1. bookVolume 23 (2021): Issue 2 (January 2021)
Journal Details
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
access type Open Access

Vector AR3-APP – A Good-Practice Example of Learning with Augmented Reality

Published Online: 10 Dec 2020
Page range: 51 - 64
Journal Details
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

After a discussion about the possibilities and status of augmented reality in education, a good practice example of an augmented reality application is presented. This case study examines the use of an augmented reality app in higher education to support abstract STEM content, such as vectors. Based on this example, the implementation of such apps in didactic concepts and self-directed learning will be discussed. Furthermore, aspects of integration into digital learning and teaching will be addressed.


1. Billinghurst, M. (2002). Augmented Reality in Education. New Horizons for Learning, December 2002. Retrieved from http://solomonalexis.com/downloads/ar_edu.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

2. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.Search in Google Scholar

3. Carvalho, C. V. de Alencar, & Lemos, B.M. (2014). Possibilities of Augmented Reality Use in Mathematics Aiming at a Meaningful Learning. Creative Education, 5, 690–700. doi:10.4236/ce.2014.59081Search in Google Scholar

4. Chao, W., & Chang, R. (2018). Using Augmented Reality to enhance and Engage Students in Learning Mathematics. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(12), 455-464. doi:10.14738/assrj.512.5900Search in Google Scholar

5. Chestnut, E. K., Lei, R. F., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2018). The myth that only brilliant people are good at math and its implications for diversity. Education Sciences, 8(2), 65.Search in Google Scholar

6. Coimbra, T., Cardoso, T., & Mateus, A. (2015). Augmented Reality: An Enhancer for Higher Education Students in Math’s Learning? Procedia Computer Science, 67, 332-39. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.277Search in Google Scholar

7. Estapa, A., & Nadolny, L. (2015). The Effect of an Augmented Reality Enhanced Mathematics Lesson on Student Achievement and Motivation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 40-48.Search in Google Scholar

8. Fonseca D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., & Sánchez, A. (2013). Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 434-445. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.006Search in Google Scholar

9. Furner, J.M., & Gonzalez-DeHass, A. (2011). How do students’ mastery and performance goals relate to math anxiety? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(4), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75209Search in Google Scholar

10. Hegedus, S., Laborde, C., Brady, C., Dalton, S., Siller, H.-S., Tabach, M., Trgalova, J., & Armella, L. (2017). Uses of Technology in Upper Secondary Mathematics Education. Springeropen.Search in Google Scholar

11. Ibáñez, M.-B, & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented Reality for STEM Learning: A Systematic Review. Computers & Education, 123, 109-23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002Search in Google Scholar

12. ITU (2020a). EQUALS Gender Digital Inclusion Map. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/action/gender-equality/Pages/equalsGDImap.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

13. ITU (2020b). About the ITU-D Digital Inclusion Programme. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Digital-Inclusion/Pages/about.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

14. Kaliisa, R., Palmer, E., & Miller, J. (2017). Mobile learning in higher education: A comparative analysis of developed and developing country contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 1-16. doi:10.1111/bjet.12583Search in Google Scholar

15. Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and Geometry Education with Collaborative Augmented Reality. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002 – Conference Abstracts and Applications, 37-41.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kellems R. O., Eichelberger C., Cacciatore G., Jensen, M., Frazier, B., Simons, K., & Zaru, M. (2020). Using Video-Based Instruction via Augmented Reality to Teach Mathematics to Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 277-291. doi:10.1177/0022219420906452Search in Google Scholar

17. Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Selijefot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). Making it real: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10(3-4), 163-174.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kerres, M. (2018). Mediendidaktik: Konzeption und Entwicklung digitaler Lernangebote. De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

19. Klopfer, E., & Yoon, S. (2004). Developing games and simulations for today and tomorrow’s tech savvy youth. TechTrends, 49(3), 41-49.Search in Google Scholar

20. Klopfer, E., & Sheldon, J. (2010). Augmenting your own reality: Student authoring of science-based augmented reality games. New Directions for Youth Development, 2010(128), 85-94.Search in Google Scholar

21. Lietze, S., Brezowar, G., & Krizek, G. (2019). Bridging Diversity – A Good Practice Example of Student Support. Proceedings of the INTED2019 Conference, 11th -13th March 2019, Valencia, Spain, 498-502. ISBN: 978-84-09-08619-1Search in Google Scholar

22. Lin, H.K., Chen M., & Chang, C (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 799–810. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.817435Search in Google Scholar

23. Martin-Gonzalez, A., Chi-Poot, A. & Uc-Cetina, V. (2016). Usability Evaluation of an Augmented Reality System for Teaching Euclidean Vectors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 627-636. doi:10.1080/14703297.2015.1108856Search in Google Scholar

24. Martin-Gutierrez, J., Ginters, E., & Perez-Lopez, D. (2012). Improving Strategy of Self-Learning in Engineering: Laboratories with Augmented Reality. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 832-839. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.249Search in Google Scholar

25. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1995). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality–virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, 282-292. doi:10.1117/12.197321Search in Google Scholar

26. Mladenović, S., Kuvač, H., & Štula, M. (2012). Virtual Learning Environment. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Virtual Learning Environments: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications (Vol. 1, pp. 1-16). IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar

27. Onyancha, R. M., Derov, M., & Kinsey, B.L. (2009). Improvements in spatial ability as a result of targeted training and computer-aided design software use: Analyses of object geometries and rotation types. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 157–67. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01014.xSearch in Google Scholar

28. Osberg, K. (1997). Spatial cognition in the virtual environment, Technical R-97-18. Seattle: HITLab. Retrieved from http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/education/puzzle/spatial-cognition.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

29. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

30. Preuß, P., & Kauffeld, S. (2019). Visualisierung in der Lehre. In S. Kauffeld, & J. Othmer (Eds.), Handbuch Innovative Lehre (pp. 403-408). Springer. Retrieved from https://books.google.at/books?id=g_-ZDwAAQBAJ&pg=PR6&dq=Handbuch+Innovative+Lehre&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjw7KCYufHmAhUEMewKHekmAEUQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=Handbuch%20Innovative%20Lehre&f=falseSearch in Google Scholar

31. Quintero, E., Salinas, P., González-Mendívil, E., & Ramírez, H. (2015). Augmented Reality App for Calculus: A Proposal for the Development of Spatial Visualization. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 301-305. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.251Search in Google Scholar

32. Robimo GmbH. (2019). AR3 – Mathematik (be)greifbar. Lehrkonzept für die AR Applikation Vektor AR3 [Unpublished manuscript]. Vienna.Search in Google Scholar

33. Rach, S. (2014). Charakteristika von Lehr-Lern-Prozessen im Mathematikstudium: Bedingungsfaktoren für den Studienerfolg im ersten Semester. Münster; New York: Waxmann Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

34. Rizzo, A. A., Buckwalter, J. G., Bowerly, T., van der Zaag, C., Humphrey, L., Neumann, U., Chua, C., Kyriakakis, C., van Rooyen, & Sisemore, D. (2000). The virtual classroom: a virtual reality environment for the assessment and rehabilitation of attention deficits. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(3), 483-499.Search in Google Scholar

35. Ruthven, K. (2018). Instructional activity and student interaction with digital resources. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on Mathematics Textbooks and Teachers’ Resources (pp. 261-275). Cham: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

36. Sala, N. M. (2016). Virtual Reality and Education: Overview Across Different Disciplines. In D.H. Choi, A. Dailey-Herbert, & J. Simmons Estes (Eds.), Emerging Tools and Applications in Education (pp. 1-25). IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar

37. Salinas, P. (2017). Augmented Reality: Opportunity for developing spatial visualization and learning calculus. In G. Kurubacak, & H. Altinpulluk (Eds.), Mobile Technologies and Augmented Reality in Open Education (pp. 54-74). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar

38. Sullivan, P., Mousley, J, & R. Zevenbergen (2004). Describing Elements of Mathematics Lessons that Accommodate Diversity in Student Background. Proceedings of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 28th, Bergen, Norway, July 14-18, 2004. Vol. 4, 257-264. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489650.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

39. United Nations Technology Innovations Lab (UNTIL) (Ed.) (2019). Inclusion and Diversity. Tech it or leave IT.https://until.un.org/sites/default/files/UNTIL_Inclusion_and_Diversity_FINAL.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

40. Wu, H., Lee, S.W., Chang, H., & Liang, J. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024Search in Google Scholar

41. Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 4(1), 119-140.Search in Google Scholar

42. Zhou, F., Duh, H.-L., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). Trends in augmented reality traching, interaction and display: A review of ten years in ISMAR. Proceedings of the Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium, 193-202. Cambridge: IEEE.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo