Poinsettia (
Plant growth is promoted with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), which are one of the alternatives used in fertilisation programmes, friendly to the environment and the growing environment in plant breeding, biological N2 fixation, nutrient uptake from the rhizosphere, expansion of the root surface area, increasing beneficial host symbiosis (Vessey, 2003), increasing soluble phosphate intake and stimulating plant growth through iron uptake with the help of bacterial siderophores (Suhag, 2016).
The root activity of the cultured plants can be increased with phytosiderophore, enzymatic activities and rhizobial or mycorrhizal symbiosis (Couillerot et al., 2009). There are many studies in which the positive effects of a single use of PGPR strains are manifested on the growth and yield in the cultivation of many plant species (Mishra et al., 2010; Silva, 2011; Parlakova Karagöz et al., 2016; Karagöz et al., 2018; Zerrouk et al., 2019). There are also conclusions that two or more bacterial mixtures increase plant production more than single applications (Rojas et al., 2001). In previous studies, different formulations of different bacterial strains were applied to poinsettia in the bacterial concentrations of 109 (Zulueta-Rodriguez et al., 2014) and 108 cells · mL−1 (Parlakova Karagöz and Dursun, 2019a) and significant results were obtained in terms of plant growth characteristics of the poinsettia.
No studies have been encountered in literature on whether the application of different doses of bacterial formulations effective on poinsettia has an impact on plant growth and its level of impact. Whereas bacterial inoculation density is an important factor in the agricultural applications of microbial inoculants. Many countries have dose standards for rhizobial inoculants (Bai et al., 2002). A limited number of studies have been carried out showing the effects of PGPR inoculation density on tomato (Pillay and Nowak, 1997), canola (Zablotowicz et al., 1991) and soybean (Zablotowicz et al., 1991; Bai et al., 2002).
Enzyme activity of plants, light intensity, photoperiod and photoperiod light time (Gebauer et al., 1984) vary according to the nitrogen form and the concentration of the soil (Geiger et al., 1999), plant species (Cousins and Bloom, 2003) and mycorrhizal association (Constable et al., 2001). Nitrate reductase (NR) is an enzyme that can be stimulated by its substrate, and any change in activity may reveal the presence of nitrate in the external environment of the plant (Arslan et al., 2009). Glutamine under the effect of glutamine synthetase enzyme; In the catalysis of glutamate synthase, it participates in glutamic acid structure and then takes a role in the formation of various amino acids. Plants exhibit better growth, photosynthesis activity, high total chlorophyll and carbohydrate concentration through these enzymes (Horchani et al., 2010).
The bract leaf area, which is one of the most important quality characteristics of the potted poinsettia, was increased by 8.52% with the treatment of bacterial formulation (
The research was carried out in a climate-controlled research greenhouse from 8 August 2018 to 15 January 2019 in Erzurum (Turkey). Rooted cuttings of poinsettia [
The treatments were different doses of
Bacterial isolates used in the study and some biochemical properties (Kotan et al., 2014)
Isolate No | MIS diagnosis result | SIM | Location (in Turkey) | Host | Nitrogen | Phosphate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TV-91C | 0.474 | Van | Poaceae | + | W+ | |
TV-113C | 0.688 | Van | Garlic | + | + | |
RK-92 | 0.889 | Erzurum | Pear | + | S |
SIM, similarity index; s, strong +; w, weak +, +, positive; −, negative.
Concentrations of bacterial formulation used in the study and their treatments codes
Treatments | The amount taken from the suspension of each bacteria strain (mL) | The total amount of formulation (mL) | The amount of water (mL) |
---|---|---|---|
Control | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1,000.0 |
T1 | 17.5 | 52.5 | 947.5 |
T2 | 35.0 | 105.0 | 895.0 |
T3 | 70.0 | 210.0 | 790.0 |
T4 | 140.0 | 420.0 | 580.0 |
T5 | 280.0 | 840.0 | 160.0 |
The maximum and minimum temperatures and relative humidity in the research greenhouse were monitored by using a Digital Temperature Humidity Meter (Loobex Htc-2). The temperature inside the research greenhouse ranged between 10.79 and 39.45°C. The relative humidity was in the range of 11.33–84.86%.
After 155–160 days from bacterial inoculation (Figure 1), the vegetative growth of the poinsettia plants (diameter of stems, chlorophyll content, green and bract leaf area, plant fresh and dry weight, number of roots, root diameter and length, root fresh and dry weight) were recorded. The measurements were taken on the plants when they reached the optimum marketing (sales) time. The stem diameter was measured immediately below the first branch using a digital calliper. The chlorophyll content parameter was obtained by calculating the average of the readings taken by using the portable chlorophyll metre (SPAD-502, Minolta, Japan) on five plants and five different leaves of each plant. The leaf area was measured using a CI 202 Portable Digital Brand Leaf Area Meter. The plant roots were washed and the growing medium was removed. After washing, the roots of five plants from each repetition of each application were examined. Two longest roots from each plant were collected at random and their diameters measured. The root diameter was averaged along the root. The two longest roots of a plant were counted and the longest root length was measured and the average was taken. Plant and root tissue samples were oven-dried at 68°C for 48 h, ground, and passed through a 1-mm sieve. The Vapodest 10 Rapid Kjeldahl Distillation Unit (Gerhardt, Germany) and the Kjeldahl method were used to determine the total N (Bremner, 1996) in the growth medium, plant and root.
The nitrate reductase (NR) assay followed the method according to Yu and Zhang (2012) with slight modifications. About 30 mg bract leaves were homogenised with 1 mL of 0.1 M HEPES–KOH buffer solution (pH 7.5) containing 3% (w/v) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP), 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 7 mM cysteine. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 g at 4°C, and the supernatant was used for NR activity analysis according to the methods described by several previous reports (Jonassen et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2011). The NR activity was calculated as mol NO2− produced per hour and gram of fresh weight (mol NO2 · g−1 · FWh−1). For Glutamine synthetase activity (GSA) assay, the bract leaf samples were extracted with 0.5 mmol · L−1 EDTA and 50 mmol · L−1 K2SO4. The homogenates were centrifuged at 20,000 g for 20 min. Then, 1.2 mL of the clear filtrate was added to a centrifuge tube, followed by 0.6 mL imidazole–HCl (pH 7.0; 0.25 mol · L−1), 0.4 mL sodium glutamate (pH 7.0; 0.3 mol · L−1), 0.4 mL ATP–Na (pH 7.0; 15 mmol · L−1), 0.2 mL MgSO4 (0.5 mol · L−1) and 0.2 mL hydroxylamine (1 mol · L−1). After the mixture was incubated at 25°C for 20 min, the reaction was terminated by adding 0.8 mL acidic FeCl3 [24% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and 10% (w/v) FeCl3, in 18% HCl]. The production of γ-glutamyl hydroxamate was measured with a spectrophotometer at 540 nm. One unit of GSA was defined as the enzyme catalysing the formation of 1 mmol γ-glutamyl hydroxamate per minute at 25°C (Zhang et al., 1997; Liu et al., 2013). One unit of GS activity was expressed in μmol GHA · h−1.
The statistical analysis was made using SPSS. The data were subjected to analysis of variance, then the means were separated by using Duncan’ Multiple Range Test (
Significant differences were observed between treatments in terms of the evaluated plant growth parameters. The highest number of green leaves (7.92 number · plant−1) was obtained in the T5 treatment and the T2, T3 and T4 treatments were statistically in the same group. The highest bract leaves number (12.42 number · plant−1), plant height (24.99 cm) and main flower stalk length (12.49 cm) were obtained with the T5 treatment. The highest values of the bract leaves number, plant height and main flower stalk length parameters were obtained with the T5 treatment by increase rate 34.27, 42.07 and 58.70%, respectively when compared with the control treatment. In terms of the size of the plant crown, the highest value was found in the T5 treatment with 18.10 cm; however, the T5 treatment was in the same statistical group as T3 (16.30 cm) and T4 (16.55 cm) treatments for this parameter (Table 3).
Differences in the green leaves number, bract leaves number, plant height, main flower stalk length and size of bract crown of poinsettias subject to different doses of PGPR formulation in the pot experiment
Treatments | Green leaves (no.) | Bract leaves (no.) | Plant height (cm) | Main flower stalk length (cm) | Size of bract crown (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Means ± SD | |||||
Control | 4.92 ± 0.58 bc* | 9.25 ± 1.09 cd*** | 17.59 ± 1.18 cd** | 7.87 ± 0.62 cd** | 13.38 ± 1.16 b** |
T1 | 4.47 ± 1.79 c | 7.22 ± 0.84 e | 15.87 ± 1.87 d | 7.33 ± 1.98 d | 12.30 ± 2.23 b |
T2 | 7.14 ± 0.55 a | 8.36 ± 0.88 de | 16.85 ± 1.28 d | 8.03 ± 0.79 cd | 13.68 ± 2.12 b |
T3 | 6.03 ± 0.68 abc | 10.92 ± 0.88 b | 19.35 ± 1.24 c | 9.55 ± 1.06 bc | 16.30 ± 1.17 a |
T4 | 6.75 ± 0.90 ab | 10.36 ± 0.38 bc | 21.93 ± 1.05 b | 11.37 ± 1.02 ab | 16.55 ± 0.35 a |
T5 | 7.92 ± 1.46 a | 12.42 ± 0.80 a | 24.99 ± 0.80 a | 12.49 ± 0.85 a | 18.10 ± 0.15 a |
Mean | 6.20 ± 1.55 | 9.75 ± 1.89 | 19.43 ± 3.42 | 9.44 ± 2.19 | 15.05 ± 2.43 |
Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (
SD, standard deviation.
*, **, *** significant at
The highest values for bract diameter (25.33 cm) (Table 4) and root dry weight (1.27 g · plant−1) (Figure 2) were also determined in the T5 treatment. It was determined that the increases obtained for these parameters were higher at rate 32.48, 136.81 and 67.11%, respectively, when compared with the control treatment. The increases in chlorophyll were obtained in all treatments compared to the control treatment but were not significantly different among treatments (Table 4). The highest values for green leaf area and bract area were determined in the T4 and T5 treatments. The green leaf area increased by 72.73 and 79.98% with the T4 and T5 treatments, respectively while the bract area increased by 29.47 and 29.97%, respectively when compared to the control treatment (Table 4).
The effect of different doses of PGPR formulation on bract diameter, main stem diameter, relative chlorophyll content, green leaf and bract leaf area in the pot experiment
Treatments | Bract diameter (cm) | Main stem diameter (mm) | Relative chlorophyll content (SPAD) | Green leaf area (cm2) | Bract leaf area (cm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Means ± SD | |||||
Control | 19.12 ± 1.46 bc* | 4.42 ± 0.23 ns | 42.00 ± 2.76 b* | 10.34 ± 0.74 c*** | 67.16 ± 9.04 c** |
T1 | 16.95 ± 2.14 c | 4.93 ± 0.42 | 52.67 ± 2.46 a | 8.66 ± 1.10 c | 77.56 ± 2.36 b |
T2 | 18.23 ± 2.90 bc | 5.00 ± 0.45 | 50.27 ± 1.12 a | 9.86 ± 0.76 c | 78.07 ± 2.24 b |
T3 | 19.45 ± 4.33 bc | 5.19 ± 0.40 | 49.97 ± 6.07 a | 15.14 ± 0.93 b | 78.53 ± 2.14 b |
T4 | 22.13 ± 0.51 ab | 4.73 ± 0.73 | 50.27 ± 2.18 a | 17.86 ± 1.51 a | 86.95 ± 1.77 a |
T5 | 25.33 ± 0.63 a | 5.45 ± 0.16 | 48.73 ± 1.17 a | 18.61 ± 1.39 a | 87.29 ± 0.99 a |
Mean | 20.20 ± 3.49 | 4.95 ± 0.50 | 48.98 ± 4.31 | 13.41 ± 4.19 | 79.26 ± 7.77 |
Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (
ns, non-significant; SD, standard deviation.
*, **, *** significant at
According to the control application, the effects of treatments on the main stem diameter was not statistically significant (
All bacterial applications increased nitrate reductase activity (NRA) in leaves compared to control. This increase was more pronounced in T5 treatment. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in NRA in terms of T2 and T4 treatments (Table 5).
The effect of different doses of PGPR formulation on NRA and GS activity in the pot experiment
Treatments | NRA (EU g · tissue−1) | GS (μmol γ-glutamyl hydroxamate formed · g−1 · min−1) |
---|---|---|
Means ± SD | ||
Control | 4.03 ± 0.98 d*** | 0.23 ± 0.01 c*** |
T1 | 6.32 ± 0.70 c | 0.23 ± 0.00 c |
T2 | 6.99 ± 0.31 bc | 0.23 ± 0.00 c |
T3 | 7.89 ± 0.94 b | 0.26 ± 0.01 b |
T4 | 7.07 ± 0.98 bc | 0.27 ± 0.01 a |
T5 | 9.63 ± 0.46 a | 0.25 ± 0.01 b |
Mean | 6.99 ± 1.85 | 0.24 ± 0.01 |
Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (
SD, standard deviation.
*** significant at
Glutamine synthetase (GS) activity was significantly increased with T4 compared with the control group. GS activity in plants grown with T3 manifested the second-highest and the third-highest GSA was observed in plants grown with T5. But no significant difference between them (T3 and T5). Also, there was no significant difference in GS activity among T1, T2 and control groups (Table 5).
In the observations described above, the highest total N content in leaf samples was present with T5 (6.90 mg · kg−1) and T2 (6.80 mg · kg−1). There was no significant difference between treatments in terms of total nitrogen content in the roots samples. The highest values for plant fresh weight (37.89 g · plant−1) were also determined in the T5 treatment. The highest value for plant dry weight (Table 6) was determined in the T4 and T5 treatments. Plant dry weight increased by 85.94% and 137.11% in T4 and T5 treatments compared to the control treatment (Table 6).
The effect of different doses of PGPR formulation on plant fresh and dry weight, the total nitrogen content of leaf and root in the pot experiment
Treatments | Plant fresh weight (g · plant−1) | Plant dry weight (g · plant−1) | Total N of leaf (%) | Total N of root (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Means ± SD | ||||
Control | 16.00 ± 3.69 c*** | 2.56 ± 0.68 b*** | 5.84 ± 0.13 c*** | 1.85 ± 0.05 ns |
T1 | 17.81 ± 4.94 c | 2.91 ± 1.04 b | 6.47 ± 0.07 b | 1.90 ± 0.03 |
T2 | 14.10 ± 3.09 c | 2.54 ± 0.80 b | 6.80 ± 0.06 a | 1.85 ± 0.04 |
T3 | 20.08 ± 4.23 c | 3.29 ± 0.71 b | 5.12 ± 0.30 e | 1.86 ± 0.03 |
T4 | 28.86 ± 4.47 b | 4.76 ± 0.82 a | 5.46 ± 0.24 d | 1.90 ± 0.07 |
T5 | 37.89 ± 4.80 a | 6.07 ± 0.21 a | 6.90 ± 0.06 a | 1.95 ± 0.04 |
Mean | 22.46 ± 9.30 | 3.69 ± 1.48 | 6.10 ± 0.70 | 1.88 ± 0.06 |
Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (
ns, non-significant; SD, standard deviation.
*** significant at
The long-term preservation of colour and form characteristics of ornamental plants is an important criterion for the acceptance of indoor ornamental plants as a decorative element (Karunananda and Peiris, 2011). A study carried out by Acar et al. (2003) revealed that after the colour feature of ornamental plants, buyers made their choices mainly according to form features. In our study, it was concluded that in the single stem cultivation (Fisher et al., 1996) of poinsettia varieties, increasing doses of bacteria formulation resulted in more compact and pot filling plants with better form in terms of the maximum number of green and bract leaves, plant crown width, bract diameter, green leaf and bract leaf area. Zulueta-Rodriguez et al. (2014) emphasised that
Similar increases in the diameter of the main stem of poinsettias presented in this study have been reported in numerous studies as a result of the inoculation of
Previous studies have reported that the application of
Ge et al. (2016) reported that the application of
It is known that as a result of the inoculation of ornamental plants, forest trees, vegetables and agricultural products with PGPR, seedling germination, plant height, shoot weight, nutrient and chlorophyll content increases (Lazarovits, 1995; Glick et al., 1999; Saharan and Nehra, 2011). Das (2010) reported that PGPRs are effective in increasing the chlorophyll content of the
The intake of nutrients in the growing environment and the type and quantity of microorganisms among the applications are determined to be the reasons for the differences incurred in leaf areas. As a matter of fact, in many studies, there are definitions of PGPRs that stimulate the development of plant organs by improving cell division and expansion (Taiz and Zeiger, 2002) or nutrient uptake (Lazarovits, 1995; Glick et al., 1999; Saharan and Nehra, 2011; Nguyen et al., 2019). Besides, the PGPR applications have been reported to increase the blueberry leaf area (De Silva et al., 2000), tulip leaf area (Parlakova Karagöz and Dursun, 2019c), banana leaf area (Baset et al., 2010), soybean leaf area (Han and Lee, 2005), cabbage seedling leaf area (Turan et al., 2014), maize leaf area (Gholami et al., 2009), canola leaf area (Zablotowicz et al., 1991) and the area of poinsettia leaves (Zulueta-Rodriguez et al., 2014). The findings of this study are compatible with this literature. As a result of this study, it has been determined that increasing the leaf area parameter could be realised by applying increasing doses of PGPR.
Macias et al. (2010) studied the effect of different growing environments on the bract diameter and obtained bract leaf diameters ranging between 12.8 and 22.1 cm. The bract leaf diameter values obtained in this study were determined to be between 16.95 and 25.33 cm. The study carried out by Martinetti et al. (2007) revealed that commercial biofertilizer treatments supplemented with 0.75 and 1.5 mL · L−1 adjusted of
According to Paul and Clark (1996), microorganisms in soil are involved in biogeochemical cycles such as the decomposition of organic matter, humus formation, nutrient conversion and fixation of atmospheric nitrogen. Bacteria change root morphology and increase biomass; thus, it is possible to benefit more from soil volume and receive soil nutrients (Fierro-Coronado et al., 2014). The significant difference between plants treated with the T5 treatment and the control group and other dosages in terms of plant fresh weight and plant dry weight, total nitrogen content in leaves and root dry weight determined in this study can be explained with the results of the previous study. Furthermore, increasing the dose of bacterial formulation increased the root dry weight in this study.
Nitrogen, which is one of the most important nutrients that plants should take from the soil solution is an important factor that limits plant growth after water (Vitousek and Howarth, 1991). As shown in many previous studies, there is a strong association between nitrogen supply and the CO2 assimilation rate (Evans, 1989; Smart, 1994). Also, nitrogen availability is very important in leaf life. Many publications report that nitrogen deficiency can accelerate leaf yellowing and ageing (Smart, 1994; Pourtau et al., 2004; Kato et al., 2005). As a result of this research, the effect of the treatments on the total nitrogen content of green leaf was found to be statistically significant. PGPRs enable plants to get better nutrients and are known to provide better growth and higher yields by activating hormonal activity and obstructing naturally present harmful microflora in the roots (Altin and Bora, 2005). As a result of a study carried out by Arab et al. (2015) access to nitrogen and phosphorus elements dependent on the activity of
Nitrogen (N) is taken from the soil by plants in NO3− and NH4+ forms (Hawkesford et al., 2012). Nitrate reductase (NR) in the cytoplasm of higher plants is a key enzyme involved in the reduction of NO3 (Hu et al., 2014). The presence of nitrate in the medium is not an absolute condition for the expression of the NR gene (Tischner, 2000). However, since NR is an enzyme that can be stimulated by its substrate, change in activity may reveal the presence of nitrate in the external environment of the plant (Arslan et al., 2009). The application of T5 incurring the highest total nitrogen content and the highest NR activity determined in the leaf samples in this study confirms this situation.
In this study, it was determined that the NRA increased with increasing doses. It is concluded that this may be related to an increase in the concentration of bacteria in the growing medium (Geiger et al., 1999).
Ammonia formed as a result of the reduction of ammonium or nitrate taken by the roots is toxic to plant tissue and therefore should not be deposited but immediately enter organic structures (Barro et al., 1991). The introduction of ammonia into organic structures takes place through a mechanism called Glutamine synthetase-Glutamate synthase pathway (Marschner, 1995). In this way, under the activity of glutamine synthetase enzyme ammonia is added to the structure of glutamine and glutamic acid under the catalysis of glutamate synthase and then plays a role in the formation of various amino acids. As a result of our research, the most efficient application of glutamine synthetase enzyme activity was determined as T4. The increase in plant crown width in T3, T4 and T5 treatments may also be related to glutamine synthetase enzyme. Horchani et al. (2010) reported that ammonium-fed tomato plants exhibited better growth, photosynthesis activity, high total chlorophyll and carbohydrate concentration.
In conclusion, it has been demonstrated that the previously tested application of a bacterial formulation comprised of a combination of