Clarivate listed nursing journals in 2020: what they publish and how they measure use of social media

1 Grimwade AM. Eugene Garfield – 60 Years of Invention and Innovation. Front Res Metr Anal. 2018;3:14. GrimwadeAM Eugene Garfield – 60 Years of Invention and Innovation Front Res Metr Anal 2018 3 14 10.3389/frma.2018.00014 Search in Google Scholar

2 Yuen J. Comparison of impact factor, eigenfactor metrics, and SCImago journal rank indicator and h-index for neurosurgical and spinal surgical journals. World Neurosurg. 2018;119: e328–e337. YuenJ Comparison of impact factor, eigenfactor metrics, and SCImago journal rank indicator and h-index for neurosurgical and spinal surgical journals World Neurosurg 2018 119 e328 e337 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.14430055360 Search in Google Scholar

3 Davis P. Impact factor denied to 20 journals for self-citation, stacking. Scholarly Kitchen, 2018; 27 June. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/06/27/impact-factor-denied-20-journals-self-citation-stacking/. Accessed February 3, 2021. DavisP Impact factor denied to 20 journals for self-citation, stacking Scholarly Kitchen 2018 27 June https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/06/27/impact-factor-denied-20-journals-self-citation-stacking/. Accessed February 3, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

4 Watson R, Cleary M, Hunt GE. What gets highly cited in JAN? Can editors pick which articles will contribute to a journal's impact factor? J Adv Nurs. 2013;69:e30–e34. WatsonR ClearyM HuntGE What gets highly cited in JAN? Can editors pick which articles will contribute to a journal's impact factor? J Adv Nurs 2013 69 e30 e34 10.1111/jan.1226124099516 Search in Google Scholar

5 Dardas LA, Woodward A, Scot, J, Xu H, Sawair FA. Measuring the social impact of nursing research: an insight into altmetrics. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75:1394–1405. DardasLA WoodwardA ScotJ XuH SawairFA Measuring the social impact of nursing research: an insight into altmetrics J Adv Nurs 2019 75 1394 1405 10.1111/jan.1392130507052 Search in Google Scholar

6 Rawat S, Meena S. Publish or perish: where are we heading? J Res Med Sci. 2014;19:87–89. RawatS MeenaS Publish or perish: where are we heading? J Res Med Sci 2014 19 87 89 Search in Google Scholar

7 Sharma M, Sarin A, Gupta P, Sachdeva S, Desai AV. Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World J Nucl Med. 2014;13:146. SharmaM SarinA GuptaP SachdevaS DesaiAV Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations World J Nucl Med 2014 13 146 10.4103/1450-1147.139151415016125191134 Search in Google Scholar

8 Selgen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997;314:498–502. SelgenPO Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research BMJ 1997 314 498 502 Search in Google Scholar

9 Gray R, Bressington D, Jones M, Thompson DR. What performance metrics should Journal Editors report? Or, is Impact Factor the only metric in town. J Adv Nurs. 2020;71:1–2. GrayR BressingtonD JonesM ThompsonDR What performance metrics should Journal Editors report? Or, is Impact Factor the only metric in town J Adv Nurs 2020 71 1 2 10.1111/jan.1454032929777 Search in Google Scholar

10 Smith DR, Watson R. Career development tips for today's nursing academic: bibliometrics, altmetrics and social media. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72:2654–2661. SmithDR WatsonR Career development tips for today's nursing academic: bibliometrics, altmetrics and social media J Adv Nurs 2016 72 2654 2661 10.1111/jan.1306727399604 Search in Google Scholar

11 Bar-Ilan J, Halevi G, Milojević S. Differences between altmetric data sources – a case study. J Altmet. 2019;2:1. Bar-IlanJ HaleviG MilojevićS Differences between altmetric data sources – a case study J Altmet 2019 2 1 10.29024/joa.4 Search in Google Scholar

12 SAGE Publishing. Increasing Citations and Improving Your Impact Factor. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/increasing-citations-and-improving-your-impact-factor. Accessed February 4, 2021. SAGE Publishing Increasing Citations and Improving Your Impact Factor https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/increasing-citations-and-improving-your-impact-factor. Accessed February 4, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

13 Aveyard H. Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care: A practical guide 4th edition. London: Open University Press; 2018. AveyardH Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care: A practical guide 4th edition London Open University Press 2018 Search in Google Scholar

14 Iob G, Visintini C, Palese A. An overview of JAN editorials from 2014 to 2019: Who cares? J Adv Nurs. 2020;76:1289–1292. IobG VisintiniC PaleseA An overview of JAN editorials from 2014 to 2019: Who cares? J Adv Nurs 2020 76 1289 1292 10.1111/jan.1433232065437 Search in Google Scholar

15 Watson R. Time for a discussion about discussion articles. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74:2021–2021. WatsonR Time for a discussion about discussion articles J Adv Nurs 2018 74 2021 2021 10.1111/jan.1357029543398 Search in Google Scholar

16 Watson R. Response by Editor-in-Chief. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75:3186–3187. WatsonR Response by Editor-in-Chief J Adv Nurs 2019 75 3186 3187 10.1111/jan.1415931328290 Search in Google Scholar

17 Harris N, Noyes J, Fraser L, et al. Managing and sharing research data in children's palliative care: risks, benefits and imponderables. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76:2794–2797. HarrisN NoyesJ FraserL Managing and sharing research data in children's palliative care: risks, benefits and imponderables J Adv Nurs 2020 76 2794 2797 10.1111/jan.1452732909313 Search in Google Scholar

18 Clifton A, Banks D. When is an editorial not an editorial: when it is empirical research! J Adv Nurs. 2019;75:3188–3189. CliftonA BanksD When is an editorial not an editorial: when it is empirical research! J Adv Nurs 2019 75 3188 3189 10.1111/jan.1416031328304 Search in Google Scholar

19 Draper P. A critique of concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70:1207–1208. DraperP A critique of concept analysis J Adv Nurs 2014 70 1207 1208 10.1111/jan.1228024467340 Search in Google Scholar

20 Morse JM. The baby and the bathwater. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70:2969–2969. MorseJM The baby and the bathwater J Adv Nurs 2014 70 2969 2969 10.1111/jan.1248625378185 Search in Google Scholar

21 BMJ. Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ's new eLearning programme: research to publication. BMJ Open Blog. 2015:22(September). https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/. Accessed January 24, 2021. BMJ Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ's new eLearning programme: research to publication BMJ Open Blog 2015 22 September https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/. Accessed January 24, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

22 Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Godlee F. All trials must be registered and the results published. BMJ. 2013;346:f105. ChalmersI GlasziouP GodleeF All trials must be registered and the results published BMJ 2013 346 f105 10.1136/bmj.f10523303893 Search in Google Scholar

23 Whitehead D. Writing for publication: the book review. In: Holland K, Watson R, eds. Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012:42–58. WhiteheadD Writing for publication: the book review In: HollandK WatsonR eds. Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare Oxford Wiley-Blackwell 2012 42 58 10.1002/9781118702727.ch4 Search in Google Scholar

24 Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Int Res. 2011;13:e1234. EysenbachG Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact J Int Res 2011 13 e1234 10.2196/jmir.2012327810922173204 Search in Google Scholar

25 Knight S. Social media and online attention as an early measure of the impact of research in solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2014;98:490–496. KnightS Social media and online attention as an early measure of the impact of research in solid organ transplantation Transplantation 2014 98 490 496 10.1097/TP.000000000000030725061904 Search in Google Scholar

26 Crotty D. What's next for open science – making the case for open methods. The Scholarly Kitchen. 2021:25(February). https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/02/25/whats-next-for-open-science-making-the-case-for-open-methods/?informz=1. Accessed February 25, 2021. CrottyD What's next for open science – making the case for open methods The Scholarly Kitchen 2021 25 February https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/02/25/whats-next-for-open-science-making-the-case-for-open-methods/?informz=1. Accessed February 25, 2021. Search in Google Scholar