[
Almeida-NETO, M., Ulrich, W., 2011. A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26: 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.08.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F., Blüthgen, N., 2006. Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology, 6: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coral, G.A., Reyna, G.M.T., 2010. Manual de cultivo del Macambo Theobroma bicolor (Humb & Bonpl.) [Cultivation Manual of Macambo Theobroma bicolor (Humb. & Bonpl.)]. IIAP. Iquitos, Perú: Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana. 44 p. [cit. 2025-04-01]. http://www.iiap.org.pe/upload/publicacion/PUBL534.pdf. (In Spanish).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dáttilo, W., Marquitti, F.M.D., Guimarães Jr, P.R., Izzo, T.J., 2014. The structure of ant–plant ecological networks: is abundance enough? Ecology, 95: 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1647.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deheuvels, O., De Waal, L., Bagny-Beilhe, L., 2017. How habitat heterogeneity affects pollinator's communities in cocoa-based agroforestry systems? In Proceedings of the first International Symposium on Cocoa Research ISCR 2017. Lima: ICCO. 5 p. [cit. 2025-04-01]. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/586664/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delgado, C., Couturier, G., Balcazar, L., Chichipe, A., 2023. Insect pests of Theobroma cacao (Malvaceae) in the Peruvian Amazon. Tropical Agriculture, 100: 110–114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delmas, E., Besson, M., Brice, M.H., Burkle, L.A., Riva, G.V.D., Fortin, M.J., Gravel, D., Guimarães, P.R., Hembry, D.H., Newman, E.A., Olesen, J.M., Pires, M.M., Yeakel, J.D., Poisot, T., 2019. Analysing ecological networks of species interactions. Biological Reviews, 94: 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12433
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Do, Y., Choi, M.B., 2019. Network analysis for co‐occur-rence of pest insects on host crops. Entomological Research, 49: 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12333
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dormann, C.F., Gruber, B., Fründ, J., 2008. Introducing the bipartite package: Analysing ecological networks. R News, 8: 8–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dormann, C.F., Fründ, J., Blüthgen, N., Gruber, B., 2009. Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. The Open Journal of Ecology, 2: 7–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Nyström, M., Peterson, G., Bengtsson, J., Walker, B., Norberg, J., 2003. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1: 488–494. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0488:RDECAR]2.0.CO;2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
El-Wakeil, N.E., 2010. Insect economic levels in relation to crop production. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 43: 1710–1744. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400902753584
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fontaine, C., Guimarães JR, P.R., Kéfi, S., Loeuille, N., Memmott, J., Van Der Putten, W.H., Van Veen, F.JF., Thébault, E., 2011. The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks. Ecology Letters, 14: 1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01688.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fortuna, M.A., Stouffer, D.B., Olesen, J.M., Jordano, P., Mouillot, D., Krasnov, B.R., Poulin, R., Bascompte, J., 2010. Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? Journal of Animal Ecology, 79: 811–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01688.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grilli, J., Rogers, T., Allesina, S., 2016. Modularity and stability in ecological communities. Nature Communications, 7: 12031. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harterreiten-Souza, E.S., Togni, P.H.B., Pires, C.S.S., Sujii, E.R., 2014. The role of integrating agroforestry and vegetable planting in structuring communities of herbivorous insects and their natural enemies in the Neotropical region. Agroforestry Systems, 88: 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9666-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jankielsohn, A., 2018. The importance of insects in agricul- tural ecosystems. Advances in Entomology, 6: 62–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jordano, P., 2016. Sampling networks of ecological interactions. Functional Ecology, 30: 1883–1893. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12763
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lagneaux, E., Andreotti, F., Neher, C.M., 2021. Cacao, copoazu and macambo: Exploring Theobroma diversity in smallholder agroforestry systems of the Peruvian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems, 95: 1359–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00610-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewinsohn, T.M., Prado, P.I., Jordano, P., Bascompte, J., Olesen, J.M., 2006. Structure in plant–animal interaction assemblages. Oikos, 113: 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14583.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marengo, J.A., 1998. Climatologia de la zona de Iquitos, Peru [Climatology of the Iquitos Region, Peru]. In Kalliola, R., Paintan, S.F., (eds). Geoecologia y desarrollo amazónico: estudio integrado en la zona de Iquitos, Peru. Turku: Turun Yliopisto, p. 35–57. (In Spanish).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Melo, A.S., Paz-Neto, A. A., Melo, J.W.S., Gondim-Junior, M.G.C., 2024. Interspecific interaction network of mites associated with mango trees. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 93: 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-024-00936-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Novotný, V., Basset, Y., 2000. Rare species in communities of tropical insect herbivores: pondering the mystery of singletons. Oikos, 89: 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890316.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olesen, J.M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y.L., Jordano, P.,2007. The modularity of pollination networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104: 19891–19896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706375104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oliveira, J.B.B.S., Faria, M.L., Borges, M.A., Fagundes, M., Araújo, W.S., 2020. Comparing the plant–herbivore network topology of different insect guilds in Neotropical savannas. Ecological Entomology, 45: 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12808
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pinho, B.X., Dáttilo, W., Leal, I.R., 2017. Structural breakdown of specialized plant-herbivore interaction networks in tropical forest edges. Global Ecology and Conservation, 12: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.08.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Power, A.G., 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365: 2959–2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shanker, C., Solanki, K.R., 2000. Agroforestry: an eco-friendly land-use system for insect management. Outlook on Agriculture, 29: 91–96. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000000101293
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tineo, D., Calderon, M.S., Maicelo, J.L., Oliva, M., Huamán-Pilco, Á.F., Ananco, O., Bustamante, D.E., 2024. Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the complete plastid genome of Theobroma bicolor (Malvaceae) from Peru. Mitochondrial DNA Part B, 9: 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2024.2310134
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torralba, M., Fagerholm, N., Burgess, P.J., Moreno, G., Plieninger, T., 2016. Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 230: 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A.M., Kruess, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., Thies, C., 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters, 8: 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Windsor, F.M., Armenteras, D., Assis, A.P.A., Astegiano, J., Santana, P.C., Cagnolo, L., Carvalheiro, L.G., Emary, C., Fort, H., Gonzalez, X.I., Kitson, J.J.N., Lacerda, A.C.F., Lois, M., Márquez-Velásquez, V., Miller, K.E., Monasterolo, M., Omacini, M., Maia, K.P., Palacios, T.P., Pocock, M.J.O., Poggio, S.L., Varassin, I.G., Vázquez, D.P., Tavella, J., Rother, D.C., Devoto, M., Guimarães, P.R., Evans, D.M., 2022. Network science: Applications for sustainable agroecosystems and food security. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 20: 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2022.03.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahra, S., Jorge, L., Dáttilo, W., Klimeš, P., Ferreira, P.D.L., Christianini, A., Nunes-Freitas, A.P., Laviski, B.F.S., Wang, B., Emer, C., Lara, C., Castillo-Guevara, C., Gomez, C., Corro, E., Lenc, J., Falcão, J., Tavella, J., Cagnolo, L., Pizo, M.A., Cuautle, M., Tahadlova, M., STAAB, M., Mottl, O., Miranda, N.P., Oliveira, P., Butterill, P.T., Antoniazzi, R., Xing, S., Izzo, T., Novotny, V., Fayle, T., 2024. Ant-plant specialisation depends on network type, but not disturbance, elevation, or latitude. Authorea, 6 May. [cit. 2025-04-01]. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.171500704.45910925/v1
]Search in Google Scholar
