This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Al-Nasa’h, M., Al-Tarawneh, L., Abu Awwad, F. M., & Ahmad, I. (2021). Estimating students’ online learning satisfaction during COVID-19: A discriminant analysis. Heliyon, 7(12), e08544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08544Al-Nasa’hM.Al-TarawnehL.Abu AwwadF. M. & AhmadI. (2021).Estimating students’ online learning satisfaction during COVID-19: A discriminant analysis.,7(12),e08544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08544Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ali, R., & Leeds, E. M. (2009). The impact of face-to-face orientation on online retention: A pilot study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(4), Art. No. 1.http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/AliR. & LeedsE. M.(2009).The impact of face-to-face orientation on online retention: A pilot study.,12(4),Art. No. 1.http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/Search in Google Scholar
Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553 562AlqurashiE. (2019).Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments.,40(1),133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553 562Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, E., Mavroidis, I., Giossos, Y., & Koutsouba, M. (2015). Student satisfaction in the context of a postgraduate programme of the Hellenic Open University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(2,4), 40–55.http://dx.doi.org/10.17718/tojde.52944AnagnostopoulouE.MavroidisI.GiossosY. & KoutsoubaM. (2015).Student satisfaction in the context of a postgraduate programme of the Hellenic Open University.,16(2,4),40–55.http://dx.doi.org/10.17718/tojde.52944Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 129–144). Erlbaum.AndersonT. (2003).Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. InMooreM. G. & AndersonW. G.(Eds.),(pp.129–144).Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2013). Communication and social presence: The impact on adult learners’ emotions in distance learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16(1), 78–93.AngelakiC. & MavroidisI. (2013).Communication and social presence: The impact on adult learners’ emotions in distance learning.,16(1),78–93.Search in Google Scholar
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256290002400104ArbaughJ. B.(2000).Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses.,24(1),32–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256290002400104Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Artino, A. R. Jr. (2007). Self-regulated learning in online education: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 4(6), 3–18. http://www.itdl.org/index.htmArtinoA. R.Jr. (2007).Self-regulated learning in online education: A review of the empirical literature.,4(6),3–18.http://www.itdl.org/index.htmSearch in Google Scholar
Artino, A. R. Jr. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260–270.ArtinoA. R.Jr. (2008).Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training.,24(3),260–270.Search in Google Scholar
Artino, A. R. Jr. (2009). Online learning: Are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success? Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.003ArtinoA. R.Jr. (2009).Online learning: Are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success?,12(3–4),117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2AzevedoR. (2005).Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning.,40(4),199–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bacci, S., Fabbricatore, R., & Iannario, M. (2023). Multilevel IRT models for the analysis of satisfaction for distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 86, 101467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101467BacciS.FabbricatoreR. & IannarioM. (2023).Multilevel IRT models for the analysis of satisfaction for distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.,86,101467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101467Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). Academic Press. (Reprinted from Encyclopedia of mental health, by H. Friedman, Ed., 1998, Academic Press).BanduraA. (1994).Self-efficacy. InRamachaudranV. S.(Ed.),(Vol.4, pp.71–81).Academic Press.(Reprinted from, byFriedmanH., Ed.,1998,Academic Press).Search in Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman & Company.BanduraA. (1997)..W.H. Freeman & Company.Search in Google Scholar
Battalio, J. (2007). Interaction online: A reevaluation. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 339–352.BattalioJ. (2007).Interaction online: A reevaluation.,8(4),339–352.Search in Google Scholar
Baturay, M. H. (2011). Relationships among sense of classroom community, perceived cognitive learning and satisfaction of students at an e-learning course. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 563–575, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494821003644029BaturayM. H.(2011).Relationships among sense of classroom community, perceived cognitive learning and satisfaction of students at an e-learning course.,19(5),563–575, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494821003644029Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Belanger, F., & Jordan, D. H. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: Technologies, tools and techniques. Idea Group Publishing.BelangerF. & JordanD. H.(2000)..Idea Group Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Berge, Z. L. (1999). Interaction in post-secondary webbased learning. Educational Technology, 39(1), 5–11.BergeZ. L.(1999).Interaction in post-secondary webbased learning.,39(1),5–11.Search in Google Scholar
Boekaerts M., Corno L. (2005). Self-Regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 2005, 54 (2), 199–231.BoekaertsM.CornoL. (2005).Self-Regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention,,2005,54(2),199–231.Search in Google Scholar
Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61–67BolligerD. U. & MartindaleT. (2004).Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses.,3(1),61–67Search in Google Scholar
Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice (1st ed.). Routledge.BrockettR. G. & HiemstraR. (1991).(1st ed.).Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Carranza Esteban, R. F., Mamani-Benito, O., Morales-García, W. C., Caycho-Rodríguez, T., & Ruiz Mamani, P. G. (2022). Academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, satisfaction with studies, and virtual media use as depression and emotional exhaustion predictors among college students during COVID-19. Heliyon, 8(11), e11085. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11085Carranza EstebanR. F.Mamani-BenitoO.Morales-GarcíaW. C.Caycho-RodríguezT & Ruiz MamaniP. G.(2022).Academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, satisfaction with studies, and virtual media use as depression and emotional exhaustion predictors among college students during COVID-19.,8(11),e11085. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11085Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chien, T.-C. (2012). Computer self-efficacy and factors influencing e-learning effectiveness\. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 670–686, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255539ChienT.-C.(2012).Computer self-efficacy and factors influencing e-learning effectiveness\.,36(7),670–686, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255539Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cho, M.-H., & Jonassen, D. (2009). Development of the human interaction dimension of the selfregulated learning questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802516934ChoM.-H. & JonassenD. (2009).Development of the human interaction dimension of the selfregulated learning questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments.,29(1),117–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802516934Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cho, M.-H., Shen, D., & Laffey, J. (2010). Relationships between self-regulation and social experiences in asynchronous online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(3), 297–316.ChoM.-H.ShenD. & LaffeyJ. (2010).Relationships between self-regulation and social experiences in asynchronous online learning environments.,21(3),297–316.Search in Google Scholar
Chou, P. N., & Chang, C. C. (2018). Small or large? The effect of group size on engineering students’ learning satisfaction in project design courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), 1–9. https://doi. org/10.29333/ejmste/93400ChouP. N. & ChangC. C.(2018).Small or large? The effect of group size on engineering students’ learning satisfaction in project design courses.,14(10),1–9. https://doi. org/10.29333/ejmste/93400Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Compeau, R., & Higgins, A. (1995). Computer selfefficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.CompeauR. & HigginsA. (1995).Computer selfefficacy: Development of a measure and initial test.,19(2),189–211.Search in Google Scholar
Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 191–226). Lawrence Erlbaum.CornoL. (2001).Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. InZimmermanB. J. & SchunkD. H.(Eds.),(2nd ed., pp.191–226).Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
DeBourgh, G. A. (1999). Technology is the tool, teaching is the task: Student satisfaction in distance learning. In J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost, & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1999 – Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 131–137). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/7521/.DeBourghG. A.(1999).. InPriceJ.WillisJ.WillisD.JostM. & Boger-MehallS.(Eds.),Proceedings of SITE 1999 – Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference(pp.131–137).Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/7521/.Search in Google Scholar
DeBourgh G. (2003). Predictors of Student Satisfaction in Distance-Delivered Graduate Nursing Courses: What Matters Most? Journal of Professional Nursing, Vol 19, No 3 (May–June), 2003: pp 149-163DeBourghG. (2003).Predictors of Student Satisfaction in Distance-Delivered Graduate Nursing Courses: What Matters Most?, Vol19, No3(May–June),2003: pp149-163Search in Google Scholar
Eastin, M. S. & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1), 1-18.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.xEastinM. S. & LaRoseR. (2000).Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide.,6(1),1-18.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eichhorn, J. (2013). Unemployment needs context: How societal differences between countries moderate the loss in life-satisfaction for the unemployed. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(6), 1657–1680, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9402-yEichhornJ. (2013).Unemployment needs context: How societal differences between countries moderate the loss in life-satisfaction for the unemployed.,14(6),1657–1680, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9402-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fotiadou, A., Angelaki, Ch., & Mavroidis, I. (2017). Learner autonomy as a factor of the learning process in distance education. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 20(1), 95–110.FotiadouA.AngelakiCh & MavroidisI. (2017).Learner autonomy as a factor of the learning process in distance education.,20(1),95–110.Search in Google Scholar
Gao, B. W., Jiang, J., & Tang, Y. (2020). The effect of blended learning platform and engagement on students’ satisfaction – The case from the tourism management teaching. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27, 100272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100272.GaoB. W.JiangJ. & TangY. (2020).The effect of blended learning platform and engagement on students’ satisfaction – The case from the tourism management teaching.,27,100272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100272.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Goldsmith, A. H., Veum, J. R., & Darity, W. Jr. (1996a). The impact of labor force history on self-esteem and its component parts, anxiety, alienation and depression. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(2), 183–220.GoldsmithA. H.VeumJ. R. & DarityW.Jr. (1996a).The impact of labor force history on self-esteem and its component parts, anxiety, alienation and depression.,17(2),183–220.Search in Google Scholar
Goldsmith, A. H., Veum, J. R., & Darity, W. Jr. (1996b). The psychological impact of unemployment on joblessness. Journal of Socio-Economics, 25(3), 333–358.GoldsmithA. H.VeumJ. R. & DarityW.Jr. (1996b).The psychological impact of unemployment on joblessness.,25(3),333–358.Search in Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11 (1), 98–119. https://www.icpel.org/ijelp.htmlGrayJ. A. & DiLoretoM. (2016).The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments.,11(1),98–119.https://www.icpel.org/ijelp.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cedpsych.2008.05.006GreeneJ. A. & AzevedoR. (2009).A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system.,34(1),18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. UltiBase Articles, 5, 1–10.HaseS. & KenyonC. (2000).From andragogy to heutagogy.,5,1–10.Search in Google Scholar
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111–119.HaseS. & KenyonC. (2007).Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory.,4(1),111–119.Search in Google Scholar
Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42.HillmanD. C. A.WillisD. J. & GunawardenaC. N.(1994).Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners.,8(2),30–42.Search in Google Scholar
Holmberg, B. (1995). Theory and practice of distance education. Routledge.HolmbergB. (1995)..Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers & Education, 62, 149–158.JooY. J.LimK. Y. & KimJ. (2013).Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context.,62,149–158.Search in Google Scholar
Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162.JungI.ChoiS.LimC. & LeemJ. (2002).Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction.,39(2),153–162.Search in Google Scholar
Kara, M., Kukul, V., & Çakir, R. (2021). Self-regulation in three types of online interaction: How does it predict online pre-service teachers’ perceived learning and satisfaction? Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00509-xKaraM.KukulV. & ÇakirR. (2021).Self-regulation in three types of online interaction: How does it predict online pre-service teachers’ perceived learning and satisfaction?,30(1),1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00509-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kassandrinou, A., Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2014). Transactional distance among open university students: How does it affect the learning process? European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(1), 23–42.KassandrinouA.AngelakiC. & MavroidisI. (2014).Transactional distance among open university students: How does it affect the learning process?,17(1),23–42.Search in Google Scholar
Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 61, 43–51.KeF. & KwakD. (2013).Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction.,61,43–51.Search in Google Scholar
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 386–434). Erlbaum.KellerJ. M.(1983).Motivational design of instruction.InC.Reigeluth(Ed.),(pp.386–434).Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. The Adult Education Company.KnowlesM. S.(1975)..The Adult Education Company.Search in Google Scholar
Koseke, G. F., & Koseke, R. D. (1991). Student burnout as a mediator of the stress-outcome relationship. Research in Higher Education, 32(4), 415–431.KosekeG. F. & KosekeR. D.(1991).Student burnout as a mediator of the stress-outcome relationship.,32(4),415–431.Search in Google Scholar
Kostagiolas, P., Lavranos, C., & Korfiatis, N. (2019). Learning analytics: Survey data for measuring the impact of study satisfaction on students’ academic self-efficacy and performance. Data in Brief, 25, 104051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104051.KostagiolasP.LavranosC. & KorfiatisN. (2019).Learning analytics: Survey data for measuring the impact of study satisfaction on students’ academic self-efficacy and performance.,25,104051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104051.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kuo, Y-C. (2010). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in distance education courses [Doctor of Philosophy dissertation, Utah State University].KuoY-C. (2010).Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in distance education courses[,Utah State University].Search in Google Scholar
Kuo, Y-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16–39.KuoY-C.WalkerA. E.BellandB. R. & SchroderK. E. E.(2013).A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs.,14(1),16–39.Search in Google Scholar
Kuo, Y C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50.KuoY. C.WalkerA. E.SchroderK. E. E. & BellandB. R.(2014).Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses.,20,35–50.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-yLeeY. & ChoiJ. (2011).A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research.,59(5),593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Li, K. (2019). MOOC learners’ demographics, selfregulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 132(1), 16–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003.LiK. (2019).MOOC learners’ demographics, selfregulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach.,132(1),16–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.LiawS. S.(2008).Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the blackboard system.,51(2),864–873.Search in Google Scholar
Liaw, SS.,& Huang, HM. (2007). Developing a Collaborative e-Learning System Based on Users’ Perceptions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4402, 751-759.LiawSS. & HuangHM. (2007).Developing a Collaborative e-Learning System Based on Users’ Perceptions.,4402,751-759.Search in Google Scholar
Lim, C. K. (2001). Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 41–50.LimC. K.(2001).Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners.,15(2),41–50.Search in Google Scholar
Lin, Y. M., Lin, G. Y., & Laffey, J. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1–27.LinY. M.LinG. Y. & LaffeyJ. (2008).Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning.,38(1),1–27.Search in Google Scholar
Lionarakis, A. (2009). The development of methodological approaches (Teaching) of lifelong distance education programs. Institute of Adult Continuing Education (IDEKE), (in Greek).LionarakisA. (2009)..Institute of Adult Continuing Education (IDEKE),(in Greek).Search in Google Scholar
Loizidou-Chatzitheodoulou, P., Vasala, P., Kakouris, A., Mavroeidis, H., & Tassios, Th. (2001). Forms of communication in distance education and their contribution to the educational process. The case of students of postgraduate course on “Open and Distance Education” in HOU. Practical suggestions. In the Proceedings of the 1st National Conference on Open and Distance Education, pp. 75–88, Patra, Greece. In Greek.Loizidou-ChatzitheodoulouP.VasalaP.KakourisA.MavroeidisH. & TassiosTh. (2001).Forms of communication in distance education and their contribution to the educational process..In the Proceedings of the 1st National Conference on Open and Distance Education, pp.75–88,Patra,Greece.In Greek.Search in Google Scholar
Michis A. (2013). Readiness for self-directed learning and satisfaction of HOU students: Individual differences and correlations [Master Thesis, Greek Open University, Patra]. In Greek.MichisA. (2013).Readiness for self-directed learning and satisfaction of HOU students: Individual differences and correlations[,Greek Open University, Patra].In Greek.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, M. G. (1980). Independent study. In R. D. Boyd, J. W. Apps, & Associates (Eds.), Redefining the discipline of adult education (pp. 16–31). Jossey-Bass.MooreM. G.(1980).Independent study. InBoydR. D.AppsJ. W., &Associates (Eds.),(pp.16–31).Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interactions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–6.MooreM. G.(1989).Three types of interactions.,3(2),1–6.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Wadsworth.MooreM. G. & KearsleyG. (1996)..Wadsworth.Search in Google Scholar
Northrup, P., Lee, R., & Burgess, V. (2002). Learner Perceptions of Online Interaction. In P. Barker & S. Rebelsky (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2002--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1462-1467). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).NorthrupP.LeeR. & BurgessV. (2002).. InBarkerP. & RebelskyS.(Eds.),Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2002--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications(pp.1462-1467).Denver, Colorado, USA:Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Search in Google Scholar
Pike, G. R. (1993). The relationship between perceived learning and satisfaction with college: An alternative view. Research in Higher Education, 34(1), 23–40.PikeG. R.(1993).The relationship between perceived learning and satisfaction with college: An alternative view.,34(1),23–40.Search in Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4PintrichP. R. (1999).The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning.,31(6),459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in selfregulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic.PintrichP. R. (2000).The role of goal orientation in selfregulated learning. InBoekaertsM.PintrichP. R. & ZeidnerM.(Eds.),(pp.451–502).Academic.Search in Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-xPintrichP. R. (2004).A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students.,16(4),385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Predictive validity and reliability of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813.PintrichP. R.SmithD. A.GarciaT. & McKeachieW. J.(1993).Predictive validity and reliability of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ).,53(3),801–813.Search in Google Scholar
Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22, 72–89. doi:10.1080/08923640802039024PuzziferroM. (2008).Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses.,22,72–89. doi:10.1080/08923640802039024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Reinhart, J., & Schneider, P. (2001). Student satisfaction, self-efficacy, and the perception of the two-way audio/video distance learning environment: A preliminary examination. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(4), 357–365.ReinhartJ. & SchneiderP. (2001).Student satisfaction, self-efficacy, and the perception of the two-way audio/video distance learning environment: A preliminary examination.,2(4),357–365.Search in Google Scholar
Rienties, B., Li, N., & Marsh, V. (2015). Modeling and managing student satisfaction: Use of student feedback to enhance learning experience. Quality Assurance Agency..RientiesB.LiN. & MarshV. (2015)..Quality Assurance Agency..Search in Google Scholar
Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of 151 learning designs on student satisfaction and performance: Social learning (analytics) matters. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 339–343. ACM, New York, NYRientiesB. & ToetenelL. (2016)..Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp.339–343.ACM,New York, NYSearch in Google Scholar
Rodriguez Robles, F. M. (2006). Learner characteristic, interaction and support service variables as predictors of satisfaction in web-based distance education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(7) (UMI No. 3224964).Rodriguez RoblesF. M.(2006).Learner characteristic, interaction and support service variables as predictors of satisfaction in web-based distance education.,67(7)(UMI No. 3224964).Search in Google Scholar
Schreiner, L. A., & Nelson, D. D. (2013). The contribution of student satisfaction to persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory &Practice, 15(1), 73–111. https://doi.org/10.2190/cs.15.1.fSchreinerL. A. & NelsonD. D.(2013).The contribution of student satisfaction to persistence.,15(1),73–111. https://doi.org/10.2190/cs.15.1.fOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shen, D., Cho M.-H., Tsai, C.-L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet and Higher education, 19, 10–17.ShenD.ChoM.-H.TsaiC.-L. & MarraR. (2013).Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction.,19,10–17.Search in Google Scholar
Sun, J. C.-Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.xSunJ. C.-Y. & RuedaR. (2012).Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education.,43(2),191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y, & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. Tait, Alan (2003). Reflections on student support in open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1)SunP.-C.TsaiR. J.FingerG.ChenY.-Y & YehD. (2008).What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction.,50(4),1183–1202.TaitAlan(2003).Reflections on student support in open and distance learning.,4(1)Search in Google Scholar
Thatch E. & Murphy K. (1995) Competencies for Distance Education Professionals, Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1)ThatchE. & MurphyK. (1995)Competencies for Distance Education Professionals,,43(1)Search in Google Scholar
Tsiaousi, K. (2014). Distance education of municipal officials: Investigation of their readiness for electronic training [Master Thesis, Greek Open University, Patra.In Greek.TsiaousiK. (2014).Distance education of municipal officials: Investigation of their readiness for electronic training[,Greek Open University, Patra.In Greek.Search in Google Scholar
Turhangil Erenler, H. H. (2020). A structural equation model to evaluate students’ learning and satisfaction. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(2), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/ cae.22189Turhangil ErenlerH. H.(2020).A structural equation model to evaluate students’ learning and satisfaction.,28(2),254–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/ cae.22189Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tzoutza, S. (2010). Consulting group meetings: Attitudes of graduate students and the Greek Open University Teacher-Advisors. The case of graduate course on “open and distance learning” of the Greek Open University. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 6(1), 46–65.TzoutzaS. (2010).Consulting group meetings: Attitudes of graduate students and the Greek Open University Teacher-Advisors. The case of graduate course on “open and distance learning” of the Greek Open University.,6(1),46–65.Search in Google Scholar
Vakoufari, M., Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2014). Selfesteem and loneliness as factors affecting distance learning students. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(2), 100–116.VakoufariM.AngelakiC. & MavroidisI. (2014).Selfesteem and loneliness as factors affecting distance learning students.,17(2),100–116.Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, R., Werner, J., & Schramm, R. (2002). An evaluation of student satisfaction with distance learning courses, Proceedings of 18th Distance Teaching and Learning Annual Conference.. University of Wisconsin-Madison.WagnerR.WernerJ. & SchrammR. (2002).,Proceedings of 18th Distance Teaching and Learning Annual Conference..University of Wisconsin-Madison.Search in Google Scholar
Walker S. L., & Fraser B. J. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The distance education learning environments survey (DELES). Learning Environments Research, 8(3), 289–308 https://doi. org/10.1007/s10984-005-1568-3WalkerS. L. & FraserB. J. (2005).Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The distance education learning environments survey (DELES).,8(3),289–308https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-1568-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Winkelmann, R. (2009). Unemployment, social capital, and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 421–430.WinkelmannR. (2009).Unemployment, social capital, and subjective well-being.,10(4),421–430.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Xu, X., Xue, J., & Hu, P. (2023). A cross-group comparison study of the effect of interaction on satisfaction in online learning: The parallel mediating role of academic emotions and self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 199(C), 104776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104776WuY.XuX.XueJ. & HuP. (2023).A cross-group comparison study of the effect of interaction on satisfaction in online learning: The parallel mediating role of academic emotions and self-regulated learning.,199(C),104776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104776Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339.ZimmermanB. J.(1989).A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.,81(3),329–339.Search in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). Routledge.ZimmermanB. J. & SchunkD. H.(2011).Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. InZimmermanB. J. & SchunkD. H.(Eds.),(pp.1–12).Routledge.Search in Google Scholar