[
ALSTON, M., & WHITTENBURY, K. (2013): Research, action and policy: Addressing the gendered impacts of climate change. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5518-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ANDERSON, E. (2020): Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [online] [Retrieved September 18, 2020] Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ARORA-JONSSON, S. (2011): Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. In: Global Environmental Change, 21, pp. 744–751.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ARRAS, J. (2016): A taxonomy of theoretical work in Bioethics. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). [online] [Retrieved September 20, 2020 Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/theory-bioethics/supplement.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BARRITT, E., BOWMAN, M. & DUVIC PAOLI, L. A. (eds.) (2019): Environmental justice in the Anthropocene. In: King’s Law Journal, 30(2), pp. 173–329.10.1080/09615768.2019.1648721
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BECK, U. (2015): Emancipatory catastrophism: What does it mean to climate change and risk society? In: Current Sociology, 62(1), pp. 75–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BIERMANN, F. (2014): The Anthropocene: A governance perspective. In: The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), pp. 57–61.10.1177/2053019613516289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BLÜHDORN, I. (2013): The governance of unsustainability: Ecology and democracy after the post-democratic turn. In: Environmental Politics, 22(1), pp. 16–36.10.1080/09644016.2013.755005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRAND, U. (2016): ‘Transformation’ as a new critical orthodoxy: The strategic use of the term ‘Transformation’ does not prevent multiple crises. In: GAIA, 25(1), pp. 23–27.10.14512/gaia.25.1.7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRAND, U. (2009): Staatstheorie und Staatsanalyse im globalen Kapitalismus. Ein ‚neopoulantzianischer‘ Ansatz der IPÖ. In: E. Hartmann, C. Kunze, & U. Brand (eds.): Globalisierung, Macht, Hegemonie. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, pp. 212–241.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRAND, U. & WISSEN, M. (2015): Strategies of a Green Economy, contours of a Green Capitalism. In: K. van der Pijl (ed.): Handbook of the international political economy of production. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 508–523.10.4337/9781783470211.00043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRAND, U. & WISSEN, M. (2013): Crisis and continuity of capitalist society-nature relationships: The imperial mode of living and the limits to environmental governance. In: Review of International Political Economy, 20(4), pp. 687–711.10.1080/09692290.2012.691077
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRAND, U. & WISSEN, M. (2012): Global environmental politics and the imperial mode of living: Articulations of state–capital relations in the multiple crisis. In: Globalizations, 9(4), pp. 547–560.10.1080/14747731.2012.699928
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRUNNENGRÄBER, A. & DIETZ, K. (2016): Klimagerechtigkeit. In: S. Bauriedl (ed.): Wörterbuch Klimadebatte. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 157–162.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BUSCHMANN, D. & PLANK, C. (2020): Dystopia for future? In: B. Görgen, B. & B. Wendt (eds.): Sozial-ökologische Utopien: Diesseits oder jenseits von Wachstum und Kapitalismus? Munich: Oekom, pp. 97–114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CRUTZEN, P. J., DAVIS, M. & MASTRANDREA, M. D. (2011): Das Raumschiff Erde hat keinen Notausgang. Energie und Politik im Anthropozän. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CRUTZEN, P. J. (2002): Geology of mankind. In: Nature, 451(6867), p. 23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’ALISA, G., DEMARIA, F. & KALLIS, G. (2014): Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a new era. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203796146
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DANKELMANN, I. (2010): Gender and climate change: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DEMIROVIĆ, A., DÜCK, J., BECKER, F. & BADER, P. (2011): VielfachKrise im finanzmarktdominierten Kapitalismus. Hamburg: VSA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EAGLETON, T. (2006): The Truth Speakers. In: New Statesman, 3rd April 2006. [online] [Retrieved September 15, 2020]. Available at: https://www.newstatesman.com/node/164028.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EC (EUROPEAN COMMISSION) (2019): The European Green Deal. COM(2019) 640 final. Brussels, 11.12.2019. [online] [Retrieved September 12, 2020] Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ESCOBAR, A. (2016): Thinking-feeling with the Earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the south. In: Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 11(1), pp. 11–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EVAR, B., ARMENI, C. & SCOTT, V. (2012): An introduction to key developments and concepts in CCS: history, technology, economics and law. In: N. Markusson, S. Shackeley & B. Evar (eds.): The social dynamics of carbon capture and storage: Understanding CCS representations, governance and innovation. London: Routledge, pp. 18–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FOUCAULT, M. (2008/2010): The government of self and others: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1982–1983. Houndmills & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230274730
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FOUCAULT, M. (1978/2006): Sicherheit, Territorium, Bevölkerung. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität I. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FOUCAULT, M. (2000): Ethics: Essential works of Michel Foucault, vol. 2, ed. P. Rabinow. London: Penguin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FOUCAULT, M. (1988): Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977–1984, ed. L. Kriztman. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GEDEN, O. & BECK, S. (2014): Renegotiating the global climate stabilization target. In: Nature Climate Change, 4(9), pp. 747–748.10.1038/nclimate2309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GÖRG, C. (2011): Societal relationships with nature: A dialectical approach to environmental Politics. In: A. Biro (ed.): Critical ecologies: The Frankfurt school and contemporary environmental crisis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 43–72.10.3138/9781442661660-004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GÖRGEN, B. & WENDT, B. (2020): Sozial-ökologische Utopien: Diesseits oder jenseits von Wachstum und Kapitalismus? Munich: Oekom.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GRASSWICK, H. (2018): Feminist social epistemology. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [online] [Retrieved August 16, 2020] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GROSFOGUEL, R. (2007): The epistemic decolonial urn. In: Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), pp. 211–223.10.1080/09502380601162514
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAMMOND, M., DRYZEK, J. & PICKERING, J. (2020): Democracy in the Anthropocene. In: Contemporary Political Theory, 19, pp. 127–141.10.1057/s41296-019-00364-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARCOURT, W. & ESCOBAR, A. (2005): Women and the politics of place. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARVEY, D. (1993): The nature of environment: The dialectics of social and environmental change. In: Socialist Register, 29, pp. 1–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HÖHLER, S. (2015): Spaceship Earth in the environmental age, 1960–1990. London: Pickering & Chatto.10.4324/9781315653921
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HRUBEC, M. (2019): Social or environmental conflicts or sustainable development? Positive Alarmism. In: Civitas, 19(2), pp. 281–295.10.15448/1984-7289.2019.2.33782
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HULME, M. (2008): The conquering of climate: Discourses of fear and their dissolution. In: The Geographical Journal, 74(1), pp. 5–16.10.1111/j.1475-4959.2008.00266.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KANNANKULAM, J. (2008): Autoritärer etatismus im neoliberalismus. Zur staatstheorie von Nicos Poulantzas. Hamburg: VSA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KÖHLER, B. (2016): Raumschiff Erde. In: S. Bauriedl (ed.): Wörterbuch klimadebatte. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 245–252.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEWIS, S. L. & MASLIN, M. (2015): Defining the Athropocene. In: Nature, 519(7542), pp. 171–180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LOHMANN, L. (2014): Fetishisms of apocalypse: The Corner House: Dorset. [online] [Retrieved August 6, 2020]. Available at: http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk/sites/thecornerhouse.org.uk/files/Fetishisms%20of%20Apo calypse.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LÖVBRAND, E., BECK, S., CHILVERS, J., FORSYTH, T., HEDRÉN, J., HULME, R., LIDSKOG, R. & VASILEIADOU, E. (2015): Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. In: Global Environmental Change, 32, pp. 211–218.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MEADOWCROFT, J. & LANGHELLE, O. (2009): The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage. In: J. Meadowcroft & O. Langhelle (eds.): Catching the carbon: The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage. Cheltenham & Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–21.10.4337/9781849802222.00009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MULDER, D. H. (2020): Objectivity. In: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [online] [Retrieved September 10, 2020] Available at: https://iep.utm.edu/objectiv/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NAESS, A. (1973): The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. In: Inquiry, 16(1), pp. 95–100.10.1080/00201747308601682
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY (NEAA) (2009): Getting into the right lane for 2050. Bilthoven. [online] [Retrieved September 10, 2020] Available at: https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/2009/Getting-into-the-Right-Lane-for-2050
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NIGHTINGALE, A. J. (2011): Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class, and environment in Nepal. In: Geoforum, 42(2), pp. 153–162.10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NOVY, A. (2017): On the ‘good life for all’. Vienna: Vienna University of Economics and Business. [online] [Retrieved September 10, 2020] Available at: http://www.guteslebenfueralle.org/en/about-gutes-leben-fuer-alle.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’BRIEN, K., ERIKSEN, S., NYGAARD, L. & SCHJOLDEN, A. (2007): Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. In: Climate Policy, 7(1), pp. 73–88.10.1080/14693062.2007.9685639
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’NEILL, D. W., FANNING, A. L., LAMB, W. F. & STEINBERGER, J. K. (2018): A good life for all within planetary boundaries. In: Nature Sustainability, 1, pp. 88–95.10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ORTIZ, E. (2019): Teen climate activist Greta Thunberg tells Congress: ‘Unite behind the science’. In: NBC News, September 18th 2019. [online] [Retrieved September 10, 2020] Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/climate-activist-greta-thunberg-tells-congress-unite-behind-science-n1055851
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OTTO, I., DONGES, J. F., CREMADES, R., BHOWMIK, A., HEWITT, R. J., LUCHT, W., ROCKSTRÖM, J., ALLERBERGER, F., MCCAFFREY, F. M., DOE, S. S. P., LENFERNA, A., MORÁN, N., VAN VUUREN, D. P. & SCHELLNHUBER, H. J. (2020): Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(5), pp. 2354–2365.10.1073/pnas.1900577117
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RANDALL, T. E. (2016): Climate Justice: A Literary Review. In: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 9(1), pp. 246–262.10.3138/ijfab.9.1.246
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REISS, J. & SPRENGER, J. (2014): Scientific Objectivity. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-objectivity
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROCKSTRÖM, J., STEFFEN, W., NOONE, K., PERSSON, A., STUART CHAPIN III, F., LAMBIN, E. F., LENTON, T. M., SCHEFFER, M., FOLKE, C., SCHELLNHUBER, H. J., NYKVIST, B., DE WIT, C. A., HUGHES, T., VAN DER LEEUW, S., RODHE, H., SÖRLIN, S., SYNDER, P. K., CONSTANZA, R., SVEDIN, U., FALKENMARK, M., KARLBERG, L., CORELL, R. W., FABRY, V. J., HANSEN, J., WALKER, J., LIVERMAN, D., RICHARDSON, K., CRUTZEN, P. & FOLEY, J. A. (2009): A save operating space for humanity. In: Nature, 461(7623), pp. 472–475.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHERWIN, S. (2008): Whither bioethics? How feminism can help reorient bioethics. In: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 1(1), pp. 7–27.10.3138/ijfab.1.1.7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHILLIAM, R. (2011): International relations and non-western thought: Imperialism, colonialism and the investigations of global modernity. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SŤAHEL, R. (2020): Environmentalism as a political philosophy of the Anthropocene. Manuscript.10.21814/anthropocenica.3089
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SŤAHEL, R. (2019): Sustainable development in the shadow of climate change. In: Civitas, 19(2), pp. 337–353.10.15448/1984-7289.2019.2.31971
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SŤAHEL, R. (2017): Self-Limitation as the basis of environmentally sustainable care of the self. In: Human Affairs, 27(4), pp. 444–454.10.1515/humaff-2017-0036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STEFFEN, W., RICHARDSON, K., ROCKSTRÖM, J., CORNELL, S. E., FETZER, I., BENNETT, E. B., BIGGS, R., CARPENTER, S. R., DE VRIES, W., DE WIT, C. A., FOLKE, C., GERTEN, D., HEINKE, J., MACE, G. M., PERSSON, L. M., RAMANATHAN, V., REYERS, B. & SÖRLIN, S. (2015a): Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. In: Science, 347(6223), pp. 736–747.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STEFFEN, W., BROADGATE, W., DEUTSCH, L., GAFFNEY, O. & LUDWIG, C. (2015b): The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. In: The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), pp. 81–98.10.1177/2053019614564785
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STEFFEN, W., PERSSON, Å., DEUTSCH, L., ZALASIEWICZ, J., WILLIAMS, M., RICHARDSON, K., CRUMLEY, C., CRUTZEN, P., FOLKE, C., GORDON, L., MOLINA, M., RAMANATHAN, V., ROCKSTRÖM, J., SCHEFFER, M., SCHELLNHUBER, H. J. & SVEDIN, U. (2011): The Anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. In: Ambio, 40(7), pp. 739–761.10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STEFFEN, W., ROCKSTRÖM, J. & COSTANZA, R. (2011): How defining planetary boundaries can transform our approach to growth. In: Solutions, 2(3), pp. 59–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UBA (GERMAN FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY) (2011): Geo-engineering – wirksamer klimaschutz oder größenwahn? Methoden – rechtliche rahmenbedingungen – umweltpolitische forderungen. Dessau and Berlin. [online] [Retrieved August 28, 2020] Available at: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/geo-engineering-wirksamerklimaschutz-groessenwahn
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WALBY, S., ARMSTRONG, J. & STRID, S. (2012): Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory. In: Sociology, 46(2), pp. 224–240.10.1177/0038038511416164
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WARREN, K. J. (2015): Feminist environmental philosophy. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition). [online] [Retrieved August 28, 2020] Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-environmental/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WBCSD (WORLD BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT) (2010): Vision 2050. The new agenda for business. [online] [Retrieved September 11, 2020] Available at: https://www.wbcsd.org/Overview/About-us/Vision2050/Resources/Vision-2050-The-new-agenda-for-business
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WBGU (GERMAN ADVISORY COUNCIL ON GLOBAL CHANGE) (2011): World in transition: A social contract for sustainability. Berlin: WBGU. [online] [Retrieved August 28, 2020] Available at: https://www.wbgu.de/en/publications/publication/world-in-transition-asocial-contract-for-sustainability#section-downloads
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WEBER, M. (1904/1949): ‘Objectivity’ in social science and social policy. In: E. Shils & H. Finch (eds.): The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press, pp. 50–112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WIERTZ, T. (2016): Technology and politics in the Anthropocene: Visions of solar radiation management. In: S. O’Lear & S. Dalby (eds.): Reframing climate change: Constructing an ecological geopolitics. London: Routledge, pp. 116–131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WISSEN, M. (2016): Jenseits der carbon democracy. Zur Demokratisierung der gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnisse. In: A. Demirovic (ed.): Transformation der Demokratie – demokratische Transformation. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, pp. 48–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WISSEN, M. (2012): Menschheitsproblem oder Verteilungsfrage? Ein macht- und herrschaftskritischer Zugang zur ökologischen Krise. In: E. Kreisky, L. Löffler & G. Spitaler (eds.): Theoriearbeit in der Politikwissenschaft. Wien: Facultas, pp. 231–243.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WISSEN, M. & BRAND, U. (2018): Imperial mode of living. In: Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, No. 2. [online] [Retrieved August 28, 2020] Available at: krisis.eu/imperial-mode-of-living/
]Search in Google Scholar