1. bookVolume 28 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)
    Special Issue: ECO-TECHNOLOGY AND ECO-INNOVATION FOR GREEN SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
08 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Need for Cognitive Closure, Information Acquisition and Adoption of Green Prevention and Control Technology

Published Online: 23 Apr 2021
Page range: 129 - 143
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
08 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In this paper, we use the OLS regression method to analyse the influencing mechanism of the NFCC on farmers’ adoption of green prevention and control technology and further verify the mediating effect of information acquisition. The results show that the NFCC has a direct effect on the adoption of green prevention and control technology, and information acquisition has a mediating effect. The first stage of cognitive closure has a more significant effect on farmers’ adoption of green prevention and control technology, information acquisition ability has a significant positive impact on farmers’ adoption of green prevention and control technology, and information acquisition has an incomplete mediating effect on the impact of cognitive closure on the adoption of green prevention and control technologies. This paper further studies and verifies the action path of two dimensions of the NFCC on farmers’ adoption of green prevention and control technology. The results have certain theoretical significance for expanding the knowledge of farmers’ green prevention and control technology behaviour and further enriching the research on farmers’ cognition.

Keywords

[1] Pan Y, Ren Y, Luning PA. Factors influencing Chinese farmers’ proper pesticide application in agricultural products - A review. Food Control. 2021;122:107788. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107788. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Gao Y, Zhao D, Yu L. Duration analysis on the adoption behavior of green control techniques. Environ Science Pollut Res. 2019;26:6319-27. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-04088-9. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Arthanareeswaran G, Curcio S, Chakraborty S. Special Issue: Green technologies for environmental pollution control and prevention. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2015;134(pt.2):287. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.09.032. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Pan D, He M, Kong F. Risk attitude, risk perception, and farmers’ pesticide application behavior in China: A moderation and mediation model. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;276(10):124241. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124241. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kruglanski AW, Webster DM, Klem A. Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;65(5):861-76. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861. Search in Google Scholar

[6] De Dreu CKW, Koole SL, Oldersma FL. On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Addiction. 1999;25(3):348-62. DOI: 10.1177/0146167299025003007. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Keersmaecker JD, Dunning D, Pennycook G, Rand DG, Roets A. Investigating the robustness of the illusory truth effect across individual differences in cognitive ability, need for cognitive closure, and cognitive style. Personality Social Psychol Bull. 2020;46(2):204-15. DOI: 10.1177/0146167219853844. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Simon HA. Theories of bounded rationality. Decision Organization. 1972:161-76. Available from: https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=418864. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Webster DM, Kruglanski AW. Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J Personality Social Psychol. 1994;67(6):1049-62. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Andrews D. The interplay of information diagnosticity and need for cognitive closure in determining choice confidence. Psychol Marketing. 2013;30(9):749-64. DOI: 10.1002/mar.20643. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Neuberg SL, Judice TN, West SG. What the need for closure scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives. J Personality Social Psychol. 1997;72(6):1396-412. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1396. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Song Y, Fan T, Tang Y. Quality information acquisition and ordering decisions with risk aversion. Int J Prod Res. 2020;(6):1-17. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1828640. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Guo ML, Jia XP, Huang JK, Kumar KB, Burger NE. Farmer field school and farmer knowledge acquisition in rice production: Experimental evaluation in China. Agricult Ecosystems Environ. 2015;209:100-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.011. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Thuo M, Bell AA, Bravo-Ureta BE, Lachaud MA, Puppala N. Effects of social network factors on information acquisition and adoption of improved groundnut varieties: the case of Uganda and Kenya. Agricult Human Values. 2014;31(3). DOI: 10.1007/s10460-014-9486-6. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Genius, M, Pantzios, CJ, Tzouvelekas V. Information acquisition and adoption of organic farming practices. J Agricult Resource Economics. 2006;31. DOI: 10.1080/028418500127345064. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Colombo L, Femminis G, Pavan A. Information acquisition and welfare. Discussion Papers. 2014;81(4):1438-83. DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdu015. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Res Methods Instruments Computers. 2004;36(4):717-31. DOI: 10.3758/BF03206553. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo