., Konôpka, B., 2024: Assessing the influence of ruminating ungulates on forest regeneration and young stands in Slovakia: Results from the National Forest Inventory. Central European Forestry Journal, 70:222–234.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shumski, Y., Malazhavski, A., Yurgel, V., 2017: Contemporary State Of Hunting Industry In The Republic Of Belarus. Teka Komisji Ochrony I Kształtowania Środowiska Przyrodniczego, 14:112–123.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sinclair, A., Fryxell, J., Caughley, G., 2006: Wildlife Ecology, Conservation, and Management (2nd ed.). Malden, Oxford, Blackwell, 469 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sommer, R. S., Fahlke, J. M., Schmölcke, U., Benecke, N., Zachos, F. E., 2009: Quaternary history of the European roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Mammal Review, 39:1–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sunde, P., Kvam, T., Bolstad, J., Bronndal, M., 2000: Foraging of Lynxes in a Managed Boreal-Alpine Environment on JSTOR. Ecography, 23:291–298.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suzuki, K. K., Watanabe, Y., Kubota, T., Kuwano, Y., Kawauchi, Y., Yamagawa, H. et al., 2021: Large-scale spatial distribution of deer browsing damage to young tree plantations. IForest – Biogeosciences and Forestry, 14:34–40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szemethy, L., Heltal, M., Matral, M., Peto, Z., 1998: Home ranges and habitat selection of red deer (Cervus elaphus) on a lowland area. Gibier Faune Sauvage, 15:607–615.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torres, R. T., Miranda, J., Carvalho, J., Fonseca, C., 2015: Expansion and Current Status of Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) at the Edge of Its Distribution in Portugal. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 52:339–352.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ueckemann, E., Hansen, P., 2002: Das Damwild (4th ed.). Hamburg und Berlin, Kosmos, 336 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Beeck Calkoen, S. T. S., Kuijper, D. P. J., Apollonio, M., Blondel, L., Dormann, C. F., Storch, I. et al., 2023: Numerical top-down effects on red deer (Cervus elaphus) are mainly shaped by humans rather than large carnivores across Europe. Journal of Applied Ecology, 60:2625–2635.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vavra, M., Parks, C. G., Wisdom, M. J., 2007: Biodiversity, exotic plant species, and herbivory: The good, the bad, and the ungulate. Forest Ecology and Management, 246:66–72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vreugdenhil, S. J., Van Breukelen, L., Egbert, S., Wieren, V., Van Wieren, S. E., 2007: Existing theories do not explain sex ratio variation at birth in monomorphic roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Integrative Zoology, 2:10–18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croatian Bureau of Statistics. Available at https://web.dzs.hr/default_e.htm (Accessed on 10 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czech Statistical Office. Available at https://data.csu.gov.cz/datastat/data/ (Accessed on 10 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
German Hunter Association (Deutscher Jagdschutzver-band). Available at https://www.jagdverband.de/zahlen-fakten/zahlen-zu-jagd-und-jaegern (Accesed on 11 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lovari, S., Lorenzini, R., Masseti, M., Pereladova, O., Carden R. F., Brook, S. M. et al., 2019: The IUCN Red List Of Threatened Species. Available at https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania. Available at https://am.lrv.lt/lt/ (Accesed on 11 August 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Bela-rus. Available at https://dataportal.belstat.gov.by/osids/rubric-info/1063239 (Accessed on 10 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Official statistics of Latvia. Available at https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/environment (Accesed on 10 August 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ordinul Ministerului Mediului, Apelor și Pădurilor nr. 2847/24.11.2022 Studii de Evaluare a Speciilor De Faună Cinegetică în România. Available at http://www.mmediu.ro/categorie/efective/292 (accessed on 5 July 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polish Forestry Statistical Yearbook 2022. Available at https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/agriculture-forestry/ (Accesed on 11 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Slovenian Forest Service. Available at https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStat/en/Podrocja/Index/99/environment (Accesed on 10 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STADAT – system of Central Statistical Office Hungary. Available at https://www.ksh.hu/stadat?lang=hu&theme=kor (Accesed on 10 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Statistics Austria, STAT Cube – statistical database of statistics Austria. Available at https://www.statistik.at/en/statistics/agriculture-and-forestry/animals-animal-production/hunting (Accessed on 9 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Statistics Estonia. Available at https://www.stat.ee/en/find-statistics/statistics-theme/environment (Accessed on 10 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic. Available at https://datacube.statistics.sk/ (Accesed on 10 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Switzerland’ Federal Office for the Environment. Available at https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/de/home.html (Accesed on 9 March 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
