[
Al-Sudairi, M., & Haj Bakry, S. (2014). Knowledge issues in the global innovation index: Assessment of the state of Saudi Arabia versus countries with distinct development. Innovation, 16(2), 176-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2014.1108198010.1080/14479338.2014.11081980
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aytekin, A., Ecer, F., Korucuk, S., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2022). Global innovation efficiency assessment of EU member and candidate countries via DEA-EATWIOS multi-criteria methodology. Technology in Society, 68, 101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.10189610.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101896
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brem, A., Viardot, E., & Nylund, P. A. (2021). Implications of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.12045110.1016/j.techfore.2020.120451
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carayannis, E. G., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Using multiobjective mathematical programming to link national competitiveness, productivity, and innovation. Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 635-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1873-x10.1007/s10479-015-1873-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, J., Yin, X., & Mei, L. (2018). Holistic Innovation: An Emerging Innovation Paradigm. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.02.00110.1016/j.ijis.2018.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Comes, C-A., Bunduchi, E., Vasile, V., & Stefan, D. (2018). The Impact of Foreign Direct Investments and Remittances on Economic Growth: A Case Study in Central and Eastern Europe. Sustainability, 10(1), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1001023810.3390/su10010238
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crespo, N. F., & Crespo, C. F. (2016). Global innovation index: Moving beyond the absolute value of ranking with a fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5265-5271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.12310.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.123
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-h10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hazen, B. T., Overstreet, R. E., & Cegielski, C. G. (2012). Supply chain innovation diffusion: going beyond adoption. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/0957409121122695710.1108/09574091211226957
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huarng, K.-H., & Yu, T. H.-K. (2022). Analysis of Global Innovation Index by structural qualitative association. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.12185010.1016/j.techfore.2022.121850
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iqbal, A. (2011). Creativity and innovation in Saudi Arabia: An overview. Innovation, 13(3), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.3.37610.5172/impp.2011.13.3.376
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jankowska, B., Matysek-Jędrych, A., Mroczek-Dąbrowska, K. (2017). Efficiency of national innovation systems: Poland and Bulgaria in the context of the Global Innovation Index. Comparative Economic Research, 20(3), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2017-002110.1515/cer-2017-0021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiseľáková, D., Šofranková, B., Gombá, M., & Čabinová, V., (2019). Onuferová E. Competitiveness and Its Impact on Sustainability, Business Environment, and Human Development of EU (28) Countries in terms of Global Multi-Criteria Indices. Sustainability, 11(12), 3365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1112336510.3390/su11123365
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kovačević, S., Rebić, M., & Kurušić, D. (2021). The impact of the inflow of foreign direct investments on the economic development of Serbia. ECONOMICS - Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 9(2), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2021-002210.2478/eoik-2021-0022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mašić, B., Nešić, S., & Vladušić, L. (2018). Challenges in creating transformative growth for companies in digital economy. ECONOMICS - Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 6(2), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2018-002410.2478/eoik-2018-0024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mešić, A., Miškić, S., Stević, Ž., Mastilo, Z. (2022). Hybrid MCDM solutions for evaluation of the logistics performance index of the Western Balkan countries. ECONOMICS - Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 10(1), 13-34. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2022-000410.2478/eoik-2022-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mihaela, M., & Ţiţan, E. (2014). Education and Innovation in the Context of Economies Globalization. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 1042-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00667-410.1016/S2212-5671(14)00667-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nedeljković, M., Puška, A., Doljanica, S., Virijević Jovanović, S., Brzaković, P., Stević, Ž., Marinkovic, D. (2021). Evaluation of rapeseed varieties using novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA – Fuzzy MABAC model. PLoS ONE, 16(2), e0246857.b https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.024685710.1371/journal.pone.0246857
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nußholz, J. L. K. (2018). A circular business model mapping tool for creating value from prolonged product lifetime and closed material loops. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.11210.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oturakci, M. (2022). Comprehensive analysis of the global innovation index: statistical and strategic approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. Article in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.198020910.1080/09537325.2021.1980209
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pašalić, S., Mastilo, Z., Đurić, A., & Marković, D. (2020). Demographic trends and the educational system of the Republic of Srpska. ECONOMICS - Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 8(1), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2020-000710.2478/eoik-2020-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pence, I., Kalkan, A., & Cesmeli, M. S. (2019). Estimation of the Country Ranking Scores on the Global Innovation Index 2016 Using the Artificial Neural Network Method. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(4), 1940007. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021987701940007810.1142/S0219877019400078
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puška, A., Beganović, A., & Šadić, S. (2018). Model for investment decision-making by applying the multi-criteria analysis method. Serbian Journal of Management, 13(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm13-1243610.5937/sjm13-12436
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puška, A., Nedeljković, M., Zolfani, S. H., & Pamučar, D. (2021). Application of Interval Fuzzy Logic in Selecting a Sustainable Supplier on the Example of Agricultural Production. Symmetry, 13(5), 774. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym1305077410.3390/sym13050774
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puška, A., Pamucar, D., Stojanović, I., Cavallaro, F., Kaklauskas, A., Mardani, A. (2021b). Examination of the Sustainable Rural Tourism Potential of the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina Using a Fuzzy Approach Based on Group Decision Making. Sustainability, 13(2), 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1302058310.3390/su13020583
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puška, A., Stević, Ž. & Pamučar, D. (2022). Evaluation and selection of healthcare waste incinerators using extended sustainability criteria and multi-criteria analysis methods. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(9), 11195-11225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01902-210.1007/s10668-021-01902-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radukić, S., Mastilo, Z., Kostic, Z., Vladusic, L., (2019). Measuring of The Goods and Labor Markets Efficiency: Comparative Study of Western Balkan Countries. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), 15(2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2019.15-2.8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York, Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Samoilikova, A. (2020). Financial Policy of Innovation Development Providing: The Impact Formalization. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(2), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.4(2).5-15.202010.21272/fmir.4(2).5-15.2020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sener, S., & Delican, D. (2019). The causal relationship between innovation, competitiveness and foreign trade in developed and developing countries. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 533-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.08510.1016/j.procs.2019.09.085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sohn, S. Y., Kim, D. H., & Jeon, S. Y. (2015). Re-evaluation of global innovation index based on a structural equation model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(4), 492-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.110441210.1080/09537325.2015.1104412
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stojanović, I., & Ateljević, J. (2011). Innovation in The Public Sector The Way Forward For An Effective Reform Of Public Sector Management In Bosnia And Herzegovina, In Conference Proceedings “Economic Development And Entrepreneurship In Transition Economies”, Banja Luka, 184.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trung, D.D. (2022). Development of data normalization methods for multi-criteria decision making: applying for MARCOS method. Manufacturing Review, 9, 22. https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/202201910.1051/mfreview/2022019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yu, T. H.-K., Huarng, K.-H., & Huang, D.-H. (2021). Causal complexity analysis of the Global Innovation Index. Journal of Business Research, 137, 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.01310.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.013
]Search in Google Scholar
