Transcripts and Accessibility: Student Views from Using Webinars in Built Environment Education

1. Association for Learning Technology. (2019). Reporting from the Annual Survey 2018. Retrieved October 11, 2019, from https://repository.alt.ac.uk/2431/2/ReportingfromtheAnnualSurvey2018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar

3. Fogel, S. (2017, October 3). IBM inches toward human-like accuracy for speech recognition. Engadget [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.engadget.com/2017/03/10/ibmspeechrecognition-accuracy-record/Search in Google Scholar

4. Gernsbacher, M. A. (2015). Video Captions Benefit Everyone. Policy Insights Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 195-202. doi:10.1177/237273221560213010.1177/2372732215602130Search in Google Scholar

5. Kaltura. (2019). Sixth Annual State of Video in Education 2019: Insights and trends. Rerieved from https://corp.kaltura.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/The_State_of_Video_in_Education_2019-1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

6. Lant, K. (2017, August 23). Microsoft’s Speech Recognition is now as Good as a Human Transcriber. Futurism the Byte [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://futurism.com/microsofts-speech-recognition-is-now-as-good-as-a-humantranscriberSearch in Google Scholar

7. Linder, K. (2016). Student uses and perceptions of closed captions and transcripts: Results from a national study. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. Retrieved from http://info.3playmedia.com/rs/744-UDO-697/images/Student-Survey-Report-10-25-16-Final.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

8. Liyanagunawardena, T. R. (2019). Automatic Transcription Software: Good Enough for Accessibility? A Case Study from Built Environment Education. In A. Volungeviciene, & A. Szűcs (Eds.), EDEN 2019 Annual Conference: Connecting through Educational Technology to produce effective learning environments (pp. 378-386). Budapest, Hungary: European Distance and ELearning Network.Search in Google Scholar

9. Munteanu, C., Baecker, R., Penn, G., Toms, E., & James, D. (2006). The Effect of Speech Recognition Accuracy Rates on the Usefulness and Usability of Webcast Achieves. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada, 493-502. doi:10.1145/1124772.112484810.1145/1124772.1124848Search in Google Scholar

10. Powell, A. (2019). Women and the Economy, Briefing Paper. Number CBP06838, 8 March 2019. House of Commons Library. Retrieved from https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06838/SN06838.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

11. Walker, R. (2019). JISC Accessibility Clinic [Webinar]. Retrieved October 2, 2019, from https://jisc.adobeconnect.com/p39zrwbnj0tu/Search in Google Scholar

• Developing E-Authentication for E-Assessment – Diversity of Students Testing the System in Higher Education

• Transcripts and Accessibility: Student Views from Using Webinars in Built Environment Education

• Cultivating Self-Regulated Learning in Flipped EFL Courses: A Model for Course Design

• Building Digital Capacity for Higher Education Teachers: Recognising Professional Development Through a National Peer Triad Digital Badge Ecosystem

• Proposition for the Introduction of the Concept Telemathesis in Videoconferencing in Distance Education

• Educators’ Digital Competence in Swedish Rural Schools

• Vector AR3-APP – A Good-Practice Example of Learning with Augmented Reality