[
Alkhatib, E., Ojala, H., Collis, J. (2019). Determinants of the voluntary adoption of digital reporting by small private companies to Companies House: Evidence from the UK. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 34, 1–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2019.06.004.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Alkhatib, S.M., Alkhatib, E.S. (2022). The evolution and diffusion of the Standard Business Reporting (SBR) initiatives: Evidence from UK small businesses. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 22, 1–45. DOI: 10.4192/1577-8517-v22_1.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Avallone, F., Ramassa, P., Roncagliolo, E. (2016). The pros and cons of XBRL adoption in Italy: A field study. In: D. Mancini, R.P. Dameri, E. Bonollo (eds.), Strengthening information and control systems. The synergy between information technology and accounting models (pp. 157–170). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26488-2_12.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Bartolacci, F., Caputo, A., Fradeani, A., Soverchia, M. (2021). Twenty years of XBRL: What we know and where we are going. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29 (5), 1113–1145. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-04-2020-0846.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Basoglu, K.A., White, C.E.S. Jr. (2015). Inline XBRL versus XBRL for SEC reporting. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 12 (1), 189–199. DOI: 10.2308/jeta-51254.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Baumüller, J., Sopp, K. (2022). Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: Review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23 (1), 8–28. DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-04-2021-0114.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Busulwa, R., Evans, N. (2021). Digital transformation in accounting. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429344589.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Chen, Y-C. (2012). A comparative study of e-government XBRL implementations: The potential of improving information transparency and efficiency. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (4), 553–563. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.05.009.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Chojnacka, E., Jadanowska, E. (2020). Użyteczność i korzyści ujawniania informacji niefinansowych – wyniki badania ankietowego przeprowadzonego wśród spółek notowanych na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 106 (162), 45–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, E.E. (2009). XBRL’ s Global Ledger framework: Exploring the standardized missing link to ERP integration. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 6, 188–206. DOI: 10.1057/jdg.2009.5.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Collis, J., Alkhatib, E., de Cesare, S. (2018). Costs and benefits to small companies of digital reporting. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.accaglobal.com/gb/en/technical-activities/technical-resources-search/2018/january/-costs-and-benefits-to-small-companies-of-digital-reporting.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cordery, C.J., Fowler, C.J., Mustafa, K. (2011). A solution looking for a problem: Factors associated with the non-adoption of XBRL. Pacific Accounting Review, 23 (1), 69–88. DOI: 10.1108/01140581111130634.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Debreceny, R., Felden, C., Ochocki, B., Piechocki, M., Piechocki, M. (2009). XBRL interactive data: Engineering the information value chain. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01437-6.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Dhole, S., Lobo, G.J., Mishra, S., Pal, A.M. (2015). Effects of the SEC’s XBRL mandate on financial reporting comparability. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 19, 29–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2015.11.002.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Di Fabio, C., Roncagliolo, E., Avallone, F., Ramassa, P. (2019). XBRL implementation in the European Union: Exploring preparers’ points of view. In: F. Cabitza, C. Batini, M. Magni (eds.), Organizing for the digital world. IT for individuals, communities and societies (pp. 33–47). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90503-7_4.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Dunne, T., Helliar, C., Lymer, A., Mousa, R. (2009). XBRL: The views of stakeholders. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.accaglobal.com/russia/en/technical-activities/technical-resources-search/2009/january/xbrl-stakeholder-views.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunne, T., Helliar, C., Lymer, A., Mousa, R. (2013). Stakeholder engagement in the internet financial reporting: The diffusion of XBRL in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 45 (3), 167–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2013.06.012.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Enachi, M., Andone, I.I. (2015). The progress of XBRL in Europe – projects, users and prospects. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 185–192. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00064-7.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
ERICA Working Group. (2021). XBRL in European CBSO. Retrieved from https://www.bde.es/f/webbde/SES/cenbal/colabora/ficheros/en/6_Doc_ERICAWG_xbrl_2021_F.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by a certain large undertakings and groups. Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2018). Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2018/815 of 17 December 2018 supplementing Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the specification of a single electronic reporting format. Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2019/815/oj.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2021). Regulation (EU) 2021/337 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2021 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 as regards the EU Recovery prospectus and targeted adjustments for financial intermediaries and Directive 2004/109/EC as regards the use of the single electronic reporting format for annual financial reports, to support the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis. Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/337/oj.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2021a, April 21). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/34/EU, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2021%3A0189%3AFIN.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2021b, November 25). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European single access point providing centralized access to publicly available information of relevance to financial services, capital markets and sustainability. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0723.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Securities and Market Authority (2015). Consultation paper on the Regulatory Technical Standards on the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF). Retrieved from https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2015/11/2015-1463_esma_consultation_paper_on_esef.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GPW (n.d.). Lista spółek. Retrieved from https://www.gpw.pl/spolki (16.09.2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henderson, D., Sheetz, S.D., Trinkle, B.S. (2012). The determinants of inter-organizational and internal in-house adoption of XBRL: A structural equation model. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13 (2), 109–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2012.02.001.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hoitash, R., Hoitash, U., Morris, L. (2021). eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): A review and implications for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 40 (2), 107–132. DOI: 10.2308/AJPT-2019-517.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Isohella, S., Nissilä, N. (2015). Connecting usability with terminology: Achieving usability by using appropriate terms. In: 2015 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC) (pp. 1–5). DOI: 10.1109/IPCC.2015.7235849.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Janvrin, D.J., No, W.G. (2012). XBRL implementation: A field investigation to identify research opportunities. Journal of Information Systems, 26 (1), 169–197. DOI: 10.2308/isys-10252.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kaya, D., Pronobis, P. (2016). The benefits of structured data across the information supply chain: Initial evidence on XBRL adoption and loan contracting of private firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35 (4), 417–436. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.04.003.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kernan, K. (2008). XBRL around the world. Journal of Accountancy, 206 (4), 62–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klimczak, K. (2018). Koszty oraz uwarunkowania implementacji XBRL jako standardu raportowania finansowego na rynkach kapitałowych. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 98 (154), 107–121. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.1549.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Lai, S-C., Lin, Y-S., Lin, Y-H., Huang, H-W. (2015). XBRL adoption and cost of debt. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 23 (2), 199–216. DOI: 10.1108/IJAIM-04-2014-0031.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Liu, C. (2013). XBRL: A new global paradigm for business financial reporting. Journal of Global Information Management, 21 (3), 60–80. DOI: 10.4018/jgim.2013070104.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Locke, J., Lowe, A. (2007). XBRL: An (open) source of enlightenment or disillusion? European Accounting Review, 16 (3), 585–623. DOI: 10.1080/09638180701507163.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Justice. (n.d.). Przeglądanie dokumentów finansowych. https://ekrs.ms.gov.pl/rdf/pd/search_df.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mousa, R., Pinsker, R. (2020). A case study of XBRL implementation and development at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Qualitative Research in Accounting &Management, 17 (2), 263–291. DOI: 10.1108/QRAM-12-2018-0096.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Perdana, A., Robb, A., Rohde, F. (2015). An integrative review and synthesis of XBRL research in academic journals. Journal of Information Systems, 29 (1), 115–153. DOI: 10.2308/isys-50884.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Piechocki, M., Felden, C., Gräning, A., Debreceny, R. (2009). Design and standardisation of XBRL solutions for governance and transparency. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 6, 224–240. DOI: 10.1057/jdg.2009.9.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Pinsker, R., Li, S. (2008). Costs and benefits of XBRL adoption: Early evidence. Communications of the ACM, 51 (3), 47–50. DOI: 10.1145/1325555.1325565.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Singerová, J. (2015). XBRL: Different approach of utilization. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 134–140. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00721-2.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Staňková, V. (2021). Electronic data format XBRL: Recent development and prospects in the EU. In: D. Procházka (ed.), Digitalization in finance and accounting (pp. 37–46). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-55277-0_4.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Steenkamp, L.P., Nel, G.F. (2012). The adoption of XBRL in South Africa: An empirical study. The Electronic Library, 30 (3), 409–425. DOI: 10.1108/02640471211241672.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Troshani, I., Rowbottom, N. (2021). Digital corporate reporting: Research developments and implications. Australian Accounting Review, 31 (3), 213–232. DOI: 10.1111/auar.12334.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
XBRL International (n.d.). XBRL Project Directory. Retrieved from https://www.xbrl.org/the-standard/why/xbrl-project-directory (8.04.2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
XBRL International (2021). Big news! Europe to get mandatory digital ESG disclosure using Inline XBRL. Retrieved from https://www.xbrl.org/news/big-news-europe-to-get-mandatory-digital-esg-disclosure-using-inline-xbrl (23.04.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, J. (2020). Does one size fit all? Evidence on XBRL adoption and 10-K filing lag. Accounting & Finance, 60 (3), 3183–3213. DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12444.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar