[
Aertsen, Jan [2003]. Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals. Leiden: Brill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balcerak Jackson, Magdalena [2016]. “On the epistemic value of imagining, supposing and conceiving”. In Knowledge through imagination, edited by A. Kind & P. Kung. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 41–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bealer, George [2002]. “Modal epistemology and the rationalist renaissance”. In Conceivability and possibility, edited by T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 71–125.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beatty, John [2006]. “Replaying life’s tape”. Journal of Philosophy 103: 336–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonjour, Laurence [1998]. In defense of pure reason: A rationalist account of a priori justification Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chalmers, David [2002]. “Does conceivability entail possibility?”. In Conceivability and Possibility, edited by T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 145–200.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chudnoff, Elijah [2011]. “The nature of intuitive justification”. Philosophical Studies 153: 313–33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chudnoff, Elijah [2013]. Intuition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chudnoff, Elijah [2023]. “Veridical perceptual seemings”. In Seemings: New arguments, edited by K. McCain & S. Stapleford. Abingdon, Ox: Routledge. https://philarchive.org/rec/CHUVPS
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Descartes, René [1628] Regulae ad Directionem Ingenii. Translated by G. Heffernan. Amesterdam-Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, 1998.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dohrn, Daniel [2019]. “Counterfactual versus conceivability as a guide to modal knowledge”. Philosophical Studies 177: 3637–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01386-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fine, Kit [1994]. “Essence and modality”. Philosophical Perspectives 8: 1–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
García-Encinas, M. J. [2012]. “On categories and a posteriori necessity: A phenomenological echo”. Metaphilosophy 43: 147–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
García-Encinas, M. J. [2017]. “The discovery that Hesperus is Phosphorus: A follow-up to Kripke on the necessity of identity”. Analysis and Metaphysics 16: 52–69.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
García-Encinas, M. J. [2022]. “Facts of identity”. Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2153514
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godman, Marion [2021]. “Scientific realism with historical essences: the case of species”. Synthese 198: S3041–57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goris, Wouter and Aertsen, Jan [2019]. “Medieval theories of transcendentals”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/transcendentals-medieval/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, Frank [1998]. From Metaphysics to Ethics Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kant, Immanuel [1790] Critique of Judgement. Translated by J.C. Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hale, Bob [2003]. “Knowledge of possibility and of necessity”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103: 1–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hale, Bob [2013]. Necessary Beings: An Essay on Ontology, Modality, and the Relations Between Them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kripke, Saul [1971]. “Identity and necessity”. In Philosophical Troubles: Collected Papers I. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kripke, Saul [1979]. “A puzzle about belief”. In Philosophical Troubles: Collected Papers I. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 125–61.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kripke, Saul [1980]. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kripke, Saul [2011]. Philosophical troubles: Collected papers I Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowe, E. Jonathan [2008]. “Two notions of being: Entity and essence”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62: 23–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowe, E. Jonathan [2012]. “What is the source of our knowledge of modal truths?”. Mind 121: 919–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mallozzi, Antonella [2021]. “Putting modal metaphysics first”. Synthese 198: 1937–56
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quine, V. Willard [1953]. “Three grades of modal involvement”. In Ways of Paradox. New York, NY: Ramdom House: 156–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sosa, Ernest [2007]. “Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition”. Philosophical Studies 132: 99–107.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tahko, E. Tuomas [2015]. “Natural kind essentialism revisited”. Mind 124: 795–822.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomasson, L. Amie [1999]. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomasson, L. Amie [2016]. Categories. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/categories/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaidya, Anand and Wallner, Michael [2021]. “The epistemology of modality and the problem of modal epistemic friction”. Synthese 198: S1909–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williamson, Timothy [2007]. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilsch, Tobias [2017]. “Sophisticated modal primitivism”. Philosophical Issues: A Supplement to Noûs 27: 428–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
