There are two genera of the Balsaminaceae, and one is
Optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are the primary tools to observe pollen morphology, which greatly aid the development of palynology. Researchers promoted the development of plant taxonomy by extracting pollen characteristics from families such as Campanulaceae (Khansari et al., 2012), Combretaceae (El Ghazali, 2022) and Paropsieae (Mezzonato-Pires et al., 2022). The study of plant pollen helps determine that pollen characteristics can be used as a basis for plant classification (Tuler et al., 2017; Umber et al., 2022). The importance of plant classification and pollen characteristics at the intergeneric level has been emphasised, and it has been shown that pollen data can verify the information of pollen evolution on the true stamen pedigree. In addition, it provides some explanations for the direction of plant evolution.
Among
The plant materials were primarily derived from field studies and sampling, and the collected information was recorded (Annex 1). The change in height of flower colour among the species of
The pollen of 35 species of
The pictures were analysed using Image J (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), and the morphological characteristics were named based on the pollen research literature (Yu et al., 2016; Mazari et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2020; Raza et al., 2020). There were slight modifications such as pillow shape, which was named so because its shape is similar to that of ancient Chinese porcelain. When the mesh density (MD) was 12 × 1 000-fold magnification, the number of mesh was regarded as the MD.
The statistical data of Microsoft Excel YEAR (Redmond, WA, USA) were used, and SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for correlation, principal component and system clustering analyses (Pérez-Gutiérrez et al., 2015; Zafar et al., 2022). The number of sepals (NS), which is one of the important bases for the classification of
Based on the study and analysis of pollen micromorphology of 35 species of
Statistics of pollen micromorphological characteristics of
N | Species | Epidermal ornamentation | Shape | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PV | EV | |||
1 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
2 | Reticulate | Pillow | Oval | |
3 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
4 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
5 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
6 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
7 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
8 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
9 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
10 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
11 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
12 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
13 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
14 | Reticulate | Oval | Oval | |
15 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
16 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
17 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
18 | Reticulate | Triangular circle | Triangular circle | |
19 | Corrugated reticulation | Triangular circle | Triangular circle | |
20 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
21 | Reticulate | Oval | Oval | |
22 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Near circle | |
23 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
24 | Reticulate spinous granule | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
25 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
26 | Reticulate | Oval | Oval | |
27 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
28 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
29 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
30 | Reticulate | Pillow | Oval | |
31 | Reticulate | Pillow | Oval | |
32 | Reticulate | Pillow | Oval | |
33 | Reticulate | Pillow | Oval | |
34 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
35 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval |
EV, equatorial view.
There were six indices of qualitative characteristics (Figure 1), which included epidermis ornamentation (EO), polar view (PV), equatorial view (EV), characteristics of germination pores (CGP), mesh feature (MF) and ridge feature (RF). The characteristics under each index were different, and the proportion was also different, indicating that the characteristics of pollen qualitative indices were rich, which aided the interspecific classification of
Figure 1.
SEM image of

Figure 2.
Proportion analysis of pollen characteristics of

Analysis on the characteristics of pollen quantitative index of
Index | Average value | Maximum value | Minimum value |
---|---|---|---|
Polar axis length (P) (μm) | 16.55 | 24.48 | 13.29 |
Equatorial major axis length (E1) (μm) | 29.49 | 36.65 | 23.63 |
Equatorial short axis length (E2) (μm) | 16.39 | 24.42 | 12.61 |
Pollen volume (V) (μm3) | 8277.23 | 14760.12 | 3958.54 |
P/E1 | 0.57 | 0.96 | 0.46 |
P/E2 | 1.01 | 1.23 | 0.93 |
E1/E2 | 1.83 | 2.22 | 1.06 |
GPL (μm) | 7.96 | 11.64 | 5.37 |
GPW (μm) | 0.38 | 1.58 | 0.09 |
L/W | 27.35 | 105.78 | 5.45 |
MD | 27.77 | 64.67 | 5.33 |
RW (μm) | 0.54 | 0.94 | 0.3 |
GPL, germination pore length; GPW, germination pore width; L/W, germination pore length/germination pore width; MD, mesh density; RW, ridge width.
There was some correlation among the pollen characteristics (Figure 3). Among the 19 traits of pollen, there were significant correlations among some indices, such as the SN and polar morphology, equatorial morphology, number of germination holes, MD, RW, polar axis length, equatorial minor axis length, P/E1, P/E2 and E1/E2. With reference to the NS, there was some correlation between pollen characteristics, and there was also some correlation with the NS.
Figure 3.
Correlation analysis of pollen characteristics. More intense colour indicates a higher correlation. CGP, characteristics of germination pores; E1, equatorial major axis length; E2, equatorial short axis length; EO, epidermis ornamentation; EV, equatorial view; GPL, germination pore length; GPW, germination pore width; L/W, germination pore length/germination pore width; MD, mesh density; MF, mesh feature; NS, number of sepals; P, polar axis length; PV, polar view; RF, ridge feature; RW, ridge width.

According to the principal component analysis of 20 characteristic indexes (Table 3), there were 5 main components, and the contribution rate of each component was more than 10%. The cumulative contribution rate of 5 components is 80.45% > 60%, and all characteristic indexes were included. It showed that the selected current index was of significance to the clustering results among the cluster members. The results showed that the selected characteristic indexes were of significance to the classification of
Principal component analysis table of pollen micromorphological characteristics of
Bartlett sphericity test | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Composition | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Contribution rate (%) | Contribution rate | 29.53 | 15.53 | 13.90 | 10.97 | 10.53 |
Cumulative contribution rate | 29.53 | 45.06 | 58.96 | 69.93 | 80.45 | |
Characteristic index | P | 0.92 | 0.13 | 0.29 | −0.10 | −0.05 |
P/E1 | 0.87 | −0.37 | −0.04 | 0.12 | −0.23 | |
E2 | 0.87 | 0.38 | 0.15 | −0.21 | −0.10 | |
EV | 0.85 | −0.45 | −0.03 | 0.04 | −0.09 | |
E1/E2 | −0.85 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.37 | |
NGP | 0.84 | −0.45 | 0.01 | 0.12 | −0.05 | |
V | 0.79 | 0.45 | 0.32 | −0.21 | 0.02 | |
RF | 0.74 | 0.16 | −0.39 | 0.30 | −0.02 | |
PV | 0.68 | −0.21 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.34 | |
RW | 0.56 | −0.09 | −0.21 | −0.51 | 0.20 | |
EO | 0.54 | 0.47 | −0.33 | 0.45 | −0.06 | |
NS | 0.53 | −0.33 | −0.06 | −0.09 | 0.43 | |
E1 | 0.05 | 0.70 | 0.51 | −0.33 | 0.29 | |
P/E2 | 0.09 | −0.65 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.15 | |
CGP | 0.18 | 0.58 | −0.07 | −0.13 | −0.52 | |
L/W | 0.48 | 0.57 | −0.31 | 0.38 | 0.28 | |
GPL | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.81 | 0.15 | 0.02 | |
MD | −0.33 | 0.39 | 0.21 | 0.67 | −0.08 | |
MF | 0.08 | 0.05 | −0.35 | −0.63 | −0.01 | |
GPW | −0.22 | −0.35 | 0.42 | −0.10 | −0.58 |
CGP, characteristics of germination pores; EO, epidermis ornamentation; EV, equatorial view; GPL, germination pore length; GPW, germination pore width; L/W, germination pore length/germination pore width; MD, mesh density; MF, mesh feature; NS, number of sepals; PV, polar view; RF, ridge feature; RW, ridge width.
In the clustering results of the system (Figure 4), with the red dotted line as the reference line, the system clustering had three branches, and the yellow reference line analysis had six branches.
Figure 4.
Phylogenetic tree of pollen micromorphology of

The other species were uniformly clustered into one branch (third branch) under the red reference line, and the clustering distance was short, indicating that there was only a small difference among the species. With reference to the yellow dotted line, the third branch under the red reference line was further divided into three more careful branches, namely the fourth, fifth and sixth branches that contained 5, 4 and 23 species, respectively, and the varieties or same species of
Based on the quantitative data analysis between groups of
Figure 5.
Based on grouping analysis of Impatiens. (a) Proportion of 35 species of Impatiens. (b) Analysis of inter-group differences based on polar axis length (P). (c) Analysis of the difference between groups based on the equatorial major axis length (E1). (d) Analysis of differences between groups based on the length of equatorial minor axis length (E2). (e) Analysis of differences between groups based on pollen volume (V). (f) Analysis of differences between groups based on MD. (g-h) Analysis of the difference between groups based on the length and width of Germinating pore (GPL/GPW). (i) Analysis of difference between groups based on RW. All abbreviations used in the table must be explained, also letters (a-c). MD, mesh density; RW, ridge width.

The situation of the
We observed the pollen of
The PCA showed that 11 of the 19 pollen characteristics were more effective than the NS in the classification of
Based on the
Figure 6.
Heat map of interspecific similarity of

Figure 7.
Pollen characteristics of

The clustering results of 35 species of
The traditional taxonomy of
The pollen of 35 species of
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Supplementary Figure 1.

Supplementary Figure 2.



Principal component analysis table of pollen micromorphological characteristics of Impatiens.
Bartlett sphericity test | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Composition | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Contribution rate (%) | Contribution rate | 29.53 | 15.53 | 13.90 | 10.97 | 10.53 |
Cumulative contribution rate | 29.53 | 45.06 | 58.96 | 69.93 | 80.45 | |
Characteristic index | P | 0.92 | 0.13 | 0.29 | −0.10 | −0.05 |
P/E1 | 0.87 | −0.37 | −0.04 | 0.12 | −0.23 | |
E2 | 0.87 | 0.38 | 0.15 | −0.21 | −0.10 | |
EV | 0.85 | −0.45 | −0.03 | 0.04 | −0.09 | |
E1/E2 | −0.85 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.37 | |
NGP | 0.84 | −0.45 | 0.01 | 0.12 | −0.05 | |
V | 0.79 | 0.45 | 0.32 | −0.21 | 0.02 | |
RF | 0.74 | 0.16 | −0.39 | 0.30 | −0.02 | |
PV | 0.68 | −0.21 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.34 | |
RW | 0.56 | −0.09 | −0.21 | −0.51 | 0.20 | |
EO | 0.54 | 0.47 | −0.33 | 0.45 | −0.06 | |
NS | 0.53 | −0.33 | −0.06 | −0.09 | 0.43 | |
E1 | 0.05 | 0.70 | 0.51 | −0.33 | 0.29 | |
P/E2 | 0.09 | −0.65 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.15 | |
CGP | 0.18 | 0.58 | −0.07 | −0.13 | −0.52 | |
L/W | 0.48 | 0.57 | −0.31 | 0.38 | 0.28 | |
GPL | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.81 | 0.15 | 0.02 | |
MD | −0.33 | 0.39 | 0.21 | 0.67 | −0.08 | |
MF | 0.08 | 0.05 | −0.35 | −0.63 | −0.01 | |
GPW | −0.22 | −0.35 | 0.42 | −0.10 | −0.58 |
Based on the grouping category of Impatiens: analysis of the difference of quantitative characters of pollen among groups.
Group | Size | MD | RW | Germinating pore | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | E1 | E2 | V | P/E1 | P/E2 | E1/E2 | L | W | L/W | |||
Racemosae | 14.36 ± 0.62 a | 27.61 ± 1.23 a | 14.19 ±0.77 a | 5640.37 ± 621.58 a | 0.52 ±0.02 a | 1.01 ± 0.05 ab | 1.95 ± 0.1 b | 24.94 ± 6.86 be | 0.55 ±0.16 a | 6.69 ±0.59 a | 0.34 ± 0.11 a | 21.47 ± 7.05 a |
Impatiens | 14.92 ± 1.19 a | 26.3 ±2.17 a | 14.37 ± 1.55 a | 5737.18 ± 1483.27 a | 0.57 ± 0.03 a | 1.04 ± 0.04 ab | 1.84 ±0.08 b | 38.73 ± 17.12 c | 0.39 ±0.09 a | 8.32 ± 1.54 ab | 0.64 ± 0.59 a | 25.31 ±21.91 a |
Clavicarpa | 23.95 ± 0.61 d | 25.64 ± 0.18 a | 22.18 ± 2.61 d | 13594.53 ± 1350.08 d | 0.94 ± 0.03 b | 1.1 ± 0.16 b | 1.17 ± 0.13 a | 6.58 ± 1.64 a | 0.8 ± 0.16 b | 9.31 ± 2.7 ab | 0.37 ±0.29 a | 38.23 ± 22.35 a |
Uniflorae4 | 17.36 ± 0.79 b | 31.68 ± 4.76 b | 17.52 ± 1.53 b | 9585.56 ± 1239.67 b | 0.56 ± 0.1 a | 0.99 ± 0.04 ab | 1.83 ± 0.37 b | 32 ± 14.23 bc | 0.52 ± 0.05 a | 6.96 ± 0.79 a | 0.3 ±0.04 a | 24.02 ± 5.36 a |
Scorpioidae | 19.07 ± 0.98 c | 32.79 ± 0.64 b | 19.73 ±0.58 c | 12333.19 ± 753.2 cd | 0.58 ± 0.04 a | 0.97 ±0.02 a | 1.66 ± 0.08 b | 41.75 ± 12.63 c | 0.44 ± 0.11 a | 8.3 ± 1.41 ab | 0.16 ± 0.08 a | 68.16 ± 43.37 a |
Fasciculatae | 17.07 ± 1.63 b | 31.25 ± 0.82 b | 16.84 ± 1.57 b | 9077.09 ±1805.97 b | 0.55 ±0.04 a | 1.01 ±0.02 ab | 1.87 ±0.14 b | 16.5 ±3.01 ab | 0.51 ±0.05 a | 8.82 ± 0.08 ab | 0.44 ± 0.25 a | 23.7 ± 8.61 a |
Undetermined | 18.1 ±0.7 bc | 33.47 ± 1.11 b | 18.36 ±0.85 bc | 11137.07 ± 997.89 c | 0.54 ± 0.03 a | 0.99 ± 0.04 ab | 1.83 ± 0.08 b | 31.28 ± 16.75 bc | 0.63 ±0.13 ab | 9.72 ± 1.74 b | 0.35 ±0.09 a | 28.33 ±3.39 a |
Statistics of pollen micromorphological characteristics of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau.
N | Species | Epidermal ornamentation | Shape | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PV | EV | |||
1 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
2 | Reticulate | Pillow | Oval | |
3 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
4 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
5 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
6 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
7 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
8 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
9 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
10 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
11 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
12 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
13 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
14 | Reticulate | Oval | Oval | |
15 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
16 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
17 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
18 | Reticulate | Triangular circle | Triangular circle | |
19 | Corrugated reticulation | Triangular circle | Triangular circle | |
20 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
21 | Reticulate | Oval | Oval | |
22 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Near circle | |
23 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
24 | Reticulate spinous granule | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
25 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
26 | Reticulate | Oval | Oval | |
27 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
28 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
29 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
30 | Reticulate | Pillow | Oval | |
31 | Reticulate | Pillow | Oval | |
32 | Reticulate | Pillow | Oval | |
33 | Reticulate | Pillow | Oval | |
34 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval | |
35 | Reticulate | Rectangular circle | Oval |
Analysis on the characteristics of pollen quantitative index of Impatiens.
Index | Average value | Maximum value | Minimum value |
---|---|---|---|
Polar axis length (P) (μm) | 16.55 | 24.48 | 13.29 |
Equatorial major axis length (E1) (μm) | 29.49 | 36.65 | 23.63 |
Equatorial short axis length (E2) (μm) | 16.39 | 24.42 | 12.61 |
Pollen volume (V) (μm3) | 8277.23 | 14760.12 | 3958.54 |
P/E1 | 0.57 | 0.96 | 0.46 |
P/E2 | 1.01 | 1.23 | 0.93 |
E1/E2 | 1.83 | 2.22 | 1.06 |
GPL (μm) | 7.96 | 11.64 | 5.37 |
GPW (μm) | 0.38 | 1.58 | 0.09 |
L/W | 27.35 | 105.78 | 5.45 |
MD | 27.77 | 64.67 | 5.33 |
RW (μm) | 0.54 | 0.94 | 0.3 |
Characteristics of pollen germination pores of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau.
N | Germinating pore | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Characteristics | L (μm) | W (μm) | L/W | |
1 | 4 | Depression | 6.16 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 11.42 ± 0.37 |
2 | 4 | Depression | 6.59 ± 0.04 | 0.48 ± 0.02 | 13.84 ± 0.38 |
3 | 4 | Depression | 6.59 ± 0.58 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 22.78 ± 2.62 |
4 | 4 | Depression | 6.2 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 14.12 ± 0.83 |
5 | 4 | Depression | 7.45 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 35.51 ± 1.60 |
6 | 4 | Depression | 6.53 ± 0.03 | 0.45 ± 0.03 | 14.54 ± 0.82 |
7 | 4 | Depression | 5.37 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 21.55 ± 1.68 |
8 | 4 | Depression | 7.3 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 20.68 ±0.63 |
9 | 4 | Depression | 7.39 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 26.76 ± 1.4 |
10 | 4 | Depression | 6.87 ± 0.06 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 27.9 ± 1.66 |
11 | 4 | Depression | 6.91 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 24.78 ± 1.84 |
12 | 4 | Depression | 6.87 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 23.78 ± 1.71 |
13 | 4 | Bulge | 10.34 ± 0.05 | 0.84 ± 0.05 | 12.39 ±0.61 |
14 | 4 | Depression | 8.59 ± 0.05 | 1.58 ± 0.04 | 5.45 ± 0.09 |
15 | 4 | Depression | 6.64 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 21.21 ± 0.95 |
16 | 4 | Depression | 6.94 ± 0.06 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 61.95 ± 7.62 |
17 | 4 | Depression | 9.1 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 25.53 ± 0.69 |
18 | 3 | Depression | 11.64 ± 0.03 | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 18.98 ± 0.19 |
19 | 3 | Depression | 6.97 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 57.1 ± 7.09 |
20 | 4 | Depression | 7.54 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 27.07 ± 2.37 |
21 | 4 | Bulge | 6.04 ± 0.04 | 0.3 ± 0.03 | 20.00 ± 1.51 |
22 | 4 | Depression | 6.57 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 19.00 ± 1.06 |
23 | 4 | Depression | 7.69± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 29.99 ± 1.30 |
24 | 4 | Bulge | 9.52 ± 0.05 | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 105.78 ± 0.51 |
25 | 4 | Bulge | 7.08 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 30.42 ± 1.83 |
26 | 4 | Depression | 8.72 ± 0.03 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 10.82 ± 0.26 |
27 | 4 | Depression | 8.81 ± 0.03 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 27.28 ± 1.18 |
28 | 4 | Depression | 8.93 ± 0.02 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 28.51 ± 0.52 |
29 | 4 | Depression | 8.83 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 28.2 ± 0.56 |
30 | 4 | Depression | 10.23 ±0.03 | 0.44 ±0.04 | 23.18 ± 1.75 |
31 | 4 | Depression | 11.09 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 25.24 ± 1.07 |
32 | 4 | Depression | 11.1 ± 0.02 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 29.76 ± 1.2 |
33 | 4 | Depression | 10.89 ± 0.04 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 29.22 ± 1.57 |
34 | 4 | Bulge | 7.52 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 30.58 ± 2.02 |
35 | 4 | Bulge | 7.49 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 31.98 ± 3.97 |
Information of 48 species of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou area.
N | Species | T | Area | Latitude and longitude | Height (cm) | Altitude (m) | Habitat characteristics |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2017.10 | Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou | E108.700569, N27.919654 | 40–50 | 530 | Ditch edge | |
2 | 2017.10 | Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou | E108.742382, N27.868716 | 40–120 | 530 | Ditch edge | |
3 | 2017.10 | Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou | E108.721257, N27.892699 | 30–40 | 530 | Ditch edge | |
5 | 2017.10 | Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou | E108.768975, N27.809401 | 30–50 | 870 | Roadside | |
4 | 2017.10 | Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou | E108.792546, N27.802755 | 30–50 | 530 | Ditch edge | |
6 | 2017.10 | Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou | E108.825316, N27.856424 | 20–30 | 870 | Damp place | |
7 | 2017.10 | Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou | E108.819567, N27.79662 | 25–35 | 730 | Roadside | |
8 | 2017.10 | Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou | E108.809219, N27.856935 | 30–100 | 540 | Damp place | |
9 | 2017.10 | Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou | E108.791396, N27.81707 | 80–100 | 610 | Damp place | |
10 | 2017.10 | Suiyang, Guizhou | E107.206313, N28.246177 | 32–74 | 817 | Ditch edge | |
11 | 2017.10 | Suiyang, Guizhou | E107.206323, N28.246167 | 28–65 | 817 | Roadside | |
12 | 2017.10 | Suiyang, Guizhou | E107.206313, N28.246177 | 40–70 | 1560 | Roadside | |
13 | 2017.10 | Suiyang, Guizhou | E107.206303, N28.246168 | 30–80 | 1560 | Roadside | |
14 | 2017.10 | Suiyang, Guizhou | E107.206313, N28.246177 | 20–30 | 1260 | Roadside | |
15 | 2017.10 | Liupanshui, Guizhou | E104.768578, N25.980954 | 80–120 | 1741 | Ditch edge | |
16 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.718522, N25.964222 | 60–130 | 2230 | Ditch edge | |
17 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.721274, N25.963222 | 60–80 | 2350 | Damp place | |
18 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.718522,N25.964222 | 40–80 | 2240 | Damp place | |
19 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.719801, N25.959622 | 40–80 | 2240 | Damp place | |
20 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.689201, N25.975916 | 42–75 | 3001 | Damp place | |
21 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.684315, N25.965522 | 40–80 | 2177 | Roadside | |
22 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.872203, N26.925063 | 40–80 | 1228 | Damp place | |
23 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.848631, N26.899806 | 30–50 | 1246 | Roadside | |
24 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.871053, N26.899291 | 20–30 | 1621 | Damp place | |
25 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.362313, N27.902298 | 40–60 | 1929 | Damp place | |
26 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.365702, N27.880526 | 30–60 | 2826 | Damp place | |
27 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.345292, N27.881675 | 30–40 | 2293 | Damp place | |
28 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.345436, N27.877844 | 20–40 | 2297 | Damp place | |
29 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.342849, N27.877077 | 50–90 | 1409 | Roadside | |
30 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.353844, N27.873246 | 30–60 | 1321 | Ditch edge | |
31 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.357869, N27.86507 | 30–60 | 1321 | Ditch edge | |
32 | 2017.10 | Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan | E98.332572, N27.88142 | 20–60 | 1522 | Roadside | |
33 | 2017.10 | Anlong, Yunnan | E105.351878, N25.109422 | 80–100 | 1777 | Roadside | |
34 | 2017.10 | Anlong, Yunnan | E105.346129, N25.091099 | 40–50 | 1347 | Roadside | |
35 | 2017.10 | Wangmo, Yunnan | E106.049528, N25.215218 | 30–50 | 821 | Damp place | |
36 | 2017.10 | Anlong, Yunnan | E105.35389, N25.106543 | 80–120 | 1741 | Roadside | |
37 | 2017.10 | Kunming, Yunnan | E102.776044, N25.090989 | 60–80 | 2151 | Ditch edge | |
38 | 2017.10 | Kunming, Yunnan | E102.777769, N25.087062 | 60–80 | 2250 | Ditch edge | |
39 | 2017.10 | Kunming, Yunnan | E102.775397, N25.088502 | 60–80 | 2430 | Ditch edge | |
40 | 2017.10 | Kunming, Yunnan | E102.784224, N25.342856 | 20–35 | 2151 | Roadside | |
41 | 2017.10 | Kunming, Yunnan | E103.197322, N24.648467 | 40–80 | 2560 | Ditch edge | |
42 | 2017.10 | Kunming, Yunnan | E102.62844, N24.983997 | 30–50 | 2500 | Damp place | |
43 | 2017.10 | Kunming, Yunnan | E102.630165, N24.982949 | 40–80 | 2460 | Damp place | |
44 | 2017.10 | Wenshan, Yunnan | E104.76302, N23.131053 | 34–45 | 2433 | Damp place | |
45 | 2017.10 | Wenshan, Yunnan | E104.750947, N23.127863 | 46–85 | 2628 | Roadside | |
46 | 2017.10 | Wenshan, Yunnan | E104.774518, N23.13318 | 55–68 | 2227 | Roadside | |
47 | 2017.10 | Wenshan, Yunnan | E104.622741, N23.131053 | 30–54 | 2475 | Damp place | |
48 | 2017.10 | Wenshan, Yunnan | E104.610093, N23.108186 | 54–63 | 2765 | Damp place |
Pollen mesh characteristics of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau.
N | MF | MD | RW (μm) | RF |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rough, no particulate matter | 16.33 ± 0.58 | 0.72 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
2 | Rough, with particulate matter | 24.33 ±1.53 | 0.57 ±0.02 | Smoothing |
3 | Rough, with particulate matter | 33.33 ± 1.53 | 0.46 ± 0.01 | Smoothing |
4 | Smooth, very few particles | 23.33 ± 0.58 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | Smoothing |
5 | Smooth, very few particles | 15.67 ± 0.58 | 0.88 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
6 | Rough, with particulate matter | 15.00 ± 1.00 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
7 | Rough, with particulate matter | 20.00 ± 1.00 | 0.45 ± 0.03 | Smoothing |
8 | Rough, with particulate matter | 31.67 ± 0.58 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
9 | Rough, with particulate matter | 31.00 ± 1.00 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
10 | Rough, with particulate matter | 30.00 ± 1.00 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | Smoothing |
11 | Rough, with particulate matter | 32.00 ± 1.00 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
12 | Rough, with particulate matter | 26.67 ± 0.58 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | Smoothing |
13 | Rough, with particulate matter | 28.33 ± 1.53 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
14 | Rough, with particulate matter | 30.33 ± 1.53 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
15 | Rough, with particulate matter | 47.33 ± 1.15 | 0.34 ± 0.01 | Smoothing |
16 | Rough, with particulate matter | 23.00 ± 1.00 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
17 | Rough, with particulate matter | 64.67 ± 2.08 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
18 | Rough, with particulate matter | 5.33 ± 0.58 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
19 | Rough, with particulate matter | 8.00 ± 1.00 | 0.94 ± 0.02 | Wavy |
20 | Rough, with particulate matter | 41.67 ± 1.53 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | Smoothing |
21 | Rough, with particulate matter | 43.67 ± 2.08 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | Smoothing |
22 | Smooth, very few particles | 12.67 ± 0.58 | 0.59 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
23 | Rough, with particulate matter | 30.00 ± 1.00 | 0.51 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
24 | Rough, with particulate matter | 52.33 ± 3.06 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | Spinous granule |
25 | Rough, with particulate matter | 31.67 ± 2.08 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
26 | Rough, with particulate matter | 12.00 ± 1.00 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
27 | Rough, with particulate matter | 17.67 ±0.58 | 0.52 ±0.01 | Smoothing |
28 | Rough, with particulate matter | 18.33 ± 0.58 | 0.54 ± 0.01 | Smoothing |
29 | Rough, with particulate matter | 18.00 ± 1.00 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | Smoothing |
30 | Rough, with particulate matter | 42.67 ± 0.58 | 0.55 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
31 | Rough, with particulate matter | 43.00 ± 1.00 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | Smoothing |
32 | Rough, with particulate matter | 44.33 ± 2.08 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
33 | Rough, with particulate matter | 38.00 ± 1.00 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
34 | Smooth, with particles | 10.00 ± 1.00 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | Smoothing |
35 | Smooth, with particles | 9.67 ± 1.53 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | Smoothing |
Pollen size characteristics of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau.
N | Size | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P ( μm) | E1 (μm) | E2 (μm) | V (μm3) | P/E1 | P/E2 | E1/E2 | |
1 | 13.62 ± 0.04 | 26.35 ± 0.05 | 13.25 ± 0.02 | 4754.72 ± 27.43 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 1.03 ± 0 | 1.99 ± 0.03 |
2 | 15.21 ± 0.60 | 28.92 ± 0.02 | 13.64 ± 0.03 | 5997.89 ± 239.4 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 1.11 ± 0.05 | 2.12 ± 0.01 |
3 | 13.65 ± 0.02 | 25.35 ± 0.04 | 13.02 ± 0.03 | 4504.63 ± 7.64 | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 1.05 ± 0 | 1.94 ± 0.01 |
4 | 13.52 ± 0.02 | 26.48 ± 0.04 | 14.22 ± 0.03 | 5093.98 ± 11.04 | 0.51 ± 0.00 | 0.95 ± 0 | 1.86 ± 0.00 |
5 | 14.92 ± 0.04 | 27.64 ± 0.02 | 14.27 ± 0.03 | 5886.88 ± 21.83 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 1.05 ± 0.01 | 1.94 ± 0.01 |
6 | 14.28 ± 0.02 | 26.98 ± 0.03 | 13.95 ± 0.02 | 5377.12 ± 16.82 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 1.02 ± 0 | 1.93 ± 0.01 |
7 | 15.13 ± 0.03 | 27.65 ± 0.02 | 13.97 ± 0.02 | 5843.45 ± 4.87 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 1.08 ± 0.01 | 1.98 ± 0.00 |
8 | 14.82 ±0.03 | 29.12 ±0.04 | 14.73 ±0.04 | 6354.67 ±15.26 | 0.51 ±0.01 | 1.01 ±0.01 | 1.98 ±0.01 |
9 | 13.92 ± 0.03 | 29.12 ± 0.02 | 14.15 ± 0.03 | 5735.06 ± 20.11 | 0.48 ± 0.00 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 2.06 ± 0.01 |
10 | 13.84 ± 0.04 | 28.35 ± 0.03 | 14.05 ± 0.04 | 5514.04 ± 20.92 | 0.49 ± 0.00 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 2.02 ± 0.01 |
11 | 14.64 ± 0.03 | 28.54 ± 0.01 | 15.74 ± 0.02 | 6578.75 ± 19.17 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.93 ± 0 | 1.81 ± 0.00 |
12 | 14.75 ± 0.01 | 26.84 ± 0.03 | 15.26 ± 0.03 | 6043.21 ± 4.99 | 0.55 ± 0.00 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 1.76 ± 0.01 |
13 | 16.6 ± 0.03 | 28.24 ± 0.02 | 16.59± 0.02 | 7776.2 ± 14.94 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 1 ± 0 | 1.7 ± 0.01 |
14 | 15.15 ± 0.01 | 28.18 ± 0.04 | 14.97 ± 0.02 | 6391.76 ± 7.03 | 0.54 ± 0.00 | 1.01 ± 0 | 1.88 ± 0.01 |
15 | 13.29 ± 0.02 | 23.63 ± 0.01 | 12.61 ± 0.03 | 3958.54 ± 16.44 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 1.05 ± 0.01 | 1.87 ± 0.01 |
16 | 14.96 ± 0.02 | 27.09 ± 0.05 | 14.42 ± 0.04 | 5841.87 ± 21.14 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 1.04 ± 0.01 | 1.88 ± 0.01 |
17 | 14.61 ± 0.04 | 24.37 ± 0.04 | 13.25 ± 0.03 | 4717.5 ± 19.7 | 0.6 ± 0.00 | 1.1 ± 0.01 | 1.84 ± 0.01 |
18 | 24.48 ± 0.01 | 25.5 ± 0.04 | 19.93 ± 0.03 | 12440.06 ± 25.84 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 1.23 ± 0.00 | 1.28± 0.00 |
19 | 23.44 ± 0.03 | 25.79 ± 0.02 | 24.42 ± 0.03 | 14760.11 ± 30.71 | 0.91 ± 0.00 | 0.96 ± 0.00 | 1.06 ± 0.00 |
20 | 16.96 ± 0.03 | 34.8 ± 0.02 | 16.83 ± 0.04 | 9930.21 ± 5.15 | 0.49 ± 0.00 | 1.01 ± 0.01 | 2.07 ± 0.01 |
21 | 16.98 ± 0.05 | 26.97 ± 0.02 | 16.92 ± 0.01 | 7749.09 ± 20.81 | 0.63 ± 0.00 | 1 ± 0.01 | 1.59 ± 0.01 |
22 | 18.54 ± 0.04 | 28.3 ± 0.03 | 19.8 ± 0.03 | 10386.99 ± 44.18 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.94 ± 0.00 | 1.43 ± 0.00 |
23 | 16.96 ± 0.04 | 36.65 ± 0.55 | 16.53 ± 0.03 | 10275.97 ± 166.77 | 0.46 ± 0.01 | 1.02 ± 0.01 | 2.22 ± 0.03 |
24 | 19.91 ± 0.05 | 32.22 ± 0.02 | 20.24 ± 0.02 | 12985.32 ± 18.53 | 0.62 ± 0.00 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 1.59 ± 0.00 |
25 | 18.22 ± 0.03 | 33.34 ± 0.04 | 19.22 ± 0.03 | 11674.4 ± 11.48 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.95 ± 0.00 | 1.74 ± 0.01 |
26 | 14.62 ± 0.05 | 30.07 ± 0.02 | 14.51 ± 0.02 | 6381.1 ± 22.92 | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.01 | 2.07 ± 0.01 |
27 | 17.88 ± 0.02 | 31.49 ± 0.01 | 17.66 ± 0.03 | 9943.29 ± 24.86 | 0.57 ± 0.00 | 1.01 ± 0.00 | 1.78 ± 0.01 |
28 | 17.84 ± 0.04 | 31.97 ± 0.02 | 17.9 ± 0.02 | 10206.21 ± 29.62 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 1 ± 0.01 | 1.79 ± 0.01 |
29 | 17.95 ± 0.03 | 31.49 ± 0.02 | 17.3 ± 0.08 | 9777.76 ± 57.43 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 1.04 ± 0.01 | 1.82 ± 0.01 |
30 | 17.96 ± 0.03 | 33.64 ± 0.03 | 17.95 ± 0.04 | 10844.94 ± 34.53 | 0.53 ± 0.00 | 1 ± 0.00 | 1.88 ± 0.01 |
31 | 18.09 ± 0.06 | 32.47 ± 0.03 | 17.75 ± 0.02 | 10427.14 ± 37.16 | 0.56 ± 0.00 | 1.02 ± 0.01 | 1.83 ± 0.00 |
32 | 17.87 ± 0.03 | 34.44 ± 0.03 | 17.97 ± 0.02 | 11056.38 ± 14.29 | 0.52 ± 0.01 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 1.92 ± 0.00 |
33 | 17.04 ±0.04 | 33.25 ±0.03 | 17.79 ±0.03 | 10078.45 ±30.12 | 0.51 ±0.01 | 0.96 ±0.00 | 1.87 ±0.01 |
34 | 19.13 ± 0.03 | 32.05 ± 0.02 | 18.77 ± 0.03 | 11511.42 ± 33.33 | 0.6 ± 0.00 | 1.02 ± 0.00 | 1.71 ± 0.00 |
35 | 18.53 ±0.03 | 34.95 ± 0.01 | 19.92 ± 0.03 | 12904.06 ± 33.01 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.93 ± 0.00 | 1.75 ± 0.01 |
Foliar epidermal and trichome micromorphological diversity among poisonous plants and their taxonomic significance Studies of the pollen characteristics and the taxonomic significance of Impatiens from the Yunnan–Guizhou PlateauBasal defoliation, salicylic acid and cyanocobalamin to ameliorate the physiological and biochemical characteristics of flood-irrigated ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapevines in a semi-arid Mediterranean climate Evaluation of phenotypic variability of seedlings obtained from open pollination of three varieties of the genus Hylotelephium The use of stinging nettle tea ( Urtica sp.) to controlAulacorthum solani andMacrosiphum euphorbiae onRanunculus asiaticus Study of polyphenolic compounds in wines and different parts of the grapevine Research on preparing seedling substrates using edible mushroom waste and application