Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Architecture and Environmental Investment Decision-Making

[1]Alewine, H.C. and Miller, T.C., 2016. How Balanced Scorecard Format and Reputation Related to Environmental Objectives Influence Performance Evaluations. Advances in Management Accounting, 27, pp.123–165.AlewineH.C.MillerT.C.2016How Balanced Scorecard Format and Reputation Related to Environmental Objectives Influence Performance EvaluationsAdvances in Management Accounting2712316510.1108/S1474-787120160000027004Search in Google Scholar

[2]Banker, R.D., Chang, H. and Pizzini, M., 2011. The Judgmental Effects of Strategy Maps in Balanced Scorecard Performance Evaluations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(4), pp.259–279.BankerR.D.ChangH.PizziniM.2011The Judgmental Effects of Strategy Maps in Balanced Scorecard Performance EvaluationsInternational Journal of Accounting Information Systems12425927910.1016/j.accinf.2011.08.001Search in Google Scholar

[3]Beresford, B. and Sloper, P., 2008. Understanding the Dynamics of Decision-Making and Choice: A Scoping Study of Key Psychological Theories to Inform the Design and Analysis of the Panel Study. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.BeresfordB.SloperP.2008Understanding the Dynamics of Decision-Making and Choice: A Scoping Study of Key Psychological Theories to Inform the Design and Analysis of the Panel StudyYorkSocial Policy Research Unit, University of YorkSearch in Google Scholar

[4]Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L.R. and Larraza-Kintana, M., 2010. Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate responses to Institutional Pressures: Do family-controlled Firms Pollute Less? Administrative science quarterly, 55(1), pp.82–113.BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL.R.Larraza-KintanaM.2010Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate responses to Institutional Pressures: Do family-controlled Firms Pollute Less?Administrative science quarterly5518211310.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.82Search in Google Scholar

[5]Bostian, M., Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Lundgren, T., 2016. Environmental Investment and Firm Performance: A Network Approach. Energy Economics, 57, pp.243–255.BostianM.FäreR.GrosskopfS.LundgrenT.2016Environmental Investment and Firm Performance: A Network ApproachEnergy Economics5724325510.1016/j.eneco.2016.05.013Search in Google Scholar

[6]Cagno, E., Micheli, G.J. and Trucco, P., 2012. Eco-efficiency for Sustainable Manufacturing: An Extended Environmental Costing Method. Production Planning & Control, 23(2–3), pp.134–144.CagnoE.MicheliG.J.TruccoP.2012Eco-efficiency for Sustainable Manufacturing: An Extended Environmental Costing MethodProduction Planning & Control232–313414410.1080/09537287.2011.591628Search in Google Scholar

[7]Cheng, M.M., Humphreys, K.A. and Zhang, Y.Y., 2018. The Interplay between Strategic Risk Profiles and Presentation Format on Managers' Strategic Judgments Using the Balanced scorecard. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 70, pp.92–105.ChengM.M.HumphreysK.A.ZhangY.Y.2018The Interplay between Strategic Risk Profiles and Presentation Format on Managers' Strategic Judgments Using the Balanced scorecardAccounting, Organizations and Society709210510.1016/j.aos.2018.05.009Search in Google Scholar

[8]Davis-Peccoud, J., Stone, P. and Tovey, C., 2016. Achieving Breakthrough Results in Sustainability. Bain and Company, pp1–8. [online] Available at: http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/achieving-breakthrough-results-insustainability.aspx. [Accessed 1 July 2018].Davis-PeccoudJ.StoneP.ToveyC.2016Achieving Breakthrough Results in SustainabilityBain and Company18[online] Available at: http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/achieving-breakthrough-results-insustainability.aspx. [Accessed 1 July 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[9]Epstein, M.J. and Buhovac, A.R., 2018. Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.EpsteinM.J.BuhovacA.R.2018Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic ImpactsBerrett-Koehler Publishers10.4324/9781351280129Search in Google Scholar

[10]Fayers, C., 1999. Environment and Investment: The Role of Personal Investment Choice in Creating Sustainability. Sustainable Development, 7(2), pp.64–76.FayersC.1999Environment and Investment: The Role of Personal Investment Choice in Creating SustainabilitySustainable Development72647610.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(199905)7:2<64::AID-SD103>3.0.CO;2-BSearch in Google Scholar

[11]Ferreira, J.J., Raposo, M.L. and Fernandes, C.I., 2013. Does Innovativeness of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Differ from Other Industries? The Service Industries Journal, 33(7–8), pp.734–748.FerreiraJ.J.RaposoM.L.FernandesC.I.2013Does Innovativeness of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Differ from Other Industries?The Service Industries Journal337–873474810.1080/02642069.2013.740462Search in Google Scholar

[12]Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M., 2002. The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard–linking Sustainability Management to Business Strategy. Business strategy and the Environment, 11(5), pp.269–284.FiggeF.HahnT.SchalteggerS.WagnerM.2002The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard–linking Sustainability Management to Business StrategyBusiness strategy and the Environment11526928410.1002/bse.339Search in Google Scholar

[13]Gandhi, K., Schmidt, B. and Ng, A.H., 2018. Towards Data Mining-based Decision Support in Manufacturing Maintenance. Procedia Cirp, 72, pp.261–265.GandhiK.SchmidtB.NgA.H.2018Towards Data Mining-based Decision Support in Manufacturing MaintenanceProcedia Cirp7226126510.1016/j.procir.2018.03.076Search in Google Scholar

[14]Hansen, E.G. and Schaltegger, S., 2016. The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), pp.193–221.HansenE.G.SchalteggerS.2016The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of ArchitecturesJournal of Business Ethics133219322110.1007/s10551-014-2340-3Search in Google Scholar

[15]Hayes, A.F., 2015. An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), pp.1–22.HayesA.F.2015An Index and Test of Linear Moderated MediationMultivariate Behavioral Research50112210.1080/00273171.2014.96268326609740Search in Google Scholar

[16]Hayes, A.F., 2017. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. Guilford publications.HayesA.F.2017Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based ApproachGuilford publicationsSearch in Google Scholar

[17]Hourneaux Jr, F., da Silva Gabriel, M.L. and Gallardo-Vázquez, D.A., 2018. Triple Bottom Line and Sustainable Performance Measurement in Industrial Companies. Revista de Gestão, 25(4), pp.413–429.HourneauxF.Jrda Silva GabrielM.L.Gallardo-VázquezD.A.2018Triple Bottom Line and Sustainable Performance Measurement in Industrial CompaniesRevista de Gestão25441342910.1108/REGE-04-2018-0065Search in Google Scholar

[18]Hristov, I., Chirico, A. and Appolloni, A., 2019. Sustainability Value Creation, Survival, and Growth of the Company: A Critical Perspective in the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC). Sustainability, 11(7), pp.1–19.HristovI.ChiricoA.AppolloniA.2019Sustainability Value Creation, Survival, and Growth of the Company: A Critical Perspective in the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC)Sustainability11711910.3390/su11072119Search in Google Scholar

[19]Ignatius, A., 2018. The New World of Risk. Harvard Business Review, pp.124–130,[online] Available at: https://hbr.org/2018/05/the-new-world-of-risk. [Accessed 13 September 2018].IgnatiusA.2018The New World of RiskHarvard Business Review124130[online] Available at: https://hbr.org/2018/05/the-new-world-of-risk. [Accessed 13 September 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[20]Jano-Ito, M.A. and Crawford-Brown, D., 2017. Investment Decisions Considering Economic, Environmental and Social Factors: An Actors' Perspective for the Electricity Sector of Mexico. Energy, 121, pp.92–106.Jano-ItoM.A.Crawford-BrownD.2017Investment Decisions Considering Economic, Environmental and Social Factors: An Actors' Perspective for the Electricity Sector of MexicoEnergy1219210610.1016/j.energy.2017.01.016Search in Google Scholar

[21]Jassem, S., Azmi, A. and Zakaria, Z., 2018. Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making. Sustainability, 10(2), pp.1–18.JassemS.AzmiA.ZakariaZ.2018Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-MakingSustainability10211810.3390/su10020541Search in Google Scholar

[22]Jayalath, K.P., Ng, H.K.T., Manage, A.B. and Riggs, K.E., 2017. Improved Tests for Homogeneity of Variances. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(9), pp.7423–7446.JayalathK.P.NgH.K.T.ManageA.B.RiggsK.E.2017Improved Tests for Homogeneity of VariancesCommunications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation4697423744610.1080/03610918.2016.1241404Search in Google Scholar

[23]Jiangtao, L. and Pin, Z., 2010, April. Analysis of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Influences on Decision Processes and Investment Decisions. In 2010 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, IEEE, pp.111–116.JiangtaoL.PinZ.2010AprilAnalysis of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Influences on Decision Processes and Investment DecisionsIn 2010 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and EngineeringIEEE11111610.1109/ICIME.2010.5478344Search in Google Scholar

[24]Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrical, 47(2), pp.263–292.KahnemanD.TverskyA.1979Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrical47226329210.21236/ADA045771Search in Google Scholar

[25]Kalender, Z.T. and Vayvay, Ö., 2016. The Fifth Pillar of the Balanced Scorecard: Sustainability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, pp.76–83.KalenderZ.T.VayvayÖ.2016The Fifth Pillar of the Balanced Scorecard: SustainabilityProcedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences235768310.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.027Search in Google Scholar

[26]Kang, G.G. and Fredin, A., 2012. The Balanced Scorecard: the Effects of Feedback on Performance Evaluation. Management Research Review, 35(7), pp.637–661.KangG.G.FredinA.2012The Balanced Scorecard: the Effects of Feedback on Performance EvaluationManagement Research Review35763766110.1108/01409171211238848Search in Google Scholar

[27]Kaplan, R.S., 2009. Risk Management and the Strategy Execution System. Balanced Scorecard Report, 11(6), pp.1–6.KaplanR.S.2009Risk Management and the Strategy Execution SystemBalanced Scorecard Report11616Search in Google Scholar

[28]Kaplan, R.S. and Mikes, A., 2012. Managing Risks: a New Framework. Harvard Business Review, 90(6), pp.48–60.KaplanR.S.MikesA.2012Managing Risks: a New FrameworkHarvard Business Review9064860Search in Google Scholar

[29]Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., 2001. Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), pp.87–104.KaplanR.S.NortonD.P.2001Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part IAccounting Horizons1518710410.2308/acch.2001.15.1.87Search in Google Scholar

[30]Kaplan, S.E. and Wisner, P.S., 2009. The Judgmental Effects of Management Communications and a Fifth Balanced Scorecard Category on Performance Evaluation. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 21(2), pp.37–56.KaplanS.E.WisnerP.S.2009The Judgmental Effects of Management Communications and a Fifth Balanced Scorecard Category on Performance EvaluationBehavioral Research in Accounting212375610.2308/bria.2009.21.2.37Search in Google Scholar

[31]Kettinger, W.J. and Li, Y., 2010. The Infological Equation Extended: Towards Conceptual Clarity in the Relationship Between Data, Information and Knowledge. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(4), pp.409–421.KettingerW.J.LiY.2010The Infological Equation Extended: Towards Conceptual Clarity in the Relationship Between Data, Information and KnowledgeEuropean Journal of Information Systems19440942110.1057/ejis.2010.25Search in Google Scholar

[32]Kotze, P.N., Vermaak, F.N. and Kirsten, E., 2015. Including Risk in the Balanced Scorecard: Adoption Rate and Implementation Methods of Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listed Organisations. Southern African Business Review, 19(2), pp.99–107.KotzeP.N.VermaakF.N.KirstenE.2015Including Risk in the Balanced Scorecard: Adoption Rate and Implementation Methods of Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listed OrganisationsSouthern African Business Review1929910710.25159/1998-8125/5808Search in Google Scholar

[33]Lee, S. and Lee, D.K., 2018. What is the Proper Way to Apply the Multiple Comparison test? Korean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 71(5), pp.353–360.LeeS.LeeD.K.2018What is the Proper Way to Apply the Multiple Comparison test?Korean Journal of Anaesthesiology71535336010.4097/kja.d.18.00242619359430157585Search in Google Scholar

[34]Myung, J.K., An, H.T. and Lee, S.Y., 2019. Corporate Competitiveness Index of Climate Change: A Balanced Scorecard Approach. Sustainability, 11(5), pp.1–16.MyungJ.K.AnH.T.LeeS.Y.2019Corporate Competitiveness Index of Climate Change: A Balanced Scorecard ApproachSustainability11511610.3390/su11051445Search in Google Scholar

[35]Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., Mousakhani, S., Tavakoli, M., Dalvand, M.R., Šaparauskas, J. and Antuchevičienė, J., 2020. Importance-performance Analysis Based Balanced Scorecard for Performance Evaluation in Higher Education Institutions: an Integrated Fuzzy Approach. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(3), pp.647–678.Nazari-ShirkouhiS.MousakhaniS.TavakoliM.DalvandM.R.ŠaparauskasJ.AntuchevičienėJ.2020Importance-performance Analysis Based Balanced Scorecard for Performance Evaluation in Higher Education Institutions: an Integrated Fuzzy ApproachJournal of Business Economics and Management21364767810.3846/jbem.2020.11940Search in Google Scholar

[36]Olson, D.L. and Wu, D., 2020. Balanced Scorecards to Measure Enterprise Risk Performance. In Enterprise Risk Management Models (pp.137–148). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.OlsonD.L.WuD.2020Balanced Scorecards to Measure Enterprise Risk Performance. In Enterprise Risk Management Models137148SpringerBerlin, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-662-60608-7_10Search in Google Scholar

[37]Payne, J.W., Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Johnson, E.J., 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press.PayneJ.W.PayneJ.W.BettmanJ.R.JohnsonE.J.1993The Adaptive Decision MakerCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9781139173933Search in Google Scholar

[38]Pekovic, S., Grolleau, G. and Mzoughi, N., 2018. Environmental Investments: Too Much of a Good Thing? International Journal of Production Economics, 197, pp.297–302.PekovicS.GrolleauG.MzoughiN.2018Environmental Investments: Too Much of a Good Thing?International Journal of Production Economics19729730210.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.012Search in Google Scholar

[39]Rana, R. and Singhal, R., 2015. Chi-square Test and its Application in Hypothesis Testing. Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, 1(1), pp.69–71.RanaR.SinghalR.2015Chi-square Test and its Application in Hypothesis TestingJournal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences11697110.4103/2395-5414.157577Search in Google Scholar

[40]Rikhardsson, P. and Holm, C., 2008. The Effect of Environmental Information on Investment Allocation Decisions – an Experimental Study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(6), pp.382–397.RikhardssonP.HolmC.2008The Effect of Environmental Information on Investment Allocation Decisions – an Experimental StudyBusiness Strategy and the Environment17638239710.1002/bse.536Search in Google Scholar

[41]Sarker, T.K. and Burritt, R.L., 2008. An Empirical Examination of the Role of Environmental Accounting Information in Environmental Investment Decision-making. In Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production (pp. 457–475). Springer, Dordrecht.SarkerT.K.BurrittR.L.2008An Empirical Examination of the Role of Environmental Accounting Information in Environmental Investment Decision-makingInEnvironmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production457475SpringerDordrecht10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_26Search in Google Scholar

[42]Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. eds., 2017. Managing the Business Case for Sustainability: The Integration of Social, Environmental and Economic Performance. Routledge.SchalteggerS.WagnerM.eds.2017Managing the Business Case for Sustainability: The Integration of Social, Environmental and Economic PerformanceRoutledge10.4324/9781351280525Search in Google Scholar

[43]Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M., 2011. Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Innovation: Categories and Interactions. Business Strategy and The Environment, 20(4), pp.222–237.SchalteggerS.WagnerM.2011Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Innovation: Categories and InteractionsBusiness Strategy and The Environment20422223710.1002/bse.682Search in Google Scholar

[44]Simons, R., 2000. Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. Prentice-Hall, New JerseySimonsR.2000Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing StrategyPrentice-HallNew JerseySearch in Google Scholar

[45]Wisutteewong, G. and Rompho, N., 2015. Linking Balanced Scorecard and COSO ERM in Thai Companies. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 16(2), pp.127–134.WisutteewongG.RomphoN.2015Linking Balanced Scorecard and COSO ERM in Thai CompaniesJournal of Management Policy and Practice162127134Search in Google Scholar

[46]Wu, D.D. and Olson, D.L., 2009. Enterprise Risk Management: Small Business Scorecard Analysis. Production Planning and Control, 20(4), pp.362–369.WuD.D.OlsonD.L.2009Enterprise Risk Management: Small Business Scorecard AnalysisProduction Planning and Control20436236910.1080/09537280902843706Search in Google Scholar