Technology, Users, and Sustainable Social Housing

[1] Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. The SAGE Qualitative Research Kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bech-Danielsen, C. (2005). Ecological reflections in architecture: architectural design of the place, the space and the interface. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Beim, A., Larsen, L. & Mossin, N. (2002). Økologi og arkitektonisk kvalitet [Ecology and architectural quality]. Copenhagen: Arkitektskolens Forlag. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Beim, A. & Vibæk, K.S. (2013). “The Construction of Affordable Low-Energy Prefabricated Housing”. In: Trubiano, F. (ed.), The Design and Construction of High Performance Homes: Building Envelopes, Renewable Energies and Integrated Practice (p. 203-216). Abingdon: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bordass, B. & Leaman, A. (2013). Part 2: Building Performance: The Bigger Picture. Building professionals and the challenge of sustainability. Located 17. September 2018 on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92L0IDGWi3U Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bordass, B. Leaman, A. & Willis, S. (1994). “Control Strategies for Building Services: the role of the user”. Conference. Buildings and Environment Conference, BRE. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Dahl, T. (ed.) (2010). Climate and Architecture. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dahlberg, K., Dahlberg, H. & Nyström, M. (2008). Reflective Lifeworld Research. Lund: Studenterlitteratur. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Giorgi, A. & Giorgi, B. (2003). “The Descriptive Phenomenological Psychological Method”. In: Qualitative Research in Psychology – Expanding perspectives in methodology and design, (ed.) Paul M. Camic. Washington (p. 243-273). DC: American Psychological Association. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Grierson, D. & Moultrie, C. (2011). “Architectural Design Principles and Processes for Sustainability: Towards a Typology of Sustainable Building Design”. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal 5(4), p. 623–634. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Guy, S. & Farmer, G. (2001). “Reinterpreting Sustainable Architecture: The Place of Technology”. Journal of Architectural Education 54(3), p. 140–148. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Halkier, B. (2008). Fokusgrupper [Focus groups. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Jensen, J.O., Jensen, O.M. & Gram-Hanssen, G. (2014). “Omstilling til bæredygtigt byggeri” [Transition to sustainable construction. In: Holm, J., Søndergård, B., Stauning, I. & Jensen, J.O. (ed.), Bæredygtigt omstilling af bolig og byggeri [Sustainable transition of housing and construction(p. 73-106). Frederiksberg: Frydenlund Academic. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jensen, J.O., Jørgensen, M.S. Elle, M. & Lauridsen, E.H. (2012). “Has social sustainability left the building? The recent conceptualisation of ‘sustainability’ in Danish buildings.” Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy 8(1), p. 94–105. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Johansson, J. (2017). Bæredygtighed i danske almene boliger – med et brugerfokus [Sustainability in Danish social housing – with a user focus. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Justesen, L. & Mik-Meyer, N. (2010). Kvalitative metoder [Qualitative methods. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interview: Det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk. [Interview: The qualitative research interview as craft(3. ed.). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel Forlag. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Leaman, A. & Bordass, B. (1993). “Building Design, Complexity and Manageability”. Facilities 11(9), p. 16–27. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Leaman, A. & Bordass. B. (1997). “Strategies for Better Occupant Satisfaction”. Fifth Indoor Air Quality Conference. London. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Leaman, A., Stevenson, F. & Bordass, B. (2010). “Building evaluation: practice and principles”. Building Research & Information 38(5), p. 564–77. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Madsen, U.S., Beim, A., Reitz, A. & Bang, H.L. (ed.) (2015). Værdiskabelse i bygningsrenovering – En minianalyse af udvalgte koncepter for vurdering af egenskaber og kvaliteter i byggeri [Value creation in building renovation – A mini-analysis of selected concepts for the evaluation of properties and qualities in construction. Copenhagen: Bygherreforeningen and Akademisk Arkitektforening. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Mo, L. (2003). Vitenskapsfilosofi for arkitekter [Theory of science for architects. Oslo: Kolofon. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Neergaard, H. (2010). Udvælgelse af cases i kvalitative undersøgelser [Selection of cases in qualitative studies. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Nielsen, S.B., Jensen, P.A. & Jensen J.O. (2012). “The strategic facilities management organisation in housing: Implication for sustainable facilities management.” International Journal of Facility Management 3(1), p. 1–15. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Rendtorff, J.D. (2003). “Fænomenologien og dens betydning” [Phenomenology and its importance. In: Fu-glsang, L. & Olsen, P.B. (ed.), Videnskabsteori i samfundsvidenskaberne: på tværs af fagkulturer og paradigmer [Theory of science in the social sciences: Across subject cultures and paradigms(p. 133-167). Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience the Social Organization of Normality. Oxford, England; New York: Berg. Located 30. May 2013 on http://site.ebrary.com/id/10060563 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Stevenson, F. & Leaman, A. (2010). “Evaluation housing performance in relation to human behavior: new challenges.” Building Research & Information 38(5), p. 437–441. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Tanggaard, L. & Brinkmann, S. (2010). “Interviewet: Samtalen som forskningsmetode” [Interview: The interview as a research method. In: Kvalitative metoder – en grundbog, [Qualitative methods - a basic book(ed.) Brinkmann, S. & Tanggaard, L. (2. ed., p. 29-53). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzles Forlag. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Twinn, C. (2012). “Professionalism, sustainability and the public interest: what next?”. Building Research & Information 41(1), p. 123–28. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Zahavi, D. (2006). “Edmund Husserl - Hvordan verden træder frem” [Edmund Husserl - How the world emerges. In: Thau. C. (ed.), Filosofi & arkitektur i det 20. Århundrede [Philosophy and architecture in the 20th century(p. 7-18). Copenhagen: Kunstakademiets Arkitektskole. Search in Google Scholar