1. bookVolume 3 (2019): Issue 4 (October 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Jan 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Polymerization degree-dependent changes in the effects of in vitro chitosan treatments on photosynthetic pigment, protein, and dry matter contents of Ipomoea purpurea

Published Online: 23 Oct 2019
Page range: 197 - 202
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Jan 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

Morning Glory (Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth.) is a climbing plant known for its ornamental properties and ease of cultivation in temperate climates. Quality and colour of flowers and leaves, especially in the production of ornamentals, are important parameters both for producers and for customers. This study aimed to investigate the changes in photosynthetic pigment, protein and dry matter content of in vitro-propagated I. purpurea following chitosan treatment with different polymerization degrees (DP) and to determine the indirect effect of this biopolymer on leaves of the plant. Nodal explants of I. purpurea were cultured in medium supplemented with 5, 10 and 20 mg L−1 concentrations of a chitosan oligomers mixture with a variable degree of polymerization (DP) ranging from 2 to 15 or chitosan polymer with DP of 70. It was found that both oligomeric and polymeric chitosan treatments increased chlorophyll-a contents in the leaves when compared to the chitosan-naïve control group. Polymeric chitosan stimulated chlorophyll-b and carotenoid synthesis more effectively than the oligomer mixture. Also, 10 mg L−1 polymeric chitosan better triggered total protein production and plant dry matter content in I. purpurea. The results of this study showed that, due to their stimulatory effects on photosynthetic pigment, protein and plant dry matter production, chitosan oligomers at low concentration and polymers at moderate concentration might be considered as safe and natural biostimulants for ornamental plants which could affect the plant’s attractiveness and commercial success.

Keywords

1. Rihn A, Khachatryan H, Campbell B, Hall C, Behe B. Consumer preferences for organic production methods and origin promotions on ornamental plants: Evidence from eye-tracking experiments. Agric Econ 2016; 47: 599–608.Search in Google Scholar

2. England J, Talbot D. Ornamental plant production: The use of chemical plant growth regulators on protected crops (Horticulture Development Company, Fact Sheet 04/13), 2013. https://horticulture.ahdb.org.uk/download/3871/fileSearch in Google Scholar

3. Sajjad Y, Jaskani MJ, Asif M, Qasim M. Application of plant growth regulators in ornamental plants: A review. Pak J Bot 2017; 54(2): 327–333.Search in Google Scholar

4. Mata DA, Botto JF. Manipulation of light environment to produce high-quality Poinsettia plants. HortScience 2009; 44(3): 702–706.10.21273/HORTSCI.44.3.702Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Acemi A, Bayrak B, Çakır M, Demiryürek E, Gün E, El Gueddari NE, Özen F. Comparative analysis of the effects of chitosan and common plant growth regulators on in vitro propagation of Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth from nodal explants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 2018; 54: 537–544.Search in Google Scholar

6. Nge KL, New N, Chandrkrachang S, Stevens WF. Chitosan as a growth stimulator in orchid tissue culture. Plant Sci 2006; 170: 1185–1190.Search in Google Scholar

7. Ohta K, Taniguchi A, Konishi N, Hosoki T. Chitosan treatment affects plant growth and flower quality in Eustoma grandiflorum. HortScience 1999; 34(2): 233–234.10.21273/HORTSCI.34.2.233Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Salachna P, Zawadzinska A. Effect of chitosan on plant growth, flowering and corms yield of potted freesia. J Ecol Eng 2014; 15(3): 97–102.Search in Google Scholar

9. Luan LQ, Ha VTT, Nagasawa N, Kume T, Yoshii F, Nakanishi TM. Biological effect of irradiated chitosan on plants in vitro. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2005; 41(1): 49–57.10.1042/BA20030219Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Tiffin P, Rausher MD. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. Am Nat 1999; 154(6): 700–716.Search in Google Scholar

11. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 1962; 15: 473–497.Search in Google Scholar

12. Schatz C, Viton C, Delair T, Pichot C, Domard A. Typical physico-chemical behaviors of chitosan in aqueous solution. Biomacro-molecules 2003; 4: 641–648.Search in Google Scholar

13. Haebel S, Bahrke S, Peter MG. Quantitative sequencing of complex mixtures of heterochitooligosaccharides by MALDI-linear ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2007; 79(15): 5557–5566.10.1021/ac062254uOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Vårum KM, Anthonsen MW, Grasdalen H, Smidsrød O. Determination of degree of N-acetylation and the distribution of N-acetyl groups in partially N-deacetylated chitins (chitosans) by high field NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 1991; 211(1): 17–23.Search in Google Scholar

15. Lichtenthaler H. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 1987; 148: 350–382.Search in Google Scholar

16. Bonjoch NP, Tamayo PR. Protein Content Quantification by Bradford Method. In: Handbook of Plant Ecophysiology Techniques. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

17. Bradford M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72: 248–254.10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Park BK, Kim M-M. Applications of chitin and its derivatives in biological medicine. Int J Mol Sci 2010; 11: 5152–5164.10.3390/ijms11125152Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Das SN, Madhuprakash J, Sarma PV, Purushotham P, Suma K, Manjeet K, Rambabu S, El Gueddari NE, Moerschbacher BM, Podile AR. Biotechnological approaches for field applications of chitooligosaccharides (COS) to induce innate immunity in plants. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2015; 35(1): 29–43.Search in Google Scholar

20. Malerba M, Cerana R. Recent advances of chitosan applications in plants. Polymers 2018; 10: 118.Search in Google Scholar

21. Zong H, Liu S, Xing R, Chen X, Li P. Protective effect of chitosan on photosynthesis and antioxidative defense system in edible rape (Brassica rapa L.) in the presence of cadmium. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2017; 138: 271–278.Search in Google Scholar

22. Phothi R, Theerakarunwong CD. Effect of chitosan on physiology, photosynthesis and biomass of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under elevated ozone. Aust J Crop Sci 2017; 11(5): 624–630.Search in Google Scholar

23. Khan WM, Prithiviraj B, Smiyh DL. Effect of foliar application of chitin oligo-saccharides on photosynthesis of maize and soybean. Photosynthetica 2002; 40: 621–624.10.1023/A:1024320606812Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Thakur M, Sohal BS. Role of elicitors in inducing resistance in plants against pathogen infection: A review. ISRN Biochem 2013; 762412.Search in Google Scholar

25. Vidhyasekeran P. Switching on plant innate immunity signalling systems: Bioengineering and molecular manipulation of PAMP-PIMP-PRR signaling complex. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

26. Mejía-Teniente L, Durán-Flores FD, Chapa-Oliver AM, Torres-Pacheco I, Cruz-Hernández A, González-Chavira MM, Ocampo-Velázquez RV, Guevara-González RG. Oxidative and molecular responses in Capsicum annuum L. after hydrogen peroxide, salicylic acid and chitosan foliar applications. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14: 10178–10196.10.3390/ijms140510178Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. Lechner E, Achard P, Vansiri A, Potuschak T, Genschik P. F-box proteins everywhere. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2006; 9(6): 631–638.10.1016/j.pbi.2006.09.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Finnegan PM, Soole KL, Umbach AL. Alternative mitochondriale transport proteins in higher plants. In: Plant mitochondria: from genome to function. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

29. Landi L, De Miccolis Angelini RM, Pollastro S, Feliziani E, Faretra F, Romanazzi G. Global transcriptome analysis and identification of differentially expressed genes in Strawberry after preharvest application of benzothiadiazole and chitosan Front Plant Sci 2017; 8: 235.Search in Google Scholar

30. Anusuya S, Sathiyabama M. Effect of chitosan on rhizome rot disease of turmeric caused by Pythium aphanidermatum. ISRN Biotechnol 2014; 305349.Search in Google Scholar

31. Vasconsuelo A, Giulietti AM, Boland R. Signal transduction events mediating chitosan stimulation of anthraquinone synthesis in Rubia tinctorum. Plant Sci 2004; 166: 405–413.Search in Google Scholar

32. Zhang X, Li K, Xing R, Liu S, Li P. Metabolite profiling of wheat seedlings induced by chitosan: Revelation of the enhanced carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Front Plant Sci 2017; 8: 2017.Search in Google Scholar

33. Rahman M, Mukta JA, Sabir AA, Gupta DR, Mohi-Ud-Din M, Hasanuzzaman M, Giashuddin M, Rahman M, Islam T. Chitosan biopolymer promotes yield and stimulates accumulation of anti-oxidants in strawberry fruit. PLoS ONE 2018; 13(9): e0203769.Search in Google Scholar

34. El-Miniawy SM, Ragab ME, Youssef SM, Metwally AA. Response of strawberry plants to foliar spraying of chitosan. Res J Agric & Biol Sci 2013; 9(6): 366–372.Search in Google Scholar

35. Corsi B, Riccioni L, Forni C. In vitro cultures of Actinidia deliciosa (A. Chev) C.F. Liang & A.R. Ferguson: A tool to study the SAR induction of chitosan treatment. Org Agr 2015; 5(3): 189–198.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo