1. bookAHEAD OF PRINT
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2083-5965
First Published
01 Jan 1989
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Studies of the pollen characteristics and the taxonomic significance of Impatiens from the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau

Published Online: 05 Sep 2023
Volume & Issue: AHEAD OF PRINT
Page range: -
Received: 01 Dec 2022
Accepted: 20 Jul 2023
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2083-5965
First Published
01 Jan 1989
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
INTRODUCTION

There are two genera of the Balsaminaceae, and one is Impatiens. This genus is rich in germplasm resources, with more than 1 000 species in the world and more than 260 species in China (Luo et al., 2022). However, the classification of Impatiens is very challenging because it is difficult to make and preserve specimens (Yu et al., 2016). The primary classification methods of Impatiens are traditional taxonomy and molecular biology or a combination of both. In molecular biological classification, ITS sequences (Eddie et al., 2003; Yuan et al., 2004) and the chloroplast genomes (Luo et al., 2022) are commonly used for classification. Compared with molecular biology, traditional taxonomy primarily classifies plants based on morphology and palynology. The classification of plants based on pollen characteristics is considered palynology. Plants of the same genus or different genera are crossed by self-pollination or through the actions of insects (Attique et al., 2022), wind and other factors (cross-pollination) (Zavada and Hackley, 2022). This carries the genetic material of the male parent, which is a necessary condition for plants to continue their offspring. Thus, during the process of plant evolution, the pollen structure is complex to protect the genetic material (Zavialova and Nosova, 2019). To adapt to the environment, plants have formed a special pollen structure, which helps preserve the pollen. There are some differences in pollen characteristics among different plants, which is the basis of pollen classification.

Optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are the primary tools to observe pollen morphology, which greatly aid the development of palynology. Researchers promoted the development of plant taxonomy by extracting pollen characteristics from families such as Campanulaceae (Khansari et al., 2012), Combretaceae (El Ghazali, 2022) and Paropsieae (Mezzonato-Pires et al., 2022). The study of plant pollen helps determine that pollen characteristics can be used as a basis for plant classification (Tuler et al., 2017; Umber et al., 2022). The importance of plant classification and pollen characteristics at the intergeneric level has been emphasised, and it has been shown that pollen data can verify the information of pollen evolution on the true stamen pedigree. In addition, it provides some explanations for the direction of plant evolution.

Among Impatiens plants, Yu et al. (2016) made an accurate analysis by creating two subgenera of Impatiens and dividing them into seven groups. Pollen micromorphology was an important index for this classification of Impatiens. Studies on the pollen morphological characteristics of Impatiens by SEM helps identify Impatiens, provide basic pollen information for breeding and improve the rate of success of breeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Information collection and preservation methods of plant materials

The plant materials were primarily derived from field studies and sampling, and the collected information was recorded (Annex 1). The change in height of flower colour among the species of Impatiens increases the difficulty of classifying them (Chen, 1978). In this study, we used 1, 2, 3 and higher numbers when necessary to mark Impatiens of the same species but different colours. In the same type of Impatiens, more than two types of mature pollens were collected and stored in a test tube or collection tube filled with FAA fixatives.

Scanning electron microscope

The pollen of 35 species of Impatiens was observed by SEM. The pollen samples were prepared by first soaking the material and then gently removing the anthers with tweezers and dissection needles. The anthers were placed in a 2 mL collection tube and dehydrated with an alcohol gradient of 30%, 45%, 60%, 75%, 90% and 95%. The solution was replaced with anhydrous alcohol twice for 1 h at a time. The anthers were then removed with tweezers and dissected using a needle, so that the pollen was evenly distributed on the sample table with conductive glue. Under the vacuum conditions of an ion sputtering instrument (Cressington Scientific Instruments, Watford, UK), the gold spray was coated for 2–3 min. It was observed by a Zeiss scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

Image analysis

The pictures were analysed using Image J (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), and the morphological characteristics were named based on the pollen research literature (Yu et al., 2016; Mazari et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2020; Raza et al., 2020). There were slight modifications such as pillow shape, which was named so because its shape is similar to that of ancient Chinese porcelain. When the mesh density (MD) was 12 × 1 000-fold magnification, the number of mesh was regarded as the MD.

Data statistics and analysis

The statistical data of Microsoft Excel YEAR (Redmond, WA, USA) were used, and SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for correlation, principal component and system clustering analyses (Pérez-Gutiérrez et al., 2015; Zafar et al., 2022). The number of sepals (NS), which is one of the important bases for the classification of Impatiens, was added as a reference index to compare the importance of pollen characteristics during the analysis of indices.

RESULTS
Statistics of pollen characteristics

Based on the study and analysis of pollen micromorphology of 35 species of Impatiens, the data of 19 characteristics indexes were obtained, including pollen morphology (Table 1), pollen germination pore characteristics, pollen size and mesh characteristics (the data sheet is provided in Annex 2). The pollen characteristics were primarily divided into two parts, qualitative and quantitative traits.

Statistics of pollen micromorphological characteristics of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau.

NSpeciesEpidermal ornamentationShape
PVEV
1I. siculiferReticulateRectangular circleOval
2I. pinetorumReticulatePillowOval
3I. rectangulaReticulateRectangular circleOval
4I. ruiliensisReticulateRectangular circleOval
5I. holocentraReticulateRectangular circleOval
6I. siculifer var.ReticulateRectangular circleOval
7I. racemosaReticulateRectangular circleOval
8I. uliginosa1ReticulateRectangular circleOval
9I. uliginosa2ReticulateRectangular circleOval
10I. uliginosa3ReticulateRectangular circleOval
11I. uliginosa4ReticulateRectangular circleOval
12I. cyathifloraReticulateRectangular circleOval
13I. dicentraReticulateRectangular circleOval
14I. dicentra var.ReticulateOvalOval
15I. noli-tangereReticulateRectangular circleOval
16I. corchorifoliaReticulateRectangular circleOval
17I. delavayiReticulateRectangular circleOval
18I. guizhouensisReticulateTriangular circleTriangular circle
19I. auriculataCorrugated reticulationTriangular circleTriangular circle
20I. monticola var.ReticulateRectangular circleOval
21I. chlorosepalaReticulateOvalOval
22I. xanthinaReticulateRectangular circleNear circle
23I. monticolaReticulateRectangular circleOval
24I. yuiReticulate spinous granuleRectangular circleOval
25I. rubrostriataReticulateRectangular circleOval
26I. loulanensisReticulateOvalOval
27I. arguta1ReticulateRectangular circleOval
28I. arguta2ReticulateRectangular circleOval
29I. arguta3ReticulateRectangular circleOval
30I. fanjinicaReticulatePillowOval
31I. fanjinica var.ReticulatePillowOval
32I. reptansReticulatePillowOval
33I. reptans var.ReticulatePillowOval
34I. pianmaensisReticulateRectangular circleOval
35I. pianmaensis var.ReticulateRectangular circleOval

EV, equatorial view.

There were six indices of qualitative characteristics (Figure 1), which included epidermis ornamentation (EO), polar view (PV), equatorial view (EV), characteristics of germination pores (CGP), mesh feature (MF) and ridge feature (RF). The characteristics under each index were different, and the proportion was also different, indicating that the characteristics of pollen qualitative indices were rich, which aided the interspecific classification of Impatiens plants (Figure 2). There were 14 quantitative characteristic indices. The NS was the reference group, and the others included the number of germination pores (NGP), germination pore length (GPL), germination pore width (GPW), germination pore length/germination pore width (L/W), MD, ridge width (RW), polar axis length (P), equatorial major axis length (E1), equatorial short axis length (E2), pollen volume (V) and P/E1, P/E2 and E1/E2. There were differences among the species, and there was an obvious difference between the maximum and minimum values (Table 2), such as volume. The maximum value was more than 14 000 μm3, the minimum value was approximately 4 000 μm3 and the average value was approximately 8 000 μm3. Based on the aforementioned analysis described, the pollen characteristics of Impatiens were rich in diversity, which can provide positive conditions to classify the members of this genus.

Figure 1.

SEM image of Impatiens pollen. (A) Observation method and measurement index marking of Impatiens pollen: 1 PV; 2 EV; 5 polar axis; 6 equatorial major axis; 7 equatorial minor axis; 8 sprouting hole; 9 mesh; 10 mesh; 1 and 2 mirror multiple, 3 000, scale bar, 1 μm; 3 mirror multiple is 7 000, scale bar, 1 μm; 4 mirror multiple is 3 000, scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Pollen morphology of Impatiens: 1 rectangular circle, 2 oval, 3 triangular circle, 4 pillow shape, 5 nearly circular. (C) Impatiens pollen ornamentation: 1 reticulate pattern, 2 wavy reticulate pattern, 3 reticulate spinous granule. EV, equatorial view; SEM, scanning electron microscopy.

Figure 2.

Proportion analysis of pollen characteristics of Impatiens. (A) Proportion analysis of SN of Impatiens. (B) Analysis on the proportion of EO of Impatiens. (C) Percentage analysis of PV morphological characteristics of Impatiens. (D) Percentage analysis of EV morphological characteristics of Impatiens. (E) CGP proportion analysis of pollen of Impatiens. (F) Analysis on the proportion of NGP of Impatiens. (G) Analysis on the proportion of MF of pollen. (H) Proportion analysis of reticulate RF of pollen. CGP, characteristics of germination pores; EO, epidermis ornamentation; EV, equatorial view; MF, mesh feature; NGP, number of germination pores; RF, ridge feature; SN, sepal number.

Analysis on the characteristics of pollen quantitative index of Impatiens.

IndexAverage valueMaximum valueMinimum value
Polar axis length (P) (μm)16.55      24.48      13.29      
Equatorial major axis length (E1) (μm)      29.49      36.65      23.63      
Equatorial short axis length (E2) (μm)      16.39      24.42      12.61      
Pollen volume (V) (μm3)8277.23      14760.12      3958.54      
P/E1      0.57      0.96      0.46      
P/E2      1.01      1.23      0.93      
E1/E2      1.83      2.22      1.06      
GPL (μm)      7.96      11.64      5.37      
GPW (μm)      0.38      1.58      0.09      
L/W      27.35      105.78      5.45      
MD      27.77      64.67      5.33      
RW (μm)      0.54      0.94      0.3      

GPL, germination pore length; GPW, germination pore width; L/W, germination pore length/germination pore width; MD, mesh density; RW, ridge width.

Correlation analysis of pollen characteristics

There was some correlation among the pollen characteristics (Figure 3). Among the 19 traits of pollen, there were significant correlations among some indices, such as the SN and polar morphology, equatorial morphology, number of germination holes, MD, RW, polar axis length, equatorial minor axis length, P/E1, P/E2 and E1/E2. With reference to the NS, there was some correlation between pollen characteristics, and there was also some correlation with the NS. I. guizhouensis and I. auriculata were used as examples to show that the correlation was significant for plant classification. In the classification index, there was some relationship between the index and the index. The correlation showed that the pollen characteristics of Impatiens plants may be accompanied, and as the basis of plant identification, pollen characteristics can promote the acquisition of species information.

Figure 3.

Correlation analysis of pollen characteristics. More intense colour indicates a higher correlation. CGP, characteristics of germination pores; E1, equatorial major axis length; E2, equatorial short axis length; EO, epidermis ornamentation; EV, equatorial view; GPL, germination pore length; GPW, germination pore width; L/W, germination pore length/germination pore width; MD, mesh density; MF, mesh feature; NS, number of sepals; P, polar axis length; PV, polar view; RF, ridge feature; RW, ridge width.

Principal component analysis and systematic cluster analysis
Principal component analysis

According to the principal component analysis of 20 characteristic indexes (Table 3), there were 5 main components, and the contribution rate of each component was more than 10%. The cumulative contribution rate of 5 components is 80.45% > 60%, and all characteristic indexes were included. It showed that the selected current index was of significance to the clustering results among the cluster members. The results showed that the selected characteristic indexes were of significance to the classification of Impatiens. The next step of systematic cluster analysis can be carried out. The composition matrix showed that the effect of each index on the clustering results of Impatiens was P, P/E1, E2, equatorial morphology, E1/E2, the number of germination holes and so on. The mesh condition and the width of germination holes had the least effect on the classification of Impatiens. Among the 19 traits of pollen, 11 had more taxonomic effect than the NS. Sepal was an important classification index of Impatiens, so these 11 pollen characteristics played an important role in the classification of Impatiens.

Principal component analysis table of pollen micromorphological characteristics of Impatiens.

Bartlett sphericity testF = 0.000
Composition 12345
Contribution rate (%)Contribution rate29.5315.5313.9010.9710.53
Cumulative contribution rate29.5345.0658.9669.9380.45
Characteristic indexP0.920.130.29−0.10−0.05
P/E10.87−0.37−0.040.12−0.23
E20.870.380.15−0.21−0.10
EV0.85−0.45−0.030.04−0.09
E1/E2−0.850.070.160.000.37
NGP0.84−0.450.010.12−0.05
V0.790.450.32−0.210.02
RF0.740.16−0.390.30−0.02
PV0.68−0.210.280.140.34
RW0.56−0.09−0.21−0.510.20
EO0.540.47−0.330.45−0.06
NS0.53−0.33−0.06−0.090.43
E10.050.700.51−0.330.29
P/E20.09−0.650.280.300.15
CGP0.180.58−0.07−0.13−0.52
L/W0.480.57−0.310.380.28
GPL0.330.120.810.150.02
MD−0.330.390.210.67−0.08
MF0.080.05−0.35−0.63−0.01
GPW−0.22−0.350.42−0.10−0.58

CGP, characteristics of germination pores; EO, epidermis ornamentation; EV, equatorial view; GPL, germination pore length; GPW, germination pore width; L/W, germination pore length/germination pore width; MD, mesh density; MF, mesh feature; NS, number of sepals; PV, polar view; RF, ridge feature; RW, ridge width.

Systematic cluster analysis

In the clustering results of the system (Figure 4), with the red dotted line as the reference line, the system clustering had three branches, and the yellow reference line analysis had six branches. I. guizhouensis and I. auriculata were the first branch, and both types of pollens were the three-groove type. These pollens were shaped as triangular circles. They were all typical plants of the subgenus Impatiens and were reasonably classified together. However, the yellow reference line analysis indicated that they should clearly be separated because of their significant differences in the quantitative data of pollen EO, L/W and pollen size. I. yui remained a separate branch in which no reference line was used. Its EO and ridge characteristics were unique, but its quantitative index also differed significantly from that of other species.

Figure 4.

Phylogenetic tree of pollen micromorphology of Impatiens based on systematic cluster analysis. The red dotted line is 23, and the yellow dashed line is 9. The serial number values are consistent with those in Table 1.

The other species were uniformly clustered into one branch (third branch) under the red reference line, and the clustering distance was short, indicating that there was only a small difference among the species. With reference to the yellow dotted line, the third branch under the red reference line was further divided into three more careful branches, namely the fourth, fifth and sixth branches that contained 5, 4 and 23 species, respectively, and the varieties or same species of Impatiens were all divided together. On closer inspection, the Racemosae group was in the same branch (a small branch of the sixth branch), while the Fasciculatae group and the undetermined group of Impatiens gathered in another small branch. The clustering results of qualitative and quantitative traits were highly similar to those of the full characteristics (Figure 3). In summary, 35 species of Impatiens were systematically clustered with 19 pollen characteristics, and the results were satisfactory.

Impatiens grouping analysis

Based on the quantitative data analysis between groups of Impatiens (Figure 5; the data sheet is shown in Annex 3), no significant differences in the quantitative index of germination pore between groups were identified, which further verified that the quantitative index of the germination hole in the composition matrix played a low role in the classification of Impatiens. There were some differences in other quantitative indices among the groups, but there was no difference in the quantitative characteristics of pollen in some Impatiens groups, such as the Impatiens and Racemosae. The combination of Figure 4 showed that the pollen characteristics of Impatiens had some significance in the grouping of Impatiens.

Figure 5.

Based on grouping analysis of Impatiens. (a) Proportion of 35 species of Impatiens. (b) Analysis of inter-group differences based on polar axis length (P). (c) Analysis of the difference between groups based on the equatorial major axis length (E1). (d) Analysis of differences between groups based on the length of equatorial minor axis length (E2). (e) Analysis of differences between groups based on pollen volume (V). (f) Analysis of differences between groups based on MD. (g-h) Analysis of the difference between groups based on the length and width of Germinating pore (GPL/GPW). (i) Analysis of difference between groups based on RW. All abbreviations used in the table must be explained, also letters (a-c). MD, mesh density; RW, ridge width.

The situation of the Impatiens, Uniflorae and Fasciculatae groups was relatively clear, but there was a relatively large difference between the two types of pollen in the Scorpioidae group owing to the unique pollen characteristics of I. yui. The similarity of the Clavicarpa was low. Interestingly, there was also a high degree of similarity among the six species of Impatiens that were not grouped. The grouping analysis of the similarity between Impatiens further determined the classification between them, verified the results of systematic clustering and supported the superiority of Impatiens grouping.

DISCUSSION
Impatiens germplasm resources

Impatiens is rich in germplasm resources, and there are approximately 120 species in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau (Luo et al., 2022). In this study of some areas of Yunnan and Guizhou, 48 species of Impatiens were collected, which is, of course, only a fraction of the local species. During the process of collection, the preliminary investigation of Impatiens shows that the there was a high interspecific coefficient of variation of Impatiens, particularly in the variation of flower colour. Three species of Lycos’s with different flower colours, and five species of Lycos’s with different flower colours were found. Their names were marked with 1, 2, 3 and 4 to distinguish them. The variation in height of Impatiens has been confirmed for a long time (Chen, 1978).

Pollen characteristics of Impatiens

We observed the pollen of Impatiens (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The results showed that the pollen of Impatiens was primarily divided into three-groove and four-groove types, and there was a significant correlation between the number of pollen germination pores and its morphology (Figure 4). The pollen characteristics included four pollen germination pores of rectangular and oval shapes and three of triangular circles. Interestingly, Impatiens with three-groove pollen had four sepals, and Impatiens with four-groove pollen had two or four sepals. This phenomenon was used as the difference between primitive and more evolved species of Impatiens plants. As shown, the pollen of the original species of Impatiens was the three-groove type with four sepals; the over-species of Impatiens pollen was the four-groove type with four sepals, and the evolutionary species of Impatiens pollen included the four-groove types with two sepals (Yu, 2012; Yu et al., 2016). The EO of pollen was the reticulate type (Janssens et al., 2012), and the MD of evolutionary species was higher than that of the original species. The addition of reticulation on the pollen surface could contribute to plant pollination and fertilisation and protect the genetic material in plant pollen. The reticulate pattern increases the structural strength and surface friction coefficient of pollen, which helps them interact with insects and increases the ability of insects to carry the pollen (Attique et al., 2022). In our classification based on pollen quantitative characteristics, we found that polar axis length, equatorial axis length and pollen size played an important role in the classification of Impatiens, which was similar to the results of most plant pollen studies (Zafar et al., 2022).

The effect of pollen characteristics on the classification of Impatiens

The PCA showed that 11 of the 19 pollen characteristics were more effective than the NS in the classification of Impatiens (Figure 2 and Table 2), indicating that the pollen characteristics of Impatiens play an important role in the classification of Impatiens. Pollen characteristics played an important role in plant classification during the research and development of palynology and have been applied to the classification of many plants (Khansari et al., 2012; Pérez-Gutiérrez et al., 2015; Ullah et al., 2022). During the process of interspecific clustering (Figure 4), the results of pollen classification of Impatiens were satisfactory, but the difference between Impatiens that was highly similar was too low to subdivide some Impatiens that only differed slightly. During the study of pollen morphology, it was also explained that the characteristics of pollen structure can support the classification between genera and higher levels of taxonomy (Umber et al., 2022). We used pollen characteristics as the basis of interspecific classification, and the results showed that, to some extent, pollen characteristics supported the interspecific classification of Impatiens. In summary, the pollen of Impatiens had some positive effect on the classification of Impatiens, whether qualitative or quantitative. However, the identification of specific species of Impatiens also required the support of other characteristics (Lu, 1991). This also indirectly showed that there was a small difference among some species of Impatiens, and the coefficient of variation of Impatiens pollen was not as high as those of other morphological indicators (Lens et al., 2005). This has important reference value for the study of ancient plants and plant evolution (Lens et al., 2012).

Analysis of the effect of Impatiens pollen on grouping

Based on the Impatiens grouping system proposed by Yu et al. (2016), the interspecific similarity (Figure 6) and grouping of Impatiens were analysed using pollen morphological characteristics and quantitative data (Figure 7). In this study, the materials that were collected involved two subgenera. There were 33 species of the Impatiens subgenus, which can be divided into six groups. In addition to these groups, six species of Impatiens did not belong to any group. They were designated undetermined groups. In the grouping, the Racemosae group had the most materials with 12 species. According to the interspecific similarity and the grouping of Impatiens, all the plants of the subgenus Clavicarpa were found to be the three-furrow type with a triangular circle. The pollens of Impatiens, Racemosae and Fasciculatae groups were all rectangular or oval. In the Scorpioidae group, there was low similarity between the two species of Impatiens, and they also differed greatly in terms of their shape and size. Among the 35 species of Impatiens, I. yui was the only one with a pollen epidermis. Interestingly, we had not determined that the basic situation of the pollen of the six species of Impatiens was highly consistent. The pollen morphology was pillow-shaped, and it was possible that there was some evolutionary relationship between them. Compared with the other groups, the pollen P/E1 of Impatiens in the Uniflorae group was smaller, and the pollen looked slender. According to the analysis of the grouping form of Impatiens, pollen has been demonstrated to play some role in the grouping system proposed by Yu et al. (2016), which supported the classification of the two subgenera. However, there were some differences in pollen morphology among the seven groups of Impatiens, and the classification system of Impatiens may require further refinement. This is particularly true for the Scorpioidae group.

Figure 6.

Heat map of interspecific similarity of Impatiens. The number in the blue area is the same as the species serial number in Table 1. More intense colour indicates higher similarity.

Figure 7.

Pollen characteristics of Impatiens based on grouping.

Analysis of the classification results of Impatiens by pollen

The clustering results of 35 species of Impatiens showed that compared with the results of molecular markers, the clustering results of the original species were partially consistent with those of molecular markers, and the clustering distance of the same class of Impatiens was very short, or directly clustered together. This shows that the pollen morphology is similar to that of molecular markers or other morphological markers in interspecific classification (Yu et al., 2016). With the continuous improvement in the molecular marker technology, increasing numbers of researchers utilised the chloroplast genome (Janssens et al., 2006; Luo et al., 2022) or a gene fragment (Eddie et al., 2003; Swenson et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2014) to study the classification of Impatiens. The species of Impatiens is rich, and it was difficult to make and preserve specimens. The preservation of specimens greatly improved the classification of Impatiens. However, there was only a continuous breakthrough when traditional taxonomy was used, and the classification index was continuously refined. The combination of these taxonomic studies with those that utilised molecular markers and other technology overcame the classification problem of Impatiens and built a more detailed classification system of balsam.

The traditional taxonomy of Impatiens not only includes the observation of pollen by SEM but also involved the classification and analysis of Impatiens using micromorphological features, such as the leaf epidermis (Cai, 2007) and seeds (Martínez-Ortega and Rico, 2001; Janssens et al., 2009; Dadandi and Yildiz, 2015). This was a good way to combine macro- and micromorphologies (Yu et al., 2016) to find a more detailed classification system of Impatiens, but the refinement and integration of classification indicators should be more flawless.

CONCLUSIONS

The pollen of 35 species of Impatiens was studied. The analysis of pollen characteristics indicated that there was some correlation among the traits. A total of 19 pollen characteristics, except for sepals, were counted, and the qualitative characteristics showed that the pollen of Impatiens appeared rich. The comparison of quantitative characteristics showed differences among the Impatiens species. A PCA with sepals as the reference showed that the characteristic indices of Impatiens were highly important for taxonomy. In contrast, the order of taxonomic effect on Impatiens was P, P/E1, E2, EV, E1/E2, number of germinating pores, volume, reticulate ridge characteristics, PV, RW and epidermis decoration. The results of the classification of Impatiens based on pollen characteristics were reliable, and they showed that the pollen characteristics of Impatiens species were significant to the interspecific classification of Impatiens. However, the analysis of interspecific similarity showed that relying on the characteristics of pollen was not enough to support the clear classification of Impatiens. Under the condition of Impatiens grouping, it was concluded that the new Impatiens classification system was reliable, but there were some shortcomings. Thus, it was necessary to further improve the classification system. In summary, pollen micromorphology played a positive role in the classification of Impatiens, but it also had some deficiencies.

Figure 1.

SEM image of Impatiens pollen. (A) Observation method and measurement index marking of Impatiens pollen: 1 PV; 2 EV; 5 polar axis; 6 equatorial major axis; 7 equatorial minor axis; 8 sprouting hole; 9 mesh; 10 mesh; 1 and 2 mirror multiple, 3 000, scale bar, 1 μm; 3 mirror multiple is 7 000, scale bar, 1 μm; 4 mirror multiple is 3 000, scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Pollen morphology of Impatiens: 1 rectangular circle, 2 oval, 3 triangular circle, 4 pillow shape, 5 nearly circular. (C) Impatiens pollen ornamentation: 1 reticulate pattern, 2 wavy reticulate pattern, 3 reticulate spinous granule. EV, equatorial view; SEM, scanning electron microscopy.
SEM image of Impatiens pollen. (A) Observation method and measurement index marking of Impatiens pollen: 1 PV; 2 EV; 5 polar axis; 6 equatorial major axis; 7 equatorial minor axis; 8 sprouting hole; 9 mesh; 10 mesh; 1 and 2 mirror multiple, 3 000, scale bar, 1 μm; 3 mirror multiple is 7 000, scale bar, 1 μm; 4 mirror multiple is 3 000, scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Pollen morphology of Impatiens: 1 rectangular circle, 2 oval, 3 triangular circle, 4 pillow shape, 5 nearly circular. (C) Impatiens pollen ornamentation: 1 reticulate pattern, 2 wavy reticulate pattern, 3 reticulate spinous granule. EV, equatorial view; SEM, scanning electron microscopy.

Figure 2.

Proportion analysis of pollen characteristics of Impatiens. (A) Proportion analysis of SN of Impatiens. (B) Analysis on the proportion of EO of Impatiens. (C) Percentage analysis of PV morphological characteristics of Impatiens. (D) Percentage analysis of EV morphological characteristics of Impatiens. (E) CGP proportion analysis of pollen of Impatiens. (F) Analysis on the proportion of NGP of Impatiens. (G) Analysis on the proportion of MF of pollen. (H) Proportion analysis of reticulate RF of pollen. CGP, characteristics of germination pores; EO, epidermis ornamentation; EV, equatorial view; MF, mesh feature; NGP, number of germination pores; RF, ridge feature; SN, sepal number.
Proportion analysis of pollen characteristics of Impatiens. (A) Proportion analysis of SN of Impatiens. (B) Analysis on the proportion of EO of Impatiens. (C) Percentage analysis of PV morphological characteristics of Impatiens. (D) Percentage analysis of EV morphological characteristics of Impatiens. (E) CGP proportion analysis of pollen of Impatiens. (F) Analysis on the proportion of NGP of Impatiens. (G) Analysis on the proportion of MF of pollen. (H) Proportion analysis of reticulate RF of pollen. CGP, characteristics of germination pores; EO, epidermis ornamentation; EV, equatorial view; MF, mesh feature; NGP, number of germination pores; RF, ridge feature; SN, sepal number.

Figure 3.

Correlation analysis of pollen characteristics. More intense colour indicates a higher correlation. CGP, characteristics of germination pores; E1, equatorial major axis length; E2, equatorial short axis length; EO, epidermis ornamentation; EV, equatorial view; GPL, germination pore length; GPW, germination pore width; L/W, germination pore length/germination pore width; MD, mesh density; MF, mesh feature; NS, number of sepals; P, polar axis length; PV, polar view; RF, ridge feature; RW, ridge width.
Correlation analysis of pollen characteristics. More intense colour indicates a higher correlation. CGP, characteristics of germination pores; E1, equatorial major axis length; E2, equatorial short axis length; EO, epidermis ornamentation; EV, equatorial view; GPL, germination pore length; GPW, germination pore width; L/W, germination pore length/germination pore width; MD, mesh density; MF, mesh feature; NS, number of sepals; P, polar axis length; PV, polar view; RF, ridge feature; RW, ridge width.

Figure 4.

Phylogenetic tree of pollen micromorphology of Impatiens based on systematic cluster analysis. The red dotted line is 23, and the yellow dashed line is 9. The serial number values are consistent with those in Table 1.
Phylogenetic tree of pollen micromorphology of Impatiens based on systematic cluster analysis. The red dotted line is 23, and the yellow dashed line is 9. The serial number values are consistent with those in Table 1.

Figure 5.

Based on grouping analysis of Impatiens. (a) Proportion of 35 species of Impatiens. (b) Analysis of inter-group differences based on polar axis length (P). (c) Analysis of the difference between groups based on the equatorial major axis length (E1). (d) Analysis of differences between groups based on the length of equatorial minor axis length (E2). (e) Analysis of differences between groups based on pollen volume (V). (f) Analysis of differences between groups based on MD. (g-h) Analysis of the difference between groups based on the length and width of Germinating pore (GPL/GPW). (i) Analysis of difference between groups based on RW. All abbreviations used in the table must be explained, also letters (a-c). MD, mesh density; RW, ridge width.
Based on grouping analysis of Impatiens. (a) Proportion of 35 species of Impatiens. (b) Analysis of inter-group differences based on polar axis length (P). (c) Analysis of the difference between groups based on the equatorial major axis length (E1). (d) Analysis of differences between groups based on the length of equatorial minor axis length (E2). (e) Analysis of differences between groups based on pollen volume (V). (f) Analysis of differences between groups based on MD. (g-h) Analysis of the difference between groups based on the length and width of Germinating pore (GPL/GPW). (i) Analysis of difference between groups based on RW. All abbreviations used in the table must be explained, also letters (a-c). MD, mesh density; RW, ridge width.

Figure 6.

Heat map of interspecific similarity of Impatiens. The number in the blue area is the same as the species serial number in Table 1. More intense colour indicates higher similarity.
Heat map of interspecific similarity of Impatiens. The number in the blue area is the same as the species serial number in Table 1. More intense colour indicates higher similarity.

Figure 7.

Pollen characteristics of Impatiens based on grouping.
Pollen characteristics of Impatiens based on grouping.

Supplementary Figure 1.

Flower morphology of 48 species, including varieties, of Impatiens from Yunnan and Guizhou. The serial number is the same as that of attached Supplementary Table 1.
Flower morphology of 48 species, including varieties, of Impatiens from Yunnan and Guizhou. The serial number is the same as that of attached Supplementary Table 1.

Supplementary Figure 2.

Pollen micromorphological map. From top to bottom, PV (3 000-fold, ruler 2 μm); EV (3 000-fold, ruler 2 μm); epidermis (7 000-fold, ruler 2 μm); epidermis (12 000-fold, ruler 1 μm). PV, polar view.
Pollen micromorphological map. From top to bottom, PV (3 000-fold, ruler 2 μm); EV (3 000-fold, ruler 2 μm); epidermis (7 000-fold, ruler 2 μm); epidermis (12 000-fold, ruler 1 μm). PV, polar view.

Principal component analysis table of pollen micromorphological characteristics of Impatiens.

Bartlett sphericity test F = 0.000
Composition 1 2 3 4 5
Contribution rate (%) Contribution rate 29.53 15.53 13.90 10.97 10.53
Cumulative contribution rate 29.53 45.06 58.96 69.93 80.45
Characteristic index P 0.92 0.13 0.29 −0.10 −0.05
P/E1 0.87 −0.37 −0.04 0.12 −0.23
E2 0.87 0.38 0.15 −0.21 −0.10
EV 0.85 −0.45 −0.03 0.04 −0.09
E1/E2 −0.85 0.07 0.16 0.00 0.37
NGP 0.84 −0.45 0.01 0.12 −0.05
V 0.79 0.45 0.32 −0.21 0.02
RF 0.74 0.16 −0.39 0.30 −0.02
PV 0.68 −0.21 0.28 0.14 0.34
RW 0.56 −0.09 −0.21 −0.51 0.20
EO 0.54 0.47 −0.33 0.45 −0.06
NS 0.53 −0.33 −0.06 −0.09 0.43
E1 0.05 0.70 0.51 −0.33 0.29
P/E2 0.09 −0.65 0.28 0.30 0.15
CGP 0.18 0.58 −0.07 −0.13 −0.52
L/W 0.48 0.57 −0.31 0.38 0.28
GPL 0.33 0.12 0.81 0.15 0.02
MD −0.33 0.39 0.21 0.67 −0.08
MF 0.08 0.05 −0.35 −0.63 −0.01
GPW −0.22 −0.35 0.42 −0.10 −0.58

Based on the grouping category of Impatiens: analysis of the difference of quantitative characters of pollen among groups.

Group Size MD RW Germinating pore
P E1 E2 V P/E1 P/E2 E1/E2 L W L/W
Racemosae 14.36 ± 0.62 a 27.61 ± 1.23 a 14.19 ±0.77 a 5640.37 ± 621.58 a 0.52 ±0.02 a 1.01 ± 0.05 ab 1.95 ± 0.1 b 24.94 ± 6.86 be 0.55 ±0.16 a 6.69 ±0.59 a 0.34 ± 0.11 a 21.47 ± 7.05 a
Impatiens 14.92 ± 1.19 a 26.3 ±2.17 a 14.37 ± 1.55 a 5737.18 ± 1483.27 a 0.57 ± 0.03 a 1.04 ± 0.04 ab 1.84 ±0.08 b 38.73 ± 17.12 c 0.39 ±0.09 a 8.32 ± 1.54 ab 0.64 ± 0.59 a 25.31 ±21.91 a
Clavicarpa 23.95 ± 0.61 d 25.64 ± 0.18 a 22.18 ± 2.61 d 13594.53 ± 1350.08 d 0.94 ± 0.03 b 1.1 ± 0.16 b 1.17 ± 0.13 a 6.58 ± 1.64 a 0.8 ± 0.16 b 9.31 ± 2.7 ab 0.37 ±0.29 a 38.23 ± 22.35 a
Uniflorae4 17.36 ± 0.79 b 31.68 ± 4.76 b 17.52 ± 1.53 b 9585.56 ± 1239.67 b 0.56 ± 0.1 a 0.99 ± 0.04 ab 1.83 ± 0.37 b 32 ± 14.23 bc 0.52 ± 0.05 a 6.96 ± 0.79 a 0.3 ±0.04 a 24.02 ± 5.36 a
Scorpioidae 19.07 ± 0.98 c 32.79 ± 0.64 b 19.73 ±0.58 c 12333.19 ± 753.2 cd 0.58 ± 0.04 a 0.97 ±0.02 a 1.66 ± 0.08 b 41.75 ± 12.63 c 0.44 ± 0.11 a 8.3 ± 1.41 ab 0.16 ± 0.08 a 68.16 ± 43.37 a
Fasciculatae 17.07 ± 1.63 b 31.25 ± 0.82 b 16.84 ± 1.57 b 9077.09 ±1805.97 b 0.55 ±0.04 a 1.01 ±0.02 ab 1.87 ±0.14 b 16.5 ±3.01 ab 0.51 ±0.05 a 8.82 ± 0.08 ab 0.44 ± 0.25 a 23.7 ± 8.61 a
Undetermined 18.1 ±0.7 bc 33.47 ± 1.11 b 18.36 ±0.85 bc 11137.07 ± 997.89 c 0.54 ± 0.03 a 0.99 ± 0.04 ab 1.83 ± 0.08 b 31.28 ± 16.75 bc 0.63 ±0.13 ab 9.72 ± 1.74 b 0.35 ±0.09 a 28.33 ±3.39 a

Statistics of pollen micromorphological characteristics of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau.

N Species Epidermal ornamentation Shape
PV EV
1 I. siculifer Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
2 I. pinetorum Reticulate Pillow Oval
3 I. rectangula Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
4 I. ruiliensis Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
5 I. holocentra Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
6 I. siculifer var. Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
7 I. racemosa Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
8 I. uliginosa1 Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
9 I. uliginosa2 Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
10 I. uliginosa3 Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
11 I. uliginosa4 Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
12 I. cyathiflora Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
13 I. dicentra Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
14 I. dicentra var. Reticulate Oval Oval
15 I. noli-tangere Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
16 I. corchorifolia Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
17 I. delavayi Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
18 I. guizhouensis Reticulate Triangular circle Triangular circle
19 I. auriculata Corrugated reticulation Triangular circle Triangular circle
20 I. monticola var. Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
21 I. chlorosepala Reticulate Oval Oval
22 I. xanthina Reticulate Rectangular circle Near circle
23 I. monticola Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
24 I. yui Reticulate spinous granule Rectangular circle Oval
25 I. rubrostriata Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
26 I. loulanensis Reticulate Oval Oval
27 I. arguta1 Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
28 I. arguta2 Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
29 I. arguta3 Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
30 I. fanjinica Reticulate Pillow Oval
31 I. fanjinica var. Reticulate Pillow Oval
32 I. reptans Reticulate Pillow Oval
33 I. reptans var. Reticulate Pillow Oval
34 I. pianmaensis Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval
35 I. pianmaensis var. Reticulate Rectangular circle Oval

Analysis on the characteristics of pollen quantitative index of Impatiens.

Index Average value Maximum value Minimum value
Polar axis length (P) (μm) 16.55       24.48       13.29      
Equatorial major axis length (E1) (μm)       29.49       36.65       23.63      
Equatorial short axis length (E2) (μm)       16.39       24.42       12.61      
Pollen volume (V) (μm3) 8277.23       14760.12       3958.54      
P/E1       0.57       0.96       0.46      
P/E2       1.01       1.23       0.93      
E1/E2       1.83       2.22       1.06      
GPL (μm)       7.96       11.64       5.37      
GPW (μm)       0.38       1.58       0.09      
L/W       27.35       105.78       5.45      
MD       27.77       64.67       5.33      
RW (μm)       0.54       0.94       0.3      

Characteristics of pollen germination pores of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau.

N Germinating pore
Number Characteristics L (μm) W (μm) L/W
1 4 Depression 6.16 ± 0.03 0.54 ± 0.02 11.42 ± 0.37
2 4 Depression 6.59 ± 0.04 0.48 ± 0.02 13.84 ± 0.38
3 4 Depression 6.59 ± 0.58 0.29 ± 0.02 22.78 ± 2.62
4 4 Depression 6.2 ± 0.02 0.44 ± 0.03 14.12 ± 0.83
5 4 Depression 7.45 ± 0.02 0.21 ± 0.01 35.51 ± 1.60
6 4 Depression 6.53 ± 0.03 0.45 ± 0.03 14.54 ± 0.82
7 4 Depression 5.37 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.02 21.55 ± 1.68
8 4 Depression 7.3 ± 0.02 0.35 ± 0.01 20.68 ±0.63
9 4 Depression 7.39 ± 0.03 0.28 ± 0.02 26.76 ± 1.4
10 4 Depression 6.87 ± 0.06 0.25 ± 0.02 27.9 ± 1.66
11 4 Depression 6.91 ± 0.03 0.28 ± 0.02 24.78 ± 1.84
12 4 Depression 6.87 ± 0.02 0.29 ± 0.02 23.78 ± 1.71
13 4 Bulge 10.34 ± 0.05 0.84 ± 0.05 12.39 ±0.61
14 4 Depression 8.59 ± 0.05 1.58 ± 0.04 5.45 ± 0.09
15 4 Depression 6.64 ± 0.03 0.31 ± 0.02 21.21 ± 0.95
16 4 Depression 6.94 ± 0.06 0.11 ± 0.02 61.95 ± 7.62
17 4 Depression 9.1 ± 0.05 0.36 ± 0.01 25.53 ± 0.69
18 3 Depression 11.64 ± 0.03 0.61 ± 0.01 18.98 ± 0.19
19 3 Depression 6.97 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.02 57.1 ± 7.09
20 4 Depression 7.54 ± 0.03 0.28 ± 0.03 27.07 ± 2.37
21 4 Bulge 6.04 ± 0.04 0.3 ± 0.03 20.00 ± 1.51
22 4 Depression 6.57 ± 0.02 0.35 ± 0.02 19.00 ± 1.06
23 4 Depression 7.69± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.01 29.99 ± 1.30
24 4 Bulge 9.52 ± 0.05 0.09 ± 0.00 105.78 ± 0.51
25 4 Bulge 7.08 ± 0.03 0.23 ± 0.02 30.42 ± 1.83
26 4 Depression 8.72 ± 0.03 0.81 ± 0.02 10.82 ± 0.26
27 4 Depression 8.81 ± 0.03 0.32 ± 0.02 27.28 ± 1.18
28 4 Depression 8.93 ± 0.02 0.31 ± 0.01 28.51 ± 0.52
29 4 Depression 8.83 ± 0.03 0.31 ± 0.01 28.2 ± 0.56
30 4 Depression 10.23 ±0.03 0.44 ±0.04 23.18 ± 1.75
31 4 Depression 11.09 ± 0.03 0.44 ± 0.02 25.24 ± 1.07
32 4 Depression 11.1 ± 0.02 0.37 ± 0.02 29.76 ± 1.2
33 4 Depression 10.89 ± 0.04 0.37 ± 0.02 29.22 ± 1.57
34 4 Bulge 7.52 ± 0.03 0.25 ± 0.02 30.58 ± 2.02
35 4 Bulge 7.49 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.03 31.98 ± 3.97

Information of 48 species of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou area.

N Species T Area Latitude and longitude Height (cm) Altitude (m) Habitat characteristics
1 Impatiens. siculifer 2017.10 Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou E108.700569, N27.919654 40–50 530 Ditch edge
2 Impatiens.dicentra 2017.10 Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou E108.742382, N27.868716 40–120 530 Ditch edge
3 Impatiens.dicentra var1. 2017.10 Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou E108.721257, N27.892699 30–40 530 Ditch edge
5 Impatiens lasiophyton 2017.10 Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou E108.768975, N27.809401 30–50 870 Roadside
4 Impatiens.dicentra var2. 2017.10 Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou E108.792546, N27.802755 30–50 530 Ditch edge
6 Impatiens guizhouensis 2017.10 Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou E108.825316, N27.856424 20–30 870 Damp place
7 Impatiens stenosepala 2017.10 Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou E108.819567, N27.79662 25–35 730 Roadside
8 Impatiens fanjinica 2017.10 Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou E108.809219, N27.856935 30–100 540 Damp place
9 Impatiens fanjinicavar. 2017.10 Fanjing Mountain, Guizhou E108.791396, N27.81707 80–100 610 Damp place
10 Impatiens monticola 2017.10 Suiyang, Guizhou E107.206313, N28.246177 32–74 817 Ditch edge
11 Impatiens chlorosepala 2017.10 Suiyang, Guizhou E107.206323, N28.246167 28–65 817 Roadside
12 Impatiens reptans 2017.10 Suiyang, Guizhou E107.206313, N28.246177 40–70 1560 Roadside
13 Impatiens reptans var. 2017.10 Suiyang, Guizhou E107.206303, N28.246168 30–80 1560 Roadside
14 Impatiens noli–tangere 2017.10 Suiyang, Guizhou E107.206313, N28.246177 20–30 1260 Roadside
15 Impatiens loulanensis 2017.10 Liupanshui, Guizhou E104.768578, N25.980954 80–120 1741 Ditch edge
16 Unconfirmed species 1 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.718522, N25.964222 60–130 2230 Ditch edge
17 Impatiens pinetorum 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.721274, N25.963222 60–80 2350 Damp place
18 Impatiens pianmaensis 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.718522,N25.964222 40–80 2240 Damp place
19 Impatiens pianmaensis var. 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.719801, N25.959622 40–80 2240 Damp place
20 Unconfirmed species 2 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.689201, N25.975916 42–75 3001 Damp place
21 Impatiens rectangula 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.684315, N25.965522 40–80 2177 Roadside
22 Impatiens ruiliensis 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.872203, N26.925063 40–80 1228 Damp place
23 Impatiens arguta 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.848631, N26.899806 30–50 1246 Roadside
24 Impatiens xanthina 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.871053, N26.899291 20–30 1621 Damp place
25 Impatiens gongshanensis 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.362313, N27.902298 40–60 1929 Damp place
26 Unconfirmed species 3 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.365702, N27.880526 30–60 2826 Damp place
27 Impatiens holocentra 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.345292, N27.881675 30–40 2293 Damp place
28 Impatiens yui 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.345436, N27.877844 20–40 2297 Damp place
29 Impatiens siculifervar. 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.342849, N27.877077 50–90 1409 Roadside
30 Impatiens arguta 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.353844, N27.873246 30–60 1321 Ditch edge
31 Impatiens arguta 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.357869, N27.86507 30–60 1321 Ditch edge
32 Impatiens racemosa 2017.10 Gaoligong Mountain, Yunnan E98.332572, N27.88142 20–60 1522 Roadside
33 Impatiens cyanantha 2017.10 Anlong, Yunnan E105.351878, N25.109422 80–100 1777 Roadside
34 Impatiens napoensis 2017.10 Anlong, Yunnan E105.346129, N25.091099 40–50 1347 Roadside
35 Impatiens chlorosepala var. 2017.10 Wangmo, Yunnan E106.049528, N25.215218 30–50 821 Damp place
36 Impatiens loulanensisvar. 2017.10 Anlong, Yunnan E105.35389, N25.106543 80–120 1741 Roadside
37 Impatiens uliginosa 2017.10 Kunming, Yunnan E102.776044, N25.090989 60–80 2151 Ditch edge
38 Impatiens uliginosa 2017.10 Kunming, Yunnan E102.777769, N25.087062 60–80 2250 Ditch edge
39 Impatiens uliginosa 2017.10 Kunming, Yunnan E102.775397, N25.088502 60–80 2430 Ditch edge
40 Impatiens uliginosa 2017.10 Kunming, Yunnan E102.784224, N25.342856 20–35 2151 Roadside
41 Impatiens uliginosa 2017.10 Kunming, Yunnan E103.197322, N24.648467 40–80 2560 Ditch edge
42 Impatiens cyathiflora 2017.10 Kunming, Yunnan E102.62844, N24.983997 30–50 2500 Damp place
43 Impatiens auriculata 2017.10 Kunming, Yunnan E102.630165, N24.982949 40–80 2460 Damp place
44 Impatiens rubrostriata 2017.10 Wenshan, Yunnan E104.76302, N23.131053 34–45 2433 Damp place
45 Impatiens monticola var. 2017.10 Wenshan, Yunnan E104.750947, N23.127863 46–85 2628 Roadside
46 Impatiens corchorifolia 2017.10 Wenshan, Yunnan E104.774518, N23.13318 55–68 2227 Roadside
47 Unconfirmed species 4 2017.10 Wenshan, Yunnan E104.622741, N23.131053 30–54 2475 Damp place
48 Impatiens delavayi 2017.10 Wenshan, Yunnan E104.610093, N23.108186 54–63 2765 Damp place

Pollen mesh characteristics of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau.

N MF MD RW (μm) RF
1 Rough, no particulate matter 16.33 ± 0.58 0.72 ± 0.02 Smoothing
2 Rough, with particulate matter 24.33 ±1.53 0.57 ±0.02 Smoothing
3 Rough, with particulate matter 33.33 ± 1.53 0.46 ± 0.01 Smoothing
4 Smooth, very few particles 23.33 ± 0.58 0.59 ± 0.01 Smoothing
5 Smooth, very few particles 15.67 ± 0.58 0.88 ± 0.02 Smoothing
6 Rough, with particulate matter 15.00 ± 1.00 0.73 ± 0.02 Smoothing
7 Rough, with particulate matter 20.00 ± 1.00 0.45 ± 0.03 Smoothing
8 Rough, with particulate matter 31.67 ± 0.58 0.39 ± 0.02 Smoothing
9 Rough, with particulate matter 31.00 ± 1.00 0.44 ± 0.02 Smoothing
10 Rough, with particulate matter 30.00 ± 1.00 0.42 ± 0.01 Smoothing
11 Rough, with particulate matter 32.00 ± 1.00 0.44 ± 0.02 Smoothing
12 Rough, with particulate matter 26.67 ± 0.58 0.44 ± 0.01 Smoothing
13 Rough, with particulate matter 28.33 ± 1.53 0.36 ± 0.02 Smoothing
14 Rough, with particulate matter 30.33 ± 1.53 0.53 ± 0.02 Smoothing
15 Rough, with particulate matter 47.33 ± 1.15 0.34 ± 0.01 Smoothing
16 Rough, with particulate matter 23.00 ± 1.00 0.42 ± 0.02 Smoothing
17 Rough, with particulate matter 64.67 ± 2.08 0.3 ± 0.02 Smoothing
18 Rough, with particulate matter 5.33 ± 0.58 0.67 ± 0.02 Smoothing
19 Rough, with particulate matter 8.00 ± 1.00 0.94 ± 0.02 Wavy
20 Rough, with particulate matter 41.67 ± 1.53 0.53 ± 0.01 Smoothing
21 Rough, with particulate matter 43.67 ± 2.08 0.46 ± 0.03 Smoothing
22 Smooth, very few particles 12.67 ± 0.58 0.59 ± 0.02 Smoothing
23 Rough, with particulate matter 30.00 ± 1.00 0.51 ± 0.02 Smoothing
24 Rough, with particulate matter 52.33 ± 3.06 0.54 ± 0.02 Spinous granule
25 Rough, with particulate matter 31.67 ± 2.08 0.35 ± 0.02 Smoothing
26 Rough, with particulate matter 12.00 ± 1.00 0.44 ± 0.02 Smoothing
27 Rough, with particulate matter 17.67 ±0.58 0.52 ±0.01 Smoothing
28 Rough, with particulate matter 18.33 ± 0.58 0.54 ± 0.01 Smoothing
29 Rough, with particulate matter 18.00 ± 1.00 0.56 ± 0.03 Smoothing
30 Rough, with particulate matter 42.67 ± 0.58 0.55 ± 0.02 Smoothing
31 Rough, with particulate matter 43.00 ± 1.00 0.54 ± 0.03 Smoothing
32 Rough, with particulate matter 44.33 ± 2.08 0.57 ± 0.02 Smoothing
33 Rough, with particulate matter 38.00 ± 1.00 0.54 ± 0.02 Smoothing
34 Smooth, with particles 10.00 ± 1.00 0.84 ± 0.01 Smoothing
35 Smooth, with particles 9.67 ± 1.53 0.76 ± 0.02 Smoothing

Pollen size characteristics of Impatiens in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau.

N Size
P ( μm) E1 (μm) E2 (μm) V (μm3) P/E1 P/E2 E1/E2
1 13.62 ± 0.04 26.35 ± 0.05 13.25 ± 0.02 4754.72 ± 27.43 0.52 ± 0.02 1.03 ± 0 1.99 ± 0.03
2 15.21 ± 0.60 28.92 ± 0.02 13.64 ± 0.03 5997.89 ± 239.4 0.53 ± 0.02 1.11 ± 0.05 2.12 ± 0.01
3 13.65 ± 0.02 25.35 ± 0.04 13.02 ± 0.03 4504.63 ± 7.64 0.54 ± 0.01 1.05 ± 0 1.94 ± 0.01
4 13.52 ± 0.02 26.48 ± 0.04 14.22 ± 0.03 5093.98 ± 11.04 0.51 ± 0.00 0.95 ± 0 1.86 ± 0.00
5 14.92 ± 0.04 27.64 ± 0.02 14.27 ± 0.03 5886.88 ± 21.83 0.54 ± 0.02 1.05 ± 0.01 1.94 ± 0.01
6 14.28 ± 0.02 26.98 ± 0.03 13.95 ± 0.02 5377.12 ± 16.82 0.53 ± 0.01 1.02 ± 0 1.93 ± 0.01
7 15.13 ± 0.03 27.65 ± 0.02 13.97 ± 0.02 5843.45 ± 4.87 0.55 ± 0.01 1.08 ± 0.01 1.98 ± 0.00
8 14.82 ±0.03 29.12 ±0.04 14.73 ±0.04 6354.67 ±15.26 0.51 ±0.01 1.01 ±0.01 1.98 ±0.01
9 13.92 ± 0.03 29.12 ± 0.02 14.15 ± 0.03 5735.06 ± 20.11 0.48 ± 0.00 0.98 ± 0.01 2.06 ± 0.01
10 13.84 ± 0.04 28.35 ± 0.03 14.05 ± 0.04 5514.04 ± 20.92 0.49 ± 0.00 0.98 ± 0.01 2.02 ± 0.01
11 14.64 ± 0.03 28.54 ± 0.01 15.74 ± 0.02 6578.75 ± 19.17 0.51 ± 0.01 0.93 ± 0 1.81 ± 0.00
12 14.75 ± 0.01 26.84 ± 0.03 15.26 ± 0.03 6043.21 ± 4.99 0.55 ± 0.00 0.97 ± 0.01 1.76 ± 0.01
13 16.6 ± 0.03 28.24 ± 0.02 16.59± 0.02 7776.2 ± 14.94 0.59 ± 0.01 1 ± 0 1.7 ± 0.01
14 15.15 ± 0.01 28.18 ± 0.04 14.97 ± 0.02 6391.76 ± 7.03 0.54 ± 0.00 1.01 ± 0 1.88 ± 0.01
15 13.29 ± 0.02 23.63 ± 0.01 12.61 ± 0.03 3958.54 ± 16.44 0.56 ± 0.01 1.05 ± 0.01 1.87 ± 0.01
16 14.96 ± 0.02 27.09 ± 0.05 14.42 ± 0.04 5841.87 ± 21.14 0.55 ± 0.01 1.04 ± 0.01 1.88 ± 0.01
17 14.61 ± 0.04 24.37 ± 0.04 13.25 ± 0.03 4717.5 ± 19.7 0.6 ± 0.00 1.1 ± 0.01 1.84 ± 0.01
18 24.48 ± 0.01 25.5 ± 0.04 19.93 ± 0.03 12440.06 ± 25.84 0.96 ± 0.01 1.23 ± 0.00 1.28± 0.00
19 23.44 ± 0.03 25.79 ± 0.02 24.42 ± 0.03 14760.11 ± 30.71 0.91 ± 0.00 0.96 ± 0.00 1.06 ± 0.00
20 16.96 ± 0.03 34.8 ± 0.02 16.83 ± 0.04 9930.21 ± 5.15 0.49 ± 0.00 1.01 ± 0.01 2.07 ± 0.01
21 16.98 ± 0.05 26.97 ± 0.02 16.92 ± 0.01 7749.09 ± 20.81 0.63 ± 0.00 1 ± 0.01 1.59 ± 0.01
22 18.54 ± 0.04 28.3 ± 0.03 19.8 ± 0.03 10386.99 ± 44.18 0.66 ± 0.01 0.94 ± 0.00 1.43 ± 0.00
23 16.96 ± 0.04 36.65 ± 0.55 16.53 ± 0.03 10275.97 ± 166.77 0.46 ± 0.01 1.02 ± 0.01 2.22 ± 0.03
24 19.91 ± 0.05 32.22 ± 0.02 20.24 ± 0.02 12985.32 ± 18.53 0.62 ± 0.00 0.98 ± 0.01 1.59 ± 0.00
25 18.22 ± 0.03 33.34 ± 0.04 19.22 ± 0.03 11674.4 ± 11.48 0.55 ± 0.01 0.95 ± 0.00 1.74 ± 0.01
26 14.62 ± 0.05 30.07 ± 0.02 14.51 ± 0.02 6381.1 ± 22.92 0.49 ± 0.01 1.01 ± 0.01 2.07 ± 0.01
27 17.88 ± 0.02 31.49 ± 0.01 17.66 ± 0.03 9943.29 ± 24.86 0.57 ± 0.00 1.01 ± 0.00 1.78 ± 0.01
28 17.84 ± 0.04 31.97 ± 0.02 17.9 ± 0.02 10206.21 ± 29.62 0.56 ± 0.01 1 ± 0.01 1.79 ± 0.01
29 17.95 ± 0.03 31.49 ± 0.02 17.3 ± 0.08 9777.76 ± 57.43 0.57 ± 0.01 1.04 ± 0.01 1.82 ± 0.01
30 17.96 ± 0.03 33.64 ± 0.03 17.95 ± 0.04 10844.94 ± 34.53 0.53 ± 0.00 1 ± 0.00 1.88 ± 0.01
31 18.09 ± 0.06 32.47 ± 0.03 17.75 ± 0.02 10427.14 ± 37.16 0.56 ± 0.00 1.02 ± 0.01 1.83 ± 0.00
32 17.87 ± 0.03 34.44 ± 0.03 17.97 ± 0.02 11056.38 ± 14.29 0.52 ± 0.01 0.99 ± 0.01 1.92 ± 0.00
33 17.04 ±0.04 33.25 ±0.03 17.79 ±0.03 10078.45 ±30.12 0.51 ±0.01 0.96 ±0.00 1.87 ±0.01
34 19.13 ± 0.03 32.05 ± 0.02 18.77 ± 0.03 11511.42 ± 33.33 0.6 ± 0.00 1.02 ± 0.00 1.71 ± 0.00
35 18.53 ±0.03 34.95 ± 0.01 19.92 ± 0.03 12904.06 ± 33.01 0.53 ± 0.01 0.93 ± 0.00 1.75 ± 0.01

Attique, R., Zafar, M., Ahmad, M., Zafar, S., Ghufran, M., Mustafa, M. R., Yaseen, G., Ahmad, L., Sultana, S., Nabila, Zafar, A., and Majeed, S. (2022). Pollen morphology of selected melliferous plants and its taxonomic implications using microscopy. Microscopy Research and Technique, 85, 2361–2380. Attique R. Zafar M. Ahmad M. Zafar S. Ghufran M. Mustafa M. R. Yaseen G. Ahmad L. Sultana S. Nabila Zafar A. Majeed S. ( 2022 ). Pollen morphology of selected melliferous plants and its taxonomic implications using microscopy . Microscopy Research and Technique , 85 , 2361 2380 . Search in Google Scholar

Cai, X. (2007). A study on micromorphological characters of leaf epidermis of six species in Impatiens L. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, 30, 68–71. Cai X. ( 2007 ). A study on micromorphological characters of leaf epidermis of six species in Impatiens L . Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University , 30 , 68 71 . Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Y. L. (1978). Notulae de genere Impatiens L. florae Sinicae. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 16(2), 36. Chen Y. L. ( 1978 ). Notulae de genere Impatiens L. florae Sinicae . Journal of Systematics and Evolution , 16 ( 2 ), 36 . Search in Google Scholar

Dadandi, M. Y., and Yildiz, K. (2015). Seed morphology of some Silene L. (Caryophyllaceae) species collected from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, 39, 280–297. Dadandi M. Y. Yildiz K. ( 2015 ). Seed morphology of some Silene L. (Caryophyllaceae) species collected from Turkey . Turkish Journal of Botany , 39 , 280 297 . Search in Google Scholar

Eddie, W. M., Shulkina, T., Gaskin, J. F., Haberle, R. C., and Jansen, R. K. (2003). Phylogeny of campanulaceae S. Str. Inferred from its sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 90, 554–575. Eddie W. M. Shulkina T. Gaskin J. F. Haberle R. C. Jansen R. K. ( 2003 ). Phylogeny of campanulaceae S. Str. Inferred from its sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA . Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden , 90 , 554 575 . Search in Google Scholar

El Ghazali, G. E. (2022). The genus Buchenavia Eichl. and its taxonomic affinity to the genus Terminalia L. (Combretaceae): Insight from pollen morphology - A review. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 301, 104644, doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2022.104644. El Ghazali G. E. ( 2022 ). The genus Buchenavia Eichl. and its taxonomic affinity to the genus Terminalia L. (Combretaceae): Insight from pollen morphology - A review . Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology , 301 , 104644 , doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2022.104644 . Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hu, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhao, C., and Liu, J. (2020). Taxonomic importance of pollen morphology in Veratrum L. (Melanthiaceae) using microscopic techniques. Microscopy Research and Technique, 83, 865–876. Hu Z. Zhao Y. Zhao C. Liu J. ( 2020 ). Taxonomic importance of pollen morphology in Veratrum L. (Melanthiaceae) using microscopic techniques . Microscopy Research and Technique , 83 , 865 876 . Search in Google Scholar

Janssens, S. B., Knox, E. B., Huysmans, S., Smets, E. F., and Merckx, V. S. (2009). Rapid radiation of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) during pliocene and pleistocene: Result of a global climate change. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 52(3), 806–824. Janssens S. B. Knox E. B. Huysmans S. Smets E. F. Merckx V. S. ( 2009 ). Rapid radiation of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) during pliocene and pleistocene: Result of a global climate change . Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution , 52 ( 3 ), 806 824 . Search in Google Scholar

Janssens, S. B., Wilson, Y. S., Yuan, Y. M., Nagels, A., Smets, E. F., and Huysmans, S. (2012). A total evidence approach using palynological characters to infer the complex evolutionary history of the Asian Impatiens (Balsaminaceae). Taxon, 61(2), 355–367. Janssens S. B. Wilson Y. S. Yuan Y. M. Nagels A. Smets E. F. Huysmans S. ( 2012 ). A total evidence approach using palynological characters to infer the complex evolutionary history of the Asian Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) . Taxon , 61 ( 2 ), 355 367 . Search in Google Scholar

Janssens, S., Geuten, K., Yuan, Y. M., Song, Y., Küpfer, P., and Smets, E. (2006). Phylogenetics of Impatiens and Hydrocera (Balsaminaceae) using chloroplast atpB-rbcL spacer sequences. Systematic Botany, 31(1), 171–180. Janssens S. Geuten K. Yuan Y. M. Song Y. Küpfer P. Smets E. ( 2006 ). Phylogenetics of Impatiens and Hydrocera (Balsaminaceae) using chloroplast atpB-rbcL spacer sequences . Systematic Botany , 31 ( 1 ), 171 180 . Search in Google Scholar

Khansari, E., Zarre, S., Alizadeh, K., Attar, F., Aghabeigi, F., and Salmaki, Y. (2012). Pollen morphology of Campanula (Campanulaceae) and allied genera in Iran with special focus on its systematic implication. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 207(3), 203–211. Khansari E. Zarre S. Alizadeh K. Attar F. Aghabeigi F. Salmaki Y. ( 2012 ). Pollen morphology of Campanula (Campanulaceae) and allied genera in Iran with special focus on its systematic implication . Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants , 207 ( 3 ), 203 211 . Search in Google Scholar

Lens, F., Dressler, S., Vinckier, S., Janssens, S., Dessein, S., Van Evelghem, L., and Smets, E. (2005). Palynological variation in balsaminoid Ericales. I. Marcgraviaceae. Annals of Botany, 96(6), 1047–1060. Lens F. Dressler S. Vinckier S. Janssens S. Dessein S. Van Evelghem L. Smets E. ( 2005 ). Palynological variation in balsaminoid Ericales. I. Marcgraviaceae . Annals of Botany , 96 ( 6 ), 1047 1060 . Search in Google Scholar

Lens, F., Eeckhout, S., Zwartjes, R., Smets, E., and Janssens, S. B. (2012). The multiple fuzzy origins of woodiness within Balsaminaceae using an integrated approach. Where do we draw the line? Annals of Botany, 109(4), 783–799. Lens F. Eeckhout S. Zwartjes R. Smets E. Janssens S. B. ( 2012 ). The multiple fuzzy origins of woodiness within Balsaminaceae using an integrated approach. Where do we draw the line? Annals of Botany , 109 ( 4 ), 783 799 . Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Y. Q. (1991). Pollen morphology of Impatiens L. (Balsaminaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 29(4), 352. Lu Y. Q. ( 1991 ). Pollen morphology of Impatiens L. (Balsaminaceae) and its taxonomic implications . Journal of Systematics and Evolution , 29 ( 4 ), 352 . Search in Google Scholar

Luo, C., Huang, W., Yer, H., Kamuda, T., Li, X., Li, Y., and Huang, H. (2022). Complete chloroplast genomes and comparative analyses of three ornamental Impatiens species. Frontiers in Genetics, 13, 816123, doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.816123. Luo C. Huang W. Yer H. Kamuda T. Li X. Li Y. Huang H. ( 2022 ). Complete chloroplast genomes and comparative analyses of three ornamental Impatiens species . Frontiers in Genetics , 13 , 816123 , doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.816123 . Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Martínez-Ortega, M. M., and Rico, E. (2001). Seed morphology and its systematic significance in some Veronica species (Scrophulariaceae) mainly from the Western Mediterranean. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 228, 15–32. Martínez-Ortega M. M. Rico E. ( 2001 ). Seed morphology and its systematic significance in some Veronica species (Scrophulariaceae) mainly from the Western Mediterranean . Plant Systematics and Evolution , 228 , 15 32 . Search in Google Scholar

Mazari, P., Liu, Q., Khan, M. A., Sadia, S., and Ahmad, L. (2017). Pollen morphology and pollen fertility estimation of three medicinal plant species of Hypericum L. from Kaghan Valley, Northern Pakistan. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8(12), 3073. Mazari P. Liu Q. Khan M. A. Sadia S. Ahmad L. ( 2017 ). Pollen morphology and pollen fertility estimation of three medicinal plant species of Hypericum L. from Kaghan Valley, Northern Pakistan . American Journal of Plant Sciences , 8 ( 12 ), 3073 . Search in Google Scholar

Mezzonato-Pires, A. C., De Souza Freitas, G. H. G., Mendonça, C. B. F., and Gonçalves-Esteves, V. (2022). The systematic value of pollen morphology in the tribe Paropsieae (Passifloraceae sensu stricto). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 299, 104606, doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2022.104606. Mezzonato-Pires A. C. De Souza Freitas G. H. G. Mendonça C. B. F. Gonçalves-Esteves V. ( 2022 ). The systematic value of pollen morphology in the tribe Paropsieae (Passifloraceae sensu stricto) . Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology , 299 , 104606 , doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2022.104606 . Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pérez-Gutiérrez, M. A., Suárez-Santiago, V. N., Fernández, M. C., Bonillo, M. J. S., and Romero-Garcia, A. T. (2015). Pollen morphology and post-tetrad wall development in the subfamily Fumarioideae (Papaveraceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 222, 33–47. Pérez-Gutiérrez M. A. Suárez-Santiago V. N. Fernández M. C. Bonillo M. J. S. Romero-Garcia A. T. ( 2015 ). Pollen morphology and post-tetrad wall development in the subfamily Fumarioideae (Papaveraceae) . Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology , 222 , 33 47 . Search in Google Scholar

Raza, J., Ahmad, M., Zafar, M., Athar, M., Sultana, S., Majeed, S., and Hussain, A. (2020). Comparative foliar anatomical and pollen morphological studies of Acanthaceae using light microscope and scanning electron microscope for effective microteaching in community. Microscopy Research and Technique, 83(9), 1103–1117. Raza J. Ahmad M. Zafar M. Athar M. Sultana S. Majeed S. Hussain A. ( 2020 ). Comparative foliar anatomical and pollen morphological studies of Acanthaceae using light microscope and scanning electron microscope for effective microteaching in community . Microscopy Research and Technique , 83 ( 9 ), 1103 1117 . Search in Google Scholar

Swenson, U., Bartish, I. V., and Munzinger, J. (2007). Phylogeny, diagnostic characters and generic limitation of Australasian Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae, Ericales): Evidence from ITS sequence data and morphology. Cladistics, 23(3), 201–228. Swenson U. Bartish I. V. Munzinger J. ( 2007 ). Phylogeny, diagnostic characters and generic limitation of Australasian Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae, Ericales): Evidence from ITS sequence data and morphology . Cladistics , 23 ( 3 ), 201 228 . Search in Google Scholar

Tuler, A. C., Da Silva, T., Carrijo, T. T., Garbin, M. L., Mendonça, C. B., Peixoto, A. L., and Gonçalves-Esteves, V. (2017). Taxonomic significance of pollen morphology for species delimitation in Psidium (Myrtaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 303, 317–327. Tuler A. C. Da Silva T. Carrijo T. T. Garbin M. L. Mendonça C. B. Peixoto A. L. Gonçalves-Esteves V. ( 2017 ). Taxonomic significance of pollen morphology for species delimitation in Psidium (Myrtaceae) . Plant Systematics and Evolution , 303 , 317 327 . Search in Google Scholar

Ullah, F., Ahmad, M., Zafar, M., Parveen, B., Ashfaq, S., Bahadur, S., and Luqman, M. (2022). Pollen morphology and its taxonomic potential in some selected taxa of Caesalpiniaceae observed under light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Microscopy Research and Technique, 85(4), 1410–1420. Ullah F. Ahmad M. Zafar M. Parveen B. Ashfaq S. Bahadur S. Luqman M. ( 2022 ). Pollen morphology and its taxonomic potential in some selected taxa of Caesalpiniaceae observed under light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy . Microscopy Research and Technique , 85 ( 4 ), 1410 1420 . Search in Google Scholar

Umber, F., Zafar, M., Ullah, R., Bari, A., Khan, M. Y., Ahmad, M., and Sultana, S. (2022). Implication of light and scanning electron microscopy for pollen morphology of selected taxa of family Asteraceae and Brassicaceae. Microscopy Research and Technique, 85(1), 373–384. Umber F. Zafar M. Ullah R. Bari A. Khan M. Y. Ahmad M. Sultana S. ( 2022 ). Implication of light and scanning electron microscopy for pollen morphology of selected taxa of family Asteraceae and Brassicaceae . Microscopy Research and Technique , 85 ( 1 ), 373 384 . Search in Google Scholar

Wang, W., Li, H., and Chen, Z. (2014). Analysis of plastid and nuclear DNA data in plant phylogenetics-evaluation and improvement. Science China Life Sciences, 57, 280–286. Wang W. Li H. Chen Z. ( 2014 ). Analysis of plastid and nuclear DNA data in plant phylogenetics-evaluation and improvement . Science China Life Sciences , 57 , 280 286 . Search in Google Scholar

Yu, S. X. (2012). Balsaminaceae of China. Beijing: Peking University Press. Yu S. X. ( 2012 ). Balsaminaceae of China . Beijing : Peking University Press . Search in Google Scholar

Yu, S. X., Janssens, S. B., Zhu, X. Y., Lidén, M., Gao, T. G., and Wang, W. (2016). Phylogeny of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): Integrating molecular and morphological evidence into a new classification. Cladistics, 32(2), 179–197. Yu S. X. Janssens S. B. Zhu X. Y. Lidén M. Gao T. G. Wang W. ( 2016 ). Phylogeny of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): Integrating molecular and morphological evidence into a new classification . Cladistics , 32 ( 2 ), 179 197 . Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Y. M., Song, Y. I., Geuten, K., Rahelivololona, E., Wohlhauser, S., Fischer, E., and Küpfer, P. (2004). Phylogeny and biogeography of Balsaminaceae inferred from ITS sequences. Taxon, 53(2), 391–404. Yuan Y. M. Song Y. I. Geuten K. Rahelivololona E. Wohlhauser S. Fischer E. Küpfer P. ( 2004 ). Phylogeny and biogeography of Balsaminaceae inferred from ITS sequences . Taxon , 53 ( 2 ), 391 404 . Search in Google Scholar

Zafar, A., Zafar, M., Ahmad, M., Khan, A. M., Mahmood, T., Kilic, O., Fatima A., Habib D., Sultana S., Majeed S., Attique R., and Nabila. (2022). Microscopic (LM and SEM) visualization of pollen ultrastructure among honeybee flora from lower M argalla H ills and allied areas. Microscopy Research and Technique, 85(10), 3325–3338. Zafar A. Zafar M. Ahmad M. Khan A. M. Mahmood T. Kilic O. Fatima A. Habib D Sultana S Majeed S Attique R Nabila ( 2022 ). Microscopic (LM and SEM) visualization of pollen ultrastructure among honeybee flora from lower M argalla H ills and allied areas . Microscopy Research and Technique , 85 ( 10 ), 3325 3338 . Search in Google Scholar

Zavada, M. S., and Hackley, P. C. (2022). The effect of diagenesis and acetolysis on the preservation of morphology and ultrastructural features of pollen. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 302, 104679, doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2022.104679. Zavada M. S. Hackley P. C. ( 2022 ). The effect of diagenesis and acetolysis on the preservation of morphology and ultrastructural features of pollen . Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology , 302 , 104679 , doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2022.104679 . Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zavialova, N., and Nosova, N. (2019). The morphology and ultrastructure of Jurassic in situ ginkgoalean pollen. Geobios, 53, 77–85. Zavialova N. Nosova N. ( 2019 ). The morphology and ultrastructure of Jurassic in situ ginkgoalean pollen . Geobios , 53 , 77 85 . Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD