About this article
Article Category: research article
Published Online: Nov 28, 2023
Page range: 69 - 82
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fas-2022-0006
Keywords
© 2022 Grzegorz Moneta, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Comparison of the aerodynamic damping ratio of turbine blades
Object | Aerodynamic damping ratio |
Source |
---|---|---|
SO-3 turbine blades (free-standing) | 0.14% (calculated) | Formulas ( |
High pressure turbine blades of Honeywell TFE 731-2 engine (free-standing) | 0.14%–0.26% (±0.11%) | Kielb & Abhari, 2001 |
Steam turbine blades (free-standing) | 0.21%–0.40% |
Comparison of the impact of friction dampers on blade vibrations_
Object | Amplitude reduction (%) | Source |
---|---|---|
SO-3 turbine (free-standing blades, baseline under-platform dampers) | -62.0 | |
SO-3 turbine (free-standing blades, optimized under-platform dampers) | -74.0 | |
Axial compressor (free-standing blades, roller under-platform dampers) | -80.0 | |
Volvo RM6/RM8 turbine (freestanding blades, under-platform dampers) | -80.0 | |
Steam turbine (last stage blades coupled by damping bolts) | -83.3 |